Join the most popular community of UK swingers now
Login
My Tram Experience Video
Sex God
What are yours?
I haven't seen it yet, so I can't comment on the content. But I see the judge threw the book at her. Presumably he thought her bahviour was bad enough to remand her in custody - or else he reckons she is bonkers and needs protecdting from herself. Her child certainly needs protecting from her if the reports of the rant are true.
I haven't seen it yet, so I can't comment on the content. But I see the judge threw the book at her. Presumably he thought her bahviour was bad enough to remand her in custody - or else he reckons she is bonkers and needs protecdting from herself. Her child certainly needs protecting from her if the reports of the rant are true.
Sex God
Quote by foxylady2209
What are yours?
I haven't seen it yet, so I can't comment on the content. But I see the judge threw the book at her. Presumably he thought her bahviour was bad enough to remand her in custody - or else he reckons she is bonkers and needs protecdting from herself. Her child certainly needs protecting from her if the reports of the rant are true.
Sorry about that bit - should have deleted it when I checked that she was just in custody not jailed.
Sex God
Quote by foxylady2209
What are yours?
I haven't seen it yet, so I can't comment on the content. But I see the judge threw the book at her. Presumably he thought her bahviour was bad enough to remand her in custody - or else he reckons she is bonkers and needs protecdting from herself. Her child certainly needs protecting from her if the reports of the rant are true.
Sorry about that bit - should have deleted it when I checked that she was just in custody not jailed.
i wonder the question is she in remanded on custody for her own protection
best not to watch it foxy it is offensive as your likely to see. i watched less than half of it and that was half too much :huh:
i was asked yesterday is it at all possible that this could not have been stage maneged by someone to post on you tube and have her 5 minutes of fame?
I only have seen about half of it as it does look to me to have been planned somehow. but what i was suprised about was the amount of peeple where i work who actually supported this womans views.
i work in a company where there are only white peeple who work there and maybe that is why but some of those peeples thoughts were even worse than this womans and more worryingly is that one of the guys reckoned that it was a general attitude amongst many peeple he knew.
i thought peeples atitudes were getting much better but maybe not as we have seen john terry from chelsea football club racist ranting towards another player and the investigation now by the another high profile player from Liverpool charged as well. if a high profile and by that i meen the england captain says these things which is cleer to see on the video clips, then it is obviusly with the huge get racism out of football campaigns it is still rife. look at the reaction of fifa's president and the condemnation by fellow players over here to his comments of there is no racism in football.
even with all the laws around now to send peeple to court it is still happening. is it time to ignore these peeple who shout this kind of thing, and hope that if they do not get the attention that others would not bother in the future? as the current laws seem to be not working at all. john terry is the most high profile sportsman in this country as he is the england captain, and yet still he has not been banned by the fa for his comments. not even suspended so what does that tell anyone else about what some think about his comments?
I only have seen about half of it as it does look to me to have been planned somehow. but what i was suprised about was the amount of peeple where i work who actually supported this womans views.
i work in a company where there are only white peeple who work there and maybe that is why but some of those peeples thoughts were even worse than this womans and more worryingly is that one of the guys reckoned that it was a general attitude amongst many peeple he knew.
i thought peeples atitudes were getting much better but maybe not as we have seen john terry from chelsea football club racist ranting towards another player and the investigation now by the another high profile player from Liverpool charged as well. if a high profile and by that i meen the england captain says these things which is cleer to see on the video clips, then it is obviusly with the huge get racism out of football campaigns it is still rife. look at the reaction of fifa's president and the condemnation by fellow players over here to his comments of there is no racism in football.
even with all the laws around now to send peeple to court it is still happening. is it time to ignore these peeple who shout this kind of thing, and hope that if they do not get the attention that others would not bother in the future? as the current laws seem to be not working at all. john terry is the most high profile sportsman in this country as he is the england captain, and yet still he has not been banned by the fa for his comments. not even suspended so what does that tell anyone else about what some think about his comments?
Quote by starlightcouple
snip...
john terry is the most high profile sportsman in this country as he is the england captain, and yet still he has not been banned by the fa for his comments. not even suspended so what does that tell anyone else about what some think about his comments?
That no-one cares a flying fuck
Quote by browning
A bit strong, remanding her, I thought.
A chap in the paper this week paralized a woman when he hit her, and yet was given bail.
yes i also thought a bit strong. but the law has plenty of time on there hands when it comes to things like this now, but still no time to react to crimes like burglary etc. when my father was robbed two yeers ago it took a community police officer 48 hours to attend his home. this woman probably had a few real police officers and they found her as well unlike my fathers burglar. :twisted:
Quote by browning
I watched the video in full, what's the child going to grow up like?
probably be a football player like john terry
Sex God
Not going to quote all over the place but as far as I am aware from what I see and hear on a weekly basis racisum in the UK is alive and well for want of a better term. It will only get worse not better with the ever increasing infux of various settlers EU workers and asylum seekers. Im not getting into the whole debate but from what I have seen nothing much has changed.
Sex God
Quote by Dave__Notts
Bloody Poles. What good have they ever done for this country....................except fight in the Battle of Britain and saved us
Dave_Notts
And helped win Monte Cassino, with huge casualities.
John
Quote by Geordiecpl2001
Bloody Poles. What good have they ever done for this country....................except fight in the Battle of Britain and saved us
Dave_Notts
And helped win Monte Cassino, with huge casualities.
John
Yes John.........bloody Poles. No good for anything but being a good ally and dying for us
Dave_Notts
Sex God
Quote by starlightcouple
the point is exactly
Can see no point what so ever
The fact that a group of persons were on the same side during a war seams a strange thing to say, or reason to judge them, are we to presume those on the opposing side are bad people?
Quote by Bluefish2009
the point is exactly
Can see no point what so ever
The fact that a group of persons were on the same side during a war seams a strange thing to say, or reason to judge them, are we to presume those on the opposing side are bad people?
i think a possible reeson is that peeple think that they were on our side during past conflicts so must be ok then :dunno:
i am sure they are all ok but i am not sure of any polish peeple fighting for us en mass since the second world war some 65 yeers ago now is a relevant argument in 2011. a few things have changed over the yeers i would guess.
maybe mr notts would like to explain what he meens as i am at a loss as the battle of monte cassino was in 1944 and what point that is with relevance to this thred is in 2011?
Quote by Bluefish2009
the point is exactly
Can see no point what so ever
The fact that a group of persons were on the same side during a war seams a strange thing to say, or reason to judge them, are we to presume those on the opposing side are bad people?
I think the war crimes trials showed they were
Dave_Notts
Sex God
Quote by browning
Bloody Poles. What good have they ever done for this country....................except fight in the Battle of Britain and saved us
Dave_Notts
And helped win Monte Cassino, with huge casualities.
John
And operation market garden.
this threads starting to get a little like this
Sex God
Quote by Dave__Notts
the point is exactly
Can see no point what so ever
The fact that a group of persons were on the same side during a war seams a strange thing to say, or reason to judge them, are we to presume those on the opposing side are bad people?
I think the war crimes trials showed they were
Dave_Notts
And the relevance of this?
Sex God
Quote by starlightcouple
And the relevance of this?
i think we alredy asked that one mr blue.
do we now thank everyone who has done us a good turn since the beginning of time? how far do we go with this?
I know but it don't make any sense to me
If we follow this flaud logic, every one now in Poland are wonderful because they were on our side during WWII, that makes every one in Germany bad because they were not
I need it explained, must be thicker than I thought
Quote by Bluefish2009
And the relevance of this?
i think we alredy asked that one mr blue.
do we now thank everyone who has done us a good turn since the beginning of time? how far do we go with this?
I know but it don't make any sense to me
If we follow this flaud logic, every one now in Poland are wonderful because they were on our side during WWII, that makes every one in Germany bad because they were not
I need it explained, must be thicker than I thought
We declared war on Germany because of of their invasion of Poland, so it wasn't exactly something we started so the good old Poles could come to our rescue! They were fighting for their own existance so they didn't really have a choice but fight.
Quote by Mr-Powers
And the relevance of this?
i think we alredy asked that one mr blue.
do we now thank everyone who has done us a good turn since the beginning of time? how far do we go with this?
