Join the most popular community of UK swingers now
Login

Paris deaths

last reply
45 replies
2.7k views
0 watchers
0 likes
Max777
Sex God
Quote by gulsonroad30664
Now I don't always agree....no let me correct that..lol...I rarely agree with what Gulson has to say. But I will always defend his right to say it. I have never seen him be offensive to others, or openly ridicule others views.
And here was me thinking this was a thread about defending The Freedom Of Speech !!!
Carry posting Gulson...rubbish or not, it at the least makes us think !!

I have to admit I have never read it but I'm more inclined to believe the majority of commentators who state the the magazine satired all religions, including Jews.
.
Perhaps you should research a little before casting stones on the comments of others, Gulsons post was far from anti-semetic but instead based on some amount of fact.

I was well aware of that allegation.
Maybe it's Gulson that should research his claims?


yeah, maurice sine and nicholas sarkosy come to mind. read and research a bit more max or you will end up believing stanley kubricks film "apollo moon landings"
You do the research Gulson instead of being selective to suit your purposes. You're just plain wrong. End of! But hey, what do facts matter in your world of conspiracy theories?
gulsonroad30664
Orgasminator
Quote by Max777
Now I don't always agree....no let me correct that..lol...I rarely agree with what Gulson has to say. But I will always defend his right to say it. I have never seen him be offensive to others, or openly ridicule others views.
And here was me thinking this was a thread about defending The Freedom Of Speech !!!
Carry posting Gulson...rubbish or not, it at the least makes us think !!

I have to admit I have never read it but I'm more inclined to believe the majority of commentators who state the the magazine satired all religions, including Jews.
.
Perhaps you should research a little before casting stones on the comments of others, Gulsons post was far from anti-semetic but instead based on some amount of fact.

I was well aware of that allegation.
Maybe it's Gulson that should research his claims?


yeah, maurice sine and nicholas sarkosy come to mind. read and research a bit more max or you will end up believing stanley kubricks film "apollo moon landings"
You do the research Gulson instead of being selective to suit your purposes. You're just plain wrong. End of! But hey, what do facts matter in your world of conspiracy theories?
well your probably right max and i'm wrong but i enjoy your chase.
it must be that if you question the establishment, goverment and mainstreem media explanations, you are labelled a conspiracy theorist/
lee harvey oswald was acting alone in the assasination of jfk (no shooter on the grassy knoll)
fishing boats attacked the u.s. navy (gulf of tonkin)
men have landed on the moon and pigs can fly
the commis burnd down the reichstag
uss liberty was accidently attacked by the israelis
the twin towers both came down by a pancake effect
they knew it wos them mooslims cos they left their i.d.'s in the boot of their hire car at the airport and the lead hijackers passport was found in the rubble at ground zero
saddam has weapons of mass deception and i have a bridge i can sell you
ghadaffi gave out viagra to his troops as a punishment to female rebels and the no fly zone was imposed to stop ghadaffi bombing his own people (the sas were not there)
after shiite and sunny mosques were bombed in basra, the iraqi police did not capture sas dressed in arab garb and tanks of the british army did not knock down the walls of the basra police station to rescue them.
the americans and their nato allies have not been training, arming and financing extremists in libya, jordan, turkey and iraq (isis, al quader, al nursra, al shabbab, moderate syrian rebels et all) and murdering christian and muslim syrians by the thousands, men women and children.
the west did not finance and support extreme right wing facists in kiev and overthrow the elected government and victoria newland of the state department did not say that.
the french government knew it wos em because after carrying out a millitary style heavily armed op, one of em left his i.d. in the getaway car.....
assad bombed his own people in the capitol the very day the un inspectors arrived.....
being sceptical and looking at the detail does not make anyone your mainstream description of (a conspiracist). such labels are intended to negate the content of what someone is saying.
to question everything we are told is healthy in my opinion and more people fortunately are questioning more and more, like your goodself really. if ever i post something, max is always there. thank you max, you assist me in questioning myself. keep up the chase
Max777
Sex God
Yes , that's you in your little world of conspiracy theories. Have fun, I'll stay one of the sheeple.
Unknown User
Quote by gulsonroad30664
men have landed on the moon

Sorry, but I believe that to be true cos the Sunday Sport once said a WW2 bomber was found on the moon and if they said it then it must have been right.
gulsonroad30664
Orgasminator
Quote by Toots

men have landed on the moon

Sorry, but I believe that to be true cos the Sunday Sport once said a WW2 bomber was found on the moon and if they said it then it must have been right.

