This story has been running for a couple of days.
Basically, the Daily Mail ran a screamer of a piece claiming that Facebook made it easy for paedophiles to approach under age girls. Trouble is, the source for the story says that the website involved wasn't Facebook, and now Facebook are threatening to sue.
So what should the punishment be for newspapers like the Mail who, according to their source, deliberately misrepresent the truth?
Join the most popular community of UK swingers now
Login
What should the punishment be for distorting the truth?
What should the punishment be for distorting the truth?
That’s an easy one, compo, big time for the aggrieved party plus the offending rag should print an apology in the same place and with the same type setting as the original story, and for good measure they could even run it for the same time......
That’s an easy one, compo, big time for the aggrieved party plus the offending rag should print an apology in the same place and with the same type setting as the original story, and for good measure they could even run it for the same time......
I know I'm old fashioned, but I get very, very annoyed by all of this.
- it's the responsibility of parents to explain to, and be responsible for children in life. Letting them use a computer for hours without a care is like putting them out like the cat to play in public places.
Parents shouldn't expect website operators and others to be responsible for their children.
Plim :sad:
- it's the responsibility of parents to explain to, and be responsible for children in life. Letting them use a computer for hours without a care is like putting them out like the cat to play in public places.
Parents shouldn't expect website operators and others to be responsible for their children.
Plim :sad:
Now look at you people turning the forum to a newspaper vending machine and since when was it the duty of general public to set tariffs!...TOday's current news..A trial held for the first time in 350yrs without the jury,A 17yr is killed when a bus crashed due to icy roads responsible...get my over 30p from 40p read all about it in daily mail,independent and whatever read all about it read all about it 
Quote by flower411
Now look at you people turning the forum to a newspaper vending machine and since when was it the duty of general public to set tariffs!...TOday's current news..A trial held for the first time in 350yrs without the jury,A 17yr is killed when a bus crashed due to icy roads responsible...get my over 30p from 40p read all about it in daily mail,independent and whatever read all about it read all about it
Phuckers !! I wish you`d take a minute to make ya posts a tad more coherent !!
That thing about the trial without a jury is major history !!!
I`m surprised nobody has started a new thread ........appearently the defendant is considering appealing to the European Court !!!
Of course their lawyer was furious and he has every right to appeal,sorry Flower its frustration sometimes trying to do 6days work in 4 to obtain a long easter weekend!
*Responsible?!
Sex God
if there was a punishment for distorting the truth then all mp`s would be taking a vow of silence 
Quote by flower411
Now look at you people turning the forum to a newspaper vending machine and since when was it the duty of general public to set tariffs!...TOday's current news..A trial held for the first time in 350yrs without the jury,A 17yr is killed when a bus crashed due to icy roads responsible...get my over 30p from 40p read all about it in daily mail,independent and whatever read all about it read all about it
Phuckers !! I wish you`d take a minute to make ya posts a tad more coherent !!
That thing about the trial without a jury is major history !!!
I`m surprised nobody has started a new thread ........appearently the defendant is considering appealing to the European Court !!!
Over to you as a decent subject.
Sex God
Each publication could be forced to produce a second 'run' at the same interval (daily, weekly etc) as the original publication. The difference would be, the second one contains only corrections, withdrawals and reports of judgments against the publishers.
Any bets that it would be thicker than the original for many of them? LOL
Any bets that it would be thicker than the original for many of them? LOL
Quote by flower411
Now look at you people turning the forum to a newspaper vending machine and since when was it the duty of general public to set tariffs!...TOday's current news..A trial held for the first time in 350yrs without the jury,A 17yr is killed when a bus crashed due to icy roads responsible...get my over 30p from 40p read all about it in daily mail,independent and whatever read all about it read all about it
Phuckers !! I wish you`d take a minute to make ya posts a tad more coherent !!
That thing about the trial without a jury is major history !!!
I`m surprised nobody has started a new thread ........appearently the defendant is considering appealing to the European Court !!!
Google Diplock Courts...
Not major history really...
