Join the most popular community of UK swingers now
Login

WARNING,5 doggers,1 couple arrested last night

last reply
32 replies
5.8k views
0 watchers
0 likes
I have it on very good authority that 5 male doggers and 1 couple were arrested last night a D____y N__k near Ashton u Lyne last night,police had 2 surveilance teams,one in the bushes another in the lodge,2 males were charged with commiting sex acts in a public place as was the couple.I was not there last night but was on Monday when 1 plain white police corsa(came in on 2 occasions),2 dog vans,3 transit vans and a traffic patrol came in the car park in 2 hours,I was the most protected man in England on Monday night,a really worthwhile use of police resourses don't you think,I would love to know the crime statistics for that part of tameside for monday night when most of them were protecting me,without me even asking them to,so kind of them I thought,it was free as well.
dont know the location (poss will be edited by a mod anyway) and is not near to us but i take it that the area is not very far from a public road or isnt well sheltered etc?
we have been at an outdoor meet in the past with a cpl when old plod came creeping up and caught the ladies mid flow asked what we were doing told them the truth and said "its not as if we are within public gaze is it?" to which he "did one" albeit it begrudgingly!
I think some locations (particularly those that are well used/known and are within easy aces are most likely to be pinged by the law!!
iam damned sure all the scrote`s around tameside would be thankful that plod is much happier nicking consenting adults indulging in harmless fun offending no`one at such a secluded location, and leaving them free to deal drugs , harass the local population , and generally get up to no good mad :x yet another fine example of the excellent use of police resourse`s .............................i may just increase my contributions to my council tax.........................NOT!!!!!!!!!! :x :x
live a few miles away but never been there at nite as it is open to the main rd ,has any one got better sites round this area
ps your profile pictures dickanddollnw xx vey sexy haha
Police have been patroling this site for years now,i`ve had one or three great nights there myself but not been for a good while due to plod.
Could be time to move on if lead story is true.....shame
Well known stockport site ruined and now DN...whats left ????
It is a decent distance away from the main residential area,it is very secluded at night,most of the car park which is mostly pitch black cannot be seen from the main road and which is not well used at night anyway,there are a few houses up a hill at the end of the car park but no one seems to venture out during darkness and there are no children, it is rural everywhere else,another spot at p__k b__ge is also being targeted as well until at least saturday ,so i'm told,a fellow dogger is in the know,enough said,BE WARNED
I hadnt heard about that happening, but I do know that at our local spot, the police are visiting very regularly and are getting very aggressive in the way they are treating people.
A few of us (all members of here) were in the car park a few weeks back when the Police pulled in with the big riot van, they asked what we were doing and we told them the truth, we were just chatting. One of them said we were lying and no one in their right minds would be on a car park at that time of night chatting, we would be sat in a pub (who said we were in our right minds). One of us explained we didnt drink and he got a bit stroppy with us, and 8 of them got out of the van and started walking round the cars. The original stroppy little shite, then said he knew what we were doing there (but he wouldnt say what it was) and said that (now listen to this) they were worried that the kids (aka boy racers) who used the place for meeting up, would be followed by us, or that we may hurt them :shock: Shame really, cause the rest of them were fine, polite and just talked, but one of them just had to go that bit further rolleyes
One of the police women did say that the place was under survalance (SP) and that they had undercove police with videos visiting regularly. Now I think she only said it to try to scare us off, but with the report above, you never know :shock:
Once we had managed to get the laughing undercontrol (about the kids that is) we just left and havent been going there since then, and wont be going to the place you have mentioned Iluvminis, so now on the hunt for somewhere new wink
Stuff like this relly winds me up!. I am a great supporter of the police, but by acting in this manner all they do is alinate the public.
Quote by Naughty Wigan Couple
Once we had managed to get the laughing undercontrol (about the kids that is) we just left and havent been going there since then, and wont be going to the place you have mentioned Iluvminis, so now on the hunt for somewhere new wink

Which is probably what they wanted.
Having sex in any place isn't illegal. It only becomes so if done in sight of someone.
Don't forget, the courts slung one case of cctv evidence (sex) because there was no intent to display to others...and if a council wanted to hide cameras they must put-up with what they get.
My council is presently taking advantage of another courts ruling that cctv warnings don't have to be displayed if the cameras are not capable of selecting an individual person. Some of the places in town best known for ad-hoc sex are now being watched by cameras "hidden" on the top of lamposts. And for those individuals using the red-light area of northampton....the area is now covered by anpr systems that record the traffic through the area....
For reference, check-out these....know what to look for: These devices are provided for councils, police and PRIVATE SECURITY firms (otherwise known as record-and-blackmail outfits)
There seems to be a concerted effort on the wirral to rid our local beauty spots of this menace, far to many guys in reflective jackets sitting in cars, bloody big yellow vans and pandas with one front light out kerb crawling about.
with any luck once the initiative is budgeted for they will all F**K OFF!
I was asked why I had been moving up and down the car park in a suspicious manner, when I explained that the kids with the loud stereos kept pulling up next to me, I was told at least they were away from the general public!!
I for one accept this fact and the common space is for us all to share, as of yet I am yet to get involved in any dogging action that was above a couple of decibels at most!
"he who has endurance, sells insurance" hang in there, the commited will be rewarded!
Quote by jomu

Once we had managed to get the laughing undercontrol (about the kids that is) we just left and havent been going there since then, and wont be going to the place you have mentioned Iluvminis, so now on the hunt for somewhere new wink

Which is probably what they wanted.

