Join the most popular community of UK swingers now
Login
is it me ?
Sex God
Quote by NEEDFORFUN
sorry to be a boring git, but how many people actuaully take the time to revue the facts before posting here. not a row, just wondered
Why let the facts spoil a good debate
Sex God
how many people actuaully take the time to revue the facts before posting
All or none. Can't be arsed looking up the exact figures? Noone likes a smart arse. :P
;)
Sex God
Quote by NEEDFORFUN
sorry to be a boring git, but how many people actuaully take the time to revue the facts before posting here. not a row, just wondered
people on here don't argue about facts they argue about the interpretation of them
Master of Sex
%
Sex God
Quote by annejohn
%
I think you will find it more like 70%
Sex God
Quote by SinSi
%
I think you will find it more like 70%
Depends on your interpretation of 70%
Not sure you three even know how statistics work? Need to see your raw data set please, and any transformations you've applied to it.
Quote by neilinleeds
sorry to be a boring git, but how many people actuaully take the time to revue the facts before posting here. not a row, just wondered
people on here don't argue about facts they argue about the interpretation of them
%
I think you will find it more like 70%
Depends on your interpretation of 70%
Not sure you three even know how statistics work? Need to see your raw data set please, and any transformations you've applied to it.
:rotflmao::rotflmao::rotflmao::rotflmao::rotflmao::rotflmao::rotflmao::rotflmao:It is posts like this that keeps me logging on
Dave_Notts
Sex God
Quote by neilinleeds
%
I think you will find it more like 70%
Depends on your interpretation of 70%
Not sure you three even know how statistics work? Need to see your raw data set please, and any transformations you've applied to it.
4
5
8
1
8
5
1
288 289
Sex God
Quote by Dave__Notts
It is posts like this that keeps me logging on
Dave_Notts
Fuck me Dave, you're easily pleased? If it means you post more I shall of course try even harder with the complete utter shite and spurious bollox. ;)
Sex God
apperently 5732 of them so far neil 
Quote by neilinleeds
It is posts like this that keeps me logging on
Dave_Notts
Fuck me Dave, you're easily pleased? If it means you post more I shall of course try even harder with the complete utter shite and spurious bollox. ;)
Obviously you only need apply complete utter shite and spurious bollox 70% of the time!!
Sex God
Quote by SinSi
Obviously you only need apply complete utter shite and spurious bollox 70% of the time!!
60 480 seconds a day, not allowing for leap years or other adjustments? Are you mad? I've got a living to earn mate. I can give . . . hmmmmmm . . . oh FFS I can't even be arsed averaging out me post count. Tell yer what, call it half an hour?
Quote by Bluefish2009
sorry to be a boring git, but how many people actuaully take the time to revue the facts before posting here. not a row, just wondered
Why let the facts spoil a good debate
Absolutely, the facts may or may not be relevant, I personally do not think they are, that is what debate is for, some years ago the facts were that the earth was square, some years later the facts were that the earth was round, not so long ago it was a known fact that the earth was the centre of the universe, the fact NOW is that it is simply a part of many universes, what will the earth fact be in years to come.
We could debate the possibilities if we don't let the facts get in the way.
Quote by MidsCouple24
sorry to be a boring git, but how many people actuaully take the time to revue the facts before posting here. not a row, just wondered
Why let the facts spoil a good debate
Absolutely, the facts may or may not be relevant, I personally do not think they are, that is what debate is for, some years ago the facts were that the earth was square, some years later the facts were that the earth was round, not so long ago it was a known fact that the earth was the centre of the universe, the fact NOW is that it is simply a part of many universes, what will the earth fact be in years to come.
We could debate the possibilities if we don't let the facts get in the way.
Science and knowledge has progressed since the days you are refering to. Today we live in an age where evidence based study holds more weight than those that shout loudest.
Dave_Notts
Sex God
Depends on how quick I get here.
If its eight pages long i tend to latch on to the first thing that gets my soapbox twitching.
Erm, not a euphormism btw.
If its eight pages long i tend to latch on to the first thing that gets my soapbox twitching.
Erm, not a euphormism btw.
Quote by Dave__Notts
sorry to be a boring git, but how many people actuaully take the time to revue the facts before posting here. not a row, just wondered
Why let the facts spoil a good debate
Absolutely, the facts may or may not be relevant, I personally do not think they are, that is what debate is for, some years ago the facts were that the earth was square, some years later the facts were that the earth was round, not so long ago it was a known fact that the earth was the centre of the universe, the fact NOW is that it is simply a part of many universes, what will the earth fact be in years to come.
We could debate the possibilities if we don't let the facts get in the way.
Science and knowledge has progressed since the days you are refering to. Today we live in an age where evidence based study holds more weight than those that shout loudest.
Dave_Notts
Yes your right, but back then science was the consideration that made them think what they did, therefore further advances in science could easily change what we think now or are you sure that there will be no more advances in science that would make us think differently ?
Quote by MidsCouple24
sorry to be a boring git, but how many people actuaully take the time to revue the facts before posting here. not a row, just wondered
Why let the facts spoil a good debate
Absolutely, the facts may or may not be relevant, I personally do not think they are, that is what debate is for, some years ago the facts were that the earth was square, some years later the facts were that the earth was round, not so long ago it was a known fact that the earth was the centre of the universe, the fact NOW is that it is simply a part of many universes, what will the earth fact be in years to come.
We could debate the possibilities if we don't let the facts get in the way.
Science and knowledge has progressed since the days you are refering to. Today we live in an age where evidence based study holds more weight than those that shout loudest.
Dave_Notts
Yes your right, but back then science was the consideration that made them think what they did, therefore further advances in science could easily change what we think now or are you sure that there will be no more advances in science that would make us think differently ?
I am positive that the earth will not be square or flat.
Other issues are either fact or theory. The problem with disagreements, is that people cannot seperate the two as they have both been put forward by "science".
Dave_Notts
