Join the most popular community of UK swingers now
Login

why do conservatives lie?

last reply
90 replies
3.2k views
0 watchers
0 likes
Quote by Too Hot
God forbid we ever get Nationalised industries again. Nationalised industries are rarely, if ever, profitable and the more cash the sitting government has or needs to allocate to the funding of infrastructure improvements to any one industry, the more the opposition will use it as a political tool. Our style of government is not suited to anything being Nationalised. Just look at how NHS, schools, defence and other funding budgets are argued over now... It would be so much worse with Nationalised industries as well. For those with short memories, just go back to the 1970's and read up about our successful Nationalised industries.... Not.

so why is it that the only train line that turns a profit in this country is the nationalised one that was taken back by the government following the bidding scandal. The other 'profit making' are being run with huge subsidies. Gas and electric companies make huge profits and are generally foreign owned now. Likewise with water.
All these companies were owned by us, didn't make 'profits' as such but were not run with any subsidies unlike now. Nobody ever complained about the cost of heating, fuel poverty was incredibly rare (unlike now). And don't get me started about the right to buy and all the ex-council houses now being rented back to people and housing benefit being used for huge landlord profits.
This government is run by toffs, for toffs. And yet I still have to thank maggie the blue rinsed bitch for giving me a huge pay rise when she came to power because she took my top rate of tax down from 60% to 40%. May she rot in hell for what she started.
Quote by capricornten
..... May she rot in hell for what she started.

:thumbup:
With the revelations from the 30 year rule about the 75 Coal Mine list for closure that Maggie always said never existed, but in fact certainly did, should Mrs Thatcher now be officially and legitimately called;
Maggie the Liar ????
John
Quote by Geordiecpl2001
With the revelations from the 30 year rule about the 75 Coal Mine list for closure that Maggie always said never existed, but in fact certainly did, should Mrs Thatcher now be officially and legitimately called;
Maggie the Liar ????
John

YES...without a doubt
Quote by deancannock
With the revelations from the 30 year rule about the 75 Coal Mine list for closure that Maggie always said never existed, but in fact certainly did, should Mrs Thatcher now be officially and legitimately called;
Maggie the Liar ????
John

YES...without a doubt
And since Arthur Scargill has at least twice tried to buy the London flat (owned by the NUM) he occupies (until recetly, rent free!!) under Mrs T's Right to Buy scheme could he not rightly be called a hypocryte?
Quote by GnV
With the revelations from the 30 year rule about the 75 Coal Mine list for closure that Maggie always said never existed, but in fact certainly did, should Mrs Thatcher now be officially and legitimately called;
Maggie the Liar ????
John

YES...without a doubt
And since Arthur Scargill has at least twice tried to buy the London flat (owned by the NUM) he occupies (until recetly, rent free!!) under Mrs T's Right to Buy scheme could he not rightly be called a hypocryte?
Yes. also very true.
But we're British, we should know by now that the phrase "Lions led by Donkeys" not only applies in wartime !!
John
Quote by GnV
With the revelations from the 30 year rule about the 75 Coal Mine list for closure that Maggie always said never existed, but in fact certainly did, should Mrs Thatcher now be officially and legitimately called;
Maggie the Liar ????
John

YES...without a doubt
And since Arthur Scargill has at least twice tried to buy the London flat (owned by the NUM) he occupies (until recetly, rent free!!) under Mrs T's Right to Buy scheme could he not rightly be called a hypocryte?
100% totally GNV......but trying to buy a flat didn't loose thousands of people there jobs, it didn't break communities !!!
Quote by deancannock
100% totally GNV......but trying to buy a flat didn't loose thousands of people there jobs, it didn't break communities !!!

No, perhaps not, but he is nonetheless holding up the Local Authority renting this much needed accommodation to another worthy family. Hardly worthy of his supposed socialist (or should I say communist) values and may be breaking up a family much in need of being allowed to enjoy the benefits of more comfortable and appropriate living as a family unit...
Maggie the liar
Scargill the liar
Politicians = self centred, power seeking, thieving leeches caring only for their own interests not those they are supposed to represent.
Union Leaders = self centred, power seeking, thieving leeches caring only for their own interests not those they are supposed to represent.
Quote by MidsCouple24
Maggie the liar
Scargill the liar
Politicians = self centred, power seeking, thieving leeches caring only for their own interests not those they are supposed to represent.
Union Leaders = self centred, power seeking, thieving leeches caring only for their own interests not those they are supposed to represent.

er...have you actually read above...yes Maggie the Liar= YES.....However ..Scargill..no matter who unpalatable it may be to some folk... told the truth !! Was ridiculed for it, but what he was saying was the truth. Yes, total hypocrite, for trying to use the rules put in by the then thatcher government, by trying to buy his council house. But that does not make him a liar.
Also I will defend the majority of local MP's who are hard working and good individuals. I used to know my local MP quite well, and he was out most evenings, at some meeting, or meeting up with locals to discuss their concerns. In all walks of life there will be people that use the system, but I still stay that 95% of MP's from all parties, are hard working, and trying to do there best for their constituency.
Can't find the reference now dean, but wasn't there a high court case in times past in Birmingham involving dear Arthur and his Vice President diverting charitable union funds without proper authority and the Judge in the case branded Scargill a lier after he was, ahem, found to be somewhat 'economical' with the truth in his evidence...
Quote by GnV
Can't find the reference now dean, but wasn't there a high court case in times past in Birmingham involving dear Arthur and his Vice President diverting charitable union funds without proper authority and the Judge in the case branded Scargill a lier after he was, ahem, found to be somewhat 'economical' with the truth in his evidence...

not sure GNV.....but I would of thought if found to be true and he was pinching charity funds, he would of been sent to jail !!!
quick edit....found what you on about gnv here

but no mention of a LIAR ..... and 7th paragraph clearly says...the commissioners point out that Mr Scargill would not of personally profited from the action !!
Don't get me wrong here...I am not here to defend Mr Scargill or anything he has ever done. All I am saying is that during the miners strike he stated there was a hit list of 70 pits to be closed. That was the whole reason for the strike. This has been shown to be correct. Despite ridiculing him at the time, and saying no such plan was there, the minutes of meetings, now show that Mrs Thatcher clearly knew , and personally approved of the plan. Now that was not even being economical with the truth.....that was a bare faced lie !!!
I apologise unreservedly for calling him a liar without proof, he is a cheat and a thief though.
Quote by GnV
Can't find the reference now dean, but wasn't there a high court case in times past in Birmingham involving dear Arthur and his Vice President diverting charitable union funds without proper authority and the Judge in the case branded Scargill a lier after he was, ahem, found to be somewhat 'economical' with the truth in his evidence...

Try this link G

Towards the end of the article, it states
In his judgment, Mr Justice Underhill said it was very unlikely Mr Cave had written the letter. There had been "a lack of transparency" in Mr Scargill's dealings, and he had been "prepared to be economical with the truth".
The judge said: "I believe he suffers to a high degree from the common tendency to reconstruct his recollection in a manner favourable to himself."
Thanks Max. Knew I'd seen it somewhere and more recently than I thought.
Ner ner ne nerner my bete noir is worse than your bete noir ... what utter bollocks
why Do Conservatives Lie ?
We are ruled by a cabal of wealthy white middle class men and on the whole always have been. This cabal have no interest in disturbing the status quo . The Tories manoeuvre to further polarize the nation .The labour party make noises to redress the balance but haven't since Michael Foots' leadership even looked like they might enact any policy to do this. There has been a class war fought in this country since the 70's and the Tories have all but won it, parliamentary politics does not offer the working classes a solution to their problems and will not until those in charge are forced to pay attention .The unions offer a solution (yes even now) offering the working classes a means of protest and organising that protest the alternatives would I suggest be far less palatable to our 'rulers'
Thatcher and Scargill are both deeply flawed self serving individuals but so have been many of our greatest leaders .... I would suggest that the best way to judge a politician is look what they're aiming at and not necessarily at whether or not they hit it.
Why do POLITICIANS lie ... because we fail to make it in their best interests not to .. Simple
Quote by Staggerlee_BB
Ner ner ne nerner my bete noir is worse than your bete noir ... what utter bollocks
why Do Conservatives Lie ?
We are ruled by a cabal of wealthy white middle class men and on the whole always have been. This cabal have no interest in disturbing the status quo . The Tories manoeuvre to further polarize the nation .The labour party make noises to redress the balance but haven't since Michael Foots' leadership even looked like they might enact any policy to do this. There has been a class war fought in this country since the 70's and the Tories have all but won it, parliamentary politics does not offer the working classes a solution to their problems and will not until those in charge are forced to pay attention .The unions offer a solution (yes even now) offering the working classes a means of protest and organising that protest the alternatives would I suggest be far less palatable to our 'rulers'
Thatcher and Scargill are both deeply flawed self serving individuals but so have been many of our greatest leaders .... I would suggest that the best way to judge a politician is look what they're aiming at and not necessarily at whether or not they hit it.
Why do POLITICIANS lie ... because we fail to make it in their best interests not to .. Simple

And whilst the oiks, riff raff and rag tag nobodies moan and complain about how unfair life is...... We get 3,000,000 incoming immigrants who have come here with very little and many have built successful businesses and enterprises whilst the downtrodden still complain about the unfairness of life.
The problem is that we have evolved an unrealistic expectation of what a (any) government can do for us and so blaming " them" is easier than taking it on the chin and getting on with life.
The smaller and less intrusive our government becomes, the more personal responsibility people will have to take and, in my opinion, that is no bad thing.
Quote by Too Hot
Ner ner ne nerner my bete noir is worse than your bete noir ... what utter bollocks
why Do Conservatives Lie ?
We are ruled by a cabal of wealthy white middle class men and on the whole always have been. This cabal have no interest in disturbing the status quo . The Tories manoeuvre to further polarize the nation .The labour party make noises to redress the balance but haven't since Michael Foots' leadership even looked like they might enact any policy to do this. There has been a class war fought in this country since the 70's and the Tories have all but won it, parliamentary politics does not offer the working classes a solution to their problems and will not until those in charge are forced to pay attention .The unions offer a solution (yes even now) offering the working classes a means of protest and organising that protest the alternatives would I suggest be far less palatable to our 'rulers'
Thatcher and Scargill are both deeply flawed self serving individuals but so have been many of our greatest leaders .... I would suggest that the best way to judge a politician is look what they're aiming at and not necessarily at whether or not they hit it.
Why do POLITICIANS lie ... because we fail to make it in their best interests not to .. Simple

And whilst the oiks, riff raff and rag tag nobodies moan and complain about how unfair life is...... We get 3,000,000 incoming immigrants who have come here with very little and many have built successful businesses and enterprises whilst the downtrodden still complain about the unfairness of life.
The problem is that we have evolved an unrealistic expectation of what a (any) government can do for us and so blaming " them" is easier than taking it on the chin and getting on with life.
The smaller and less intrusive our government becomes, the more personal responsibility people will have to take and, in my opinion, that is no bad thing.
Just been watching the TV news about a village in Lebanon, near the Syrian border. The population of this village is now 25% original inhabitants and 75% Syrian refugees. By TooHot's reckoning, this is going to be the richest place on earth soon, with a less intrusive government and a load of incoming immigrants willing to work their socks off !!! We'll see.
John
Quote by Too Hot
Ner ner ne nerner my bete noir is worse than your bete noir ... what utter bollocks
why Do Conservatives Lie ?
We are ruled by a cabal of wealthy white middle class men and on the whole always have been. This cabal have no interest in disturbing the status quo . The Tories manoeuvre to further polarize the nation .The labour party make noises to redress the balance but haven't since Michael Foots' leadership even looked like they might enact any policy to do this. There has been a class war fought in this country since the 70's and the Tories have all but won it, parliamentary politics does not offer the working classes a solution to their problems and will not until those in charge are forced to pay attention .The unions offer a solution (yes even now) offering the working classes a means of protest and organising that protest the alternatives would I suggest be far less palatable to our 'rulers'
Thatcher and Scargill are both deeply flawed self serving individuals but so have been many of our greatest leaders .... I would suggest that the best way to judge a politician is look what they're aiming at and not necessarily at whether or not they hit it.
Why do POLITICIANS lie ... because we fail to make it in their best interests not to .. Simple

