A right-leaning Health think tank has condemned the NHS for spending £700 a year on porn to assist male visitors to fertility clinics to produce samples.
Should the tax payer pick up the bill for porn?
Sex God
Join the most popular community of UK swingers now
Login
Porn on the NHS
last reply
25 replies
1.7k views
0 watchers
0 likes
Orgasminator
Cant they use the same porn over and over again? .... Unless they still use magazines... 
But seriously, you cant get blood without buying syringes. It's a means to an end.
But seriously, you cant get blood without buying syringes. It's a means to an end.
Sex God
Quote by vampanya
Cant they use the same porn over and over again? .... Unless they still use magazines...
But seriously, you cant get blood without buying syringes. It's a means to an end.
I heard this one on radio 2 today and was quite surprised by how Strong some peoples feelings were about the NHS buying porn.
Orgasminator
They've obvioulsy never tried to wank into a cup in a clinic without any help or distraction from the surroundings then!
Nor have I by the way hehe! I'm sure I could do it fine without the porn though just based on kink factor :sticky:
Nor have I by the way hehe! I'm sure I could do it fine without the porn though just based on kink factor :sticky:
Sex God
Quote by vampanya
They've obvioulsy never tried to wank into a cup in a clinic without any help or distraction from the surroundings then!
Nor have I by the way hehe! I'm sure I could do it fine without the porn though just based on kink factor :sticky:
One lady said, why should her tax's pay for porn, its disgusting, if they need porn they should buy there own.
Orgasminator
Well its a veiw, but I would argue that if she went for any procedure would she expect to take her own equipment with her?
Sex God
Quote by Max777
Considering that the NHS budget for 2010/11 is some £102 billion, I can't see how anyone can get overly vexed over the sum of £700.....
Forgetting the money, some might find it moraly wrong
Quote by Bluefish2009
Considering that the NHS budget for 2010/11 is some £102 billion, I can't see how anyone can get overly vexed over the sum of £700.....
Forgetting the money, some might find it moraly wrong
Quite possibly but from a personal point of view I don't really care. I wonder what the monthly expenses of the NHS bigwigs run to? I would find it more morally wrong for them to be spending tax payers money on fine dining, entertaining etc .
Sex God
Quote by Bluefish2009
Considering that the NHS budget for 2010/11 is some £102 billion, I can't see how anyone can get overly vexed over the sum of £700.....
Forgetting the money, some might find it moraly wrong
maybe not those that can't have children blue
instead of paying for it why not get some sh donations together :twisted: :twisted:
could be an sh registered charity :twisted:
Sex God
Quote by Max777
Considering that the NHS budget for 2010/11 is some £102 billion, I can't see how anyone can get overly vexed over the sum of £700.....
Forgetting the money, some might find it moraly wrong
Quite possibly but from a personal point of view I don't really care. I wonder what the monthly expenses of the NHS bigwigs run to? I would find it more morally wrong for them to be spending tax payers money on fine dining, entertaining etc .
I agree
:thumbup:
Sex God
Quote by Lizaleanrob
Considering that the NHS budget for 2010/11 is some £102 billion, I can't see how anyone can get overly vexed over the sum of £700.....
Forgetting the money, some might find it moraly wrong
maybe not those that can't have children blue
instead of paying for it why not get some sh donations together :twisted: :twisted:
could be an sh registered charity :twisted:
You could be on to some thing
Quote by Bluefish2009
Considering that the NHS budget for 2010/11 is some £102 billion, I can't see how anyone can get overly vexed over the sum of £700.....
Forgetting the money, some might find it moraly wrong
maybe not those that can't have children blue
instead of paying for it why not get some sh donations together :twisted: :twisted:
could be an sh registered charity :twisted:
You could be on to some thing
As a man who had to produce a sample some 30 years ago by the old method, which for the unitiated was into a urine jar and then take it to the hospital. It seems to me that buying porn to facilitate the colection of a sperm sample is not only more hygenic but greener as well. The provider no longer has to rush to the hosp[ital with his sample wrapped in foil paper. He provides a fresh sample at the point of contact. Mind you as fit young men why would they have to be stimulated by porn to what crudely can be called to have a wank. Isnt this a case of the nanny state feeding "patients" with a spoon when I have no doubt the vast majority will be able to produce a sample without any external influence.
