Join the most popular community of UK swingers now
Login

Is sending 16 year old to prison the answer?

last reply
85 replies
2.9k views
0 watchers
0 likes
Yep,
It's black and white as far as i am concerned.
Nature vs nurture.......
I do not believe for one second that people are born to become 'evil' for want of a better word. So what makes them like that? Only leaves one thing really doesn't it?
The reality of society today is this, there exists a sub culture of young people who will rob, steal, maim and even kill for no more than a misguided quest for 'respect' or simply instant gratification.
They think they rule the streets, they aquire conviction after conviction with no more punishment than the constant threat of 'next time'.
So who is responsible? Them, their parents or is it the systems fault?
It's a cop out to blame anything imho apart from the individual or those responsible for him or her. That just leads to the idea of having no responsibility being reinforced. If anyone commits an offence, they should be punished, if they are too young by law, then those with parental responsibility should carry that punishment. The clue is in the underlined phrase.
We should all be responsible for our children, why is it not all children are the same? Are some children born 'evil' or do they all learn by example?
The answer is simple to me, make the parents or parent the single strongest, best example they get, make available help for those who feel they can't cope but make the penalties for those who don't or won't care very, very stiff.
(In Edit)
I also don't recall anycase where a parent has been given any form of sentence for a crime committed by their child under or over 16. If you have any links, i'd be very interested to see them. biggrin
Quote by staffcple
Yep,
It's black and white as far as i am concerned.
Nature vs nurture.......
I do not believe for one second that people are born to become 'evil' for want of a better word. So what makes them like that? Only leaves one thing really doesn't it?
The reality of society today is this, there exists a sub culture of young people who will rob, steal, maim and even kill for no more than a misguided quest for 'respect' or simply instant gratification.
They think they rule the streets, they aquire conviction after conviction with no more punishment than the constant threat of 'next time'.
So who is responsible? Them, their parents or is it the systems fault?
It's a cop out to blame anything imho apart from the individual or those responsible for him or her. That just leads to the idea of having no responsibility being reinforced. If anyone commits an offence, they should be punished, if they are too young by law, then those with parental responsibility should carry that punishment. The clue is in the underlined phrase.
We should all be responsible for our children, why is it not all children are the same? Are some children born 'evil' or do they all learn by example?
The answer is simple to me, make the parents or parent the single strongest, best example they get, make available help for those who feel they can't cope but make the penalties for those who don't or won't care very, very stiff.
(In Edit)
I also don't recall anycase where a parent has been given any form of sentence for a crime committed by their child under or over 16. If you have any links, i'd be very interested to see them. biggrin

Oh, if only it were that simple. I was bought up in the same house, and by the same two parents as my brother. He was in & out of prison, I wasn't.
We have bought our four daughters up with the same boundaries & moral principles. So why did one of them turn out so differently?
Answer- she made choices. I made choices. They were different from the ones my brother made.
It's all very well saying that parents should take responsibility, but what happens when, for example, you send a child to their room- only to have them push past you saying "if you touch me, I'll call childline!" Or something of that ilk.
I know some appalling parents. I grew up on an estate where they would send their kids out from the age of 5/6 barefoot, pushing their toddler siblings in pushchairs with dirty noses & dirtier nappies. They were out, barely dressed, all day every day, left to roam the streets. The primary socialisation these kids received was worse than useless.
There are crap parents. There are kids who choose to misbehave despite stable, loving homes.
Blaming the parents is the easiest way out. It's also flawed.
Quote by staffcple
Yep,
It's black and white as far as i am concerned.
Nature vs nurture.......
I do not believe for one second that people are born to become 'evil' for want of a better word. So what makes them like that? Only leaves one thing really doesn't it?
The reality of society today is this, there exists a sub culture of young people who will rob, steal, maim and even kill for no more than a misguided quest for 'respect' or simply instant gratification.
They think they rule the streets, they aquire conviction after conviction with no more punishment than the constant threat of 'next time'.
So who is responsible? Them, their parents or is it the systems fault?
It's a cop out to blame anything imho apart from the individual or those responsible for him or her. That just leads to the idea of having no responsibility being reinforced. If anyone commits an offence, they should be punished, if they are too young by law, then those with parental responsibility should carry that punishment. The clue is in the underlined phrase.
We should all be responsible for our children, why is it not all children are the same? Are some children born 'evil' or do they all learn by example?
The answer is simple to me, make the parents or parent the single strongest, best example they get, make available help for those who feel they can't cope but make the penalties for those who don't or won't care very, very stiff.
(In Edit)
I also don't recall anycase where a parent has been given any form of sentence for a crime committed by their child under or over 16. If you have any links, i'd be very interested to see them. biggrin

I didn't say a parent had been given a sentence (in any event the child will not be named wink) I had said parents can be summonsed or issued with a warrant of arrest to ATTEND court to hear their child/ward's sentence (oh and also I do know of cases where parents have been sentenced for not sending their kids to school).
I didn't say the parent was not responsible. What I said was you cannot always BLAME the parent for their child's behaviour.
Can I ask you, how much do you think a parent can do? genuine question. Take for example a 15 yr old child, they ask to go out, you sensibly take them to where they've asked you to drop them off, you've said you'll pick them up at a decent time, all responsbile behaviour on your behalf. You've spoken to the parents of the other kids, all agreed that it's ok for kids to be at this house. The kids then go upstairs into pals bedroom and produce vodka from their schoolbags mixed in plastic diet coke bottles and proceed to drink.
This is a daft example, but one that is real to me. At what point do you start or stop trusting your child?
Yes blame the parents who don't give a damn but don't shoot the parents who care down in flames. Have an open mind eh Staffs??
Quote by jaymar
Yep,
It's black and white as far as i am concerned.
Nature vs nurture.......
I do not believe for one second that people are born to become 'evil' for want of a better word. So what makes them like that? Only leaves one thing really doesn't it?
The reality of society today is this, there exists a sub culture of young people who will rob, steal, maim and even kill for no more than a misguided quest for 'respect' or simply instant gratification.
They think they rule the streets, they aquire conviction after conviction with no more punishment than the constant threat of 'next time'.
So who is responsible? Them, their parents or is it the systems fault?
It's a cop out to blame anything imho apart from the individual or those responsible for him or her. That just leads to the idea of having no responsibility being reinforced. If anyone commits an offence, they should be punished, if they are too young by law, then those with parental responsibility should carry that punishment. The clue is in the underlined phrase.
We should all be responsible for our children, why is it not all children are the same? Are some children born 'evil' or do they all learn by example?
The answer is simple to me, make the parents or parent the single strongest, best example they get, make available help for those who feel they can't cope but make the penalties for those who don't or won't care very, very stiff.
(In Edit)
I also don't recall anycase where a parent has been given any form of sentence for a crime committed by their child under or over 16. If you have any links, i'd be very interested to see them. biggrin

I didn't say a parent had been given a sentence (in any event the child will not be named wink) I had said parents can be summonsed or issued with a warrant of arrest to ATTEND court to hear their child/ward's sentence (oh and also I do know of cases where parents have been sentenced for not sending their kids to school).
I didn't say the parent was not responsible. What I said was you cannot always BLAME the parent for their child's behaviour.
Can I ask you, how much do you think a parent can do? genuine question. Take for example a 15 yr old child, they ask to go out, you sensibly take them to where they've asked you to drop them off, you've said you'll pick them up at a decent time, all responsbile behaviour on your behalf. You've spoken to the parents of the other kids, all agreed that it's ok for kids to be at this house. The kids then go upstairs into pals bedroom and produce vodka from their schoolbags mixed in plastic diet coke bottles and proceed to drink.
This is a daft example, but one that is real to me. At what point do you start or stop trusting your child?
Yes blame the parents who don't give a damn but don't shoot the parents who care down in flames. Have an open mind eh Staffs??
Mar I have seen your replies many many times about bad parents, and you seem to take it as a personel insult to you. dunno
I have seen some of your replies and YOU seem like a great parent. It is not an insult to you everytime someone blames the parents. Now excluding you Mar I have seen and heard many things about kids and their parents, I also have to say that bad parenting always equals bad kids.
All children ARE born the same it is the boundaries held within the home that make the difference. Someone said how do you stop a child who pushes past you to go out when they are grounded. I tell you what my kids would never have done that and I wonder why?
Because they respected me and yes were fearful of me at times but I tell you I never had any trouble from them ever.
I have to not agree as I feel most, not all kids, are a product of their parents skills as a parent, and lets be honest there are some shit parents out there. I dont blame all the parents for their shit kids but... I blame 95% of them.
Have I a closed mind then, or am I simply stating my thoughts and opinions, which Is i believe what a forum is for.....
Do you know me from Adam?
Take your pick, go the way we are now and watch it get worse because it will and a whole lot so.
Or take a stand and do something, I'm not for one moment saying my thoughts are the only way to deal with it, but hey, somethings better than nothing.....
Out of interest, what do you suggest as a solution?
In answer to your question, I don't see it as a case of trust, so a child tries a drink in a friends bedroom, that's a world away from sticking a large peice of steel in another child isn't it? Children will experiment, i understand and am comfortable with that, my problem arises when they then decide to visit the concequences of that on another innocent party. Is it a normal thing to expect a child to want to rob, stab or kill another human being simply because they can? Is there an excuse for that, or as imho no excuse whatsoever.
On a personal level I trust my daughter as far as this, I know what she does when she goes out, I also know that she has respect, compassion and thought for others because she has been both taught and shown by her parents example. By the way, over 16 years, never an ounce of trouble.
Quote by jaymar

If you want a decent and just society, it's pretty simple, make everyone over the age of 16 responsible for their own actions, not just criminal actions but every action.....under 16's but over the age of criminal responsibility, make the parents accountable, your child commits any offence, you serve the sentence, that should focus a few minds on parenting rather than other things that seem more important but really are not.

But isn't that what is more or less already happening?? In the court of law a child under the age of 17 yrs is sentenced with the parent present. There are now laws for parents to be summonsed to court for just that. After the age of 17 they are sentenced as adults but with an age range of 17-21 it isn't prison, it's remand centres/young offender institutions, still punishment.
I can't go along with the 100% complete blame the parents bit and if any parent in this thread can stand up and say any different then please go ahead. Sometimes you know it's not ALWAYS the parents fault.
In my experience it's rarely the parents' fault, but the fact remains that either the kid or the parent has to take responsibility, ergo it's a very simple problem to solve. If the kid isn't able to distinguish that what he did is wrong then it's the parents' fault for not teaching him. If the kid has some mental health problem then they should be excused if they had called in the experts and this was known about him. if they didn't then once again they have to be held responsible.
It's not about the parent being directly to blame, but if a kid is deemed to be 'under-age' then like it or not that kid's parents are totally responsible. It comes with the territory. If they can't deal with a kid like the ones we are talking about then they should be asking for help. if they are asking for help then that is (or should be) taken into account when they are brought to book.
Quote by winchwench
Yep,
It's black and white as far as i am concerned.
Nature vs nurture.......
I do not believe for one second that people are born to become 'evil' for want of a better word. So what makes them like that? Only leaves one thing really doesn't it?
The reality of society today is this, there exists a sub culture of young people who will rob, steal, maim and even kill for no more than a misguided quest for 'respect' or simply instant gratification.
They think they rule the streets, they aquire conviction after conviction with no more punishment than the constant threat of 'next time'.
So who is responsible? Them, their parents or is it the systems fault?
It's a cop out to blame anything imho apart from the individual or those responsible for him or her. That just leads to the idea of having no responsibility being reinforced. If anyone commits an offence, they should be punished, if they are too young by law, then those with parental responsibility should carry that punishment. The clue is in the underlined phrase.
We should all be responsible for our children, why is it not all children are the same? Are some children born 'evil' or do they all learn by example?
The answer is simple to me, make the parents or parent the single strongest, best example they get, make available help for those who feel they can't cope but make the penalties for those who don't or won't care very, very stiff.
(In Edit)
I also don't recall anycase where a parent has been given any form of sentence for a crime committed by their child under or over 16. If you have any links, i'd be very interested to see them. biggrin

Oh, if only it were that simple. I was bought up in the same house, and by the same two parents as my brother. He was in & out of prison, I wasn't.
We have bought our four daughters up with the same boundaries & moral principles. So why did one of them turn out so differently?
Answer- she made choices. I made choices. They were different from the ones my brother made.
It's all very well saying that parents should take responsibility, but what happens when, for example, you send a child to their room- only to have them push past you saying "if you touch me, I'll call childline!" Or something of that ilk.
I know some appalling parents. I grew up on an estate where they would send their kids out from the age of 5/6 barefoot, pushing their toddler siblings in pushchairs with dirty noses & dirtier nappies. They were out, barely dressed, all day every day, left to roam the streets. The primary socialisation these kids received was worse than useless.
There are crap parents. There are kids who choose to misbehave despite stable, loving homes.
Blaming the parents is the easiest way out. It's also flawed.
I gave mine the phone and phone number, I would love to go to court for punishing my children, I would go away for the crime but I would go having my voice heard in a court of law and look the judge in the eye as he passed sentence. I would rather that than be afraid of my children placing threats on me.
I was on dury service once when a case was bought against a father that had hit his son after finding him stealing to support a drinking binge. The child was 15 and went to school the next day and told about his father. He was then arrested. The father asked the courts what was he suppose to do?
The judge asked who bought the case to court and asked them to remain and dismissed everyone else.
So my point is I would take my chances, to save my children anytime.
I would also be held accountable for my childrens actions!
Bit behind the times as I timed out, but
Snip....
Kent wrote:
I also have to say that bad parenting always equals bad kids. Not true- but I'll address that below for clarity wink
All children ARE born the same it is the boundaries held within the home that make the difference. Someone said how do you stop a child who pushes past you to go out when they are grounded. I tell you what my kids would never have done that and I wonder why? Most of my kids wouldn't- out of respect mainly, and a modicum of fear for the consequences. One is different. Why? I'll answer that below too. Kids are not all born the same. The same genetic differences which account for eye/hair colour, big ears, small noses etc are present in the brain as well as the body.
Because they respected me and yes were fearful of me at times but I tell you I never had any trouble from them ever.
I have to not agree as I feel most, not all kids, are a product of their parents skills as a parent, and lets be honest there are some shit parents out there. I dont blame all the parents for their shit kids but... I blame 95% of them.

Without going into too much detail:
our kids have all been raised the same. One of them became friends with a kid who had been fostered. This kid was full of half-truths about how she never had to lift a finger to help in the house, how she received vast amounts of spending/clothing money...got special exceptions made for her, etc etc. A downward, hellish spiral began. When kids these days say "you can't do that to me!" they're usually right. If they're clever enough, they can manipulate the system to dance to their tune.
I won't go into any more detail in here, but I know that kids are not all born the same. You may not (thankfully) have had any trouble from your kids- but do they react the same way to everything around them, always? No? Because they're individuals.
As for the crappy parenting always resulting in bad kids:
I have a close friend. (:shocksmile Her mum was a really- really- nasty piece of work. I went to the house she grew up in recently, and saw the hole in the bathroom door her mum made when trying to knock it down. My friend had locked herself & little brother in there when her mum had tried to kill them with a carving knife. One of my friends classmates was killed in a car accident when she was about 11. My friends mum turned to her & said "I wish it had been you."
The mother died when my friend was at the impressionable age of 13. Her dad felt unable to cope, so he sent her to live with friends of the family. These friends were heavily into toting guns & crime. She flirted with the gun toting for a while. Her "foster" dad her when she was 14. She reported it, and was told she'd been "asking for it" by wearing a disney nightie. Whilst waiting for the case to be heard, the perpetrators family firebombed the bedroom she was sleeping in.
When she told her dad what had been done to her, he (a christian) responded by saying "we must forgive people who do bad things to us."
She had an horrific upbringing. However, she chose something different. She's been literally groundbreaking with her choice of career, has travelled widely, and gained a science degree a couple of years ago.
She still bears scars- mental and physical- for example she will only go near guy's you could guarantee would be the complete opposite of her dad. She can't hold down a relationship. However, she's living proof that bad parenting does not always create bad kids.
Quote by Theladyisaminx
I gave mine the phone and phone number, I would love to go to court for punishing my children, I would go away for the crime but I would go having my voice heard in a court of law and look the judge in the eye as he passed sentence. I would rather that than be afraid of my children placing threats on me.
I was on dury service once when a case was bought against a father that had hit his son after finding him stealing to support a drinking binge. The child was 15 and went to school the next day and told about his father. He was then arrested. The father asked the courts what was he suppose to do?
The judge asked who bought the case to court and asked them to remain and dismissed everyone else.
So my point is I would take my chances, to save my children anytime.
I would also be held accountable for my childrens actions!

I had a similar experience with my youngest. After the divorce and due to a series of errors made by my ex, the youngest went into a freefall. She became unmanageable, became a bully and was extremely disruptive. My ex couldn't control her. eventually she was sent to me.
She made the mistake of thinking I was soft like her mum. She went off on one, and to cut a long story short I physically chastised her. No bruises, no damage, just a very shocked and frightened 15 year old.
The next day she went to school and reported me to the school counsellor. She in turn reported me to the social services. The next day I had a social worker on the phone to me saying I can't do this and I can't do that. I told him to go fuck himself. She was my daughter, she was out of control and something was needed doing. I did what I thought was necessary. If he wished to report me to the police then he should go ahead and do so.
Strangely enough I heard nothing more. My daughter calmed down and stopped being a bully (now that she knew what it felt like to be bullied). Alright she wasn't a bad kid and she only needed to be brought up short, but it worked and I'd have no hesitation doing it again. I realise that it won't work in all cases, but in some it definitely will.
And for every new age social worker there's another one with a head on their shoulders, so don't give in to disruptive and unrepentant progeny, there's a good chance that they'll benefit from the occasional 'kick up the arse'.
Quote by kentswingers777
I never said all kids only 95%.

And the source of the statistic? :twisted: wink
Quote by Peanut

I never said all kids only 95%.

And the source of the statistic? :twisted: wink
I will give you the same reply you gave me remember? That is, I have not got the time to find it, but if I find the time I will endevour to look for it. That ok for you?
Quote by Theladyisaminx
Yep,
It's black and white as far as i am concerned.
Nature vs nurture.......
I do not believe for one second that people are born to become 'evil' for want of a better word. So what makes them like that? Only leaves one thing really doesn't it?
The reality of society today is this, there exists a sub culture of young people who will rob, steal, maim and even kill for no more than a misguided quest for 'respect' or simply instant gratification.
They think they rule the streets, they aquire conviction after conviction with no more punishment than the constant threat of 'next time'.
So who is responsible? Them, their parents or is it the systems fault?
It's a cop out to blame anything imho apart from the individual or those responsible for him or her. That just leads to the idea of having no responsibility being reinforced. If anyone commits an offence, they should be punished, if they are too young by law, then those with parental responsibility should carry that punishment. The clue is in the underlined phrase.
We should all be responsible for our children, why is it not all children are the same? Are some children born 'evil' or do they all learn by example?
The answer is simple to me, make the parents or parent the single strongest, best example they get, make available help for those who feel they can't cope but make the penalties for those who don't or won't care very, very stiff.
(In Edit)
I also don't recall anycase where a parent has been given any form of sentence for a crime committed by their child under or over 16. If you have any links, i'd be very interested to see them. biggrin

Oh, if only it were that simple. I was bought up in the same house, and by the same two parents as my brother. He was in & out of prison, I wasn't.
We have bought our four daughters up with the same boundaries & moral principles. So why did one of them turn out so differently?
Answer- she made choices. I made choices. They were different from the ones my brother made.
It's all very well saying that parents should take responsibility, but what happens when, for example, you send a child to their room- only to have them push past you saying "if you touch me, I'll call childline!" Or something of that ilk.
I know some appalling parents. I grew up on an estate where they would send their kids out from the age of 5/6 barefoot, pushing their toddler siblings in pushchairs with dirty noses & dirtier nappies. They were out, barely dressed, all day every day, left to roam the streets. The primary socialisation these kids received was worse than useless.
There are crap parents. There are kids who choose to misbehave despite stable, loving homes.
Blaming the parents is the easiest way out. It's also flawed.
I gave mine the phone and phone number, I would love to go to court for punishing my children, I would go away for the crime but I would go having my voice heard in a court of law and look the judge in the eye as he passed sentence. I would rather that than be afraid of my children placing threats on me. I said that once. Then you realise you're up against a wall & you stand to have your entire family destroyed, and the rest of your children's lives potentially wrecked because of the actions of one.
I was on dury service once when a case was bought against a father that had hit his son after finding him stealing to support a drinking binge. The child was 15 and went to school the next day and told about his father. He was then arrested. The father asked the courts what was he suppose to do?
The judge asked who bought the case to court and asked them to remain and dismissed everyone else. In your two weeks (is) of jury service, you encountered a judge with some sense. It doesn't mean they're all afflicted with the same.
So my point is I would take my chances, to save my children anytime. I hope you never find yourself up against that particular rock & hard place, I really do.
I would also be held accountable for my childrens actions! I hope you never have cause to.
Peanut wrote:
It's not about the parent being directly to blame, but if a kid is deemed to be 'under-age' then like it or not that kid's parents are totally responsible. It comes with the territory. If they can't deal with a kid like the ones we are talking about then they should be asking for help. if they are asking for help then that is (or should be) taken into account when they are brought to book.

Asking for help is all well and good. However, what happens when you do, and "help" tells you that all they can do is offer you parenting classes, but that they're not aimed at people like you? You're doing all the right things- and they only have the resources to help the families who aren't.
There are quite a few good families here alone who have found themselves fighting for help. They've had to make decisions that go against their own standards for the "greater good." Don't imagine you can understand what they're going through, or what they face on a day to day basis. Please don't assume that you know what you'd do in their shoes. You cannot possibly grasp the complexities of such a situation unless you've lived it.
Having said my piece on behalf of those families I know will be reading this kiss, methinks it's time to step away.
Quote by Peanut

I never said all kids only 95%.

And the source of the statistic? :twisted: wink
Sorry to copy your reply to me which was " And you can continue to wait. I have neither the time nor the inclination to try to dig up something I read somewhere and can't remember where. If you don't believe then that's fine ". Touche. lol :lol:
I don’t think for one minute all bad parenting makes for bad children. Luckily some better their lives, I have friends that have grown up to be law abiding citizens.
They still have insecurities even in adulthood. They still feel a sense of no self esteem and question their self worth which they have difficulty with at times.
I have anger for parents that treat children in such a diabolic way they should be brought to justice and be punished. My point was just this in my op not all 16 year olds should be sent to prison for more torture.
Also I know there are parents out there doing their best by their children and still the child seems to have the upper hand.
I would not or could not ever let my child think they can get the upper hand over me sod what the pc brigade say about it. These are my children to bring up as loving caring and well adjusted adults and in doing so if punishment is deserved then punishment is given. Just to say I have three children a 17 year old boy and twins one of each 11. My 17 year old still has to be in bed by on college night’s home at 9pm if he doesn’t like the rules he is old enough to move out.
I do feel we can do more for our children from early ages by setting clear defined boundaries and explaining from as young as 2-3 the consequences of their actions.
To explain right from wrong, people are too scared for others to see at this age a child having a temper tantrum because a parent has said no to their wishes. I have worked for a large chain store for 18 years I saw parents give in to quieten the child to save embarrassment. If you move the boundaries then, you have lost the fight, the problems just get bigger the older the child.
Quote by kentswingers777

I never said all kids only 95%.

