Join the most popular community of UK swingers now
Login

Chatroom Socials

last reply
107 replies
4.2k views
0 watchers
0 likes
Well, this has been playing on my mind for a good while now - and I guess it was inevitable really with the way the chatrooms have evolved and changed since the days of one single room, and the rate at which the site has grown.
but as yet another chatroom social is born, I find this quite sad:
we know there is a munch in wigan but when we have asked in the chatroom they all seem a little "scared", so we thought we would try and arrange something ourselves...

Far from being 3 integrated areas of the site through the unified log-in , imo, what we're actually getting is a more divided site, with seperate 'communities' on the forum and in the chatrooms. There are some people who use both, and flit between the two - but by far the most divisive thing on SH is the gulf between forum users and chatroom users, to the point where chatroom people are organising their own socials according to room or area and forum people have the monopoly on Munches dunno
feel free to tell me if i'm talking bollox, but am I the only one who sees it this way? and does anyone else feel the current trend of chatrom socials is getting out of hand? a victim of the social's own success? My concern is that (a) the divide will get bigger and (b) there'll be so many 'events' happening to which people want to attend, that eventually it will kill munches and socials anyway because attending costs money, time, babysitters etc, and folk will start spreading themselves so thinly between these 'events' that there wont be enough bodies to fill places on guestlists ? :dunno:
Quote by Darkfire
we know there is a munch in wigan but when we have asked in the chatroom they all seem a little "scared", so we thought we would try and arrange something ourselves...

I can't comment on how the site was before.........but to be honest I can't blame some members for feeling this way due to the way a lot of new forum users are jumped on.....
I for one was pretty much frightened about even introducing myself on the forum even after I'd spent a fair amout of time reading it.......
the problem is that one chatroom user might post in the cafe and get flamed for it.........then they go and tell all their chatroom friends about their experience in the cafe giving it a bad name.....
i do think that a large amout of the problem is that so often a new forum member posts...........and rather than them being welcomed they just get picked to bits......
recently i've tried to give new forum users/members advice but have been shot down myself for this as well............maybe its just a change in the way that the site works...........but i really hope its not.........
I think there will always be enough "friends/room people" and also "friends/forum people" to keep all the smaller socials well attended as well as the bigger "munches."
If there is a real or percieved difference between chat and forums meets its the rules are more relaxed for the rooms.... people obviously have to be in them but attendance seems more based on "acceptance" which can be quicker than via the forums so more "socials" if a term is required, without the full 40 pages indexed and cross referenced rule book that munches have seemed to aquired more reciently.
"Munches" in the original, BDSM, terms were social meets where anyone could attend and were openly posted with both venue and and dates so anyone could attend (much like the chat rooms and forums) so new people could socialise without the "OMFG" issues that come with jumping in at the deep end with clubs and/or meets.
Pwersonally I dont have any preference to which type I attend, but I do think we need more "just come and chat as you would in here... but face to face" meets that are all inclusive no matter how much experience or new people are (if people are worried about them being inundated with single guys, by going on experience.... 90% of the newish single guys that say they want to come dont even attend, lol)
There are the big events, originally munches exclusively but some of the chatroom socials are also becoming quite large in their own rights. I think theres more than enough people to go around all the events even if its only 5-10 people at the smaller socials as this allows far more interaction and socialising than some of the larger meets where people naturally gavitate to people they already know in sub groups as it feels more "safe" or "comfortable" to people like myself who are naturally shy.
I dont do a lot of munches or room meets... so cant really coment on politics or "rules" but I do think there should be more crossover so some meets can be called "munches" which dont require forum partisipation where people are also known from the rooms and/or can be vouched for...
I think the problem may be the rules force people into "room meets" and "munches" and "socials" instead of being all inclusive of people on this site!
Just my 2p worth... add compound interest means someone owes me ;-)
Jon Xx
Quote by Darkfire
feel free to tell me if i'm talking bollox,

not necessarily bollox...
Quote by Darkfire
but am I the only one who sees it this way?

im sure some will agree with you ... but im not sure that i do
Quote by Darkfire
a victim of the social's own success?

i think its more than likely the reasons PK gives above..... why would those people wanna go to a function where there might be people who have had a dig at them???? before people use the " leg -pulling" excuse.... they have still seen it as a "dig" hence their reaction.....
having spent some time in the chatrooms its easy to see that in the majority, people tend to be nice in there ( normally for an ulterior motive)... and sometimes- "OVER NICE"... sometime to the point of it being sickening... whereas here theres more variation of subject matter.... and more diverse topics under debate.... the chatrooms are really "titty shows" and when someone comes on here acting like a desperate perv... they are soon put in hteir place
dont get me wrong im not saying that its always like that... theres some rude and insulting behaviour at the other end of the spectrum....
still forums and the chatrooms are still over flowing people trying to be friendly in the main... and naturally people split into groups... and people ill break off......
Quote by Darkfire
My concern is that (a) the divide will get bigger

i agree... what a shame.....
Quote by Darkfire
there'll be so many 'events' happening to which people want to attend, that eventually it will kill munches and socials anyway because attending costs money, time, babysitters etc, and folk will start spreading themselves so thinly between these 'events' that there wont be enough bodies to fill places on guestlists ? dunno

i think thats the worse case scenario... and possibly true... bu those who make the effort will be hopefully rewarded with increasing their social circle... and therell be less moaning about
people being on the site and not meeting people... afterall... why would u wanna be on the site just to chat ((( calm down u lot))
i think we should face it... this place is cliquey... and any active swingers will tell you "so is swinging"... its not a bad thing...
anyhow.... those who wanna make friends will be ok... those who havent got the spirit or the patience will drop out... and those who wanna sit there and bitch about the masses will have plenty to bitch about..
happy days
long live diversity... aslong as its done safely and without harming others...
anyways... thats my view...
I Agree Read the whole lot and completely lost might be that its 5 in the morning i'll post tomorrow i think MMorning all oh and goodnight for me Big kiss smile
I don't think they're necessarily getting out of hand.
I can understand if people use a particular chatroom because they have and specific interest or only interested in meeting people in their area. If they are looking to meet potential playmates, it's understandable.
I am a little sad that they feel "scared" about attending a munch
Who ever is 'scared' of attending a munch.
Please, please, please pm me, there is nothing to be scared of.
I recently attended a social bbq that was predominantly chat room people, the social was advertised on LMU and was open to anyone forum and chat room, just cos its someone from the chat room arranging the social doesnt mean forumites arent welcome and vise versa its not like the social is being arranged in the chat room so no one from the forum will find out.
I admit i use both and see quite a few from the local chat room i use posting on the forums, a lot of people in the chat room dont event know what a munch is or that the LMU forum exists, i know this from conversations i have had with people.
If there is someone new around i think its our job as regulars to nurture and help all we can and get them involved in whatever aspect of the scene and site they are interested in, its very daunting at first, i remember how i felt.
Its inevitible that people who are chatting together are going to want to meet each other especially in their own areas. There is very little arranged in my neck of the woods and i would like to see more but it wont stop me travelling to the other events that i want to go to.
Earthy xx
I agree that there does appear to be a snobbery attached to forum contributed a few threads myself ,it does tend to be by and large the same people who reply and/or contibute additional threads.
Having said that there does appear to be numerous cliques forming in the chatrooms where even in the different rooms cliques are forming within cliques. But then again thats just human tend to relate more to people whom we percieve to be the same as us i.e from the same town or county
Notice on holiday the number of British bars etc that spring up as an example, there are British and Irish bars in all holiday destinations.
mad there I go rambling again!
I dont think there is a snobbery as such attached to the forums, lots of forum users also use the chat rooms. and its bound to be the same people posting on the forum threads cos they are the ones that use the forums.
As for cliques, yes the site has its little cliques and as you say is human nature, but if you perservere and make the effort to be involved you will be accepted, not that i am saying you need to be part of a clique, all i mean is that cliques are only that until you are part of it,.
oh that sounds bollox but i cant be arsed to change it now lol
Earthy xx
From a personal perspective, the two are quite different, which is why last nights chat was kinda special.
On the minus side, forum folk can be a little closed shop and stand-offish. And I'll be blunt, on occassion simply rude to new/inexpeirenced folk (I haven't been victim of this fortunately, but have seen it). On the plus side, the bonds in the forums seem much more solid (ooer ;) ), and the topics covered and depth of conversation move above and beyond that generally found in the chatrooms. This meant that going into a room last night with the forum lot felt very "real" ....and like an entirely new experience
:twisted:
The chatrooms are more likely to be frequented by one-liner throwers and people with no conviction in what they say (on the minus side), but on the plus side some are more receptive to new-comers and frankly they're too busy for heavy scrutiny of newbies. ....that and you've got cams biggrin
Having said that, it's a community site phenomena, not exclusive to SH at all.
Quote by SteveClarke
From a personal perspective, the two are quite different, which is why last nights chat was kinda special.
On the minus side, forum folk can be a little closed shop and stand-offish. And I'll be blunt, on occassion simply rude to new/inexpeirenced folk (I haven't been victim of this fortunately, but have seen it). On the plus side, the bonds in the forums seem much more solid (ooer ;) ), and the topics covered and depth of conversation move above and beyond that generally found in the chatrooms. This meant that going into a room last night with the forum lot felt very "real" ....and like an entirely new experience
:twisted:
The chatrooms are more likely to be frequented by one-liner throwers and people with no conviction in what they say (on the minus side), but on the plus side some are more receptive to new-comers and frankly they're too busy for heavy scrutiny of newbies. ....that and you've got cams biggrin
Having said that, it's a community site phenomena, not exclusive to SH at all.