i'm sure its true cos i seen it wiv me own eyes on the telly and the governments and telly's would'nt lie that big a whopper would they ? surely we wood find out sooner or lata ?
was a good un tho wanit "one small step for man, one giant lie for all mankind"
not many peeps believe it anymore tho do they ! do they ?
Unknown User
Quote by gulsonroad30664

men have landed on the moon

Sorry, but I believe that to be true cos the Sunday Sport once said a WW2 bomber was found on the moon and if they said it then it must have been right.

i'm sure its true cos i seen it wiv me own eyes on the telly and the governments and telly's would'nt lie that big a whopper would they ? surely we wood find out sooner or lata ?
was a good un tho wanit "one small step for man, one giant lie for all mankind"
not many peeps believe it anymore tho do they ! do they ?
I'm wiv you brudda! *smiling*
Back on subject (just about) there is nothing wrong with doubting some of what you say, I applaud those that question but at the same time and for me personally those with blinkered minds who think everything is exactly as it appears are simply kidding themselves and I know that to be true cos the Illuminati (not quite the Bavarian order) via Zeitgeist and similar have sent a message *smiling* NWO in the fullest sense is but a generation away.
Unknown User
Quote by gulsonroad30664
what does nwo mean toots ? ziet ? x

Nwo

Where will you be when the Proles rise? *cough*
Zeitgeist, watch the movies, excellent stuff.
gulsonroad30664
Orgasminator
Quote by Toots
what does nwo mean toots ? ziet ? x

Nwo

Where will you be when the Proles rise? *cough*
Zeitgeist, watch the movies, excellent stuff.

new world order ? is it the romans, the egyptians, the messapetanians or sumfin ?
Unknown User
Quote by gulsonroad30664
new world order ? is it the romans, the egyptians, the messapetanians or sumfin ?

Raise your game, it's none of those but instead the Aldi/lidl shopper, switched on, savvy
and ready to rise against the Tesco massive.
Max777
Sex God
Quote by Toots
Back on subject (just about) there is nothing wrong with doubting some of what you say, I applaud those that question but at the same time and for me personally those with blinkered minds who think everything is exactly as it appears are simply kidding themselves and I know that to be true cos the Illuminati (not quite the Bavarian order) via Zeitgeist and similar have sent a message *smiling* NWO in the fullest sense is but a generation away.

If that's directed at me Toots, I'm far from blinkered and certainly don't accept everything at face value however that's a world away from the fantasy world that Gulson and his ilk inhabit in which EVERTHING is a conspiracy.
gulsonroad30664
Orgasminator
Quote by Max777

Back on subject (just about) there is nothing wrong with doubting some of what you say, I applaud those that question but at the same time and for me personally those with blinkered minds who think everything is exactly as it appears are simply kidding themselves and I know that to be true cos the Illuminati (not quite the Bavarian order) via Zeitgeist and similar have sent a message *smiling* NWO in the fullest sense is but a generation away.

If that's directed at me Toots, I'm far from blinkered and certainly don't accept everything at face value however that's a world away from the fantasy world that Gulson and his ilk inhabit in which EVERTHING is a conspiracy.
i'm blinkered. i do not believe anything i'm told without question
herts_darlings1
Sexpert
And the majority of this has what to do with innocent people being murdered?
Unknown User
It does actually bode the question....where is the limit of free speech !!
You quite rightly can't go up to someone and racially abuse them for example. Some may argue that is a restriction of free speech !!! Even the Pope commented that if you verbally someone's Mother, you can't be surprised if you get a punch on the nose !!!
As anyone that knows me, would know, I abhor violence of any nature, and so ofcause condemn in the strongest terms, the senseless killings of these cartoonists. I am just wondering, where do we draw the line !!!
I myself was a little concerned when I saw the magazine was leading with another cartoon of Mohammad. I did feel this was simply fanning the flames of discontent.
We now see massive demonstrations in Jordan and Chechnya. In Niger we see 45 churches have been burnt, and 5 people killed, because of the new cartoon. Maybe discretion would have better the better part of valour on this occasion.
With freedom of speech comes responsibility.
Max777
Sex God
Quote by herts_darlings1
And the majority of this has what to do with innocent people being murdered?

Sometimes threads go off topic. This one did when Gulson put his usual spin on the tragic events in Paris.
Woohoo
Mod
I think this thread has run its course,so it's now locked.