Join the most popular community of UK swingers now
Login

My opinion of the Armed Forces

last reply
140 replies
6.0k views
0 watchers
0 likes
Thanks Kent..
To be honest, i'm more disapointed than upset. It started of refreshing haveing a discussion with people with differing views. If I din't want to understand others views Mrs Suffolk and I would just hang out in ARRSE, but here I hoped for some more diversity from others with valid views, even if they did not mirror my own. But it has degenerated into just blind hatred and insults, and I'm a little pissed off I bit, and resulted to the same, but hay, only human!
As for watching "Wounded" last night, I was moved to tears! There, I said it. I was glad I watched it though, and I am glad that the VSI are being acknowledged and not hidden away. But I was also humbled by the maturity and determination of those young men. I serve with men like this, and they are the salt of the Earth, because they almost all ways put their muckers before themselves. That is why I found some of the comments so hard to take. But your right. I think this thread has run its course, well for me anyway.
I'm now going to turn to the right, gain height and fall out....
lol :lol:
Stand easy Suffolk. wink
Mrs 777 is at a loose end at the moment as her son is on TAC ( I think that is how it is spelt ) excercise, and he is not back until Sunday.
She hates it when she cannot talk to him.
On that programme last night that young lad Tom, his commanders and his mates must be so proud of the way, he just got on with it.
Truly inspirational stuff and I will try and stop mrs777 from watching it, as it really upsets her.
Quote by Phuckers"]What was the question again,...am not sure who to agree with here.
the question was .....whats your opinion of the armed forces.......
I live in Hereford the base of SAS and am a friend to many,well 2 incidents happened late last month that makes me wonder how heavy handed and brutal we might be...
bedsheet wearing Taliban kidnap a British journalist with his translators and guide but when confronted during a rescue mission they decide to shoot the local captives first ahhh nah nah,i smell a rat.. then after the rescue we leave the bodies of the translator at the battle thus hearts and minds out of the window
same pj's wearing,saliva spitting goons hijack 2 petrol tanks then let the locals have the content for free,what do the Americans do set the two tanks alight with 90 human beings around them,dis..fucking..gusing,aweek later a report on the investigation just gives the number of the deceased as 60 Taliban and 30 civilians,pure stupidity.
How the fuck are we to win this meaningless war if we keep behaving like this,i mean its been over 7years just what type of equipments do the Taliban buried a brave soldier here last wednesday i hope his life has not gone sjt Paul McAleese RIP

i think the under 20`s should be over here dealing with our yobs to toughen em up a bit.....
the 17,18,19 year olds shouldnt be coming home in boxes.......the army promises a great life.....shame you not here to live it......
OK back to the original question ........ what is your opinion of the Armed Forces?
My son is in the Armed Forces and will Pass Out in just a few weeks. He is likely to be posted to Afghan next year, and of course having almost completed his training, he can't wait to get out there.
I cannot possibly find the words to tell you how proud I am of him, although as his mother I am also worried sick. However, to be fair, if he was a pizza delivery lad on a moped, I would be terrified too.
So ..... my opinion .......... total admiration for all our brave lads and lasses of the Armed Forces, and please god keep them safe.
Mrs 777 xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Quote by flower411
I mentioned a young marine earlier ... he`s the son of one of my cousins ... he`s been places that nobodies children should be sent .... he came back ..

I have one or two friends who work/worked for an outfit based in Hereford ;-) and they have similar stories they could tell.....They came back....
I have the upmost admiration for all our armed forces whatever conflict they are fighting in...
Be it right or wrong they are there doing the job they signed up to do in horrific conditions....With shit equipment.....and for what is basically a shit wage....
Dont ever let me hear anyone knocking them evil
This thread has the feel of " The Emperors New Clothes" about it, so i will leave the adults to continue the discussion.
Yes Benny YOU do that eh?
I have never known a thread in all the years I have been posting where one persons views have both shocked and dissmayed everyone.
Don't ever send me a pm again spouting about how precious people are.
If you leave this thread to the " adults " then I for one will not be sorry to see you not participate anymore.
Or are you going to do another flounce? :shock:
I have kept quiet throughout the whole debate for the reason that i got banned a few months back for venting my anger publicly about the negative and nasty views aimed at our forces.
I would however like to say i am proud to be on a forum with people like Kenty and Suffolk, Flower and splendid as although your views differ at least they are informed and based on knowledge.
To Mrs Kent, your boy although he will be in grave danger and peril, he will be looked after,supported and loved by his mates and colleagues, he will come back a changed man and he will react in his own way to what he sees, just love him,support him but never press him for details of what he did or saw just let him tell you in his own time, it took me 10 years to talk about Iraq so please be patient with him.
I have done 1 and a half tours of Afghanistan in the hardest of conditions possible and should be there now but for getting wounded, not whilst out shooting "rag heads" in a gung ho style but whilst rescuing a classroom full of under 7`s from a group of drug crazed Taliban who had fled there having tried to bomb a red cross medical centre.
We are not heroes we are just doing a job and we dont want praise or worshipping, but respect and compassion would be nice cos just like everyone else we are doing a job we are ordered to,to the best of our abbility, we are not out there killing for the sake of it in a gung ho style, we are there protecting and helping and trying to make it a better place to live, the stuff we do like getting meds and food to people and delivering aid to starving areas does not get reported as although its boring to the press, its still much needed and part of the process and still incredibly dangerous.
Ok I have mixed feeling on the armed forces. I know alot of people in the forces I was even involved with running an organisation for them back in the 90's and still keep in touch with alot of the people from back then. My ex husband served in Bosnia and one day I got a knock at the door and 2 Officers standing in front of me, and I thought omg hes dead, luckily he'd only been injured nothing too bad, but it did really scare me.
Some of my friends who have done over 20 years serve take pride in their work keep fit and have served in various other places they've seen friends injured and killed but still continue to do the job. They leave their families behind, young children some only a few weeks old to go to places like Iraq, Afganistan and their job always comes first, and I really admire people who do that.
My childrens half brother passed out as a Dog Handler in August and there is rumour that he will be out in Agfanistan next year, hes really looking forward to it and says he can put his training into some proper use. The job he is doing is something he has wanted for so long and currently hes still under training, hes enjoying the job and cant wait until hes transferred to his permanent base in 6 weeks.
But what really annoys me is I know one person whos been in the army 18 years is totally unfit, doesnt really care about his job just does it cos hes only got 6 more years to do then he gets a pension and they can all go to hell.
I guess you cant judge the armed forces on one persons attitude its the same with this forum really you're always going to get one or two people who dont agree on something that is written down.
I just hope that the friends I have out there come back safely.
Thankyou Jump for your kind words.
Mrs 777 very rarely posts on here, and has a go at me often for my remarks but....she was upset enough yesterday to write something.
She is not like me in that I write down what I think, where she is a lot more laid back in how she goes about things.
Yes next year will be tough on all of us, allbeit in different situations. I do not know what I would do in a pub enviroment if someone slagged off our boys and girls. It is the one real thing I get soooooooo angry about.
I have always had the greatest respect and admiration for ALL our armed forces long before mrs777's son joined up. They ARE heroes in my book even though they hate being called that.
Sometimes jump like me you say things how you feel, and we both got banned last time for our comments. This time whilst I have wanted to scream in big bold letters how I feel, I know it is what some want and look for. I am past caring now to be honest even though I will not shout like I want to...to say what I really want to, for that would be foolish.
Stay safe Jump and the greatest admiration to you from this end mate.
Afghanistan and other military follies aside....I left school in 1981..there was no work..many of my schoolmates joined one branch of the forces or another,of the ones I knew well who joined up they were when they went in reasonable average 16 year olds after 6 weeks basic training the ones I saw had (except for one) almost overnight become mean spirited rascist homophobic thugs...draw your own exception was an asian lad I knew well who had after 3 weeks been beaten and bullied out of the opinion of the armed forces as people is low.
Oh and btw witch hazel is very good for bruises...all that self congratulatory back slapping must cause some.
Quote by Staggerlee_BB
Afghanistan and other military follies aside....I left school in 1981..there was no work..many of my schoolmates joined one branch of the forces or another,of the ones I knew well who joined up they were when they went in reasonable average 16 year olds after 6 weeks basic training the ones I saw had (except for one) almost overnight become mean spirited rascist homophobic thugs...draw your own exception was an asian lad I knew well who had after 3 weeks been beaten and bullied out of the opinion of the armed forces as people is low.
Oh and btw witch hazel is very good for bruises...all that self congratulatory back slapping must cause some.

I will....maybe they were already " mean spirited racist homophobic thugs "?
Six weeks training? What were they training for...the Epsom Derby?
IF you go into the army now as a 16 year old you do TWO years training, and it ain't basic.
You have to do one year at a army foundation college, and then the second year with your preferred regiment.
I cannot believe for a second that 16 year olds ( even back then ) done six weeks basic training to join the you have not explained it quite correctly?
I used to see racist homophobic thugs EVERY week at football clubs up and down the country back in the 80's.
I can tell you now matey the army would NEVER now tolerate any of that, certainly not whilst in training,they come down on that sort of thing very hard.
It is in any walk of life those kinds of things happened in the 80's, but thankfully whilst it does still exist, it is nowhere near what it was....thankfully so too!
Maybe what you are trying to say is that because ( in your opinion ) then your mates were turned into that by either the army or the enviroment of the army, that young soldiers are like that now too?
Of course you can back that statement up with facts? I am sure a young soldier nowadays, along with all the bollocks they have to put up with from some members of the public, can now add themselves to the list of " mean racist homophobic thugs " as well?
I do not know why they bother to even get themselves out of bed, to go down to the army recruitment office in the first place. May as well stay in bed and pick their Giros up every fortnight. Am sure it is much much easier, and they don't get shot at whilst doing it either.
I do apologise, my friends...and they were my friends were not racsist or homophobic when they entered ...they all came home on leave after (I believe )6 weeks perhaps not the end of basic training but possibly induction (It was a very long time ago and my memory isn't what it was)however they had as I said come back very changed and in no case for the better.
I've been drinking in a garrison town on a saturday night I never want to do it again...I have never seen more fights or felt more threatened in my life.
The army have a difficult job to do, this does not excuse the behaviour of it's members.
Ahhh Staggers has hit another nail on the head. It is a place of heavy drinkers and a much higher ratio of racists and homophobic people than 'real life'.
I saw two women out of the 6 that I hung out with attempt suicide. One of those was technically successful and her parents are still feeding her and changing her bum, the other I never saw again. All because they were having lesbian relationships in a barracks where the 6 of us were the only women 'available for the men's pleasure'.
rascism... oh yeah loads of that too. Too many examples to mention without breaking some sort of AUP or something.
Ummmm lots of sex abusers too.... and generally ignorant people.
Unfortunately that doesn't make the nuts and bolts of it any different. These are highly trained people. Doing a job.
I can criticise and deplore their bad points and acknowledge the good job they are forced to do.
and bugger... yeah it was 12 weeks actually. ..at 17.5 years old.
Gotta go. I am half cut and going oot on the toon for a night.
I love you Staggers. Can I have your children?
Quote by splendid_
Ahhh Staggers has hit another nail on the head. It is a place of heavy drinkers and a much higher ratio of racists and homophobic people than 'real life'.
I saw two women out of the 6 that I hung out with attempt suicide. One of those was technically successful and her parents are still feeding her and changing her bum, the other I never saw again. All because they were having lesbian relationships in a barracks where the 6 of us were the only women 'available for the men's pleasure'.
rascism... oh yeah loads of that too. Too many examples to mention without breaking some sort of AUP or something.
Ummmm lots of sex abusers too.... and generally ignorant people.
Unfortunately that doesn't make the nuts and bolts of it any different. These are highly trained people. Doing a job.
I can criticise and deplore their bad points and acknowledge the good job they are forced to do.
and bugger... yeah it was 12 weeks actually. ..at 17.5 years old.
Gotta go. I am half cut and going oot on the toon for a night.
I love you Staggers. Can I have your children?

If I had any you'd be welcome to them
Quote by kentswingers777
Six weeks training? What were they training for...the Epsom Derby?
IF you go into the army now as a 16 year old you do TWO years training, and it ain't basic.
You have to do one year at a army foundation college, and then the second year with your preferred regiment.
I cannot believe for a second that 16 year olds ( even back then ) done six weeks basic training to join the you have not explained it quite correctly?

It was between 6-14 weeks basic training. And yes, it is very basic. They need to teach the boys and girls the first principals of everything within the military life. From washing, ironing, marching, weapons training, etc. All very basic and broken down to the common denominator for them. The little loves have never been away from home before so they need to be shown everything from step one.
At the end of their basic they will then move on to more advanced training within their regiments.
Dave_Notts
That may have been then Davey, but it certainly is not like that now.
Of course the first six weeks now are getting them into some kind of routine. Yes they have to learn to iron, no washing as that is done for them. The learning to march is another factor.
BUT after the six weeks initial training, believe me it is quite tough. Mrs777's son finishing his first years training in December when he has his passing out parade, then In January will start his second years training.
It was going to be six months with the Blues and Royals horse side of things, then six months learning to drive tanks and armoured vehicles. Now it has been announced that will be reversed, as armoured vehicle drivers are in short supply.
It is tough for these kids as they were only 16 when they joined up, and most kids of that age struggle to merely get out of bed in the mornings. lol
A difficult thing for a16 year old to leave his family and friends, and all the things he is used too, to go sometimes hundreds of miles away, and get a very strict regime and many times being screamed at. Not easy for a 16 year old am sure you would agree.
Not changed at all Kenty. Exactly the same routine now as it was in the 70's, 80's, and 90's.
Basic then advanced to bring you up to the basic requirement what a regiment would want you at when you come to it.
Sorry, one thing has changed. Different generation, but that is it.
You are trying to say that things have changed considerably over the past two decades, when it has not. You may find that when you hear people talk about a Centurian.....it is actually a tank and not a rank lol
Dave_Notts
I didn't get my bloody washing done for me... :shock:
nor did the toy soldiers.... confused
Not meaning to sound arguementative Davey but...I had mates who were in the army in the 80's and as you all know mrs777's son is there now.
Both of their versions I have heard and there IS a difference, unless you would like to share with me why you think there is not in a bit more detail?
I do not know anything myself other than what I have been told by PEOPLE who were there then, and there now. People in the know.
I will take past serving soldiers and current serving soldiers viewpoints, over someone from civvy street.
Now I have shot me self in the foot when Davey tells me he served for 12 years or however long, so he is in the know. wink
dear g n v, what on earth did i put forward as a "theory" ? muhammed atta's green perfect condition saudi passport was found by the f.b.i. at ground zero within 24 hours of the attacks on the trade centre. this was the evidence that led to the naming of the other "terrorist's". this is a fact in the public domain and the 9/11 commision report. dirty rotten stinker mohammed threw his passport out the window of the plane he was flyin just before he crashed it. osama binliner, we were told, (justification for the invasion of afghanistan)was holed up in a cave in tora bora, bush sent marines in looking for him after bombing the hills and mountains with them bunker bustin 5,000lb bombs. fact. then we were told that iraq had weapons of mass deception and that al quaeder were in iraq as well and that saddam could launch weapons of mass destruction within half an hour and reach cyprus. fact. doctor david kelly who blew the whistle on that load of bollock's died of an overdose and wrist slitting in the woods ? three steel structured buildings, one not hit by a plane, wtc7, collapsed at free fall speed ? robin cook resigned from the cabinet over the illegal war, then dies in a fall when walking. these are fact's, not my theoretical machinations. hope i have not offended. merely wish to inform. dave
Quote by kentswingers777
Now I have shot me self in the foot when Davey tells me he served for 12 years or however long, so he is in the know. wink

I'll pass you the gun.
10 years and a number of tours.
When I watched the TV program of bad lads who joined up and had 50's style conscription basic training, it hadn't changed at all. Even though the old soldiers used to tell me that "In my day it was a lot harder." Load of tosh. The army is still training in exactly the same way it has been for the past 50 years.......just with different weaponary. It is hard.......but it has to be. It needs to weed out those that cannot cope. I loved my time there, and I stayed within the law. Unfortunately I see critism from others, like splendid, and I have to agree with her as I saw things that she mentions and know it is true. To have unquestionable loyalty to an organisation is not a thing that our country believes in. We have to question and deal with the answers.
From another thread I saw on here it said all soldiers are heros. I for one do not think in anyway that I was. That is how I can categorically say that not all soldiers/exsoldiers are heros.
Dave_Notts
See I fucking knew that was going to happen Davey. lol
I said in another thread to jump that most if not all soldiers or ex soldiers,do not think they are heroes. It is a massive ammount of the general public that do.
You then know Davey that yes soldiers can go over the top, but the army train them to think hard, to act hard. They do a shoot to kill programme at this foundation colledge and it is so on the money that they do not let them soldiers out of camp for a week when they get back.
Joining the army has one major aim, and that is to train people to kill, if the need arises. So of course soldiers overstep the mark, it is understandable on occasions.
When you are a soldier and see a buddy blown to pieces by a IED,is it any wonder they overstep the mark? Who would'nt?
What is the football hooligans excuse, or the ferel thugs pissed up on a Sat night's excuse?
They are young men training to kill in a tough enviroment.....they ain't there to play tiddlywinks.
Quote by kentswingers777
See I fucking knew that was going to happen Davey. lol
I said in another thread to jump that most if not all soldiers or ex soldiers,do not think they are heroes. It is a massive ammount of the general public that do.
And that’s why I said they are wrong IMO
You then know Davey that yes soldiers can go over the top, but the army train them to think hard, to act hard. They do a shoot to kill programme at this foundation colledge and it is so on the money that they do not let them soldiers out of camp for a week when they get back.
They also train them to take responsibility for their actions and to know the difference between knocking the feck out of an unarmed POW and knocking the feck out of someone who is still able to retaliate with a weapon. All shoots are to kill. Only in John Wayne and Hollywood is a shoot to wound policy a viable option. When you are taught to hit below the chin to the belt buckle it is not to incapacitate but to ensure that when hit they stay hit.
Joining the army has one major aim, and that is to train people to kill, if the need arises. So of course soldiers overstep the mark, it is understandable on occasions.
On no occasion is it ok to overstep the mark. International law is laid down to protect everyone. If we overstep the mark then the enemy will overstep the mark in retaliation.
When you are a soldier and see a buddy blown to pieces by a IED,is it any wonder they overstep the mark? Who would'nt?
Those that are trained and held accountable for their actions.
What is the football hooligans excuse, or the ferel thugs pissed up on a Sat night's excuse?
Same as a soldiers. An excuse and not a reason.
They are young men training to kill in a tough enviroment.....they ain't there to play tiddlywinks.
They are there to carry out a job on behalf of this country. They represent it and if they overstep the mark then they should face the consequences for their actions
And those reasons Davey are why we will never win in Afghanistan.
The rules of engagement are not the same. We have to live and die by these laws yet " they " can use all manner of underhanded means to kill our soldiers.
It is a war and IF I was in charge, I would come down hard....very hard. Go in and get the job done, no matter how you do it.
Sorry Davey but no matter how much training you have, if you see a mate get blown to pieces all rationality goes by the by.
I am sick and tired really of hearing about how WE have to behave, when 13 year olds are being given bombs to lure and then to kill soldiers. Go in hard....the more they kill the less there will be.
Ya cannot fight a war with one hand and one leg tied behind ya arse. No wonder so many high ranking officers are quitting lately.
A nice big fucking bomb should do the trick.
wink
You have totally misinterpreted me Kenty old boy.
War is war and anything is fair in achieving your aim as long as you stay within national and international laws. Are you telling me it is ok to shoot or torture POWs? This is what people who oppose your views are saying, not that military activities are bad.
I find it strange that you call the Taliban all these names for doing what they are doing yet you say if you are in charge you would throw international law out and be the same as them.
I am glad the army isn’t commanded by you or by people with your views.
Dave_Notts
Quote by Dave__Notts
You have totally misinterpreted me Kenty old boy.
War is war and anything is fair in achieving your aim as long as you stay within national and international laws. Are you telling me it is ok to shoot or torture POWs? This is what people who oppose your views are saying, not that military activities are bad.
I find it strange that you call the Taliban all these names for doing what they are doing yet you say if you are in charge you would throw international law out and be the same as them.
I am glad the army isn’t commanded by you or by people with your views.
Dave_Notts

International laws?
What about Nato's laws?
Did Nato NOT agree on America going into Iraq, or Afghanistan? I cannot remember Nato giving them the green light, they just went ahead with Britain and said.....fuck ya we don't care what you or anyone else says. :shock:
Yes Davey I do agree with getting the information out of the " enemy " IF that information gets to save our boys lives, in whatever means it takes.
I am sure many soldiers would love to do that job too.
As I have already said and will continue to say,the rules of this war are not the same for both sides.
Go in hard and get the job done by WHATEVER means are at your disposal. That might not sit comfortably with you, but I am not bothered about that. What I AM bothered about is not watching programmes like the other night with young 18 year old having limbs blown off.
Each one of those soldiers is worth a thousand of those medieval toss pots.
You might well not like me in charge of the Army, but from what I see high ranking military officers, with far more knowledge and experience than you and me, are quitting in disgust, which leads me to believe they are disillusioned with the whole state of affairs.
So.....we are trying to fight a WAR with specific rules of engagement in place for us, with substandard equipment, in a hostile environment thousands of miles away from home.
They have no rules at all other than to kill our soldiers in ANY way they can. IF they catch our soldiers they either shoot them in the head, or take a fucking big sword and chop their heads off. Or lay down IED's wherever they please. Why can't we lay down a few IED's for them? Oh cannot do that as it does not fit in with " international laws ".
And we have a chance of winning this war? Not a hope in hells chance....until ALL rules are taken away from us. That day could not come soon enough for me. mad
A very quick comment as I'm on my way out of the door...
Kenty, "god" forbid your step son should become a POW...but if he did, you'd be hoping his captors abided by international law, no?
Quote by kentswingers777
Joining the army has one major aim, and that is to train people to kill, if the need arises. So of course soldiers overstep the mark, it is understandable on occasions.

But doesn't overstepping the mark make us as bad as them dunno
Quote by Witchy
A very quick comment as I'm on my way out of the door...
Kenty, "god" forbid your step son should become a POW...but if he did, you'd be hoping his captors abided by international law, no?

Of course I would BUT....there ain't NO international laws in Afghanistan, and even IF there was it would not be in operation by the Taliban.