people arent stinging nettles they are individuals.
and i dont think something has to be intended maliciously, to be racist.
so its not racist to tar a whole race with the same brush? ive met dodgy people of all colours and good of all colours.
yeah ok keep waving your little flag
The use of the word 'preference' still implies that one has made a decision. So the question remains as to how and why the decision is made. Which logically reintroduces the arguments of racism, and experience based prejudice
These are issues which in some cases are difficult to argue. I know I have instinctive prejudices and misconceptions of the unknown or unfamiliar. I like to think I can come to terms with them fairly quickly when meeting different people.
So up to that level of self protective reflexes, I accept that I do practise prejudice in a way that most people do. I don't practise an extreme form of organised racism and I don't join in with institutionalised hatred. Again that is also what most people do.
That is all we can do. Make a statement which is as true as we believe it of ourselves and go out and be prepared to live it.
Would you guys shag a 94 year old wrinkly?
I am guessing regardless of your answer here - the truth in most cases would be "NO"
Why? Would we seriously claim ageism - or would we understand that appart from someone with a granny-porking fetish, you would not find them sexually attractive.
You either want to fuck someone or you don't - the reason for not wanting to shag a person of different race does not have to be racist.
fair comment pololady but what if you shag someone and have a nasty experience of it then decide you will never go with someone of that colour again because, well they are the same colour?
its not just a preference of attractiveness in that case surely?
2 Things i guess...like other peeps, I dont think race has anything to do with it ( unless the people reading it are racist i s,pose)...however someone replied to the post saying that it depends whether your ugly !..good point..and as they say , beauty is in the eye of the beholder and all that !..but in my experience so far on the site, i,ve found that there are a " few" individuals, who seem to always have a lot to say, and can be quite cutting in their replies to posts, and the avatar pic which accompanies thier post, bears no resemblance at all to what they actually look like in the flesh ! ( i speak from experience!!)...and yes, dare I say it, the site can be very clicky. Everyone is here for different reasons, although all under the same umberella of " swinging"..Some people seem to think that to " swing" you must first develop a trusting relationship, then go from there..to me, thats what a lot of peeps are trying to get away from..I,m sure ..nay..I know ! that i,m not alone in being turned on by having a sexy encounter with a complete stranger..which is why I like visiting clubs, where wants to ask a million questions before inviting you to take part in a 3 some in a rest room !! So lets all remember that we are all individuals, be we white, black, scottish !!!, TV, bi, straight etc but where we,re all the same is that we,re after some kind of sexual kick !!..AND we,re all adults who should know when its safe or not to meet someone.....i,ll now wait for a million peeps to get on the soapbox and lecture me on what swinging is !! I think I know after 20 years of being on the scene ! nite nite xx
Partyman...you think jimmy Logan was bad....dont u remember Kendo Nagasaki ???!! That guy was so ugly he had to wear a mask !!! Ooooops , there I go calling someone ugly !!