I read an article/blog/postng yesterday (forgot to keep link so you could read it) on a msg board about a group in the USA who claim to be Christian Swingers.
There was a reply to this stating
But surely the "rules" or laws of Christianity forbib such activity.
Im not very religious so it's hard for me to form an opinion.
Is it possible to be a Christian and a swinger?
Funny thing religion.. brings out all sorts of opinions. As a former theologian student, I studied several different religions but one thing that remained constant was that the reason we now have so many different religions is that someone did not like the rules of their current one.
Example why do you have the Church of England - because divorce was not permitted under catholic law. Formed by King Henry VIII.
Almost all of todays religions have stemmed from Judaism and if you look you can several ties to it.
Now back to the orginal post question. As to religious swingers well they are out there, bible thumping, door knocking, cross bearers that in the dark recesses of their lives, long and yearn for additional personal contact. As to polygamy, it is actually stated in the Bible that it is permitted. Jewish law has similiar rules. Now before anyone actually gets upset - go read Deutronomy 17:17 and beyond. Later rules actually stipulated that KINGS were only allowed 18 wives whereas the common man was limited to four. This can be found in the Talmud (Jewish bible) as well as the King James version.
As of the Old Testament is a vital part of the Christian faith, it cannot be disregarded in this discussion. It was concerning the Old Testament laws and the Old Testament Prophets that Jesus said plainly that he came not to destroy the Law or the Prophets but rather to fulfil. In addition, there is no passage in the New Testament that clearly prohibits polygamy. This was the understanding of the early Church Fathers and for several centuries in the Christian era."
"Considering that monogamy prevailed as the only legitimate form of marriage in Greece and Rome, it cannot be said that Christianity introduced obligatory monogamy in the Western World. Indeed, although the New Testament assumes monogamy as the normal or ideal form of marriage, it does not expressly prohibit monogamy, expect in the case of a bishop and a deacon. It has been argued that it was not necessary for the first Christian teachers to condemn polygamy because monogamy was the universal rule among peoples whose midst it was preached; but this is certainly not true of the Jews, who still both permitted and practiced polygamy at the beginning of the Christian era."
"Some of the Fathers accused the Jewish Rabbis of sensuality, but no Council of the Church in the earliest centuries opposed polygamy, and no onstacle was put in the way of its practise by kings in countries where it had occurred in the times of paganism. In the middle of the sixth century Diarmait, King of Ireland, had two queens and two concubines. Polygamy was frequently practised by the Merovingian kings. Charles the Great had two wives and many concubines; and one of his laws seems to imply that polygamy was not unknown even among priests. In later times Philip of Hesse and Frederick William II of Prussia contracted bigamous marriages with the sanction of the Lutheran clergy, Luther himself approved of the bigamy with considerable tolerations. It had not been forbidden by God; even Abraham, who was “perfect Christian,†had two wives. It is true that God had allowed such marriages to certain men of the Old Testament only in particular circumstances, and if a Christian wanted to follow their example he had to show that the circumstances were similar in his case; but polygamy was undoubtedly preferable to divorce. In 1650, soon after the Peace of Westphalia, when the population had been greatly reduced by the Thirty Years’ War, the Frankish Kreistag at Nuremberg passed the resolution that thenceforth every man should be allowed to marry two women. Certain sects of Christians have even advocated polygamy with much fervor. In 1531 the Anabaptists openly preached at Munster that he who wants to be a true Christian must have several wives. And the Mormons as all the world knows, regard polygamy as a divine institution."
<steps off the pulpit>
:crazy:
Ok sermon over.. who wants to shag? :happy: :happy: :happy: :happy:
whatta topic
to me the basic christian any religion theme is be kind to others....and try to lead a good life were you dont upset others.....
..the 10 commandments well most were man made to enforce us uncontrolable peasants
i agree with most except the turn the other cheek one...........slap me and you ll end up in hospital
There is a lot of info following the link that Mark posted and I'm nowhere near through it all but I have found something I find troublesome.
This is from their site.
"Encourage your children to explore their developing sexuality responsibly, in ways that are voluntary, consensual, and harmless for every participant."
On first reading I thought good sense then I became concerned re the last part.
" in ways that are voluntary, consensual, and harmless for every participant"
I believe this to be treading on dangerous ground, I fear that this can be interpruted as giving license to commit abusive acts.
gawd you talk bollocks in here ALMOST as much as you do in the chatroom cisco lmfao.
.xX Jo Xx.
ok i dont have much to add here as i think its allready been nailed down that religeon and sex are each persons own business , what i would like to comment one if this idea that a person who is strong on religionl who also swings is a hypocrite (ok so no-ones said that yet but thats how it reads)
well im coming from the side that hasnt been admited to im an agnostic and proud to be and yet i still follow the ten commandments yes even the thou shalt not take any god over me ..well i dont but he didnt say i had to follow him either hehe
onto the no adultary ..he said dont TAKE not dont make out with when her hubby says go for it :P
ok now ive rambled on for a little while i might add im going to back cisco on this one , as i know a lot of catholics and like all good agnostics i have great philisophical debates with the local priest even nearlly had him hanging up his cassock and anyone who thinks a catholic would dare ask for his penance before having paid thier dept is just wrong and at that the pennance is for the soul and thats all not to pay a debt to god but to settle your own guilt
heaysy