We have been reading all about the RBS boss, scooping himself a nice fat tasty pension for himself, even though he dragged his company to it's knees.
I do not think any worker is worth the kind of money bounded about, through a pension scheme. I think it is quite obscene.
Now it seems the Government are trying to stop this guy from getting his per year pension.
But are the very people who are now saying this guy should be stopped from having this pension, just as bad?
That is just one example of MP'S and their own expenses. Twenty two grand a year for their second homes?
The boss of RBS whilst a rogue and a arsehole, in my opinion should keep his pension. It was agreed BEFORE the banking scandal came about. If he has to give his pension back, what about the sleazy MP'S who we have all heard, have bankrolled their own pensions for years, and very excessive allowances.
It seems to me the Government are under massive pressure to do something about this greedy banker, but could they also be out in the same bracket, for being greedy?
For millions like myself who struggle most months, with a small pension, which btw is NOT index linked like our own MP'S, I find the whole sorry tale a mess.
In my mind Ministers and MP'S are just as greedy as the bankers. I wish I had a second home with massive expenses, with a nice large salary.
I just think the whole saga is a two faced hypocritical mess, caused by the Government, and if they stop his pension, then theirs should also fall in line with the man or woman on the street.
Gotta agree with Kent on this. A contract is a contract. Its the members of the government and the so called banking 'regulators' that should be fired immediately without pension rights.
It brings a bad taste to the mouth to pay his pension from public money which effectively is what is happening but its a drop in the ocean if it means we finally establish a system of control on the rich using the sweat of the workers to get richer with no sign of regulation at all.
Well, the good and the grate (sic) are enjoying a very nice lunch courtesy of the EU today in Brussels thanks to the generosity of the tax paying public..
No different to Mugabe's birthday party really.. and equally sickening (although they may not be accorded access to Mugabe's 85kg cake!)
Maybe one day, the people will wake up to realise how much these leeches suck and seek to re-take the power themselves..
but then, a few years later, they will need to be ousted too as power corrupts.
It's a vicious circle and will never be defeated.
Come the revolution, I would shoot the capitalists and landlords first whether they are bankers or not. Politicians are relatively harmless in comparison.
Unlike the former we all get to vote the politicians in--so who is to blame if we get the ones we deserve.
Unfortunately a contract is a contract - though the RBS chiefs don't deserve a penny of it.
Everyone has known for years bankers & brokers were overpaid, with massive bonuses and corporate hospitality expense accounts being milked for champagne + caviar parties,golfing holidays and pheasant shooting etc ; the big question is why our prudent chancellor and his "party of the working man"(?!) did'nt do anything about it.
The 1930s labour party manifesto included the nationalisation of banks. With luck we are on our way there.
The problem now is that we have no major manufactoring. It is all financial now, and now the banks have crashed, it will effect all of us.
We have heard of MP'S who have " employed " family members on vasy salaries, only to find out they have actually done no work at all.
An MP is in a position of trust ( supposedly ), but still they hide behind dodgy rules, made by their own, to protect their own.
IF this banker is allowed to keep his pension, whilst it leaves a nasty taste in my mouth, he has a contract which has to be honoured by law.
But stop and think for a minute about all the people on the street, ordinary people, who through no fault of their own have either had their pensions slashed or.....in some cases lost the lot.
Sometimes it can be a shit life for some, and as the saying goes " the rich get richer, and the poor get poorer ".
Redpantherman has hit the nail on the head:
The banks have been consistantly pressured by the government to make money, lend money and generally bouy the economy leaving Brown, both as Chancellor and Prime Minister to run a massive Borrow & Spend policy. RBS, HBOS and Northern Rock are symptoms, not the root problem.
Fred the shred has already foregone other things he was entitled to as part of his package - the shares, his years salary, ( apparently), on the tacit agreement from the government that nothing more would be said on the matter. At the end of the day, this is just more Labour distractionism to hide their own appaling performance.
"Nice Bloke" Dave is not tough enough for the job of sorting this country out, it's sad to say, but we will probably need another Thatcher.
I think this pension limit that's being bandied about is a moral argument rather than a legal one. I think it applies if the pension scheme goes bust not the employer. Pension schemes dont belong to the employer, they are held in trust for the members.
I am not happy with retrospective legislation.
Morally Mr Goodwin hasn't got a leg to stand on.
Legally he has every right.
I think they ought to refuse to honour the contract and let him sue. Keep it in the papers for a while lest we ever forget the filthy greed of the filthy rich.
Wasn't it within the directors powers to reduce his pension? So it was never a cotractual right. Without the tax payers intervention the bank was insolvent anyway so there were insufficient funds to pay pensions. There is no way this guy should be allowed to benefit so significantly for such incompetence. Believe me we don't know the half of it .
There is very little more nauseating than watching a Government Minister playing to the the Daily Mail mob (a nasty little rag if I ever saw one). If there is ANYTHING more likely to undermine our economy than the banks having a collective lobotomy and lending to people they know can't repay it is for the signal to be sent out that you cannot rely on contract law to be honoured in this country. When this whole fiasco is over who is going to want to do business in this country? Utter utter stupidity.
If I buy something I wish to know if I am going to get my money's worth or make a profit. It is my money, my future.
If a director, or broad make policies to buy loans ect, then it only has to look good in the short term. In an up market, like we have had for a few years now, that is easy. By the time the bottom falls out the directors have retied, moved on or just taken the short term bonuses.
The directors who have been left holding the hot potato are no worse than the directors who started the whole risky trading, that became banking culture.
Perhaps a family run company would take more care than a public company. After all the directors have a stack in the future.
Travis
Pension scheme assets don't belong to the employer.
A Company going bust has no direct bearing on the assets of the pension scheme.
The media reporting is a classic example of idiot journalists attempting to understand a very complex subject. The MPs aren't much better. I suspect half the time they simply play the outrage card rather than trying to inform anybody.
The only double standards politicians show are that they are liars and hippocrites! (and even more so when they utter words like...'trust me!'
I dont know where you get the idea that being a criminal defence lawyer is a well paid job. It certainly isnt anymore ( even if it ever was)comparatively speaking.
Try googling/ Wikki and do a search under the Lord Carter reforms to the legal aid carter, A labour peer, reviewed the costs system and made it all the more strict and stringent. The law came into effect recently(as such).
Kent, this clearly again shows an ill-informed, biased, outdated, wrong and pathetic view of yours of the system of law and order and the practice of Criminal Justice proffesionals.
The role of a Defence practitioner isnt as easy, well paid, glamorous as you make out..... i should know!!!!
people defend because people need defending... its called natural justice. To slate a highly regarded proffesional as you do is rude and ignorant in the extreme.
But then again, i forgot, you would be part of the lynch mob who would hang people without trial (presuming guilt) because you regard those going through the Justice system as beneath you.
If there was a situation where you were accused of something, I would like to see you survive without one of the dedicated proffessionals who put their bigotry aside and deal with the issue in hand..preserving peoples rights, fairness and equality...and having to put up with the so called "scum of the earth".
you wouldnt last a minute!!!