All joking aside about the newspaper, this has to be a fantastic idea....yes?
I do not know too much about this new law but if it helps in any way it must be a good thing.
The worry is the ammount of people who are on the register, who were enquired about. Is it really that bad out there?
What are others views on the Sarahs law. Is it tough enough, or should it have even more far reaching things attatched to it?
Will it possibly increase public unrest if they know there is a child molester near to them, or even next door.
I am curious as to how others feels about this as I know there are people on here who work closely with children.
A tough subject I know but it seems a new law that makes a lot of sense....or does it?
I must confess to being a little concerned: nobody could object to the principle, but there have been cases of wrong financial and other data about folk out there and if there was a mistake, or even someone with a similar name an innocent man's life could be completely ruined.
I knew Peter Sutcliffe the racing driver (Ferrari Le Mans best achievment) and look what he has had to suffer without any blame whatsoever, just because he had the misfortune to have the same name as one of the most notorious criminals of all time!
Plim :sad:
A new license for vigilantism splendid
The hospitals are emptying as the paediatricians run for the hills.
If you have nothing to hide: You have nothing to fear.
if your name is similar to any notorious criminal; change it.
If your neighbours are so thick that they think that a paediatrician is a : Move. Fast.
so how does it work then, as its not clear from the article....can anyone just ring up and say 'Im worried about Mr Suchandsuch next door...his eyes are to close together, he has a monobrow and just looks shifty... is he a '
or do you have to give strong reasons/evidence as to why you are worried?
Is it done by phone or personal police visit, and does the person who is being enquired about get told that someone has enquired about them being a ?
could be quite horrible if you were an innocent person (I wont say man as women can be paedos too) and the police rang one day to say....'oh BTW someone wanted to know if you were a '.....I think you would be very shocked, hurt and suspicious of everyone wondering who could have been the one/s who thought that.
I do think its a good idea, just would like some more knowledge on the mechanics of it if anyone can enlighten me.
It really is a sad state of affairs Fabs for sure.
It is all well and good having a Sarah's law, as that obviously can help others to protect their kids but....how must Mrs Payne be feeling today to find out her childs killer, had pictures of her in his cell?
|uk|dl1|link3|http%3A%2F% %2Fsarah-payne-photos-in-killers-cell%2Farticle%2F 467965798
I cannot for the life of me understand how this filthy person managed to acquire these in the first place? He is in a prison environment and the very child he murdered, the authorities obviously were not monitoring him enough.
Spare a thought today for Mrs Payne and try for one second to think how she must have felt.
This animal really should have saved us all a lot of money, and been put to death when he was found guilty! Human rights only apply to humans, and this animal does not fall into that category!
There is a sweeping statement. :twisted:
I have read it again.....still reads the same.
To get back to the original theme: Have a , which is commented upon on website.
It is all well and good having this law, but what happens when they are caught?
The chances of this animal ever being released is remote to say the least but....why reduce his sentence?
The ten years less he has to serve is two years longer than the child he killed actaully lived for....she was eight.
For me it is clear cut, life in prison with no chance of parole.
What judge in his right mind reduces the original sentence, when in reality it will make no difference at all?
Imagine how Sarah Payne must now feel....the justice system beggars belief sometimes.
Crikey, you were a bit slow on the uptake with this one Kenty.
As you said, it'll make no difference. He won't even live that long, hopefully.