So the long awaited meet up has arrived........you're chatting and relaxed in eachothers' presence...
What makes that final decision for you...... the one that says... yes... i really want to drag this person off to a room and enjoy all the pleasures that two people can give eachother.... whether passionate and furiously fast or langourously slowly teasing and touching until you cannot take any more....???
Is it the meeting of the eyes..... the silent message that passes between you.... the one that says yes............. i really want to make love to you.........???
Or something else?
equi-princess xxx
I can usually tell pretty quickly if the chemistry is right and it doesn't always be just on looks but I must admit the :shock: :smitten: eyes do it for me. I think the look a woman can give can melt the heart in seconds.
A bit like a job interview, first 2 mins that is all it takes
For me eye contact, the smile, the knowing look, the casual brush of hand or leg against each other...................
(sorry mind wandered off then)
normally ,,,just the look in the eyes is enough to know or not know if its going to end up naked...very quickly
I cannot have sex with someone unless I am physically attracted to them ... I learned this a long long time ago. So for me, I have to chat to someone for a while, get to know them, see honest pics of them and THEN I decide if I want to meet them, but, like Blue, if I have decided to meet them I have already decided that if sex is in the offing then that's fine by me. In a club I have a slightly different approach (a bit like speed dating) whereby someone may catch my eye (the physical attraction), followed by a brief chat (compatibility), then followed by fast n furious sex. Sex is always better with someone you actually feel a real desire to have sex with as opposed to 'wham bam thank you mam' sex - that does sweet FA for me.
It would take A). a horendous meet for sex to not take place B). that it was already established that sex was not on the menu at a first meet C). lack of opportunity.
This doesn't stop me wanting to meet someone though.
toss the coin ?
odds or evens on
both been done to settle things
We are of the opinion that when we meet up with someone, we tell them before that we dont shag on first date,so to speak, but if the meet goes really well nothing is to stop us from changing our mind.
There has got to be some kind of attraction there for us in the first place, be it in the mind or in the looks. Whatever way we hope to have a good time be it socially of sexually.
(by the way hi Saffy, good to see you back babe xxxxxxxxxxxx)
XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX
having arranged to meet....then only once turned it down.....
never forget as soon as i got to the house I thought...oh dear.....the grass on the front was over the front window sill.....when inside the house...it was grubby and unkept...and worse still so were the couple...never forget they both had dirt in their fingernails....sorry but personal hygiene is a must for me.....I made some excuse about never doing anything on first meet and got away as quick as possible.
I've only been 'officially' swinging a couple of months. The first guy I met off here was of the opinion that you don't need to fancy the person you are gonna swing with, you just do it for the experience.
I heartily disagreed with this. I don't know whether it's fancying them, feeling some sort of physical attraction, a chemistry, a 'spark' or whatever but there has to be something going on that makes me feel that tingle that makes me think "I want more.........."
I wish I could bottle that sensation!
I suppose that there are two ways of looking at this.
I can see that there might be the swingers whose attraction is for the simple pleasures of sex without the constraints of a relationship, for whom people of the opposite (or same) sex of similar perspective are natural and willing partners. I would imagine these are the ones that get classified as the "Hello ...... mmmm .... oooohhhh!!!! .... thanks and goodbye" type.
I can also see that, as liberated as swinging might allow you to be, the physical gyrations involved are still a very intimate and personal thing, and you would want to make a bit more than the indifferent contact required by the first type. This is where a bit more mutual compatibility would come in, I feel, even if this stops a long way short of wanting to have each other's children.
Of course, not speaking from great experience, the above could just all be so much bollox.