Its a bit of a whopper. Of course historically a jolly big war was a neat solution in such circumstances.
sean is the proprietor of a bar in dublin. he realises that nearly all his customers have become unemployed alcoholics and can no longer afford to patronise his bar. to solve this problem, he comes up with a new marketing strategy that allows his customers to drink now and pay later. cleverly, he keeps track of all the drinks consumed by whom on a ledger (obviously on a computer with all the data on the individual drinkers) and thereby granting them loans.
word gets around fast about sean's drink now pay later bar and very quickly, sean has the highest volume of wet sales outside of lansdown road rugby ground. his suppliers grant him longer credit terms and lower prices. by providing his customers freedom from imediate payment, sean gets no resistance when he frequently increases his prices.
sean's gross sales volume increase becomes exponential and hard to finance with sean's limited reserve's, so he goes to his bank to ask for an increase on his overdraft. a young dynamic vice-president at the bank recognises that these customer debt's constitute valuable future assets and increases sean's borrowing limit. the bank see's no problem as the debt is secured by unemployed fixed income alcoholic drinkers.
at the bank's corporate headquarters, expert trader's figure a way to trade the debt on at a profit and make massive commissions and transform these loans into long term, high yeild collaterised debt obligations known as DRINKBONDS, ALKIBONDS and PUKEBONDS. they have their credit rating agency rate these securities as triple A and sell them on in the international securities market to other bank's......
I simply finished off the earlier post for tidiness.
As I posted earlier --the traditional way out of depressions is war. I am hopeful that cleverer and more influential folk than me will devise an alternative solution this time. Such a solution will require co-operation at international level. Who knows we might even see human beings working together towards common goals internationally. I doubt it simply because like flower said, the fundamental, that we are in deep deep shit, isn't widely understood yet which makes the will to work together weak. War is a simpler and much more widely understood solution.
Fixing the problem was the order of the day and not highlighting what the problem was, as most people were quite aware it was the banks that caused the problem.
1. Money was "loaned" to the banks to make them fluid, do not call it bail out or capital injection call it what it is...a loan.
2. Freeze mortgage and savings interest rates, so banks can not pay the loans through overcharging the working man, who paid for their loans in the first place.
3. The banks have to pay the loans back over a fixed period i.e. 5 years or 10 years
4. Failure to agree to pay causes immediate foreclosure on the bank, all assets become property of HMCG, all accounts are underwirtten by Bank of England therefore no personloses out.
The banks are making profit again, we "own" this profit and the loans should be paid back from it. there is no problem with a business breaking even year after year until its loans are paid off then it can run free again.
Yeah I didn't bother to try to find the original author. Mary versions are more frequent than Sean versions.
I'm not an economist even on a barrack room level, it all gets way to clever for me.
I think wars cure depressions by providing high employment and production whilst limiting individual spending. So we do a lot but don't throw it all away on buying over priced houses and goods. In essence I spose it forces individuals to make the sacrifices necessary to rebuild the capitalist economy. Tbh I am not even sure such rebuilding is a good idea but I am not holding my breath waiting for a socialist utopia.
Any alternative will involve austerity and will require global co-operation. I think austerity is unacceptable to most at an individual level and global co-operation is unlikely. That's why I worry so much.
What upsets me about the current strategy is that it will hit the poorest hardest, and as it hits the slightly better off there will be an inevitable backlash by the majority against the minorities. There are extreme examples of that in history too of course.
I was working in Ireland immediately before the credit crunch and was struck by the obvious signs that the economy was overheating and the brakes needed to be applied.
Over the coming weeks, keep an eye on the price of Spanish gilts. I beleive there to be a very strong chance that the money markets will lose confidence in Spain's economy and the price of government paper will plummet.
Why is this likely, and why is this different to reland and Greece ?
The big difference in a Spanish crisis is the size of the economy. Ireland and Greece are small economies, and are easier to rescue.
The ECB will struggle to bail out a big economy like Spain (the IMF will begin to look more reluctant as well). And the irony is that this is likely to be a self-fulfilling prophecy, ie the money markets know the difficulty to rescue such a big economy and so this in itself adds risk to holding Spanish debt.
The outcome?
The stronger economies of Germany and France are not going to let the Euro die. I foresee the Euro split into A and B, or even Euro A,B,C, for the different economies. Each Euro layer will be able to set interest rates, and so avoid the current problems of the Irish, ie not being able to devalue out of the crisis like we have.
This is going to happen over the coming weeks ... watch this space !