thing we have to remember is this did start with dissaffected youths.....unfortunatly this was overtaken by pure greed and criminality. people saw a chance to get something for nothing and the greed factor kicked in.
Starlight you will find so many of those convicted will not be from the backgrounds you suggested.......but from strong, moral, white, middle class families. we have already seen a primary school teacher, ex-soldier and university graduate in court etc.... this was just the me me me society...where people are greedy and want more and more !! Maybe we need to address this need for greed as much as we do any moral parental issues.
In reality the causes of this are many and varied....and most definatly changed as the days passed. Once the dust has settled, do not think it would do any harm to try and investigate them !!!
to be fair to Gulson on the Police.....they have already come out and apologised for what they call misleading information !! I think it is fair to say the police at first thought he had shoot at them...in the end it seems the police bullet passed straight through his body and lodged in another police handset !!
Thing is though Gulson...it is not just the disaffected youths. I even heard David Cameron today blaming it on children without fathers !!! What a load of tosh ! This was pure greed. People saw a chance to get something for nothing and took it. A great many now caught, were of no previous conviction, and from good backgrounds. What we have to look at, is why this greed exists. And where Gulson is correct it starts at the top. We see the MP's fiddling the expenses...Greed. We see high wage earners doing everything to try and avoid tax, so they can add more money to their hoard...Greed. And yes we see looters in the street taking things from a shop retail frontage..Greed. If we can stop this continual obssesion with being better, having new and shineyer things than others, and Greed. maybe if we could just stop and think about those a little less fortunate than ourselves every now and again...maybe..just maybe this world would be a better place to live.
Well said Gulson.
Dean he didnt highlight youths did he?
The common thing shared by all the various groups identified in Gulson's post is grasping materialism. What is common to the lowest of the rioters on the streets, and the politicians who fiddled their expenses, and nations who go to war for resources is a willingness to take advantage of, if not wilfully engineer a set of circumstances that allows them to line their pockets with not so much as a second thought for the damage it does to others. The rioters may not even be able to fully articulate their motives, but there can surely be no denying that whatever their class, or background, or education, their minds were shaped by the materialistic, acquisitive greed that runs through every level of the world they live in. That's what makes their actions political, whether they know it or not.
The politicians are now going to try and kid us that they have analysed the situation, and are going to put in place measures to remedy things and prevent this happening again. Bullshit. Absolute shite! The reason I say that is because I already know, without a shadow of a doubt, that their analysis will begin and end with the living conditions of the very lowest of the low. They will not seek to go beyond that to the real cause, because to do so would mean challenging the very world view that maintains their grip on power. They will never do that, so until we change that worldview for ourselves, unfortunately nothing else will change.
N x x x ;)
I doubt very much if most of the scumbags who were rioting could name any banks or anyone in goverment.....................
To many excuses being made for thier behaviour, IMO.
did you just know that these goody two shoes brigade would surface from under that stone over there >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
sky news amongst others have reported that you guessed it, the human rights twats are alive and well and there to rubbish the harsh sentences of some of the rioters.
now the group in question that is saying the sentences are " But there seems to be a complete lack of proportionality to some of the sentences ". that is a fair enough statement as most peeple would say it is about time that proper sentences for horrible crimes are punished properly insted of to light a sentence.
this group that make the claim, well no wonder we find ourselves in a situation of melt down with the EXCUSE BRIGADE .
" We give children and young people in custody advice about how to improve their treatment and conditions and makes sure they are released from prison safely with the support they are entitled to ".
does that just about sum it all up.
i am sure some of those goody to shoes mob on this site will no doubt say these peeple do great service to young peeple that have robbed others. where are the services to help the victims in all this? to many human rights goody to shoes peeple there to not bother about the victims but there to protect and help the criminals.
want to know why the young criminals are the way they are? then look at peeple like this.
this part of the site in light of the riots made me snigger. community indeed.
the motto at the top of there page says
LESS CRIME,SAFER COMMUNITIES,FEWER PEOPLE IN PRISON.
well there work done a lot of good then eh? :twisted:
I have no problem with heavy penalties, for crimes. However what I do want to see is consistancy. There are some getting 4 years for posting on facebook, but actually not doing anything. Others were caught with stolen goods and seen on CCTV smashing up property and yet get a fine and a community order.
here is typical of what I hate..... the two lads got 3 years in prison for incitement to riot. It was just something they wrote on facebook. In reality it was more a fantasy and they never actually left the house. Below is a link to a pensioner who actually stole and looted his supermarket...but because he is old...he gets off with a caution....where is the justice in that ???
not sure if the placement of a smiley at the end means you are joking here. Firstly in this case of the pensioner, it is not the magistrate or the judge, but the Police that have decided not to pass it on, and let him off with a caution !!
Secondly you say all magistrates are labour voters ???? If you really think that, you really are on a different planet to others. Equally if you think all mail readers are extreme right wingers you are equally deluded.
I say again....the in-balance with lengh and type of sentance given out, in these cases of the riots and looting, will simply lead to appeals, ( costing us the taxpayer more money ) and will simply mean the sentance given out is likely to be reduced.
Think we are all missing the point of the long sentences.
Been so used to the courts handing out poor sentences, that now someone has realised that we need long jail terms not short that the long terms being handed down seem out of kilter.
It is known that the longer the sentence the less likely the offender is to re-offend.
And while they are locked they cant commit any crimes.
Rioters who rampaged through London and other cities this summer had, on average, 15 previous offences to their name, it emerged today.
From here;
Interesting to see that most of the offenders have previous!
So the ciminals wish to do some more looting it seams
I do wish you would improve your ability to read and digest information before you post.