We have yet to see the disclosure of Mp's second incomes....which , no doubt , Mp's will claim are necessary to keep them in touch with the "real world"
I think we may well find these revelations to be as damming as the expenses scandal currently running.I fear that second incomes are a gravy train based on an old boys network and are there to bias legislation in favour of the rich and , therefore, powerful few.
The fundamental problem is that being a politician, once the hobby of the truly wealthy, is now a career choice.
I think our representatives should be adequately rewarded for the job (national average wage springs to mind). I'd also build a nice halls of residence with state of the art leisure facilities for those who cant commute.
When I debate the matter I get all sorts of rhetoric about the need to have MPs of the highest calibre,brilliant minds ad nauseum. I think our representatives need to be driven by altruism not ambition. If you want brilliant minds etc buy them in, thats what we have a civil service for isn't it?
Oh and Ken Livingstone was a research technician at a cancer research facility and trained to be a teacher before and during his political career. They never mention that in the Sun.
MP's salaries were set at a scale to entice young and articulate, non-acristrocratic members into what used to be the "old boys network"
Some of the best Parlimentarians have been career politicians and it is a silly and absurd critique that the motivation for becoming an MP should matter before the ability to do the job.
A very vital role is played by long term career MP's in bringing about tomorrows greatest MP's
Pay them accordingly, do away with expenses and the whip system.