Join the most popular community of UK swingers now
Login

Hopefully not a moan (but if taken that way what the hell, i

last reply
71 replies
4.1k views
0 watchers
0 likes
Quote by neilinleeds
I'd offer you me manly chest too if I thought it might be mutually consoling> Kind of a one-way street though that whole comforty, breasty thing eh? smile That's probably why men are so pissed off, generally speaking, innit? It's cos, deep down, there ain't a man alive who didn't wishe he had his own set of tits to play with. I mean, you'd just never get tired of the possibilities, would you?
Well, not unless you was possessed of a sorely limited imagaination, anyways, but I degress? ;)
N x x x ;)

See, I think I'd quite like me one of them penis-y things y'all have. :rascal: It's the peeing standing up that does it... Oh & the wanking. And I'd like to understand what getting a hard on at an awkward moment feels like too lol
Could the "demise" of the SH forum be, in part, related to improvements in other areas of the site? When the forum was at the height of it's popularity I don't remember there being any cams in chat. Whereas new members used to head straight to the forum when they joined, now they head straight for chat. In fact, IIRC you needed two IDs to access what were, in effect, two separate halves of the same site.
Also, perhaps forums on other sites are busier because the other areas are weaker? I say perhaps because I don't have any active IDs on other sites so I can't talk from experience.
What do you think?
Quote by tweeky

more locked threds then than there are now lol
Quote by Cubes
Could the "demise" of the SH forum be, in part, related to improvements in other areas of the site? When the forum was at the height of it's popularity I don't remember there being any cams in chat. Whereas new members used to head straight to the forum when they joined, now they head straight for chat. In fact, IIRC you needed two IDs to access what were, in effect, two separate halves of the same site.
Also, perhaps forums on other sites are busier because the other areas are weaker? I say perhaps because I don't have any active IDs on other sites so I can't talk from experience.
What do you think?

Personally I think the forum has always been a minute part of the site with a very small per centage of site members actually using it. Even back in 2005-6 when the forums were way busier I am guessing that only 2% of site users were using the forum dunno Its never been the sites most popular area.
Only a very occasional chat user here but from what I know the main improvements are in the amount of cams you can view and the size you can view them at plus being able to watch cams in various rooms. This all suits people who like to watch for whatever reason. I dont think those people would have been natural forum members before the cam chat existed?
I think part of the reason forums on other sites are busier is because people have moved. So you simply get the posts you once had here over there. That said I would still say the per centage of people using the forum on the other site is still a very low amount of the actual site members. I am on two other sites one I rarely log into the other the chat seems fine to me :dunno: again only a very occasional user.
Quote by flower411
I think what frustrates me is that people discuss/debate/moan (delete as appropriate!) about the forum being quiet all the time and yet there are very few people who actually start threads to get the place going again. dunno Just seems like there needs to be threads started if folk want a busier forum...

That doesn`t work !!
No matter how many new threads get started there are two/maybe three people who will bump the song game and the word association thread .....some people might call this trolling.
If these threads were made stickies I reckon the posting in them would stop almost immediately .........oops !! now I`ve said it out loud maybe it wouldn`t ....might be worth a try tho.
that is exactly what happens on other sites we are on and it works perfectley ok. :thumbup:
Quote by flower411
I think what frustrates me is that people discuss/debate/moan (delete as appropriate!) about the forum being quiet all the time and yet there are very few people who actually start threads to get the place going again. dunno Just seems like there needs to be threads started if folk want a busier forum...

That doesn`t work !!
No matter how many new threads get started there are two/maybe three people who will bump the song game and the word association thread .....some people might call this trolling.
If these threads were made stickies I reckon the posting in them would stop almost immediately .........oops !! now I`ve said it out loud maybe it wouldn`t ....might be worth a try tho.
Why would anyone posting in the song game and word association threads stop others from starting new threads? :dunno:
The only reason that those threads are in the Cafe is that the other dullard hating member constantly whinged about the state of the forum until Admin merged the forums. The irony was that he was complaining about the forums being too quiet. Seems that people weren't starting new threads even then.
I'm a very new recruit to both those threads.......and I've got you and Tweeky to thank for that lol
Quote by flower411

I'm a very new recruit to both those threads.......and I've got you and Tweeky to thank for that lol

Ermm yeah ...that`s kinda why I mentioned that some people might call it trolling !!
and you weren't trolling of course? dunno
Quote by Max777
I think what frustrates me is that people discuss/debate/moan (delete as appropriate!) about the forum being quiet all the time and yet there are very few people who actually start threads to get the place going again. dunno Just seems like there needs to be threads started if folk want a busier forum...

