I want to explore this rule a little bit.
Suppose:
1) A chat room is pretty busy.... over 50 people in the room.
2) Someone enters who is extremely attractive and captures the attention of the room
3) A significant part of the room start to direct said attractive person
4) A well meaning member tells the room to stop directing
5) Said attractive person says "But I love this banter"... "just wish the directing was more imaginative"
6) Almost the entirety become imaginative and start to direct in more and more imaginative ways
7) Said well-meaning member becomes very annoyed.... threatening mods and bans etc
8) A straw-poll is taken and the entirety of the room except well-meaning member vote for directing of said attractive person
I think we all understand the intent behind the no-directing rule and it is an important part of the chat room etiquette. However, when a member actively wants to be directed do they have to re-trench to one of the new "direct me" rooms?
Who exactly is being protected when the person being directed is encouraging/demanding of direction?
Yes, I know it might not be clear to a newbie when it is acceptable to direct and when it is unacceptable but in the scenario outlined there can be no doubt that the person wanted to be directed.
Your thoughts please
Join the most popular community of UK swingers now
Login
No Directing!
Quote by Markthomsonuk
Your thoughts please
People have been removed from chat for both directing and also encouraging directing when in chatrooms that have "no directing" in their title.
anybody seen / reported to be breaking this rule will be dealt with by the chatroom ops or admin (not mods)
Sex God
At the risk of sounding stupid ... isn't your scenario exactly why the new directing rooms were created?
Sex God
Hey, welcome to the forums and a good question/scenario.
I see that Ian's already beaten me to the punch again
:lol2: but I'll just shove my 2c in anyway. 
Short answer is yes. :thumbup: Long answer is yyyyyyyyeeeeeeeessssssssss. :lol2:
Or they can move to another room that doesn't state 'No Directing' or 'Usual rules', start their own room, etc.
As Kaznkev has already said, those that don't wish to be directed while on cam. The idea is to provide a safe haven for those not wishing to be directed and as it can be the source of many problems in chat (again as Kaznkev have illustrated), it's a rule that tends to be implemented.
There's a small number of members that use chat that are consistently breaking this rule and this does prevent people from going and remaining, on cam. If you wish to help us with this problem please use the 'Report this profile' button at the bottom of their profile page and include room name, date and time so we can have the logs checked and deal with appropriately.
I do realise that there can be quite a few people breaking the rule at any one time, but even reporting 1 or 2 at a time will help to get the message across that there are other areas where this is acceptable. That does include members encouraging direction as well. ;)
I see that Ian's already beaten me to the punch again
:lol2: but I'll just shove my 2c in anyway. Quote by Markthomsonuk
.............I think we all understand the intent behind the no-directing rule and it is an important part of the chat room etiquette. However, when a member actively wants to be directed do they have to re-trench to one of the new "direct me" rooms?
Short answer is yes. :thumbup: Long answer is yyyyyyyyeeeeeeeessssssssss. :lol2:
Or they can move to another room that doesn't state 'No Directing' or 'Usual rules', start their own room, etc.
Quote by Markthomsonuk
............Who exactly is being protected when the person being directed is encouraging/demanding of direction?.........
As Kaznkev has already said, those that don't wish to be directed while on cam. The idea is to provide a safe haven for those not wishing to be directed and as it can be the source of many problems in chat (again as Kaznkev have illustrated), it's a rule that tends to be implemented.
There's a small number of members that use chat that are consistently breaking this rule and this does prevent people from going and remaining, on cam. If you wish to help us with this problem please use the 'Report this profile' button at the bottom of their profile page and include room name, date and time so we can have the logs checked and deal with appropriately.
I do realise that there can be quite a few people breaking the rule at any one time, but even reporting 1 or 2 at a time will help to get the message across that there are other areas where this is acceptable. That does include members encouraging direction as well. ;)
Sex God
Quote by Funlovers2009
At the risk of sounding stupid ... isn't your scenario exactly why the new directing rooms were created?
:thumbup:
It's so simple wen u think about it isn't it
:doh: 
Mod
The other problem I see is that the 'no directing' rooms are the entrance rooms to the servers. If people crowd in one of these rooms because of a lady 'showing' and encouraging directors, it blocks anyone else going into that server and all the other rooms. I know there are overflow rooms, but if someone is encouraging directing in there as well, everyone is stuffed! :sad:
Mal
Mal
Master of Sex
Quote by Kaznkev
it would be good to have more support for the woman on cam.
I dunno. Everyone seems to prefer it when Jewl takes her bra off.:grin:
Mod
Doesn't matter who is on cam, whether it be female or male they all deserve respect and to be shown manners.
Quote by woohoo
Doesn't matter who is on cam, whether it be female or male they all deserve respect and to be shown manners.
I totally agree.
So next time I am on cam please do not ask me if Green Peace are on the way with their buckets of water and plans to roll me back into the sea
Dave_Notts
