A few months ago there was a thread about fancying who you play with, and the majority of people said there has to be attraction or chemistry, otherwise it is a no-go. My question is, how big a part do appearances play in who you fancy?
Are you mostly after "fit", good-looking people? Do you ever vet prospective playmates on appearance alone? Do you get the hots for people that don't look so good to you but have an irresistible attitude/personality? Would you go with someone that was physically attractive but with whom you couldn't hold a simple conversation? Does the appeal of someone's appearance go up or down as you get to know them? Can horniness/eagerness trump looks in the fancy stakes? Are there any physical traits that you find an instant turn-off? Instant turn-on? Any thoughts/anecdotes, all welcome.
only one thing matters in this game.
you turn up when arranged.
I'm really fussy.....if it's clean and sweet smelling then I'll have some of it.
.
Well as a single lady too I wholey agree with all of Marya's comments; which is unusual for me to agree wholey with anyone lol
I need a Beauty in bed with me, but what I class as a Beauty may be a Beast to another!
I dont mind quirks, imperfections or that they dont quite fit my 'spec'; if I click with them I click, nothing else matters!!
Usually for me it's a 'kaboom!' attraction at first sight that really gets me going, but I have found that I have got to know someone and got the hots later too.
So Beauty or Beast is completely in the eye of the beholder for me and I never take it personally if someone thinks I am a Beast :P
Pam xx
for us its less about the looks and more about someone being sexy :twisted:
someone that is sexy is far more appealing than someone who is just attractive
hmm... i`m pretty tall... so i like big tall guys who make me look petite... but some guys personality kinda outweigh that.....