That doesn`t work !!
No matter how many new threads get started there are two/maybe three people who will bump the song game and the word association thread .....some people might call this trolling.
If these threads were made stickies I reckon the posting in them would stop almost immediately .........oops !! now I`ve said it out loud maybe it wouldn`t ....might be worth a try tho.
Why would anyone posting in the song game and word association threads stop others from starting new threads? :dunno:
The only reason that those threads are in the Cafe is that the other dullard hating member constantly whinged about the state of the forum until Admin merged the forums. The irony was that he was complaining about the forums being too quiet. Seems that people weren't starting new threads even then.
I'm a very new recruit to both those threads.......and I've got you and Tweeky to thank for that lol
I am so glad Max that you consider my campaigning to be of such a high level that I was able to convince admin to merge the forums :smug: I must admit I am the universe's law on how to make friends and influence people :lol2: My popularity and level of sway is probably second to none rotflmao
Admitedly the merging of the JFF forum into here was probably a bad idea in hindsight at the time it was done. However fast foreward to now and where have all the JFF threads gone? We seemed to be burried in them at one time after all there was a forum full of them which is now represented by just three threads biggrin It proves the point I have made in other threads that a sub forum title directly effects the posts within it. Now that there is no JFF the will to create new JFF type threads seems to have vanished. The Cafe forum may still not be busy but I think it has a good mixture of content.
All in all as far as I am concerned it has not worked out the badly after all :mrgreen:
Why are the threads about 'what we should be doing' usually longer than threads about anything else?
Quote by duncanlondon
Why are the threads about 'what we should be doing' usually longer than threads about anything else?

Because there are those who wish to impose on others, the way they want the forums to be.
Quote by tweeky
I am so glad Max that you consider my campaigning to be of such a high level that I was able to convince admin to merge the forums :smug: I must admit I am the universe's law on how to make friends and influence people :lol2: My popularity and level of sway is probably second to none rotflmao
I think like a lot of people, Admin got sick of your constant whinging. It was your's and Flower's display of petulance, some may call it trolling, that made me determined not to allow the shape of the forum to be dictated by a few..
Admitedly the merging of the JFF forum into here was probably a bad idea in hindsight at the time it was done. However fast foreward to now and where have all the JFF threads gone? We seemed to be burried in them at one time after all there was a forum full of them which is now represented by just three threads biggrin It proves the point I have made in other threads that a sub forum title directly effects the posts within it.
Had Kaz still been posting, there would still probably be numerous JFF threads on the go. :twisted:
Now that there is no JFF the will to create new JFF type threads seems to have vanished. The Cafe forum may still not be busy but I think it has a good mixture of content.
The forum is what the forum is. There are many threads that don't interest me, I just ignore them. One thing for sure, the biggest turn off for me is posters constantly whinging about the state of the forums. If you want to change them, do something POSITIVE!
All in all as far as I am concerned it has not worked out the badly after all :mrgreen:
Quote by Max777
The only reason that those threads are in the Cafe is that the other dullard hating member constantly whinged about the state of the forum until Admin merged the forums. The irony was that he was complaining about the forums being too quiet. Seems that people weren't starting new threads even then.
I'm a very new recruit to both those threads.......and I've got you and Tweeky to thank for that lol

well i love the name one and it is one of the few on hear that make me laugh. then again though i have been called a troll so maybe i had better go and do the name again :grin::grin:
Quote by Max777

I am so glad Max that you consider my campaigning to be of such a high level that I was able to convince admin to merge the forums :smug: I must admit I am the universe's law on how to make friends and influence people :lol2: My popularity and level of sway is probably second to none rotflmao
I think like a lot of people, Admin got sick of your constant whinging. It was your's and Flower's display of petulance, some may call it trolling, that made me determined not to allow the shape of the forum to be dictated by a few..
Admitedly the merging of the JFF forum into here was probably a bad idea in hindsight at the time it was done. However fast foreward to now and where have all the JFF threads gone? We seemed to be burried in them at one time after all there was a forum full of them which is now represented by just three threads biggrin It proves the point I have made in other threads that a sub forum title directly effects the posts within it.
Had Kaz still been posting, there would still probably be numerous JFF threads on the go. :twisted:
Now that there is no JFF the will to create new JFF type threads seems to have vanished. The Cafe forum may still not be busy but I think it has a good mixture of content.
The forum is what the forum is. There are many threads that don't interest me, I just ignore them. One thing for sure, the biggest turn off for me is posters constantly whinging about the state of the forums. If you want to change them, do something POSITIVE!
All in all as far as I am concerned it has not worked out the badly after all :mrgreen:

I think you need to get a better grip on reality Max. Anyone who has been here any amount of time knows that moaning by one or two people wont get anything changed. It was more than a few call it moaning if you will and then the question was asked by admin. If I remember correctly there was a discussion about removing the Introduce yourself forum, discussion about merging the CA and the JFF into the Cafe. As we can all see JFF and Introduce yourself were merged CA was left where it was. Open forum debate not people moaning.
If you had actually bothered to read any of my posts properly recently you can see in fact I am not moaning about the forum. All I have done is express an opinion on the differences of the forum now and in the past. I did not say I prefered it then or now I just said it was busier then. Ive stated a few times lately that although this is quieter it suits me fine as it is right now :D
Quote by tweeky
I think you need to get a better grip on reality Max. Anyone who has been here any amount of time knows that moaning by one or two people wont get anything changed. It was more than a few call it moaning if you will and then the question was asked by admin. If I remember correctly there was a discussion about removing the Introduce yourself forum, discussion about merging the CA and the JFF into the Cafe. As we can all see JFF and Introduce yourself were merged CA was left where it was. Open forum debate not people moaning.
If you had actually bothered to read any of my posts properly recently you can see in fact I am not moaning about the forum. All I have done is express an opinion on the differences of the forum now and in the past. I did not say I prefered it then or now I just said it was busier then. Ive stated a few times lately that although this is quieter it suits me fine as it is right now biggrin

My grip on reality is fine thank you. If anyone cares to read back over the forums prior to the forums being merged, they can see for themselves where the bulk of the complaining was coming from.
I'm pleased to hear that you are happy with the forum now...shame you can't convince your mate likewise.
Quote by flower411

I think like a lot of people, Admin got sick of your constant whinging. It was your's and Flower's display of petulance, some may call it trolling, that made me determined not to allow the shape of the forum to be dictated by a few..

Shape of the forum ?
What does that mean ?
Has it anything to do with the very few people who insist on bumping nonsense "off topic" threads to the top of the page because they think it annoys other forum users ?
No its to do with the fact that there are posters who actually enjoy these threads and I'm sick of the likes of yourself constantly trying to have them removed. It's your opinion that they are nonsense and obviously that view is not shared by all others.
When you're pointing the finger accusing users of deliberately posting to annoy other forum users, remember the other 4 fingers are pointing back at you.
Quote by flower411

I think like a lot of people, Admin got sick of your constant whinging. It was your's and Flower's display of petulance, some may call it trolling, that made me determined not to allow the shape of the forum to be dictated by a few..

Shape of the forum ?
What does that mean ?
Has it anything to do with the very few people who insist on bumping nonsense "off topic" threads to the top of the page because they think it annoys other forum users ?
No its to do with the fact that there are posters who actually enjoy these threads and I'm sick of the likes of yourself constantly trying to have them removed. It's your opinion that they are nonsense and obviously that view is not shared by all others.
When you're pointing the finger accusing users of deliberately posting to annoy other forum users, remember the other 4 fingers are pointing back at you.
Four of you :notes:
OK ...is that like a gang kinda thing ?
There`s only one of you flower but there`s four of us !!
Sounds a bit unfair to me !!
A battle of wits ....four of you ....
Ya don`t stand a chance lol
how could that be flower you are obviously unarmed
bolt
Quote by flower411

I think like a lot of people, Admin got sick of your constant whinging. It was your's and Flower's display of petulance, some may call it trolling, that made me determined not to allow the shape of the forum to be dictated by a few..

Shape of the forum ?
What does that mean ?
Has it anything to do with the very few people who insist on bumping nonsense "off topic" threads to the top of the page because they think it annoys other forum users ?
No its to do with the fact that there are posters who actually enjoy these threads and I'm sick of the likes of yourself constantly trying to have them removed. It's your opinion that they are nonsense and obviously that view is not shared by all others.
When you're pointing the finger accusing users of deliberately posting to annoy other forum users, remember the other 4 fingers are pointing back at you.
Four of you :notes:
OK ...is that like a gang kinda thing ?
There`s only one of you flower but there`s four of us !!
Sounds a bit unfair to me !!
A battle of wits ....four of you
Ya don`t stand a chance lol
Yeah right.....obviously far too subtle for you!
Quote by Max777
Yeah right.....obviously far too subtle for you!

rotflmao:rotflmao:
seriosly. i use the word association game because i enjoy it. i am not into the boring politics of others who think they own the site. :notes:
reely talk about self importance. :twisted:
but then what does an arse hole like me know? dunno:grin:
Quote by flower411

I think like a lot of people, Admin got sick of your constant whinging. It was your's and Flower's display of petulance, some may call it trolling, that made me determined not to allow the shape of the forum to be dictated by a few..

Shape of the forum ?
What does that mean ?
Has it anything to do with the very few people who insist on bumping nonsense "off topic" threads to the top of the page because they think it annoys other forum users ?
No its to do with the fact that there are posters who actually enjoy these threads and I'm sick of the likes of yourself constantly trying to have them removed. It's your opinion that they are nonsense and obviously that view is not shared by all others.
When you're pointing the finger accusing users of deliberately posting to annoy other forum users, remember the other 4 fingers are pointing back at you.
Four of you :notes:
OK ...is that like a gang kinda thing ?
There`s only one of you flower but there`s four of us !!
Sounds a bit unfair to me !!
A battle of wits ....four of you
Ya don`t stand a chance lol
Yeah right.....obviously far too subtle for you!
Yeah right ....erm right erm yeah right back at ya big boy !
Took you 2 hours to come up with that?........you're right, with wit like that I've no chance
Quote by Max777
Why are the threads about 'what we should be doing' usually longer than threads about anything else?

Because there are those who wish to impose on others, the way they want the forums to be.
Was just re reading a few posts and this did tickle me. Ive always said in jest, never get rid of the monarchy cus people like me make fucking great dictators.
Quote by Max777

I think you need to get a better grip on reality Max. Anyone who has been here any amount of time knows that moaning by one or two people wont get anything changed. It was more than a few call it moaning if you will and then the question was asked by admin. If I remember correctly there was a discussion about removing the Introduce yourself forum, discussion about merging the CA and the JFF into the Cafe. As we can all see JFF and Introduce yourself were merged CA was left where it was. Open forum debate not people moaning.
If you had actually bothered to read any of my posts properly recently you can see in fact I am not moaning about the forum. All I have done is express an opinion on the differences of the forum now and in the past. I did not say I prefered it then or now I just said it was busier then. Ive stated a few times lately that although this is quieter it suits me fine as it is right now biggrin

