Join the most popular community of UK swingers now
Login

Gangbangs

last reply
33 replies
3.3k views
4 watchers
0 likes
Well, that got your attention!
I know we have covered this subject before, but we do have lots of newer members whose thoughts I'd be interesting in hearing.
I was away for a couple of days during which I got involved in a deep discussion of the definition of a Gangbang. Of course, lots of peeps will say a certain number of givers to one reciever, but do we have more specific thoughts than that? Is it a case of 'one at a time' or several at once? Does only oral or bukkake but no penetration constitute a GB or not?
I ask because I am likely to be organising one for myself soon, and I would like to know if you good peeps have the same understanding of the word Gangbang as I do?
Discuss biggrin
Hxx
lol
i feel as though i am sat in an A-Level general studies exam again!!!
my own understanding of a gangbag is that it is more to do with the number of people involved.. rather than what sexual acts they each perform.
hower... i am just a novice.... so dont listen to me!
lol
whatver... am sure u will have a fab time heather.......ENJOY
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
definition: gangplank
A long thin board straped to the side of a ship and purportedly used by pirates in the 17th century.
(hope this helps) lol
I would have said it was to do with the number of people involved as well,it doesnt really matter what they are doing just that they are participating.
Hmm, interesting question, and one worthy of a brief ponder...! (And if it's been covered before and I'm repeating old news, then sorry and tough!)
It's strange to start thinking about putting "rules" to something like this... I'd say that if there's at least three or four guys present to the one lady, then it's a gangbang, regardless of the exact, ahem, ins and outs.
But, if a definition is required then my take on it would be thus:
Three guys minimum, but four to be certain. (You've heard of threesomes and foursomes, but fivesomes?)
More than one guy should be participating at the same time.
I'd say that oral and penetration (obviously!) counts, but I'm not so sure about bukkake. While it can obviously be part of a gangbang, I'd say you need the first two to qualify.
Personally though, I'd go for the "nevermind what you call it, if it feels good do it" approach!
A
Quote by Heather
Well, that got your attention!
I know we have covered this subject before, but we do have lots of newer members whose thoughts I'd be interesting in hearing.
I was away for a couple of days during which I got involved in a deep discussion of the definition of a Gangbang. Of course, lots of peeps will say a certain number of givers to one reciever, but do we have more specific thoughts than that? Is it a case of 'one at a time' or several at once? Does only oral or bukkake but no penetration constitute a GB or not?
I ask because I am likely to be organising one for myself soon, and I would like to know if you good peeps have the same understanding of the word Gangbang as I do?
Discuss biggrin
Hxx

As far as I'm aware one of the major rules during many bukkake sessions is that there is no penetration and even no female genetalia shown even so I'd put that down to falling outside of the GB area - it's a thing on it's own based on the Japanese ritual of humiliation toward a wife or partner.
I'd always assumed that a GB included full sexual engagement and is, as you rightly say, a number of givers to one reciever, usually involving both single and/or multiple people at once. The fine line between an orgy and a GB is, to my definition, that in a GB one person is the reciever with all other people taking part being the opposite sex. All there to serve/service to centre of attention.
Of course, I could be wrong !
Carpathian
Hmm posts rolling in thick and fast here Heather, obviously a subject close to people's hearts ;)
I would agree with above, you need some form of penetration, doesn't really matter what, you need multiple males to a female, 5 seems a good number for a definition, and not too many females or the word 'Orgy' would appear in my personal view.
Quote by tallnhairy
, you need multiple males to a female, 5 seems a good number for a definition,

lol as u were posting this... i was thinking to myself the ideal ratio.... and we came up with the exact same answer!
wink
lol :lol: :lol:
WellBustyBabe - What can I say, great minds think alike ;)
Judy - Hehe, we up to seven eh, any advances on 7? Oh and fourth answer - The answer to the male female ratio on SH...
EDIT - ooops misreading male female sides there :doh: Sorry, obviously my answer 4 involves many males to one woman :doh:
So, can several blokes giving one other bloke a good seeing to not be called a gang bang? confused
Personally, I think a gang bang means one person having the attention of several other people, regardless of the actual acts (as long as they're sexual rolleyes ) and regardless of the gender of the people participating. But, if the all do each other, that would be an orgy, not a gang bang. As far as numbers go, I would say it certainly has to be three or preferably more people "doing". Only two "doers" is just an average threesome wink
Isnt the Internet a wonderful place....
On Sunday Feb. 10th, 2002 the new world sexual record - the world's biggest gangbang were set. Polish porn star Klaudia Figura had sex with 646 men during one day session..
According to regulations each sexual contact has to take between 30 and 60 seconds.


Problem is... 1) This is old news - what is the record now and 2) We still have the problem with the definition of "sexual contact"
confused 646 :? Ohch
Some interesting thoughts and responses.
During my conversation, I voiced the preference for several blokes at the same time.... for example one between my legs, another in my mouth, another in my hand and the rest of the available space being taken up my the rest giving me a good massage...
But then my friend proferred the following senario:- What if it were several men, but one at a time and from behind so it would be totally anonymous? I kinda like this idea! :twisted: :twisted:
But is it a Gangbang if there is only one at a time? rolleyes
Hxx
Judy!
Concise Oxford Dictionary states.....gang-bang n. slang...
an occasion on which several men successively have sexual intercourse with one woman.

so does a non-penetrative 3some with a couple not constitute an MMF then??????
<<<<watches his claim to swinger...dom...hood..erm...ship vanish>>>>>
Damn! redface
Quote by Heather
But then my friend proferred the following senario:- What if it were several men, but one at a time and from behind so it would be totally anonymous? I kinda like this idea! :twisted: :twisted:
But is it a Gangbang if there is only one at a time? rolleyes

I think it's still a gangbang when it's one at a time! smile
Like you, I like the idea of some anonimity and a "surprise" element, but I'd have to have a friendly minder/partner around, to make sure they all used the appropriate precautions... otherwise I'd be too worried to enjoy myself! redface
Good luck! ;)
Mandy
x
sad
Quote by Heather
What if it were several men, but one at a time and from behind so it would be totally anonymous? I kinda like this idea! :twisted: :twisted:
But is it a Gangbang if there is only one at a time? rolleyes

From the look of the World Record above, yes, no problem. In fact that WAS only one at a time.
:twisted: I like your idea about anonymity, but would you not prefer more attention instead?
Naughty Heather whip
Well, the plan that appears to be shaping up is for my friend to act as minder/host/whatever-you-like-to-call-it. I'd have the company of several nice gents whom I'd have had the chance to chat with, etc., but when their turn came, I wouldn't see which one of them was doing it. A blindfold was even suggested at one point.
Weighing up all things, I'm convinced it's an interesting senario... :twisted: :twisted: Just can't get my head around the 'one at a time' bit as it's not what I'd thought of as a GB before.
Hey Ho!
I suppose 'try it and see if it feels like a GB' would be the only viable answer.
Hxx
I think investing in a 5 litre tub of KY may be a good idea if you're thinking of beating the record.
Suitable analgesia may be required as well.
Don't put ideas in my head, Jomu! :twisted:
Good day to all
I see that this topic has grabbed a lot of people's attention.
It would be nice to see more opinions from the ladies. I have a feeling that their views could well surprise the guys.
It seems to me that several things have to be in place for a group session to be called a gangbang. Failing those you have a greedy-girl's evening.....
1. pre-arranged
2. a team that has 'worked together' before because that helps avoid disappointment
3. a minimum of five spare men available at any one time (nice to have reinforcements from time to time)
4. a minder/carer/partner present (with encouragement as well as caring duties)
5. a visit to the local condom discount store
beyond those minmum numbers and preferred situations i'd make the following responses to comments posted so far:
is a separate issue and while perhaps an integral part of a lady's requirements does not constitute a gb.
B. penetrative sex is integral
C. an element of anonyminty is common
Finally I'd encorage all female readers of the string to step forward with their descriptions of what they consider essential components of a g-b situation. Come on girls, let the blokes know what works for you. I'm sure the guys here would like to know. Maybe Heather needs to ciculate a questionnaire ????? Well, Heather, over to you. Maybe you can get a swinging heaven research bursary ???
Have a nice Easter Monday, folks and if the Easter Bunny (Doe) is not scampering so quickly this morning we can all guess why.
terry/ The Kent Host
Hi Heather
Having read this thread I thought id tell you about my experience it might be of help
I arranged a GB. and if you enjoy yours as much as i enjoyed mine your in for a good evening wink
One thing most important was I had a Minder, he kept control of things from behind me, checked the guys were wearing condoms etc. So i could relax and enjoy it
The biggest buzz was i was on all fours and had no idea who was penetrating each time,
Although penetration occured with each male, they all took it in turn to massage touch and stimulate, and i returned the compliment one guy even braved a 69 during the proceedings. so there were at least 5 men in attendance at all times
Hope this helps you Heather in arranging yours
LOve n Hugs
VIcky
WOW!!!
Sounds fun.... :shock:
appreciation for the point of view from vivky-uk
and a hii to her and heather from kent host
Just on the g-b subject again:
anyone tempted to try, be careful of course, AND there is a bunch of hung black guysys from tottenham who are enormously recommended by a lady is a frequent guest here at Kent-Host-ville. Nice to know that even with that competition Host here still gets called upn for hosting duties.
They go (and boy do they go, host is told) under the name of The A-team and have had an ad or two on the site. If you can't find em , and want to, give me a quick message and I will find out from S****a.
Happy easter to all.
terry/ the kent host
Hi Kent-Host babes mwwwaaaahhhhhhhh kiss
My Definition of a GB was when either one person or a few people are having "fun" with a a few more.. I always classed 4 or people indulging in sexual activities as a GB ..maybe im wrong. Another point was ive never refered to it as a GB though, more of an orgy i suppose. Speaking of Orgies..I'm trying to post some pics from 3wknds ago. watch this space. wink
Magik
Now, there's a word you don't see much of anymore... Orgy. :shock:
There is much to think about, though. If only they came in mail order catalogues and you can pick and chose... rolleyes You could say, "Yes, I want one with a blindfold", or "I'll have the handcuffs but not the anal but extra tit fucking".
Ah... wouldn't it be loverly! biggrin
:haha: yes or like argos where you go up, check on the computer to see if they have any left in stock!.
Now the word "orgy" now there is a Star word for sure.. Used more in the 80's tho i reckon. To be honest from my experiances i have found that an "orgy" (where there are a few women and a few men) is much more exciting.. but i disagree with some people when they say its best if you dont know them all well... i found that it was more of a laugh that i knew the participants... That and the fact that it was more of a buzz seeing these people as youve never seen them before!. It was like sharing a big secret i suppose!. wink
Magik
o so complicated!!!
heather wot are you actually looking for?! if you wanted several men serving you at once and you called it a gb then why not!!?!! ru after a definitive gb as a milestone event or something?? i hope all your dreams come true either way!!! blast
xx
Hi Woofrrrr (always impressed as people inventiveness with forum names! smile )
The point to the thread was this... Everytime I've had a GB before, I've sort of 'stumbled' into the situation by chance. :twisted: But I now have a situation where I can plan vertuallly anything I want.
By asking the good peeps not only have I got a few more ideas, I'm also considering that maybe my 'traditional' understanding isn't as potentially exciting as someone elses understanding.
I expect we can all knock up some scrambled eggs, but given a free range over cooking utensils, methods of heating, ingrediants and ways of serving, a lot of us would be navel gazing the way I am now.
Hxx
Well youve lost me :doh:
Sounds complicated! wink
Magik lol