I know but it don't make any sense to me
If we follow this flaud logic, every one now in Poland are wonderful because they were on our side during WWII, that makes every one in Germany bad because they were not
I need it explained, must be thicker than I thought
We declared war on Germany because of of their invasion of Poland, so it wasn't exactly something we started so the good old Poles could come to our rescue! They were fighting for their own existance so they didn't really have a choice but fight.
the history books would tell us you was right mr powers
but what do history books know eh?
Sex God
Quote by Mr-Powers
And the relevance of this?
i think we alredy asked that one mr blue.
do we now thank everyone who has done us a good turn since the beginning of time? how far do we go with this?
I know but it don't make any sense to me
If we follow this flaud logic, every one now in Poland are wonderful because they were on our side during WWII, that makes every one in Germany bad because they were not
I need it explained, must be thicker than I thought
We declared war on Germany because of of their invasion of Poland, so it wasn't exactly something we started so the good old Poles could come to our rescue! They were fighting for their own existance so they didn't really have a choice but fight.
Yep, got all that. My point is, if the children and grandchildren are all good because of the side their ancestors fought on, by default that makes all the children and grandchildren of those on the opposing side bad??????
Quote by Bluefish2009
And the relevance of this?
i think we alredy asked that one mr blue.
do we now thank everyone who has done us a good turn since the beginning of time? how far do we go with this?
I know but it don't make any sense to me
If we follow this flaud logic, every one now in Poland are wonderful because they were on our side during WWII, that makes every one in Germany bad because they were not
I need it explained, must be thicker than I thought
We declared war on Germany because of of their invasion of Poland, so it wasn't exactly something we started so the good old Poles could come to our rescue! They were fighting for their own existance so they didn't really have a choice but fight.
Yep, got all that. My point is, if the children and grandchildren are all good because of the side their ancestors fought on, by default that makes all the children and grandchildren of those on the opposing side bad??????
Honestly, i didn't see the relevence of Nott's comments either, and i don't really care who is good all bad. I know i quoted you but i was aiming my comments at Nott's.
I went alittle bit off on one there!
Poland surrendered, so the Poles no longer had to fight. These people decided/chose to fight for Britain. They were fed, clothed, paid by Britain to protect us not their homeland. They had a choice, and they choose to fight for Britain, in our uniform and with our munitions.
Would I like to see unlimited access. No, a system like USA or Australia where those that can support themselves or have skills that are beneficial to the country should be on the priority list.
My statement was clear to me in such that individuals cry "foreigner get out" and put all the woes on their presence and then when the shit hits the fan in either war/investment/labour shortage the country goes begging to those that she despises.
Dave_Notts
Would I like to see unlimited access. No, a system like USA or Australia where those that can support themselves or have skills that are beneficial to the country should be on the priority list.
My statement was clear to me in such that individuals cry "foreigner get out" and put all the woes on their presence and then when the shit hits the fan in either war/investment/labour shortage the country goes begging to those that she despises.
Dave_Notts
Quote by Dave__Notts
Poland surrendered, so the Poles no longer had to fight. These people decided/chose to fight for Britain. They were fed, clothed, paid by Britain to protect us not their homeland. They had a choice, and they choose to fight for Britain, in our uniform and with our munitions.
Dave_Notts
Poland didn't surrender, they retreated! Eventually making it to their allies, us, so yes they did have a good reason for fighting, yes they played a major part in the battle of britain but they were not just doing it for us Brits. We should be no more thankful to them as they should be to us.
Quote by Mr-Powers
Poland surrendered, so the Poles no longer had to fight. These people decided/chose to fight for Britain. They were fed, clothed, paid by Britain to protect us not their homeland. They had a choice, and they choose to fight for Britain, in our uniform and with our munitions.
Dave_Notts
Poland didn't surrender, they retreated! Eventually making it to their allies, us, so yes they did have a good reason for fighting, yes they played a major part in the battle of britain but they were not just doing it for us Brits. We should be no more thankful to them as they should be to us.
should they not be more thankful to us
i meen i know i am not that great at history but even i know we went to war against germany because they invaded poland of whom we had a pact with..
without us poland would have been crushed forever.
i think they should be much more grateful to us!
that is what happensd when the history of the second world war is not taught in schools. :thumbup:
