Do you people think its fair to ask for voluntary contribution towards costs of a hotel??
John.
I tended to meet in hotels. I would always pay. However, if the person I was meeting was someone who I started to see on a more regular, friendly fuck-buddy type of arrangement and they offered to go halves then yes, that to me is ok.
But then a hotel is a fixed cost that is checkable and I could show them a receipt/bill etc. There would be no way that any profit etc could be queried.
thanks for the reply, yea the other post has me nervous that we may be committing a swinging sin if we even suggest it..but it Is our understanding that it is common.
the cheaper alternative obviously does not appeal to some members. giving the very liberated nature of swinging I have to admit to be confused about peoples hang ups over the whole thing lol..
funny if you think about it, the majority thinks its wrong to contribute towards the cost of swinging in that situation, but right that we should have to shoulder the cost totally alone..eg we have to pay for the sex but they wont..??
"But then a hotel is a fixed cost that is checkable and I could show them a receipt/bill etc. There would be no way that any profit etc could be queried."
I cant see how you can make profit on a "voluntary contribution"
That brings in the issue of trust, would you 'party' with someone you felt didn't trust you or with someone you didn't trust?
but I do see what your saying, but I think if anyone asked to see the receipt I would be very unhappy with them being there.
Where you used to be, there is a hole in the world, which I find myself constantly walking around in the daytime, and falling into at night. I miss you like hell.
Edna St. Vincent Millay
Nice quote by the way.
On the occasions that we have booked rooms our selves we have never asked for contributions, but every time our guest has offered half and we have always excepted.
lets just say that with most swinging or indeed any social encounters, getting down to splitting costs comes a bit later in the proceedings, ie after some familiarisation with one another and a growing sense of trust and confidence.
being hit with it from the outset just isn't that appealing?
going to add my 2 pennyworth. on the cost of hotels and sharing. if we were to meet in a hotel and we were the ones staying over in it then we would shoulder the costs just as if someone else was having the benefit of the room over night then they should shoulder the costs, my vision of the situation is that people use hotels for play for a number of reasons a couple of which are ... security on not wanting strangers in their home and they are meeting someone from a good distance away. both of which I can see the relevant points, but for both its their choice to want or need the hotel so it should be up to them to shoulder the cost.
if we were to visit someone else in their hotel room and we used room service/mini bar etc then we have caused them extra expense then we would offer to cover for what we have used as they wouldn't have expected these extra expenses in the hire of the room.
just my take on things
i do believe in no one being out of pocket for swinging but it is their choice to use a hotel instead of their own home so if you can't afford it then don't swing.
Cant be arsed to quote but what a load of bollocks in the last five posts in general. We dont Choose to use a hotel we do because we need to or have in the past. You can come to ours if you like as long as you dont mind the kids watching? We dont stay over in the room either as once again we have to get back for the kids. If the others want to thats fine by us. We've found people quite happy to share costs this way. Always try to make everyones costs fair, we have paid for the room entirely when the other couple had driven 100's of miles to meet us. That seemed a fair split to us the fuel vs the room cost.
If I book a room I expect to pay for it...
If someone else books a room I always offer to share the costs....