I know it's sad isn't it-I clearly have a problem not being able to switch off from work mode (I'm a data analyst/database guru during the week!)
The fact is though that 10% of the ads in couples seeking men are men seeking couples which qualifies as bad data. I've just analysed 50 ads and the offenders are:8481,8479,8452,7650,7500.
I suspect that the guys are reading the category as 'men who are couples-seeking' so you might fix it by renaming the category 'Couples who are seeking men'.
It get's sadder because now I'm off to do a bad data analysis on all the other categories.
In my defence I've missed out on three gangbangs in the past couple of months. Gangbang1 was the well-documented enchantress production which unfortunately was pulled at the last minute by all the guys pulling out at the last minute due to performance anxiety. Gangbang2 was spoilt by my boss ringing me at 8am to pull me into a project meeting literally 5 minutes before I was going to throw a sicky. Gangbang3 was cancelled due to wife getting 2 pages of her diary stuck together and suddenly realising that she had the painters in!
Please don't think I'm dissing the site-it's technically very good. This is feedback to hopefully help the site become even better.
PS i'm thinking of setting up a penis classification system for categorising willies-along the same lines as bra sizes but will also deal with other characteristics such as cut/uncut, length, girth, orientation (ie direction of swing) whether its a shower/grower etc-hence the poll.
CJ
Join the most popular community of UK swingers now
Login
10% Bad Data in Couples seeking men+penis classification
Mark, your absolutely right, biased samples they may but I'm sure you'll agree the overall trend in my analysis is sound (all categories have exactly the same bias) and it confirms your hunch that it's the guys who are placing ads in wrong categories as the only other section with a significant number of incorrect entries is women seeking men which has the following men seeking women, an 8% rating on my bad data scale (8488,8482,6826,4887 are the offenders)
Like I said I don't want to tread on any toes but I happen to be designing a classification system and HCI interface for a client and I was at a loose end this morning. I guess if the CATS are made less ambiguous you will be able to let the bottom feeders really shine with less editing work for yourself and maybe even start to catch out anyone deliberately placing ads in the wrong section just to ensure they at least get read!
CJ
Like I said I don't want to tread on any toes but I happen to be designing a classification system and HCI interface for a client and I was at a loose end this morning. I guess if the CATS are made less ambiguous you will be able to let the bottom feeders really shine with less editing work for yourself and maybe even start to catch out anyone deliberately placing ads in the wrong section just to ensure they at least get read!
CJ
