Let's put it this way. I am not into spreading it about. If someone comes and puts up a poster on my street, I would be upset.
... but a chat among friends one evening, or two, a different thing altogether. As long as everyone talked about is there and happy.
... though there is a big difference between indescretion, and conclusions drawn from unfounded assumption... then going on to share the assumption with others. Is there not?
lp
thought so.
then I might suggest that some who may cry 'indescretion' at times may be the very people who draw assumptions.
and by 'assumptions' I don't mean a cartoon-drawn version of a medical encyclopeadia's diagram depicting a bottom affliction.
lp
I have no problems in naming the sin, but I would never name the sinners.
what I've been upto is totally my business as it is my choice to divulge any part of it, insofar as I don't name the people I've been doing it with, which is something I would only do with their consent.
it has nothing to do with bragging either and I would only talk about it in a spirit of exchanging experience and giving each other new ideas or stimulating thoughts..preferably in private conversations with my date of the moment. I've written pubblicly about things I've done in the past, that are not traceable to the person I've done them with..again in the spirit of public debate about sexuality and experience, not just for a joke.
I feel this is my right, and nobody should diss me for it.
thanks, witchy...a most illuminating post.