My grip on reality is fine thank you. If anyone cares to read back over the forums prior to the forums being merged, they can see for themselves where the bulk of the complaining was coming from.
I'm pleased to hear that you are happy with the forum now...shame you can't convince your mate likewise.
Being honest I remember posting on threads about forum mergers I dont recall marching about with a banner about it though dunno Sure I made my point clear whatever the case. I have looked up the relavent thread and there were far more votes on the issue than just mine or flowers, community decision regardless of who brought it up.
If you think it was Flower or I or a combination of both that brought around a change in the layout of the forums all on our lonesome then fine! continue to be deluded.
Tis late, sleepy time
I'll graciously decline your kind offer Flower but I'm pleased that you've explained that you need time to hone that rapier wit of yours
Morning folks,
I've been reading this thread since yesterday, and as a noobie simply digested the atmosphere without interference.
But now I have to chip in my penny's worth.
Is the whole object of the forum to allow people to express their individual points of view?
I cannot commenton the past, but it seems there is life out here. A four page thread already kinda proves that, don't you think?
Live and let live I say.
For isn't the beauty of us all much like a wild flower arrangement, not in our similarities, but our diversity?
:welcome: to the forum orch80... and yes, you make a good point :thumbup:
Hi Nola,
Thanks for the welcome. Glad to be here and a part of community.
Quote by orch80
Morning folks,
I've been reading this thread since yesterday, and as a noobie simply digested the atmosphere without interference.
But now I have to chip in my penny's worth.
Is the whole object of the forum to allow people to express their individual points of view?
I cannot commenton the past, but it seems there is life out here. A four page thread already kinda proves that, don't you think?
Live and let live I say.
For isn't the beauty of us all much like a wild flower arrangement, not in our similarities, but our diversity?

rotflmao:rotflmao:
yes he is wild arlight plus a bit of a donut. :grin::grin:
Loving the inspiration for my new avatar :cool:
Quote by tweeky
Loving the inspiration for my new avatar :cool:

I dig it dude. Absolutely sublime...
Quote by orch80
Morning folks,
I've been reading this thread since yesterday, and as a noobie simply digested the atmosphere without interference.
But now I have to chip in my penny's worth.
Is the whole object of the forum to allow people to express their individual points of view?
I cannot commenton the past, but it seems there is life out here. A four page thread already kinda proves that, don't you think?
Live and let live I say.
For isn't the beauty of us all much like a wild flower arrangement, not in our similarities, but our diversity?

Great comment. Welcome to the Forum. As you can see it is rarely smooth in here. There are 3 types of people here in my humble opinion (not that I own the site or anything) bad ones, good ones and the ones that pretend to be good ones. The trick is to see through the bullshit of the bad or pretenders and enjoy the good ones. Glad to read your thread, get involved and have fun, it's not like it's real life wink
Quote by Srne
Morning folks,
I've been reading this thread since yesterday, and as a noobie simply digested the atmosphere without interference.
But now I have to chip in my penny's worth.
Is the whole object of the forum to allow people to express their individual points of view?
I cannot commenton the past, but it seems there is life out here. A four page thread already kinda proves that, don't you think?
Live and let live I say.
For isn't the beauty of us all much like a wild flower arrangement, not in our similarities, but our diversity?

Great comment. Welcome to the Forum. As you can see it is rarely smooth in here. There are 3 types of people here in my humble opinion (not that I own the site or anything) bad ones, good ones and the ones that pretend to be good ones. The trick is to see through the bullshit of the bad or pretenders and enjoy the good ones. Glad to read your thread, get involved and have fun, it's not like it's real life wink
Thanks for the welcome.
So with the "wrong'uns", would it be fair to apply the 'mushroom' principle?
Keep them in the dark and feed them bullshit?
Quote by Srne
Morning folks,
I've been reading this thread since yesterday, and as a noobie simply digested the atmosphere without interference.
But now I have to chip in my penny's worth.
Is the whole object of the forum to allow people to express their individual points of view?
I cannot commenton the past, but it seems there is life out here. A four page thread already kinda proves that, don't you think?
Live and let live I say.
For isn't the beauty of us all much like a wild flower arrangement, not in our similarities, but our diversity?

Great comment. Welcome to the Forum. As you can see it is rarely smooth in here. There are 3 types of people here in my humble opinion (not that I own the site or anything) bad ones, good ones and the ones that pretend to be good ones. The trick is to see through the bullshit of the bad or pretenders and enjoy the good ones. Glad to read your thread, get involved and have fun, it's not like it's real life wink
Go on tell us who's what and which and why goongoongoongoongoongooooooooooooooooonnnnnn