WOW - the first time a post that I have put up has gone to 7 pages! Thanks to all who have contributed. Two points:
1) I hate the continued reference to "class". We in this country have always had a different view on who is "working class" compared to others. When we say "Upper class" we tend to refer to the traditional upper class on yesteryear - the nobility and gentry. In "Middle Class" we include many very skilled people from the professions e.g medical doctors who really ought to be in the higher grading and we use "Working Class" to refer to the rest of us. We refer to a skilled engineer or a plumber as working class whereas they are really middle class by my definition.
2) Agree with the comment about threads - I wish the Site Admin would impose a maximum of say 3 or perhaps 4 posts that can go on the same sub-thread.
Plim :sad:
sorry freck I meant foxy.
Slaughterhouse Five, or Breakfast of Champions?
lp
Stag and Blue can I thank you both for such an intelligent and moderate debate.
I don't know what people should consider to be right. To either vote for what would be good for all or good for themselves. I think most people attempt to consider the bigger picture, but rely on more personal values if the gut instinct creeps in.
we don't have a new 'leader' from what i can see. I think we brits tend to swing massively towards the party which has a new leader. the chancellor is usually the runner up who gets a short stay to clean up the administrative errors, after the leader has finished being in the spotlight. brown has done that, albeit somewhat hopelessly.
not this time, not yet, we just don't have a real runner out there yet.
Seems like a general improvement in things.
A few months ago its was terrorists who were getting houses in Bayswater and 100,000 a year in benefits.
well I can think of many people who 'earn' those kind of incomes or more who don't actually do that much to get it. they are simply parasites in organisations. their salary is paid for in the excessive profiteering which the consumer has to pay.
so in many cases i can't see that someone in that role is any different from someone on the dole.
The number of people on "newspaper" benefits is extremely small.
The amount of benefit given to an unemployed person is
The "other" benefits are given to those who demand them...councils and landlords....council tax and housing benefit (and "mortgage" benefit (eventually)).
Those with disabled persons to care for get other benefit.
Quite frankly I find it hard to believe many of the stories....given that most of the benefits are means tested.
We'll slip sideways to ESA (incapacity/illness benefit)...which is not only means tested but also medically tested now (if being examined by occupational health professionals is anything to do with medicine)....all claimants are examined (not voluntary....mandatory) by "healthcare professionals" (anyone higher than a tooth polisher can be a healthcare professional....as long as they fulfil the requirements and pay to be registered).
The "healthcare professionals" do not even have to be doctors or nurses....who much prefer to be called "primary healthcare professionals".
Which leads, and has led, to terminally ill people being assessed as fit for work, and not just on the odd occasion either.
No, to be "well-off" on benefits you have to be a liar, and working, or extremely lucky.
Mind you....there must be an election coming...the Daily Wail is trotting-out the old stories with new endings...and the Sun....so one party must have promised to shut the bbc down....
The old ones are always the best !
Thanks too to all the late posters on this thread - it is a complex issue and the range of contribution has been interesting.
Plim
Only another couple of weeks... can we survive that long or will we be smothered in our beds by volcanic ash before it happens?