And whilst the oiks, riff raff and rag tag nobodies moan and complain about how unfair life is...... We get 3,000,000 incoming immigrants who have come here with very little and many have built successful businesses and enterprises whilst the downtrodden still complain about the unfairness of life.
The problem is that we have evolved an unrealistic expectation of what a (any) government can do for us and so blaming " them" is easier than taking it on the chin and getting on with life.
The smaller and less intrusive our government becomes, the more personal responsibility people will have to take and, in my opinion, that is no bad thing.
IIRC staggers has no issues with immigration
Oh dear, expecting some degree of social justice really doesn't equate to moaning about the unfairness of the world. I fully agree that people should take responsibility for their lives... I believe (and have done for many years ) that the way they should do this, is to band together and tear down the walls of our Mammon worshipping plutocracy and institute a genuine democracy lead by and for the majority ...I believe in short that the vast majority of people are not greedy ignorant self serving cunts .... Just it would seem those who would rule us
Great ideals but history the world over has shown us that one Dictator is replaced by another, one bad King by another bad King, one corrupt government by another. how can we guarantee that this would not happen again if we did band together and rid ourselves of all our would be leaders ?
I don't like to push my beliefs on anyone, and likewise expect the same. However one factor here is blindingly obvious, no matter what your political opinion.
This is still a democracy in name, and therefore we all have a right to say who should be in power. 45.5 million people had the chance to change politics in this country at the last election, and around 55% used their voice.
If the remaining 45% used their vote then the country and it's politics might look vastly different.
It is my belief the reason that politicians of all parties are economical with the truth is because our cynical population has allowed them the comfort and grace to do so.
Again I agree with you, but what is the solution, we are never going to get the other 45% to vote, most are sick of finding that whoever they vote for the same happens, one party borrow and we pay vast amounts in interest payments to the world bank the other get in power and cannot improve things because they are spending all the money getting rid of the old debt, all of them lie and spend more time thinking about policies that suit them and not enough about solutions, even when they have good ideas they are too scared to put them forward if they are radical.
At last we are doing something about our crazy immigration policy but nowhere near enough, we are still being ridden doggy style by the EU dictators, we are still the dumping ground for the worlds trash.
It is a shame we cannot ban all parties and have independent MP's who might vote for policies they believe in instead of being forced to tow the party line, but even if they were all independents some would still band together in their own interests.
Quote by Jed
It is a shame we cannot ban all parties and have independent MP's who might vote for policies they believe in instead of being forced to tow the party line, but even if they were all independents some would still band together in their own interests.

That, actually, is how it is although the more liberal amongst the electorate would have it changed to proportional representation and 'lists'.
It's why MP's who fall foul of the party whip can remain in Parliament; they are technically speaking independent. They owe their allegiances to The Sovereign first and foremost and they are not paid by which ever political party they are aligned to but by the State. True, they maybe under some obligation to the constituency party who stumped up the funds for their election campaign and may find themselves deselected at the next election but their legal status is as independent but, as you say, banded together in their own interest.
The leader of the biggest band, traditionally, is the one called by the Sovereign to form a Government.
I have over time admired a few who have stood up to the party whip and voted with their beliefs and concious but for the most party they do tow the party line, especially when speaking in public, I have admired those that have left a party and joined another but support the belief that at that time they should also resign as an MP and stand again since many are elected by their constituents for their party membership not their personal policies, I think it is better to elect them for their personal policies but if they were then they will be re-elected. No matter what you think of Maggie it was wrong for her party to depose her as Prime Minister without declaring an election, the people voted her to be our Prime Minister and the people should have the choice to decide on the PMs replacement not the reigning party. Many voted for the tories because she was the leader.
Why not look around at what recent immigrants to this country have achieved in the last ten years. No one moaning about this or that government or expecting anything special. As a nation, we are world class at moaning how unfair life/society/government is and whilst we are moaning others look around and take advantage of the many and great opportunities that are available in this country - if you are prepared to knuckle down and get on with it. Many locals, it seems, would rather complain about the pitiful state of our society rather than getting on and making the most of opportunity.
Ah well, two years time we will probably have a lib/lab coalition government and the right wingers will still be moaning about Europe, the Greens will still be moaning about fracking, HS2 will be scrapped and the government will once again become bigger in line with the letter leaning principles of socialism.
I have always been a supporter of immigration, I think I mentioned this in an earlier post on this thread, immigration has brought us invention and prosperity throughout our history, without immigrants Britain would have fallen far behind the rest of the world in commerce, trade and industry back in the 17th century let alone the 18th and 19th.
But like many other Nations I believe in controlled immigration, it should not be about "what can we do for you" it should be "what can we do together by allowing you to reside and work here".
Immigration has nothing whatsoever to do with Asylum, if someone has a genuine needs for asylum we should help them, if they arrive here from a Country where they will be imprisoned without trial, tortured, murdered then we should help them, if they arrive here from (for example) France, they do not need political asylum, France will not kill them or torture them (except perhaps with their feeling of self importance), therefore they are just another person wanting to migrate here.
Quote by GnV
Not letting you get away with that one too easily Dean...
Why should the Country allow the Miners to hold them to ransom? What god given right did Scargill have to rule? He was not an elected representative of the people but yet he acted as a demi-god hurting the lives of thousands of people whilst he and his henchmen enjoyed lavish lifestyles.
He had no accountability - indeed he had no shame. That he very nearly brought the Country to its knees but for the determination of Mrs T to break the mob rule in the name of democracy is something that often, even 30 years later, seems to escape those who were brow beaten into submitting to his will for fear of being branded 'scabs' and publicly ridiculed in their own communities.
On the other hand, Mrs T did have accountability and won two further elections to boot. The Electorate certainly gave their verdict on her performance.
Scargill couldn't win; the establishment is omnipotent not unelected load mouthed bullies like Scargill. The electorate in common have the power to remove governments, not evil minded cretins like him with nothing but self interest in mind.
I'm so sorry that you were caught in the midst of this at such a critical stage in your adult development. I might have expected that the passage of time might have now healed those wounded emotions.

:thumbup:
Quote by GnV
Not letting you get away with that one too easily Dean...
Why should the Country allow the Miners to hold them to ransom? What god given right did Scargill have to rule? He was not an elected representative of the people but yet he acted as a demi-god hurting the lives of thousands of people whilst he and his henchmen enjoyed lavish lifestyles.
He had no accountability - indeed he had no shame. That he very nearly brought the Country to its knees but for the determination of Mrs T to break the mob rule in the name of democracy is something that often, even 30 years later, seems to escape those who were brow beaten into submitting to his will for fear of being branded 'scabs' and publicly ridiculed in their own communities.
On the other hand, Mrs T did have accountability and won two further elections to boot. The Electorate certainly gave their verdict on her performance.
Scargill couldn't win; the establishment is omnipotent not unelected load mouthed bullies like Scargill. The electorate in common have the power to remove governments, not evil minded cretins like him with nothing but self interest in mind.
I'm so sorry that you were caught in the midst of this at such a critical stage in your adult development. I might have expected that the passage of time might have now healed those wounded emotions.

What a complete load of tosh!
1. Scargill was elected from his members - not unelected
2. This country allows the working man to withdraw his labour - its a democratic right of the working populace
3. You miss the point, it was about pit closure, the decimation of a working industry. The short-sightedness of the reports about pit profitability was all wrong. Betws, Grimethorpe, Houghton Main, Trentham and Parkside were all profitable out of the initial 10 for closure. The pits didn't follow review procedure as they could have taken 9 months and not given Thatcher the result she wanted.
4. whilst you claim Scargill was a loud mouthed bully, Thatcher was worse. She used and abused the police force as an Army, she had British Coal manipulate figures, She had miners made in to a laughing stock, She destroyed ways of life.
I'm sorry but the repercussions of the miners strike are still ongoing and the fallout economically from the closures is still ongoing in the Midlands and The North.
Quote by Too Hot
Why not look around at what recent immigrants to this country have achieved in the last ten years. No one moaning about this or that government or expecting anything special. As a nation, we are world class at moaning how unfair life/society/government is and whilst we are moaning others look around and take advantage of the many and great opportunities that are available in this country - if you are prepared to knuckle down and get on with it. Many locals, it seems, would rather complain about the pitiful state of our society rather than getting on and making the most of opportunity.
Ah well, two years time we will probably have a lib/lab coalition government and the right wingers will still be moaning about Europe, the Greens will still be moaning about fracking, HS2 will be scrapped and the government will once again become bigger in line with the letter leaning principles of socialism.

oh please, anything but lib/lab coalition. That would mean all sense of justice in this world would have vanished. I still strongly believe that there are a great number of labour members of parliament that have a social concience. Maybe not all, but a higher proportion than tory or liberal public school multimillionaire toffs.