am i really that obvious?
Quote by earthchild
I dont think there is a snobbery as such attached to the forums, lots of forum users also use the chat rooms. and its bound to be the same people posting on the forum threads cos they are the ones that use the forums.
As for cliques, yes the site has its little cliques and as you say is human nature, but if you perservere and make the effort to be involved you will be accepted, not that i am saying you need to be part of a clique, all i mean is that cliques are only that until you are part of it,.
oh that sounds bollox but i cant be arsed to change it now lol
Earthy xx

and I thought I was rambling lol
Quote by robhambledon
I dont think there is a snobbery as such attached to the forums, lots of forum users also use the chat rooms. and its bound to be the same people posting on the forum threads cos they are the ones that use the forums.
As for cliques, yes the site has its little cliques and as you say is human nature, but if you perservere and make the effort to be involved you will be accepted, not that i am saying you need to be part of a clique, all i mean is that cliques are only that until you are part of it,.
oh that sounds bollox but i cant be arsed to change it now lol
Earthy xx

and I thought I was rambling lol
Shurrup you lol
smackbottom
Earthy xx
Quote by earthchild
I dont think there is a snobbery as such attached to the forums, lots of forum users also use the chat rooms. and its bound to be the same people posting on the forum threads cos they are the ones that use the forums.
As for cliques, yes the site has its little cliques and as you say is human nature, but if you perservere and make the effort to be involved you will be accepted, not that i am saying you need to be part of a clique, all i mean is that cliques are only that until you are part of it,.
oh that sounds bollox but i cant be arsed to change it now lol
Earthy xx

and I thought I was rambling lol
Shurrup you lol
smackbottom
Earthy xx
ow,ow,ow ouch,ouch ,aaarghh......stop it !.......no don`t stop,ow,ow,ow ow,ow,ow,ow,ow................ok stop now Ilike it too much biggrin
Quote by earthchild
I recently attended a social bbq that was predominantly chat room people, the social was advertised on LMU and was open to anyone forum and chat room, just cos its someone from the chat room arranging the social doesnt mean forumites arent welcome and vise versa its not like the social is being arranged in the chat room so no one from the forum will find out.
I admit i use both and see quite a few from the local chat room i use posting on the forums, a lot of people in the chat room dont event know what a munch is or that the LMU forum exists, i know this from conversations i have had with people.
If there is someone new around i think its our job as regulars to nurture and help all we can and get them involved in whatever aspect of the scene and site they are interested in, its very daunting at first, i remember how i felt.
Its inevitible that people who are chatting together are going to want to meet each other especially in their own areas. There is very little arranged in my neck of the woods and i would like to see more but it wont stop me travelling to the other events that i want to go to.
Earthy xx

2nd time i have had to write this.... forgot to save the last effort redface
this is my quandry...... when i organise the next north east munch (don't worry there is one in the works) i know the forum people will come along and i know i can get the chatrooms users from the north east to go... but how am i going to try and persuade the chatroom users in the yorkshire/scottish/north west rooms to take the risk and come along? without the hard sell i am not sure..
local events are not a bad thing, don't get me wrong.... as earthy said there are not many events up here, but should it be at the expense of munches or to compliment munches... maybe the chatroom people are not prepared to travel to events as much as forum people, i really don't know.....
i also saw the remark last night and so i made the effort to go into the north west room for about half an hour and answer any questions that people had about munches... granted on my side there were various people in the room that had been to munches before, but i think there is a fear of the unknown about going to something that they may not know loads of people, the exact flip side of a regular forum user going to a chatroom social where you don't know the organisor and most people going (i know that there are not a lot of forum people who would go)
The other thing is i have noticed is that a lot of the chatroom users who put there name down for these chatroom socials is that they dont do anything else on the forums, and maybe that is the question we should be asking......how do we get those people to spend more time here and feel comfortable enough to ask for a munch invite....if they felt more comfortable here maybe the divide wouldn't so great.....
maybe the people from these rooms should tell us why they are not comfortable or scared going to munches... if we undersatnd the problems, maybe then we can come up with the solutions.....
sean xxxxxxxxx
See, I dont actually have an opinnion on this - I have thoughts, but no fixed view on it yet so wanted to know if anyone else thinks the same, or not dunno If I didnt want people's opinnions, I wouldnt have asked!
My immediate thoughts on this are far too much from a 'single fem's point of view' than 'Darkfire's ' - if that makes any sense loon
But DeeCee you raise an interesting point:
Quote by DeeCee
having spent some time in the chatrooms its easy to see that in the majority, people tend to be nice in there ( normally for an ulterior motive)... and sometimes- "OVER NICE"... sometime to the point of it being sickening... whereas here theres more variation of subject matter.... and more diverse topics under debate.... the chatrooms are really "titty shows" and when someone comes on here acting like a desperate perv... they are soon put in hteir place
dont get me wrong im not saying that its always like that... theres some rude and insulting behaviour at the other end of the spectrum....

so while people think that the forum is 'cliquey' (and I happen to think it is, or certainly particular groups of friends on here are which then rubs off onto the general 'feel' of things) , I do see the chatroom very similar to how you've described above. So, we can argue all day that both are as bad as each other.
Now here's the single fem talking, not the ex-bouncer, the rottweiler etc rolleyes - MY personal 'issue' is that when i see a guestlist which is 90% full of names I've never heard of (people i know nothing about) it instantly puts me off. I like to know who's going, who I might be interested in chatting to etc, and who's organising. So I always end up going to 'forum organised events' . I very much like to meet new people, but I aint walking into the lion's den - especially when I do see the chatroom mentality similar to how DeeCee described above ( and obviously, some chatroom people feel exactly the same about 'forum organised events' ). We spend considerable time berating the directors, wanking on cam, the general 'get yer tits out' atmosphere - am I wrong to think I kinda dont want to be in that atmosphere face to face? :dunno:
more thoughts please, i'm still forming an oppinion lol
and Sean
The other thing is i have noticed is that a lot of the chatroom users who put there name down for these chatroom socials is that they dont do anything else on the forums, and maybe that is the question we should be asking......how do we get those people to spend more time here and feel comfortable enough to ask for a munch invite....if they felt more comfortable here maybe the divide wouldn't so great.....

good point :thumbup:
Personal hat on.
I have no opinion only a comment to offer. When I saw the guest list for an event here, just the other day, my thought was 'who the hell are these people'? I only knew three, or maybe, four names on the list and hadn't even seen the other names posting in the forum.
Not that people HAVE to post in the forum - just my comment.
cool
I think that the problem is just one of familiarity to be honest :P
At first, I found it very difficult to integrate into the NE chat room... I think with all the 'one-liner' types around people are always 'suspicious' of who's who. It wasn't until some of the regular forum users that 'knew' me, greeted me in there and those that didn't know me started to say 'hi' and chat - it's just a comfort thing biggrin
The forums are exactly the same - i.e. there's almost a 'prove yourself' period. I'm not saying that's right but I do think that to regular users of chat or the forums, respect is important and there's way of going about earning it as far as I can see (and learned myself in the 'early days') wink
At the end of the day, we are all animals and social 'grouping' is important to us... for some, leaving the comfort of chat for forum munches/ocials would mean them all of a sudden losing 'rank'... I think you know what I mean? confused And, vice-versa for those from the forums attending chat socials..
I think our best ambassadors are people like Fabio etc who uses both successfully and seems to be respected here and in chat... maybe we could send out certain members as kind of cultural attaches (like Fabio said he did in NW chat last night) :D
Quote by SteveClarke
From a personal perspective, the two are quite different, which is why last nights chat was kinda special.
On the minus side, forum folk can be a little closed shop and stand-offish. And I'll be blunt, on occassion simply rude to new/inexpeirenced folk (I haven't been victim of this fortunately, but have seen it). On the plus side, the bonds in the forums seem much more solid (ooer ;) ), and the topics covered and depth of conversation move above and beyond that generally found in the chatrooms. This meant that going into a room last night with the forum lot felt very "real" ....and like an entirely new experience
:twisted:
The chatrooms are more likely to be frequented by one-liner throwers and people with no conviction in what they say (on the minus side), but on the plus side some are more receptive to new-comers and frankly they're too busy for heavy scrutiny of newbies. ....that and you've got cams biggrin
Having said that, it's a community site phenomena, not exclusive to SH at all.

I really dont think you'll ever get away from a, for want of a better expression"them and us, forum/chatroom thingy confused
Both experiences are very different and IMHO attract different people. Sure members will flit in and out of each of them however I'm sure they will have a bias towards one or the other and indeed will feel a lot more comfortable either in "here" or over "there".
The whole social / munch scenario seems more to come about from the fact that each regular chatroom has created it's very own community and those within that circle have essentially gotten to know one another quite well hence the desire to meet for a few beers.
A lot of chatroom regulars dont even know that the LMU exsists and there are some who dont even know of the PM function :shock:
I think there will always be a place for the regular type munches and the chatroom socials. I cant see one cancelling out the other tbh but it's a pity that some feel a little daunted at the thought of attending a munch evil
That said, can hardly blame newbies after the recent round of rules and regulation posts surrounding the munches of late. It looks like the regular munch goers can't even decide on a suitable format :?
You cannot force people to be part of a community if they do not identify with that community.
Within society it is the norm to find multiple communities within what is considered an overall community.
But enough of communities.
I am not surprised some people are scared of munches – read the hype. Read the ‘pre’ and ‘post’ munch news! It does not sound like a friendly no pressure environment where people can have a natter and put names to faces – sometimes it sounds like an out and out orgy (sadly over exaggerated) or a reunion of old shagging buddies. Aside from that if your name isn’t down months in advance it may well not get on the list at all.
SOME of the chatroom socials are more in keeping with the original principles of a ‘munch’ than the actual munches are – I am not surprised people what to go to those with the very people they chat to each day, rather than something they have read about in here.
I won’t get into the terminology problem – but with that aside… the regular rooms with regular users seem to be successful at arranging a friendly get together - so what?
They keep it simple and easy – that is why it is so successful.
If you are worried about chatters not coming over to the forum and there being a divide – how often do you try going over and integrating with them? And I don’t mean in a locked room where you have to have been on the forum to get the password?
Some of you may find it scary yourselves – realising the forum is not the centre of the swinging heaven universe in terms of people getting together. But this is just one tiny community within a much larger community.
It once was a big thing to become a ‘regular’ on the forum and truly accepted into the fold (see the repeated advice about getting known and going to munches) there was almost a feeling of ‘status’ (you see better examples of that in another place) - but the actual truth of the matter is – it is not such a big deal. There are people getting on with what they came here for and successfully socialising with their new found friends who are blissfully unaware that the forum even exists.
Good luck to ‘um!
As long as they use the correct terminology.
Darkfire,
you mention that if you went to a munch where there was a lot of names you didnt know, from the chatrooms, it would be like walking into the lions den, with all the directors and suchlike, as much as we berate the way in which they are towards women in the room, would they honestly be that way without the safety of the keyboard and screen to separate them?
Fabio,
agreed, more has to be done to integrate the site, to make people more comfortable in all areas, im not smart enough to know how to go about it, but those of us who are comfortable, its surely down to us to make it happen (and yes, i will freely admit to being the piss taking bastard on the forums, and am going to have to make a conscious effort to not show that side of me to overtly to anyone who is new here)
Quote by earthchild
... just cos its someone from the chat room arranging the social doesnt mean forumites arent welcome and vise versa its not like the social is being arranged in the chat room so no one from the forum will find out....

but, when its a 'particular room meet' that is in effect exclusive to the people who use that room - does 'open to chatroom and forum' always mean what it says on the tin? dunno I have to say when I see those, I personally dont think I or other forum users would be welcome - yes we can get on the guestlist ... chances of anyone speaking to us when we're there? ... :dunno:
Quote by essex34m
Darkfire,
you mention that if you went to a munch where there was a lot of names you didnt know, from the chatrooms, it would be like walking into the lions den, with all the directors and suchlike, as much as we berate the way in which they are towards women in the room, would they honestly be that way without the safety of the keyboard and screen to separate them?

remember, from the single fem's view - would I take that 'risk' ?
Quote by Darkfire
Darkfire,
you mention that if you went to a munch where there was a lot of names you didnt know, from the chatrooms, it would be like walking into the lions den, with all the directors and suchlike, as much as we berate the way in which they are towards women in the room, would they honestly be that way without the safety of the keyboard and screen to separate them?

remember, from the single fem's view with no-one I can call my 'munch buddy' or 'chaperone' - would I take that 'risk' ?
thats where my ignorance kicks in, i will never know that viewpoint
After last night's fun in Forum Chat... and it really was buzzzing biggrin I did wonder afterwards though if having the password on the room gives off the wrong messages... after all, whoever has the room can boot any idiots anyway... just a thought confused
Quote by Darkfire
Darkfire,
you mention that if you went to a munch where there was a lot of names you didnt know, from the chatrooms, it would be like walking into the lions den, with all the directors and suchlike, as much as we berate the way in which they are towards women in the room, would they honestly be that way without the safety of the keyboard and screen to separate them?

remember, from the single fem's view - would I take that 'risk' ?
So do you see chatroom people as a 'risk'?
Quote by Bloke2005
After last night's fun in Forum Chat... and it really was buzzzing biggrin I did wonder afterwards though if having the password on the room gives off the wrong messages... after all, whoever has the room can boot any idiots anyway... just a thought confused

You mean I missed you Bloke? sad I drew on a five o'clock shadow and everything, hoping you would pop in!
wink
Anyway maybe we should try opening up the room, same name but without the password. I'm up fot the experiment.
To me it's not so much about keeping people 'out' it's about not having to explain every five seconds to somebody of what the room is and not I won't get my tits out! lol I know I'm being a little unfair but yes I do agree that of course we could meet some nice folk who we would otherwise not have met.
Quote by Jags
Personal hat on.
I have no opinion only a comment to offer. When I saw the guest list for an event here, just the other day, my thought was 'who the hell are these people'? I only knew three, or maybe, four names on the list and hadn't even seen the other names posting in the forum.
Not that people HAVE to post in the forum - just my comment.
cool

surely thats a big plus point about a social..rather than meet the "same old, sameold" people at every event. part of any social scene is to meet new people or people you have never come across before...who knows the new person today maybe a household regular tomorrow!!! (but they wont if they feel neglected or not wanted)
i think we all like to feel safe in the "comfy" zone of familiarity but thats too narrow minded in my view..yes i like to see familiar names on a guest list but yes i also like to see new names too!!
RWL
xx
Quote by Bloke2005
After last night's fun in Forum Chat... and it really was buzzzing biggrin I did wonder afterwards though if having the password on the room gives off the wrong messages... after all, whoever has the room can boot any idiots anyway... just a thought confused

again i think it is a "them and us" situation that has always been my beef with the forum chat..... in a sense how are you suppose to integrate with people if you A) lock the doors and B) make people come on the forum to get the password.... wouldn't they see a better side if it wasn't locked... and also wouldn't that tempt people in if they saw a friendly side....
like bloke said.... the room owner would kick the idiots....
i am again agree-ing with bloke that it probably a familiarity one..... after all in the days of one chatroom, you kinda know of everyone who was going, or had a fair idea that a lot of people know people going..... now with the expansion of the chatrooms i suppose you don't feel as comfortable in a larger munch meet, than you would do in a smaller "local" social...