Well I assume you are talking about porn as a visual motion picture experience Sandman.
Porn has been around in this format nigh on a century now believe it or not! The conventions of porn were set fairly early on with the cum shot or the 'money shot' as it was known being it's trade mark. It has remained pretty much the same throughout though certain 'taboos' have been fashionable through the decades namely: 70s - Blow jobs, 80's anal and fisting, 90s Bukkake and watersports, 2000 + asphixiation and abuse. These dates are not precise nor are these practices new or particularly desirable or erotic.
The porn industry has gone as far as it will ever go. What ever has been thought of has most likely been done already.
I wonder why you ask this question? Are you not getting your kicks out of porn anymore?
Well there are a lot of us who have seen a lot of porn, including myself. And what we would have thought as being the holy grail of porn at age 15 is now no longer so titillating as we have seen it a 1000 times over. We have become more sophisticated in our seach for turn ons. No longer do we seek silicone enhanced models who fake their orgasms and bore us to death. We look towards genuine people participating in porn and getting thier rocks off, to use an old phrase.
What on earth do you want from porn anyway? It's never going to be an ultimate experience is it! Only sex with a real live person is going to do that!
I've got two problems with most porn. The first is, it's so cold. The participants often fail to convince me that they have even the tiniest morsel of desire for each other. I think that's why I often find movie love scenes much more erotic than porn - the participants are actual actors and can convincingly portray desire. Secondly, the huge pneumatic fake tits on most porn-women. They're not sexy, they're just wrong.
Don't get me wrong, I do like some porn. (I must do; I own over a hundred tapes & DVDs - mostly down to my hoarding instinct, I'm willing to throw anything away in case I might find it sexy at some point in the future.) But there has to be some fire in there, or love, or... something. Otherwise I get bored very quickly!
it was a simple question and your prowess of knowledge of porn is i'm sure very grand as is your patronizing tone.
Thank you for listing the decades of porn,but your are not alone in your observations of this - all I was interested in really were suggestions be they serious or fun as to the 'next chapter' in porn. xxx
And the answer is there is no next chapter in porn. It's all been done before. There are only fashions....
Porn is only ever going to be as good as it gets because one's perception of it is a subjective experience. It is not determined by the newest perversion that porn makers are capable of incorporating into their films. This has nothing to do with it. What is exciting is sex between real people and sometimes this is captured on film although that is an objectifed version of the event. It is not the same as partaking of the event however.
No one is being patronizing here. People have taken their time to answer your query as best they can. Please try to respect that!
3D porn?
I guess, if you want to talk about the medium itself, there is room it can move forward. Multi-angle features were meant to be a big thing a few years ago, but it tends to disappoint in my experience - flicking through angles in the primitive way we do now is frustrating and unnatural - I think people need a camerman to make the best-shot decisions for them and show them a variety of angles.
BUT what if you could choose and change the angle yourself, in any way you wanted? Wouldn't be possible with live actors of course, but it would with computer-generated graphics. You could take real-life actors and use motion-capture techniques to capture their movements as they have sex, then create 3D models of the actors and map those actions onto them, a la Hulk. The subtleties of course would have to be added later - eye contact, blowjob techniques, etc etc etc. You could end up with a sex scene in which the viewer could move the viewpoint infinitely, and observe any piece of the action they wanted...
The downside to this is that it'd cost an absolute bomb. So no chance unless Roman Abramovich has an interest in high-tech pornography...
I'm sure there is lots more variation to come...
The success of the bangbus/milfhunters/etc sites shows that there is a market for new ideas (for those who don't know these are gonzo-ish porn shot in a rough pseuo-documentary style, and work on the premise that the woman is being 'picked up' at random then gradually convinced to go further and further - sometimes the hardcore elment is only the last 1/4 of the episode). I've yet to see this formula coupled with good camerawork, good acting, good editing, or a girl who pushes things on a bit herself when she gets going!
The 'virtual sex' videos are another new area - these are shot from the man's point of view, finally, porn where men don't have to look at other men doing the grimace face!), and feature 1 on 1 action that the dvd watcher can jump between - directing the action.
I think we've still not seen the end of the backlash aginst the 'bad boob job and bored' american girls either... it's going to be a while before everything settles back down and we strike a happy balance between the opposing silicon and gonzo camps.
Another point is that good quality video editing, dvd duplication and web sales are now possible on a very low 'hobby' size budget... everyone can make porn now - so if you can't find what you want... go make it!
The first few times I saw a porn movie, when I was a spotty teenager in the '80s, I was shocked and amazed, and of course very turned on by it. It was new and exciting to see people having sex, the visual aspects of it. The more porn I saw though, the more I realised that the women were obviously getting nothing out of the experience (apart from the money of course), and that is a big turn off for me.
What turns me on now is seeing people genuinely aroused and experiencing pleasure, especially seeing a woman orgasm. If mainstream porn movie directors put more foreplay into the scenes, told the actors to really go for it and give the girls the time to get aroused and excited, it would certainly make for more exciting viewing. However I guess it would take longer to film, and maybe the porn actresses don't want to get sexually excited in the films but rather save it for their private life?
What turns me on now is seeing people genuinely aroused and experiencing pleasure, especially seeing a woman orgasm. /quote]
Same here, mate. See my post in the thread "Help with choosing erotic/pornography movies".
Mr Licks
ive always like the amature ones like ben dover etc etc
well, if we are posting links to unusual porn sites... :-)
The best porn I have seen has been some of the home made clips on the net, where the 'normal' couple care for and love one another, take things slowly and show genuine passion for one another. That gets my rocks off, 'barbie shagging ken' doesn't.
..... Imagine if they invented mobile holographic projectors that you could take with you in your car and you could have holograms perfoming for you in the woods, in your car, in the bogs at work..... the possibilities are endless...... :twisted: :twisted: :twisted: :twisted: 
:lol: :lol:
