Now I know what our boys and girls did at the Olympics was superb, but is this making a mockery of what some would say is a defunked system of gongs already?
Now I know he won the Tour de France and Olympic gold but........a Knighthood for it? Surely a Knighthood should be awarded for a lifetime of achievements? I would like to see people who dedicate their lives to fantastic causes get honoured, and not a cyclist who races a bike, or runs around a track.
It took Brucie 60 plus years to receive his Knighthood? I think giving out these awards at what seems like anyone with a sporting background, should be curtailed and given to people who really deserved to be given such a huge award.
Do others agree or not?
I think the whole honours system is messed up.
Fair play, winning the Olympics is an achievement, to be the best in the world deserves some recognition - but when you stack the ability to run quickly or to cycle a long way or to be able to throw a javelin - against volunteering to care for the mentally ill all your life, or working in a children's hospice, or any other countless acts of selflessness, then any sporting achievement doesn't seem that great.
I noticed too that the man who discovered the Higgs Boson - the so called "God's Particle" has been honoured some 48 years after he made his discovery. Honour him certainly... but 48 years after the event - seems more like an insult to me.
Honours should go to those that deserve them for something over and above. Riding a bike well is great - I can't do it - but I don't believe anyone who can do it better than me should be knighted, whereas people who do genuine good works should be recognised.
I think they are waste of time and effort and mean nothing anyway, i say scrap them.
Well done Bradley, he won a team event and he ackwnoledges that, and to all others who dedicate themselves to whatever their calling....but keep it in perspective...the one who's going to be remembered longest is the other one.... Jimmy Saville MBE
One thing that people seem to misunderstand about State honours is that the person that receives the honour doesn't nominate themselves.
They have to be nominated and their case reviewed against the laid down criteria. But in essence the person can be nominated for achievements like:
making a difference to their community or field of work
enhancing Britain’s reputation
long-term voluntary service
innovation and entrepreneurship
changing things, with an emphasis on achievement
improving life for people less able to help themselves
displaying moral courage and vision in making and delivering tough choices
I would edge my bets that the sports people who have received an award have fallen into the category of enhancing Britain's reputation. Let's be honest, in sporting terms this year our Country has done extremely well!
Well seems the Sir's of this world have a huge say in the new Sir's yet to be given out.
I think it much better if a select committee of the general public were allowed to be properly involved in who gets what and why.
WTF ??? Cherie Blair????? What the woman who loves a freebie???? I wonder if her Hubby Tony Bliar nominated her? I bet he knew the person who did though.
A classic example of not what you know, but who you fecking know. :twisted:
In my most humble opinion its a great shame that more everyday people are not recognised for what they do, but how many of you have ever nominated someone? How many of you have taken the 20 minutes it takes to nominate someone?
I'm guessing the answer will be zero?
Well for my two pence worth I have been honoured by the state twice.
I never asked for it, expected it or wanted it. But the results are sat not six foot from me now and I'm not ashamed.
I don't think Olympians should have been given any 'Honours' surely the medal (if won) is achievement enough.
The medal isn't recognition from their country, the honour is.
He's already got and MBE, CBE, OBE and now he says he deserves a Knighthood? What a self-centred individual he is and with his comment below....well, to me it demonstrates
to me perfectly why Medals should not be given to sports people.
There still seems to be a discrepancy between a Paralympic medal and an Olympic medal. It's tougher to get on in normal life if you've got a disability, and then to do sport on top of that is quite an achievement, I think, but maybe the powers that be don't."
Ungrateful greedy sod he is, he seems to see the Knighthood as a medal in itself to sit nicely against the other letters to his name. Yuk!
No, I mean the letters after his name are CBE. You can make up the rest to suit you.
Some people are never grateful for their lot.
Some disabled people are far worse off than this person, and just get on with life without all the fucking whinging and moaning and never get close to a CBE. In fact many of them struggle to get the proper levels of care or help they need.
Sounds like a bit of a whining git to be honest.