see the flaw already.............
Join the most popular community of UK swingers now
Login
Democracy on SH
Forum Virgin
well it can have its good and bad points.
If voted for its becomes a popularity contest and maybe the best people are not selected to carry out the role and duties of a mod. It can also become very cliquey as i evidenced an Irish version of this site. Where mods seemed intent on throwing there weight around and showing off as they had a "star"
If voted for its becomes a popularity contest and maybe the best people are not selected to carry out the role and duties of a mod. It can also become very cliquey as i evidenced an Irish version of this site. Where mods seemed intent on throwing there weight around and showing off as they had a "star"
nice knowing you...... you bloke! 
Sex God
Forum Virgin
double post
somehow apologies
somehow apologies
Sex God
Sex God
Quote by Peanut
No. Definitely no.
A Mod's appointment should not be based on popularity. It should simply be based on the ability to do the job in the manner commensurate with the owner's vision for the site.
That sums it up well for me.
Sex God
Quote by Lost
It's good that they aint voted in. I think maybe Mods and Op's are a bitfor doing it i spose
and there are faults with how the system works but i'm for the status quo
Down down deeper n down
i'm with you the almighty quo rocks
:worship: :worship: Quote by st3v3
No. Definitely no.
A Mod's appointment should not be based on popularity. It should simply be based on the ability to do the job in the manner commensurate with the owner's vision for the site.
That sums it up well for me.
Most large & very successful Company's use the "Circle of success" theory. Which states "skills can be taught, but attitude is the real key"
Anyone can be taught a skill ........... but only those with the correct attitude should be shown it!!!!
Sam xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Sex God
Quote by Peanut
No. Definitely no.
A Mod's appointment should not be based on popularity. It should simply be based on the ability to do the job in the manner commensurate with the owner's vision for the site.
:thumbup:
Quote by flower411
No. Definitely no.
A Mod's appointment should not be based on popularity. It should simply be based on the ability to do the job in the manner commensurate with the owner's vision for the site.
That sums it up well for me.
And who decides that ... if it`s not popularity with somebody ... what is the criteria ??
Maybe you should re-read the last sentence.
Quote by blonde
No. Definitely no.
A Mod's appointment should not be based on popularity. It should simply be based on the ability to do the job in the manner commensurate with the owner's vision for the site.
That sums it up well for me.
Most large & very successful Company's use the "Circle of success" theory. Which states "skills can be taught, but attitude is the real key"
Anyone can be taught a skill ........... but only those with the correct attitude should be shown it!!!!
Sam xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
In my limited experience of large companies... like promotes like which is how fuckwits survive in the corporate climate
Sex God
Quote by flower411
And some people could possibly be of the opinion that it would be a good idea to change the selection process on SH for precisely this reason !!
There's nothing up with the selection process, there's also nothing up with the mod and op team, whilst not everyone may agree with the decisions made at times, the admin team does investigate all complaints.
Sex God
I think we have witnessed democracy in a nutshell.
Someone suggests doing something either well intentioned or pointless, a riotous assembly picks it over, the proceedings dissolves into jeering and abuse, the suggestion is forgotten and replaced with something equally distracting and quite possibly just as pointless.
Someone suggests doing something either well intentioned or pointless, a riotous assembly picks it over, the proceedings dissolves into jeering and abuse, the suggestion is forgotten and replaced with something equally distracting and quite possibly just as pointless.
Quote by flower411
Don’t think it would work to be honest.
It would just become a popularity contest rather than people voting for the best person/s to do the job.
Exactly !! the name Tony Blair springs to mind !!
And will an outgoing one be able to appoint a successor?
:happy: :happy: :2fingers: :thrilled:
Quote by Peanut
No. Definitely no.
A Mod's appointment should not be based on popularity. It should simply be based on the ability to do the job in the manner commensurate with the owner's vision for the site.
That sums it up well for me.
Most large & very successful Company's use the "Circle of success" theory. Which states "skills can be taught, but attitude is the real key"
Anyone can be taught a skill ........... but only those with the correct attitude should be shown it!!!!
Sam xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
In my limited experience of large companies... like promotes like which is how fuckwits survive in the corporate climate
More like the "peter" principle.. never promote anyone with better ability than yourself...
Quote by Den_irelandJust like national elections! A vote for the image not the ability! No thank you!
Well it can have its good and bad points.
If voted for its becomes a popularity contest and maybe the best people are not selected to carry out the role and duties of a mod. It can also become very cliquey as i evidenced an Irish version of this site. Where mods seemed intent on throwing there weight around and showing off as they had a "star"
Now widespread discussion, yes please. However not wide spread power. Athens made that mistake. A nasty place to live if you did not say yes to everyone.
On the whole I like things just as they are.
