So what do you think of that then?
apparently it has been mooted by one of the main political parties to have a form of non-military national service.
Michael Caine has put his name to the idea... but of course, we must remember that we should only blow the bloody doors off.
so, good/bad idea?
I have no details, nor links. Just the idea.
lp
stop pointing those bloody spears atme!
but seriously..errm
lp
You're a big bloke but you're out of condition.
On the one hand its like a workhouse.
On the other hand its like communal living.
Interesting idea.
I wonder (having NOT researched) if the idea is to 'target' deprived/troublesome areas... or to have a trye 'across the board' approach?
lp
no:
non-millitary
I thuink as well as taking people away from home and giving 'character building' experiences, the leaning is towards community focus.
lp
Maybe it will be a tough regime, I know not. It's only proposed to be siw weeks.
Of course, financially I'm not sure of the workings, as there will obviously not be the benefits of having the cannon fodder at the end of the 'Service', but I believe it is thought that the cost will be wieghed against a potential drop in crime and anti-social behaviour etc etc etc.
By the way, I'm not trying to sell this idea, just wondering what peoples thoughts were.
lp
Yes, I've heard of this. I really need to know more about it before giving a definate view.
Plim :sad:
how about ideas for how it Might Work?
lp
I think it's a brilliant idea and have been advocating such a move for many years.
Organised like National Service but not a military organisation.
2 Years service but there can be exemptions - ie
If you are in full time education (and attending classes) your exempt.
If you are in full time employment - your exempt.
Other "needs" for such an organisation would be
Training - it is an ideal chance to teach people trades.
Age - there could be different sections for young and older people.
Education - a chance for people to improve thier 3 R's.
The service is not needed to hike up Snowdon or help old ladies with it's gardens, but it could train people to operate the Green Goddess fire engines which work equally proficiently at pumping water out of flooded areas as they do at pumping water onto fires.
Assisting in the fighting of forrest fires.
First aid relief in the event of dissasters.
Helping in flood situations.
Assisting in the evactuation of areas.
Assisting in emergency food distribution.
Setting up temporary refugee camps when evacuation is necessary.
Operating light machinery such as generators for use in emergency situations.
Driving evacuation buses, supply vehicles in the event of an emergency.
Assistance with camps for people awaiting asylum or imigration decisions.
There are no doubt many things in which a non-military, unarmed service could benefit the country and many ways in which they can be trained.
As others have said, a military style training regime would benefit our youth, drill, respect, pride, teamwork, self esteem, character building, educational skills, trades are some of the things military training is renowned for not just for training fighting men.
The idea is certainly worth discussion, polishing and consideration.
But not as a punishment.
I rather like the sound of that.
training and preparing a form home/international guard.. equiped with the skills and knowledge to assist in domestic emergancies should the need arise.
Maybe 7-10 year refresher weekends too?
Could make a very handy resource.
lp
I like the sound of that too. If u exclude the employed and the educated its just like a workhouse except you dont have to build any workhouses.
There are too many things wrong with this although in some way I'd like community spirit and pride that a "military/ structured" organisation brings.
Where do you house or group the people?
Who funds it?
Who mans it, admin/teaching/instructing/maintanence?
I'm against national service or a conscription of any kind for the forces, some of the kinds of things quoted on this thread were included in the CCRF for TA(until the focus changed and moved onto training to support continuing ops), you arent going to get community spirited(sarcasum mode off) people signing up to a home guard type affair for emergancies......again funding.
I dont like the idea of education being available to "them"(general term and not derogatory) in terms of 3r's, vocational, or trade...school and FE is there already why duplicate it and why offer it if "they" turn it down the first time round?
Scouts/brownies, Army Cadets, Air training core, Naval equivalent are all dotted about but need parents nudging their kids into something other than out the door and onto the street because they cant be arsed bothering inputting alittle effort engaging with their sprogs.
Instill some self worth early on.....I also note the lack of decent open spaces for kids locally.
I might not post much but when I do it vomits out of my fingers so to speak......feel free toignore if you think I'm talking bollocks.
these are all great well intentioned ideas, but its just the logistics that are the main problem. national service was disbanded because the military became saturated with manpower it no longer needed or could manage effectively. also costs escalated beyond expectations.
I think the main problem is that we have become a nation of spectators more than participators. its now a problem to get anyone of their arses to do anything more than is necessary.
It's just another way of getting jobs done at low cost.
Green Goddess fire appliances pumping water ?
When new they had the delivery rate about 5% of one of the appliances we have now...you can hire better pumps from a tool hire shop.
Put someone on a digger ?
Minor training problem: As in they need it and you have to provide it.
I consider the idea as one advocated by those with more money than sense, and those who resent paying the going rate for skilled labour...so we'll run a "civic" scheme where convicts do the plumbing for free and those receiving the service donate to the party that loathes skilled workers with a passion, and unions even more so.
its not just a 'lower class' that appears to unemployable but also a 'middle class' who are doing the work of two or more people, in order to keep a salary.
the salaried classes are competing with each other in a race to see who can create the biggest final salary pension and leaving bonus. in order to do this employees are reduced and the salaries are redistributed amongst the remainder.
unless the economy is radically restructured we will see yet more people managed out and fewer intake of trainees.
this is in effect economic genocide at work. a class of people rise to prominence through their skills and set about eradicating other competing elements. except they aren't killed outright' just left to exist on a crap diet, and occupied with drugs, violence, ill health etc. in the hope that they will simply cease to breed.
the only prob i can see is its voluntary
make it compulsary i say
fab idea
had it been in force when i was a kid i would of rebeled like crazy admitedly but yet overall i think it would of done me good