Walk in crime has gone up 300% in a some town in south England. X has been released from prison again. Within three days of his release reports started to be made. Unattended bags stolen, purses emptied. All crimes X is well know for, and gone to prison for many times. It is only a matter of time before enough evidence is found at a scene to put X back inside.
Which costs us more;
holding him in prison, paying for men and space to stop X steeling or
letting him steel.
Is it a matter of which costs more? Is it a matter of do the crime do the time? Has putting X in prison stopped him offending?
The only time X does not offend, offend against the public is when he is in prison. Do we need a more permanent solution?
Travis
Off with his hands.
lets see him lift a purse now.
Any idea why X steals for a living?
Fair enough Sassy.
Victims of crime suffer enormously and I sympathise.
But if we work on the whys we often find the hows.
I dont look on people as good or bad, I just look on people as people.
Given the lifestyle choices of the population of these forums I am often surpised at the prejudice and lack of compassion expressed in posts.
The drug depndency would have been one of my guesses.
And I agree that u need to sort out teh casue rather than the behaviour that results.
But then I believe half the worlds ills are caused by prohibition and censorship.
I am happy to disagree with you sassy as Im sure you are to disagree with me.
Suffice to say there are plenty of folk who would hold an immovable view that this site and the activities it supports are wholly wrong.
But u r right. Im sure some of the girls on Streatham high road selling themselves to get enough to score their first fix at in the morning think swinging is abhorrent.
The problem with compassion is you cant learn how to do it very easily.
One of the reasons is that those lacking in compassion always seem to have the easy obvious answers and shout them very loudly. Such answers rarely work. If they did we wouldnt be looking for new answers. It is difficult to listen when you are shouting.
I try to put myself in other people shoes and walk a few miles. My prejudice was that those who live a life style that others often judge would be more inclined to do the same. I was wrong, my prejudices often are.
Does compassion have limits though? I think it does. As has pointed out in his initial post 'X' is a serial offender. In and out of Jail time and time again for repeat offences. Has he then forfeited his right to freedom and an amount of compassion? I think so.
Now I consider compassion discretionary with thought. You can tailor compassion with good sense and logic as well as heart. It isn't something you have no control over acting upon, though of course feeling it is different.
Back on topic, maybe there is ways that we can change the system for people like this. Lifer open prisons/ life tagging implants possibly. Forced labour, (not extreme)chain gangs. It might be worth looking at cost effective, as opposed to present jail costs, solutions. There must be a myriad of options possible from cleaning up pigeon poo in trafalgar square to land mine clearing in East Asia. How about some ideas? Extreme or mundane - but original?
alcohol problem, eek the worst drug society has to handle.
I have oft thought that fit offenders could usefully be put to work on treadmills generating a suatainable environmentally friendly electricity supply.
Can I pull together some themes?
X has been given light sentences, it failed.
X has been dried out in prison, he started drinking again.
X has been given longer sentences, it failed.
X has been released on probation, it failed, he committed offences on probation.
X knows he is going to be caught, he still offends.
Has a continuing offender, society has tried to understand, treat, and punish X at various times. He still offends, still cost Britain money, still contributes nothing to the land he was born to.
What do we do with him?
sorry folks bet you think i am some type of reactionery string them up biggot!....but......
if you teach a child that actions have consiquences and that the punisment is worse than the crime they quickly learn to behave in a civilised manner and this then lasts thro their life!
if you let them get away with minor infractions they will push the envelope!
if you punnish them today for doing X because you are having a bad day (period work life ect) ad leave them off for doing X tomorrow because your in a good mood you teach them that strenth is power and can do as it likes!
so if you want to solve this problem punish the parents and make the punishment suit the crime!
I hate to say this as i have always thought that it is better that 100guilty men go free than 1 innocent man hang!...but bring back the birch and the rope
beat a man while drunk high or just angry and have the flesh stripped from your back with a whip kill a man and die!
sos for man read person of any age gender or colour!
or at last bring back corporal punishment in schools! and protect our teachers!!
I must agree tomorrow's armed bank robber was yesterdays sweet thief.
An early education in civilized behaviour is a sound grounding. No citizen oath will help if the child leaving school does not civilized value.
By civilized I mean the ability/desire to live side by side in peace.
Travis
try solutions that actually work, as opposed to just removing those failed by society, from society, and sticking them in a 12 by 6 foot box?
I have tried to stay out of this thread but can't.
Here is a true story for you.
I work in a cab office in a busy part of london and there is a drunk tramp that hangs around the area, he's been hanging around for years. Alot of the drivers(including me) buy him food on a regular basis, we don't give him money because he spends it on booze.
Last year he was beaten up badly and spent about a month in hospital. When he came out he was sober and social services put him into his own flat. This is the THIRD time this has happened.
Within a week he was back on the drink again and last week an ambulance came for him EVERY night. Whilst the ambulance is attending to him there could be someone dying of a heart attack who needs the ambulance more.
You can only help those who want to help themselves. We must draw the line somewhere.
My personal opinion is that this drunk tramp should be put down, radical I know, but how long can we keep trying to help him?.
The traditional approaches just dont work. One definition od madness is doing the same things and expecting a different result.
I think society has to accept that some people are simply unable to function independently as part of society. Traditional gaol doesnt work for these people.
Once we have accepted this reality its a simple step to establish care homes, for the want of a betetr word,where peopel are made to work and live in a heavily regulated environment. Not a prison but a place where you can be cared for and grow and probably heal.
Bloody hell I sound like the old hippie i am again.