We know it was what they wanted, but to be honest, I really cannot be bothered arguing with them. I go out to have fun and dont want it to end up being a very uncomfortable evening, so we move on to somewhere else (till they find the new place that is).
One of the Police women actually said they didnt have a problem with the boy racers using the place as they would rather they met there for a chat, than hanging round the streets. But not ok for us to meet there for a chat. Double standards, me thinks rolleyes
Quote by Naughty Wigan Couple
I hadnt heard about that happening, but I do know that at our local spot, the police are visiting very regularly and are getting very aggressive in the way they are treating people.
A few of us (all members of here) were in the car park a few weeks back when the Police pulled in with the big riot van, they asked what we were doing and we told them the truth, we were just chatting. One of them said we were lying and no one in their right minds would be on a car park at that time of night chatting, we would be sat in a pub (who said we were in our right minds). One of us explained we didnt drink and he got a bit stroppy with us, and 8 of them got out of the van and started walking round the cars. The original stroppy little shite, then said he knew what we were doing there (but he wouldnt say what it was) and said that (now listen to this) they were worried that the kids (aka boy racers) who used the place for meeting up, would be followed by us, or that we may hurt them :shock: Shame really, cause the rest of them were fine, polite and just talked, but one of them just had to go that bit further rolleyes
One of the police women did say that the place was under survalance (SP) and that they had undercove police with videos visiting regularly. Now I think she only said it to try to scare us off, but with the report above, you never know :shock:
Once we had managed to get the laughing undercontrol (about the kids that is) we just left and havent been going there since then, and wont be going to the place you have mentioned Iluvminis, so now on the hunt for somewhere new wink
if this place is by a large expanse of water where the entrance is opposite a pub it sounds like the same cop who got on his high horse with us the spotty faced little sh*t , i cant see the funny side of rude arrogant tossers even if they hide behind a uniform , if they speak to me in a disrespectfull manner then how can they expect anything but the same treatment back, anyways our spot is still a plod free zone :P :P up to now anyhow :wink:
It sure is the same place Dickanddoll and we are keeping away for a while, well at least until they move onto somewhere else wink
so if you dont like it, just ask to see his warrant card, ask his station and duty sergeant
admittedly, that winds police up even more, but if you dont intend going back, its not so big an issue....
Another maybe little known fact is that you can ask for any video footage that may contain your image under the data protection is quite a handy tool to tie up lots of resources in local authorities or plod you need to do is write to the relavent authority who you suspect has recorded your image and ask for a copy of it. EG I was shopping on the high st between 12pm and 3pm on (whatever date) and i believe you have recorded my image please can I have a copy of it ? Provided the image is recorded onto a hard drive it is subject to the data protection act and all the protection that provides to an individual. wink
It is not that simple. I tried it. I got a tape with about 5 minutes of video which had everything except me blanked.
Read and digest:
Access by Data Subjects
This right is provided by section 7 of the Data Protection Act 1998 - Data Protection Principles 1, 6 & 7.
When data subjects make a request for accessing their information, those operating the system must be able to recognise such a request.
A standard subject access request form should exist for this purpose and should indicate:
What information is required to locate the requested images?
What information is required in order to identify the person making the request.
What fee is charged for carrying out the requested search. (max )
Whether merely viewing the images recorded would satisfy the individual.
That within 40 days of receiving the required fee and information the response will be provided.
An explanation of the Rights provided by the 1998 Act.
Written information should be given to individuals of the types of images retained, their purpose and the policy concerning disclosure in relation to those images
Standard 3 above should also be provided with the subject access request form.
The designated person should deal with all subject access.
The images requested should be located by a designated person
A designated person should make the decision whether disclosure also entails disclosure to a third party.
A designated person should determine the decision as to whether the images of third parties are held under a duty of confidence.
A designated person must ensure that third party images are disguised if third party images are not to be disclosed
An editing company may be used if the system does not have the capability to comply with standard 9 above
If a third party or an editing company is used the following procedures apply:
There is a contractual relationship between the data controller and the editing company
The editing company must give appropriate guarantees regarding the security measures taken in relation to the images.
It is the responsibility of the designated person to check and ensure that the guarantees are met
That the editing company can only use the images in accordance with the instructions of the designated person should be explicit and in the form of a written contract.
The security guarantees provided by the editing company should be explicit and in the form of a written contract.
If it is decided by a designated person that an access is not to be complied with, the following should be documented:
The date of the request
The identity of the person making the request
Why the request to supply the images was refused.
The name and signature of the designated person making the decision
All staff should be aware of individuals rights
If disclosure is made, it should be in private with only authorised staff present
The Data Subject is entitled to a copy of his data in intelligible format (Standard VHS tape)
Under Sections 10, 12 And 13 Of The Data Protection Act 1998 Other Rights May Also Apply
When there is a request from an individual to prevent processing likely to cause unwarranted and substantial damage or automated decision taking in relation to that individual. All operators must be able to recognise such a request
When such requests are made all staff must be aware of the designated person who should respond to them
The response from the designated person must indicate whether they will comply with such requests
There must be a response in writing within 21 days of the designated person receiving the request
The designated person must give written reasons if the request cannot be complied with.
A copy of the request and response must be kept
The designated person must notify the individual if an automated decision is made.
If the individual makes a requests in writing within 21 days the designated person must reconsider an automated decision
The designated person will respond within 21 days setting out the steps they will take if they receive a receipt of the written request in standard 8 above,
The designated person will document the original decision, the request from the individual and their response to the request.
Data Subjects can take court action to prevent unlawful processing
Data Subjects can claim compensation for "damage" suffered as a result of breaches of this Act.
Action Surrounding Subject Access Requests, Complaints And Audit
The contact point indicated on the sign should be available to members of the public during office hours Employees staffing the contact point should be aware of the appropriate policies and procedures
Specific documentation should be provided to each enquiry
Enquirers should be provided, on request, with one or more of the following:
The leaflet which individuals receive when they make a subject access request as general information
A copy of this code of practice
A subject access request form if required or requested
The complaints procedure to be followed if they have concerns about the use of the system
The complaints procedure to be followed if they have concerns about the non-compliance with the provisions of this code of practice
A complaints procedure should be clearly documented
A record of the number and nature of complaints or enquiries received should be kept together with an outline of the action taken
A designated person should use the report in standard 4 to assess public reaction to and opinion of the use of the system
A designated person should undertake regular reviews of the documented procedures to ensure compliance with the code
A report of the reviews in standard 6 should be provided to the data controller so the legal obligations and provisions of this code can be monitored
An internal annual assessment should be undertaken
The results of the report in standard 7 should be compared with the purpose of the scheme. If the scheme is not achieving its purpose, it should be discontinued or modified
The results of the report in standard 7 should be made publicly available
Quote by fcuser
"he who has endurance, sells insurance" hang in there, the commited will be rewarded!

Is that a reference to the old song by Frank Crumit
There's No One With Endurance Like The Man Who Sell Insurance
Recorded in 1935
I have it on a CD I bought in Great Yarmouth for
Regards
Harry Jones
This dogging spot has always been a big place for drugs and provides access to a couple of houses. Not too suprised they'd want to clear it out really. Usually has plenty of cars full of teenagers too.
Plenty of other places that are out of the way around there.
it could be they were after drug users and the doggers were unlucky,I was not accused of anything but acted surprised when dogging was mentioned,I actually asked what was dogging and had the bob explain it to which I replied"jesus,really,that goes on does it".I might take up acting,haha
Quote by iluvminis
it could be they were after drug users and the doggers were unlucky,I was not accused of anything but acted surprised when dogging was mentioned,I actually asked what was dogging and had the bob explain it to which I replied"jesus,really,that goes on does it".I might take up acting,haha
if you do take up acting we`ll nominate you for an oscar wink :wink:
thank you very much,xx
years ago ( and i mean years) i / we used to go to all kinds of raves and illegal discos ets.
no one knew where they were going to happen until about 3 hours before the disco/show/fun started.
it was great - the plod didnt really have a chance.
i am not saying it will work with our type of fun but something along the lines of this concept just may make it a little less easy for the plod.
it may mean there are a lot of participants in one location that particular time - but that cant be bad either - would be like a rgular dogging supermarket!!!!
have fun all
Hi DD,it may be a few weeks till any court appearance or if they got a caution i'll update this thread once i know whats happened,I haven't been back for obvious reasons but i'll speak to my informer,john
thanks iluvminis wink you'll be wondering where my post went? thank fuck you didn't quote it before i removed it redface to anyone wondering..i was telling a few gags about mrs dirty's fanny rolleyes she is out right now, but due back at seven..she'll then trawl the posts on the forum..i was giggling a minute ago, but became increasingly concearned as her eta draws nearer..i just lost my bottle :cry: she would have gone beserk surprisedops: lanky german twat :roll: lol ..........................................................only kidding bc1 :wink: she knows that, and dishes out worse :roll: she says if my cock was as big as my mouth, i'd be of some use to her :lol:
Ask the " good authority" how many shows he has had this month ......I bet its one every other night and all the women have been gorgeous . rolleyes
Incidentally Mr D there is nothing funny about mrs D's fanny :-)
Quote by Silk and Big G
Incidentally Mr D there is nothing funny about mrs D's fanny :-)

hello you two wink lol
no, i'm not laughing about that fanny tonight guys..unfortunately i've got to tackle it later, and the demands are gonna be high confused after a brief conversation in the chatroom re "porn for couples", we ventured to our local emporium in search of a reccomended "nice" film....what does mrs dirty find rolleyes a triple dvd edition of lexington steele :shock: bugger..he'll be using his 12 incher for an hour..then i'll get dragged upstairs for some of that redface its not as if i've even got the stamina to give her 6 inches twice surprisedops: oh dear..the only time i want it twice these days, is just before i've done it once :lol:
took her to the quack's yesterday for an examination..he said "dirty, i don't like the look of your wife's vagina at all" :lol: i said "YOU fucking don't" :roll: :lol:
it wasn't so bad when she had a neat brazilian, but fucking hell..it's like a kin carwash at the moment..with a red royal mail van going through it..with the rear doors open :twisted: i've got to throw flour at it just to find the wet patch :cry:
bloke at the site asked why she was blonde up top, but dark down there..i said "well, you know when you hit your thumb nail with a hammer, and it goes all black"?...he said "ermmm, yeah"..."well" i said, "her fanny's had some hammer"...
oh lordy...i must get some new ones :oops: :cry: :lol:
just by way of update..i've just been reading the cover of that dvd...looks like "lex the impaler" will be powerfucking his way through 11 nymphos.....powerfucking :shock: whats one of those? :shock:
i luv dogging and go in my local area a fair bit
till recently anyway !
the police r about a lots more now and although iv not been caught" yet i hav, wen with a fella, been asked to move on as the carpark is being used by nasty drug takers and doggers (the polices words not mine) !
that same carpark does hav ppl thre using drugs but they r simply sitting in their car enjoying a smoke and r no problem to anyone but the boy racers r another thing !!
they constantly cause problems there !
we hav been told that if caught we will b out on the sex offenders list
whcih is unfair as no one but other doggers can see us (aprt from the police)
ls
UPDATE,apparently all have pleaded not guilty and will appear in court in due course,should be interesting,if the police were deliberately waiting in the bushes with 'surveilance equipment',it is not right,something stinks about this but I can't pin it down to what it is,a sort of 'entrapment' type thing although no one forced or 'set up' the doggers to my knowledge,its not like the police stumbled across them on routine patrol nor was it the result of someone phoning in a complaint that they responded to,the outcome will be interesting,possibly a test case(I don't know if there has been a precident),so time will tell,I do feel for the doggers though and would not like to be in their position at this time,john
What court are they appearing at , we would like to go and show support ............or doesnt the 'source' know that ? cool