This could be what we hear a lot very soon.
The Independence vote is almost upon us.
I have said many times that personally I hope they vote NO to independence, we have been good together for too long to break things up, yes we have had our differences but we have had that with most Nations in the world including the Irish who have always fought alongside us, so have the Welsh and Scottish.
The movie makers do us know favours, the film Braveheart was so untrue it should have been marketed alongside the sightings of a cow and a double decker bus on the moon.
William is thought by some to be of lower ranked nobility stock, whilst others believe him to be a descendent of Alan Wallace of Ayrshire a tenant farmer.
A recent programme on the discovery channels claims he was a common thief prior to being appointed Guardian of Scotland after he was instrumental in the defeat of the English army at Stirling.
I have a great respect for William Wallace, I attended his funeral some years ago but the portrayal of him in the movie has the usual Hollywood element of making a good movie.
Prima Nocta is another thing that has been inflated, there is no proof that such a law ever existed, many believe it was a rumour started by the French to drive a wedge between England and Scotland, there is some evidence that it was a ploy adopted by many Priests who took the virgin bride to be the night before her wedding so the groom would not get blood on himself. it could be that some Lords carried out the practice claiming it to be law when it wasn't, we didn't have TV, Radio or the Internet back then and many people only ever heard what the nobles told them.
There is no doubt that many Scottish Nobles gained much from Englands rule over Scotland and even in the film the then "Robert the Bruce" betrayed Scotland in favour of the English.
But what happens if Scotland does become independent ? many things could change ......
The chances of them retaining the British Pound is certainly in question.
Their desire to open their borders to make immigration easier will not bode well with those in England who are looking to tighten our borders. Will we see a new "wall" dividing the two nations, will there be a need for customs and excise control points between the two nations.
Will Scottish Nationals living in England be required to surrender their UK passports and apply for a Scottish Passport ?
They would no longer be members of the EU, will they still have the right to live and work not only in the UK but will the millions of them living in other EU countries have to go home ?
They can of course apply to the EU for membership but all new member states have to adopt the Euro and any such application could be vetoed by the founding members, the UK being one of the founding states.
What of the armed forces, of course we would have to allow every Scottish National the right to leave the British Armed Forces if they so wish but polls so far indicate that the vast majority would wish to continue serving and that the Scottish Defence Force might struggle to recruit people to serve.
Will Scotland be a member of NATO, it is not automatic especially with their policy on not having nuclear weapons based in Scotland or owned by them.
Our Nuclear Submarine base at Faslane would be re-located of course, we have no choice in that matter, probably to Barrow in Furness where the nuclear submarines are built.
Will Blackpool face closure, the largest percentage of visitors there come from Scotland, if a visit there requires a visa or passport it could put them off coming.
There are so many questions, so many changes that could occur.
I believe they should stay with us, but I also believe that if they choose to leave the Union then independence should be total and we should treat them the same as we treat any other non EU, none United Kingdom nation.
I really think it's the currency question which will decide it and I suspect that the Scots will vote NO.
If you look at the independence / currency question and Alex Salmond saying "Oh yes, we'll keep the pound, it's our pound as well"
Then look at it like this;
Mrs Salmond comes home one night and says to her husband "Alex, we've been happily married for many a long year, but now I want to have my freedom. Nothing against you I just think I'll be better off if I'm independent".
Alex says "But honey we're better off together, please don't break up our happy marriage".
Mrs Salmond "Sorry Alex, I've made my mind up, we're splitting up...........but by the way, after we're divorced I WANT TO KEEP A JOINT BANK ACCOUNT OK ??"
Anybody on here been divorced? Would you keep a joint bank account with your ex ??
John
An interesting factor is "who can vote"
The following groups of people can register to vote in the referendum:
•British citizens resident in Scotland.
•Qualifying Commonwealth citizens resident in Scotland. This means Commonwealth citizens who either have leave to remain in the UK or do not require such leave, and are resident in Scotland.
•Citizens of the Republic of Ireland and other EU countries resident in Scotland.
•Members of the House of Lords resident in Scotland.
•Service/Crown personnel serving in the UK or overseas in the Armed Forces or with Her Majesty’s Government who are registered to vote in Scotland.
Interesting for a number of reasons, it is said that a poll of the armed forces have indicated that the majority wish to remain in the British Army so would have to vote NO.
There are a large number of people residing in Scotland who are not of Scottish birth but eligible to vote, many permitted to be there because they are members of the EU, will they be worried that until Scotland becomes a member of the EU their right to live in Scotland could be in jeopardy, the same applies to those there under their Commonwealth status.
There are 4 times as many people of direct Scottish descent or birth living outside Scotland who are not eligible to vote, some 20 million of them.
Just in case our celtic brothers get their way...
Not sure division is a good thing for anyone. It creates more problems than it solves.
Whoever is in charge is likely to be a useless egotist whether they are Scottish, English or whatever nationality.
I have thought all along that the yes vote would win in all the polls but at the last minute people would switch to a no vote.
However after watching the televised debate I am inclined to believe it will be a yes vote followed by 5-7 years of legal and constitutional wrangling.
As for some of the other questions raised, well here is my twopence worth:
NATO. Scotland would have to apply to join, and until it did so (and met the criteria to join the alliance) NATO would not be obligated to protect it. However the UK would as Scotland would still be Sovereign soil, The current bases would probably be declared soveriegn base areas enabling the UK to deploy its forces in a 'foreign' country. In the unlikely event that someone were to threaten or invade Scotland the Uk would be obligated to support her, and an attack on the UK would activate the central tenement of the NATO alliance.
Submarines: The UK can base her subs in Devonport. It isnt the subs that are the problem, it the weapons.
Armed forces: Scottish servicemen would not be forced out of the UK forces. they ave all sworn an oath of allegiance to the Crown and the Crown would still be the constitutional monarch of the new indipendent Scotland. It is most likly they would be ofered a chance to transfer if they had the right skill sets and personal qualities/attributes for vacant slots. Most probably wouldn't transfer in my opinion.
Currency: Scotland will still use the £. Why wouldn't they? Personally I think a currency union would be a pointless thing. How can you have an independent country where your interest rate is set by someone else.
Oh, and for the record the Swiss have deployed members of their armed forces to Afghanistan and other UN missions in non conflict roles. They currently have troops in Ghana, Kosovo, Bosnia-Herzegovina, the Middle East and Korea carrying out peace support missions.
I'd bet money on one thing.
IF the Scots vote for independence and it all goes horribly wrong then it'll all be down to the horrible English in some way, nothing to do with the Scots who voted for it.
John