Join the most popular community of UK swingers now
Login

Couples: which one of you does the chatting/charming/arrangi

last reply
8 replies
1.2k views
0 watchers
0 likes
Hello,
for those couples that meet by arrangement, I am curious to know: which one of you is in charge of the communications and organising?
I've been trying to troubleshoot my failed couple connections and probably the only pattern I can see emerging is that prior to meeting I spoke almost exclusively with the man-part of the couple. I've heard from others that it is customary for the women to do the communicating (whether it's a woman joining a couple or two couples meeting). My couple-guys always assure me their women are keen, but the women are never available to chat - though obviously present at our meetings! I wonder if I should take that as lack of enthusiasm on the part of the women, and be more cautious if they do not show a modicum of self-generated enthusiasm? But then I also know that women esp. mothers are often buried under endless tasks and schedules... Am I missing something obvious here?
wave
It's me! I'm the incurable flirt with the gift of the gab. Cubette is just as keen as me to have meets, but she's not as outgoing as I am. Her fear of embarrassment or rejection tends to put her off, which is why she tends to stand behind me in these situations. However, when it comes to the actual down and dirty part, she's usually streets ahead of me. Go figure!
I know, that doesn't help does it? ;)
Mrs does most of the talking for us, Mr is the quiet shy one. She likes to ensure the other Cpl are fully aware of us and our limits before a meet, so no one gets in too deep. Mr will chat in the rooms, but Mrs responds to the winks and messages also.
If she chats with a male and the female is never around to chat, we assume she is not really involved and don't take any talk of a meet seriously.
I (the male) do all the preliminary chatting, the final decision is a joint one without fail, I am the more discerning amongst us, of course I am, I have Sasha who I love, I am not about to start playing with someone I don't find sexually attractive when I have her at home and available to me am I lol Sasha on the other hand doesn't have to look far to find someone more sexually attractive than me :lol:
I like being a realist wink
I (the male too) also tend to do most of the initial chatting. Mainly because I'm the one that logs in almost everyday, whilst Mrs T tends to only login twice a week when we are on cam. Mrs T is very fussy, and I wouldn't dream of wasting my time, hers or a prospective meet if I didn't think she would be attracted to them or I didn't like the approach he had made.
The final decision is joint, but rests mainly with Mrs T because she won't meet anyone she doesn't find attractive.
I should add that like most on here, the final decision is a joint one, I won't "take one for the team" so I would never expect Sasha to do so no matter how attractive I find the female. Swinging is great fun, but it has never been worth losing my relationship for.
'Her fear of embarrassment or rejection tends to put her off, which is why she tends to stand behind me in these situations'
When I read this I couldn't help but click on your profile....Mrs Cubes the very thought that someone might reject you.....
Got the question today, you know the one, the one you should NEVER ask.
We had a mail from a couple, read their profile,(on a different site to this one) looked at their pictures and decided it was a thanks but no thanks for us.
I sent the appropriate polite mail saying we did not think we would be sexually compatible, and then they asked, "why not"
What did they expect me to say, "you are far to pretty and sexy for us", "we are not worthy of you"
Do people really expect to read something they want to hear, would they like me to be honest and say "the male half looks cool but sorry the female is obese and ugly" I know some people will look at my pics and feel sick, I don't want to know they felt that way about me thanks lol better to live in ignorance sometimes.