im new

23 May 2005

Quote by foxylady 123
:giveup: :giveup: :giveup: :giveup: :giveup: :giveup: :giveup: :giveup: :giveup: :giveup:

Ah well , ive lost that one.................................................................................i had money on you never coming back here!!! :( :( :(
Cheers Sharon!!
Umm........ dunno

23 May 2005

I personally wouldn't want to sleep with someone who was cheating on their partner......but I have no problem with anyone that DOES want to do that....
In my opinion, as long as the person cheating is up front with their prospective lover and tells them that they have a partner already it is then up to the prospective lover to decide what they want to do.
Just thought I'd put my two penneth in..... biggrin

23 May 2005

Quote by Vix
And why are genitals banned from Avatars?

I think it's something like this:
1: Avatars can be seen by anyone who happens upon the site, whether registered or not. Not everyone wants to see kebab and sausage the min they click on a link.
2: That's the rules - live with it.
3: Er....
4: That's it.
Don't want to challenge THE RULES, but aren't the huge advert photos just as accessible as the tiny avatars - without needing to register to be able to see either?
.................... and do people actually wander into this site by accident? (I suppose you could think it was a site for 1940s Big Band music enthusiasts!)

23 May 2005

Quote by donsidelovers
I have to say I am utterly appalled by the attitudes expressed by some people here. The judgemental nature of so many posters on this thread is almost enough to make me wish I had never found SH but the fact that I have seen how supportive other people on this forum can be makes me less eager to run away screaming. Where, on this site or anywhere else for that matter (or is there an 'Official Swingers Handbook' that I have somehow missed?), does it lay out the rules of what is and what is not swinging? Who gives anyone the authority to state whether cheating is either acceptable or even if it is swinging or not? What authority does anyone have to take someone to task over what they state in their introduction? As foxylady points out there are many people with many different habits or preferences that many of us here would not be interested in so why do certain people feel it is necessary to give one poor woman (and I don't agree with the conspiracy theories flying around) a hard time about her private decisions? The only acceptable comment from anybody should have been 'Hello and welcome!'!!
There is a time and place to debate the ethics of cheating (in fact there was a thread on that very subject last week) but not in someone's introduction unless they had asked for people's opinions. Ok, Sharron made a mistake and should have posted in the LMU section but that doesn't give anyone licence to offer their opinion of her or her actions. Some people need to take a long hard look at themselves! :x
That off my chest all I would like to add is:
"Hello Sharron! Welcome to SH. I hope you enjoy your stay and are not put off by the negativity already expressed. Some of us are actually nice people, believe it or not. I hope you find the fun you are looking for and wish you well."
H

:worship: :worship:
i'm sick of biting my tongue on this one, so i ain't gonna any more! lol

to be brutally frank, the constant disparaging and dismantling of posts and posters from certain quarters is wearing REALLY bloody thin! the constant tag-teaming of a mere handful of members who continually comment on others posts and ram their unasked for opinions down their throat is annoying and tedious in the extreme. the "oh you misunderstood me" cop out when they get pulled up on it, is quite frankly, complete crap, cos they do it ALL THE TIME, and we can read in between the lines well enough to pick up on the intent.
there is a time and place for debate and discussion. this was not it. and it strikes me as the worst kind of hypocrisy that some members should so obviously delight in commenting on the quality of other peoples posts, when all they seem to put up is negative, sniping, thinly veiled personal comment at every damn opportunity! rolleyes

clearly they value the right to express opinion dearly, so i'm sure noone will take any offense at this, or assume for one moment i'm having a personal dig at anyone, will they? confused

/flame off!
neil x x x ,

23 May 2005

Quote by neilinleeds
/flame off!
neil x x x ,

Neil.
Come 'ere me old mucka.
Go and have a wander http://www.swingingheaven.co.uk/swingers-forum/viewtopic/44826.html and tell Clare I sent ya.
I've forgotten how to do that clever "change the full link to a word like "here" stuff.

23 May 2005

:rotflmao: :rotflmao: :rotflmao:
dammie i can assure i'm quite happy ta! smile

not had a good old rant or told anyone off for ages, cos i don't do that sorta thing anymore! ;) right enjoyed me little self so i did! took me right back it did! :bounce: :rotflmao:
n x x x :P

23 May 2005

Um...errr.....um...Can I presume that this thread is ending soon :!: confused

: :?

23 May 2005

Quote by master55
Um...errr.....um...Can I presume that this thread is ending soon :!: : :?

Only if we all stop posting in it and let fall off the page rotflmao

23 May 2005

Really?
If we stop posting will it fall off the page?

23 May 2005

No, I've just had a look ................... it's still there.

23 May 2005

hiya sharon you go for it hun enjoy yourselfim up your way next week

23 May 2005

Quote by neilinleeds
I have to say I am utterly appalled by the attitudes expressed by some people here. The judgemental nature of so many posters on this thread is almost enough to make me wish I had never found SH .... cut to save page space

to be brutally frank, the constant disparaging and dismantling of posts and posters from certain quarters is wearing REALLY bloody thin! the constant tag-teaming of a mere handful of members who continually comment on others posts and ram their unasked for opinions down their throat is annoying and tedious in the extreme. ... cut to save page space
Two cracking posts. I agree totally with the sentiments of donsidelovers and neilinleeds and the other posters on this thread that are fed up with the petty spitefulness of some of the members here.
If this thread was a genuine introduction then it should make us all feel a little ashamed at how we've allowed such unpleasantness on the forums to continue for so long.
If it was a wind-up then it's blown a real breath of fresh air through the forum. It's good to see so many people are so fed up with the forum police.
Edited to remove an extra full stop before I get told off. lol

23 May 2005

Quote by northwest-cpl
Edited to remove an extra full stop before I get told off.

Can you do anything with my spare "."s? They are below if you want them
...............................................

23 May 2005

Not gone yet then

23 May 2005

keep it running - wont be long before another innocent victim asks a question and is lambasted by the moralistic SH tag team :twisted:

23 May 2005

Quote by Mac69

Edited to remove an extra full stop before I get told off.

Can you do anything with my spare "."s? They are below if you want them
...............................................
Well you could thread them on a piece of string and make a set of Thai love-beads. Failing that I'm reliably informed that there is a chronic shortage of "." in LMU ... you could send them over there and kill two birds with one stone. :lol:

23 May 2005

Quote by northwest-cpl

Edited to remove an extra full stop before I get told off.

Can you do anything with my spare "."s? They are below if you want them
...............................................
Well you could thread them on a piece of string and make a set of Thai love-beads. Failing that I'm reliably informed that there is a chronic shortage of "." in LMU ... you could send them over there and kill two birds with one stone. :lol:
I like the love beads idea best. I'll need to get some holes to put in them - do you think I can use the centres from some "O"s or would they be too big?

23 May 2005

Quote by Mac69

Edited to remove an extra full stop before I get told off.

Can you do anything with my spare "."s? They are below if you want them
...............................................
Well you could thread them on a piece of string and make a set of Thai love-beads. Failing that I'm reliably informed that there is a chronic shortage of "." in LMU ... you could send them over there and kill two birds with one stone. :lol:
I like the love beads idea best. I'll need to get some holes to put in them - do you think I can use the centres from some "O"s or would they be too big?
Not if you use the same technique I use for crosswords when the word has too many letters for the boxes ..... just write smaller!

23 May 2005

Having added the centres of some small "o"s, what must I do with the middle bits of the "."s that the centres from the small "o"s displaced? dunno

23 May 2005

But you've already got the answer ...........................

Quote by northwest-cpl
Well you could thread them on a piece of string and make a set of Thai love-beads. Failing that I'm reliably informed that there is a chronic shortage of "." in LMU ... you could send them over there and kill two birds with one stone.

:lol: :lol: :lol:

23 May 2005

It's no good - I'll just have to show my hignorhance! Wots LMU.....? :cry:

23 May 2005

Quote by Sexysteph
All that. And very nice it was too.
Steph

But - if you two kiss and make up at the munch - can I watch?
Puuuuuuurrrrleeeeeeeeeeeaaaze? :twisted: :twisted: :twisted:

23 May 2005

Mac, you've scored!

23 May 2005

Quote by Sexysteph
Right Some of you are going to be suprised that I am replying again on this thread
I have had a few pms with Sharron and I have asked her if she would like to come to the Leicester Munch in September. I feel this will give Sharron an opportunity to meet a lot of people off the site in a purely social setting where no one is under ANY pressure.
I do understand about her home background a lot more and I have apologised for some of the content of my posts which were a genuine effort to try to prevent potential heartache. I still do not condone cheating but I can understand it better and I thank Sharron very much for helping me to see this.
I was going to place this on the Munch thread but have thought better of that. I want people to see that I would be very happy to have Sharron on the Munch list and I hope she will be in a position to accept an invitation when they go out nearer the time. Being a Carer for people with a disability I am very aware of the time constraints placed on Carers.
I hope that we can all put this thread behind us and move forward.
Sharron something I should have said earlier

Steph

:smile2:

24 May 2005

thank you very much steph i would like it very much if i could come and meet every one
:rose: :rose: :rose: :rose: :rose: :rose: :rose: :rose: :rose: :rose: :rose: :rose:
12 red roses just for you xx

24 May 2005

:welcome: anothersharron
Well what a can of worms you have opened here :shock:
Nice to see we can all express our opinions on the forums.
Whether we are right or wrong it is only OUR opinion in OUR eyes, who are we to be judgemental of others & try to push OUR morality onto them, whatever their circumstances :!:
I for one wish you all the best anothersharron & hope you find what you wish for on here.
The WHOOSH Manâ„¢

24 May 2005

.
.
.
.
.
.
.
................................................................SPLASH .................................

24 May 2005

Ok call me cynical ,but it all makes me wonder why the poor woman was pre judged in the first place!!!
confused

25 May 2005

Welcome to SH Sharron - I hope you enjoy it in here
(From someone who has been away for a few days and has only just read this thread.)
Mike.

25 May 2005

Late too the party as always,
But to play devils advocate, would you be as considerate towards a husband that was cheating on his wife Steph
xxx