As far as the moral argument is concerned, according to most faiths masturbation is not allowed so the porn is secondary to the first offence of masturbation or what the Catholic church still term as self abuse.
Sex God
a simple change in uniform would probably do the trick just as easy :twisted:
Orgasminator
I wonder if the objecters to porn would approve of the nurses taking the sample instead then
Sex God
Quote by vampanya
I wonder if the objecters to porn would approve of the nurses taking the sample instead then
I'll happily object to the porn if I can pick the nurse(s). :rascal: :lol2:
Orgasminator
Quote by easy
I wonder if the objecters to porn would approve of the nurses taking the sample instead then
I'll happily object to the porn if I can pick the nurse(s). :rascal: :lol2:
Oh no! You get the matron with the hairy palms and the biceps like Arnies.... it'll only hurt a little :eeek:
Sex God
Quote by Bluefish2009
Considering that the NHS budget for 2010/11 is some £102 billion, I can't see how anyone can get overly vexed over the sum of £700.....
Forgetting the money, some might find it moraly wrong
Jehova's Witnesses find blood and organ donation morally wrong - is that any reason for the NHS not to provide it for those that don't?
Sex God
Quote by vampanya
I wonder if the objecters to porn would approve of the nurses taking the sample instead then
I'll happily object to the porn if I can pick the nurse(s). :rascal: :lol2:
Oh no! You get the matron with the hairy palms and the biceps like Arnies.... it'll only hurt a little :eeek:
:eeek: Anyone seen my copy of Big Jugs Monthly?
Sex God
Quote by foxylady2209
Considering that the NHS budget for 2010/11 is some £102 billion, I can't see how anyone can get overly vexed over the sum of £700.....
Forgetting the money, some might find it moraly wrong
Jehova's Witnesses find blood and organ donation morally wrong - is that any reason for the NHS not to provide it for those that don't?
I actually agree 100%, but playing devils advocate for a moment
The Jehovah's pay tax also, and it is OK for the NHS, to use tax payers money to support the exploitation of the females in the porn industry. There are some very dubious parts of the porn industry
Orgasminator
Exploitation of females??? Thats a bit out of date isn't it? What about the exploitation of the men in the films too then? Come on, really?
There are some dubious parts to the porn industry no doubt, but the NHS would be getting top shelf from sex shops porn, not exactly black market stuff.
There are some dubious parts to the porn industry no doubt, but the NHS would be getting top shelf from sex shops porn, not exactly black market stuff.
Sex God
Quote by vampanya
Exploitation of females??? Thats a bit out of date isn't it? What about the exploitation of the men in the films too then? Come on, really?
There are some dubious parts to the porn industry no doubt, but the NHS would be getting top shelf from sex shops porn, not exactly black market stuff.
I would agree, it does sound out of date, maybe it is in our world, but listening to this very debate on the radio, it is not a view that is any less subscribed to now than it ever has been.
Orgasminator
Usually the people who scream 'exploitation' are nowhere near the industry and have no idea of why the women do what they do. For mainstream legal porn the women are far from being exploited. I know there's a darker side to the industry but as we're commenting on the NHS porn I would say that the women taking part are well paid, very happy in their chosen work and would laugh at the idea that they're being exploited.
And its the exploitation arguement they use to try to get porn banned altogether. Sooo Mary Whitehouse!
And its the exploitation arguement they use to try to get porn banned altogether. Sooo Mary Whitehouse!
Sex God
Quote by GnV
Is this it easy?
It's now on video....
:laughabove: :laughabove: :laughabove: :laughabove: :laughabove: :laughabove:
