Join the most popular community of UK swingers now
Login

cant think of a suitable title!

last reply
17 replies
840 views
0 watchers
0 likes
Lately we have seemed to spend a lot of time telling a lot of the new male members that this is not a site for a quick shag, and that swinging is something totally different.
We have often suggested that perhaps they would be better hiring a prostitute.
What I am wondering is… ladies: if you knew a guy was in the habit of paying for sex,… would it put you off having a meet with him? – even if he was “just your type”?
Also, if the guys knew a girl was a prostitute.. Would they have a meet with her, even if it was a freebie?
Before any one wonders.. I am NOT thinking of a career change.. lol lol, it is just something that has just come up.
WBB
Great question
I wouldn't ever want to pay for it... primarily because for it to have any worth, I'd want to feel fancied, and paying for it would certainly put into question the woman's motives!
As a guy, I'd not want a freebie from a prostitute based partly on prejudice and partly fear.
I'd suspect the number of partners she'd had would be very high, and I'd be extremely concerened about potential diseases (even thous some might argue she's a safer bet).
I think one real danger in terms of raising questions about a prostitute and a swinging are that people can often equate the two as being about money (prostitue) or desire (swinger). The danger is, people think swinging is about high numbers of partners too. For some this IS the case, but for many it's not, they just enjoy swinging with a select few.
For this reason, I (as a man) couldn't accept a freebie from a prostitute (it's the numbers and safety issue).
btw, as a slight aside, does anybody else think along these lines (like I do)....
if a person has a high number of partners... it's not just a matter of them having slept with say 100 instead of 10, but also the people they slept with also probably sleep around a lot more too... so their 100 partners probably have had 100 too... thus increasing the potential risks of STD not by a factor of 10, but 10*10 ?
/Kid
but we all pay for it one way or the other dont we?
Thats an age old punter cop out Mark mate .
Lets try it from another angle . Your fella is in a new job , hes been there six months and loves the place . His boss comes over for drinks one night and he seems pleasant enough , polite and curteous , and not bad looking for an older fella even if he isnt really your type .
Later that week your bloke tells you that his boss has recognised you from a swingers picture site , and he has made it quite clear ( although in not so many words ) that were he to be invited to make the beast with two backs with you then your man would be almost guaranteed a promotion and better pay and conditions . You hadnt ever really thought of shagging his boss , and arent really excited at the idea ...............but what would ya do ??
Rather than risk the wrath of WBB if this comes over like a thread hijack please tell me to piss right off and ill delete it rofl
xxxBusty xx
Quote by mark/surrey
but we all pay for it one way or the other dont we?

I disagree (gosh - I'm doing that a lot today)
It should be 50/50 to be worthwhile!!!!!
But as to the question - I would not be happy to be with a man who I knew had a propensity to pay for sex - for the same reasons Kid stated he would not use a prostitute.
Now I have nothing against prostitution as such. I believe that it does have a place in society. But I believe that it should be made legal and regulated, and only in permitted premises which undergo regular and rigourous checks. It is the prostitutes who use their earnings to fund their drug habits which are the worry and probably pose the biggest health risk.
Alex x
not at all silk... i think it is very relivant to the question i asked really.
so no need to piss off... though i might think of another punnishemnt for you! :twisted:
lol
LOL well its G here , but keep thinkin ;-)
In response to Silk & Big G's question
No job is worth that and I have more respect for myself!
Hugs, Alex xx
in answer to big Gs q:
i would not agree to the boss's demands for 2 reasons. firstly because i do not think i COULD have sex with someone unless it was from attraction to them, i can not just "go through the motions" regardless of what is to gain from it.
secondly.. if someone is swayed into giving you a promotion in that way..... they are not likely in my opinion to have high moral values.. so what is the chance that when they get a better bribe you are not going to be out of the door and on ur arse?
So Alex,
We have established that we don't work for the same company, and no fees would be involved........... just a time and a place to sort out now then..... wink :wink: lol :lol2:
Quote by frogster
So Alex,
We have established that we don't work for the same company, and no fees would be involved........... just a time and a place to sort out now then..... wink :wink: lol :lol2:

Very Funny
and stop hi-jacking WBBs thread! rolleyes
Sorry WBB.......... redface
Hmmmmmm... to make amends, surprisedops:
I tend to echo the thoughts above, about risk etc. I also think it depends on your level of maturity at a particular time in your life.
When I was 18 the trouser snake was almost uncontrollable and I would shag anything with a pulse, given the chance, had I been in a position of a severe need of a shag, I may have considered paying for it...... :shock:
Over the years I have matured and for me now it has to be a lot more than "just get your rocks off sex" a mental thing that leads to the physical thing, I am much more a pleasure giver than a pleasure seeker. smile
Or do you think I am talking Bollocks?
confused:
Quote by mark/surrey
but we all pay for it one way or the other dont we?

If you see a relationship as "paying" for sex/intimacy, then yes. Personally I'd hate to be in a relationship that I felt that way about and I like to think I'd walk away if I ever felt like that.
As someone who has used prostitutes (and I don't have any particular regrets), I want to say something against the suggestion that we tell young men to go and seek their services. And that is: it's bloody expensive. We all know that sex is addictive and young men aren't well-known for their frugality, and I can well imagine the possibility of limitless sex with a vast array of women leading to lots of these men overstretching their financial capabilities and getting into debt, possibly serious debt.
I know we don't have a responsibility to mother these people, but when we're giving advice I do think we have a responsibility to reflect on whether it is good advice.
Yes WBB, i would be put off meeting him if i knew he paid for sex but i would probably still meet him. One would instantly think, no chance. I always give the benefit of the doubt. At least he has been honest enough to tell you that he has paid for sexual services and obviously won't mind me asking in depth about this. How many guys have paid for it and not told females, quite a few i imagine.
Quote by TheAnalogKid
btw, as a slight aside, does anybody else think along these lines (like I do)....
if a person has a high number of partners... it's not just a matter of them having slept with say 100 instead of 10, but also the people they slept with also probably sleep around a lot more too... so their 100 partners probably have had 100 too... thus increasing the potential risks of STD not by a factor of 10, but 10*10 ?
/Kid

Of course we think like that.
If you worry about it too much you may as well become celibate as you will never know just how many people you are sleeping with ( partners of partner and so on)
I certainly don't wish to become celibate, i enjoy my safe fun too much biggrin
Personally I wouldn't be interested sexually in someone who I knew to be a prostitute. I'm not knocking it per se, but someone for whom sex is a commodity to be bought and sold has a fundamentally different attitude to sex from me, and I couldn't be with anyone who was that far removed from me philosophically, because for me physical compatibility alone is not enough.
i agree that someone who sees sex as a comodity would perhaps not be the type of person you would feel drawn towards having fun with.
i would be worried about the fact they had probably perfected the art of "enjoying" it... and were just going through the motions.
i think this would probably make you parranoid about your own performance then.. meaning that no one would have a good time!
as for meeting up with someone who was in the habit of being the customer.... i think personally i would always be wondering if he thought anything for free was "clear gain".
evil
Quote by frogster
When I was 18 the trouser snake was almost uncontrollable and I would shag anything with a pulse, given the chance, had I been in a position of a severe need of a shag, I may have considered paying for it...... :shock:
Over the years I have matured and for me now it has to be a lot more than "just get your rocks off sex" a mental thing that leads to the physical thing, I am much more a pleasure giver than a pleasure seeker. smile confused:

My fella said exactly this Frogster. He finds the sexual exchange the turn on and him giving another person pleasure is where he gets his satifaction most.
I myself hate the feeling of being "bought". That feeling that when a gift is given insencerely that automatically the person has earned the right to get into my knickers, it makes me feel cheep.
I personally would not need to pay for sex as I am a female and I am risking opening a can of worms by saying this but here goes anyway.
If I wanted an easy shag as a girl I could flaunt my cleavage, flirt like mad and have a one night stand. I would only need to go as far as my SU and know there are plenty of desperate freshers wanting to get laid in the first week of term, some even have star charts where they compete with their new house mates......
I don't think paying for sex would make me happy in the long run :?: