I took part in the biometric trials for the new ID card - it took 10 minutes (well, OK, 15 if you count the chat about what the machines would do) and have now got my own (useless) demonstration ID card - complete with chip containing my fingerprints (no black ink which was a HUGE disappointment), facial characteristics and iris imprint (oh, forgot about date of birth, signature, gender and postcode). Luckily there was no match with anything already on the database!!
It was a painless and clean process - not much human intervention and the software was most impressive!
The questionnaire which I had to complete afterwards asked about my opinion of the proposed ID card - I have no qualms about it and would happily carry it if it were introduced.
I'd be interested to hear the views of others - for and against.
Well, I'm neither for it nor against it. Still on the fence. I'm not totally sure what their real objectives are. The only thing I'm against is having to pay for it; when I eventually decide I Don't want one.
Having lived in places where an ID card (or passport) was required, I have no problems with ID cards per se.
The problem I have is that it won't serve the purpose it is being "sold" to us for. To give you some idea of the problems please see this extremely long article:
Everything you never wanted to know about the UK ID card :sleeping:
and the Consultation Document in PDF format here:
Consultation Document :small-print:
Note: These two links are stronger than Mogadon!
More than happy to carry one as long as they don't become commercialised. The amount of information you can put into that chip is enormous. You can bet your life that all the big banks, financial organisations, supermarkets etc will all be trying to exploit them in some way. There's no end to the amount of databases you could end up in.
How many people have got a storecard? If you're a regular shopper at these stores they know how many there are in your household, whether you've got young children, which beer you drink, whether you're bald/grey, how often your period is, and far more. All this information is used to decide your income, your lifestyle, your social habits and is probably sold on to the junk mailers so that they can target their audience better. I'm sure they have other uses too.
Steve
Whilst I was being 'done' the chap working the machine explained that the sytem searches for matches of fingerprints and irises - they are expecting members of the press to attempt to get through the system by registering under different names in different trial areas. If there is a match on either prints or irises then the person has been before!
The iris is, so I am told, more accurate than prints which could be affected by one's job!
I too have an Army background and wasn't born in this country, and it has caused me no end of hassle. My brother has fared worse cos of Maggie Thatcher's immigration laws and it now means that he had to use a different channel to his children when they travel together. He was a UK citizen but couldn't pass on his 'Britishness' to his children cos he wasn't born in Britain. The law says that he and I are only British cos our father was, even though we were born in BAOR, and we can't pass on our nationality to our children. He took great umbrage and became Australian to join his children. My problem was more easily solved!!
That's a bit off thread - but shows up the complications around people and their ID everywhere.