And the source of the statistic? :twisted: wink
Sorry to copy your reply to me which was " And you can continue to wait. I have neither the time nor the inclination to try to dig up something I read somewhere and can't remember where. If you don't believe then that's fine ". Touche. lol :lol:
I expected nothing less biggrin
Quote by winchwench
Peanut wrote:
It's not about the parent being directly to blame, but if a kid is deemed to be 'under-age' then like it or not that kid's parents are totally responsible. It comes with the territory. If they can't deal with a kid like the ones we are talking about then they should be asking for help. if they are asking for help then that is (or should be) taken into account when they are brought to book.

Asking for help is all well and good. However, what happens when you do, and "help" tells you that all they can do is offer you parenting classes, but that they're not aimed at people like you? You're doing all the right things- and they only have the resources to help the families who aren't.

Ah, sorry, I didn't make myself clear. What I meant was that the fact they asked for help should be a mitigating factor should they be up in front of the beak. Not on how successful said help request was. I'm well aware that there is less than perfect help available in some areas of the country. Having said that though, if one doesn't ask, one doesn't get... until it's far too late.
There are quite a few good families here alone who have found themselves fighting for help. They've had to make decisions that go against their own standards for the "greater good." Don't imagine you can understand what they're going through, or what they face on a day to day basis. Please don't assume that you know what you'd do in their shoes. You cannot possibly grasp the complexities of such a situation unless you've lived it.

It all depends on what considers to be a good parent. Some consider a good parent to be someone who never raises a hand to their kid, gives them everything they ever asked for etc etc. There are some who consider bad parents to be ones who hit their kids when they play up, who say no to the kids most times they ask for something gratuitous.
Given the tone of your last sentence I can see you misunderstood my remark. I'm sorry that you did. It was not my intention to judge, but no you are partly wrong, I can grasp the complexities even though I haven't experienced all of situations like that. Direct experience of some of it, visual experience of other components allows me to extrapolate what it's like. The fact still remains that regardless of the situation, regardless of the complexities as soon as a couple decide to have a child then they are responsible for that child, for good or bad no matter how helpless or blame-free they are, until that child is old enough to bear responsibility for themselves. Yes I realise that is black and white, but sometimes in life some things are black and white. This I believe is one of them.
Having said my piece on behalf of those families I know will be reading this kiss, methinks it's time to step away.

Please don't. A good debate requires input from all arenas.
Quote by winchwench
Asking for help is all well and good. However, what happens when you do, and "help" tells you that all they can do is offer you parenting classes, but that they're not aimed at people like you? You're doing all the right things- and they only have the resources to help the families who aren't.

worship to that
Quote by winchwench
There are quite a few good families here alone who have found themselves fighting for help. They've had to make decisions that go against their own standards for the "greater good." Don't imagine you can understand what they're going through, or what they face on a day to day basis. Please don't assume that you know what you'd do in their shoes. You cannot possibly grasp the complexities of such a situation unless you've lived it.
Having said my piece on behalf of those families I know will be reading this kiss, methinks it's time to step away.

I've said it before and I'll say it again.....
You should have been born with wings and a halo :kiss:
A lot of children on our estate have been brought up with "paid for on benefits" perks. They see their parent/s having never worked, drinking, smoking and at home with all the electrical gadgets under the sun.
They never learn the value of taking part, earning or having good behaviour rewarded. Instead they become instant gratification mongrels, whose parents give them money to shut them up! When that's gone they look for other ways to get money and kicks.
Over the last 20/30 years the change in societal acceptance of violence has shifted, look at the use of bad language, violent films, violent computer games, they see criminals glorified and untouchable by the law! They see these people as role models sadly.
Instead of instilling good societal values in these kids, the authorities have put a ring fence around these kids, whilst their parents have capitalised on softer laws absolving them of their responsibilities.
Do I believe in jail for kids under 16? Damn right I do, however as someone else mentioned, it should be hard to do, no TV, no games, no computers, it should be a programme of worth, teach kids the value of learning a physical trade (even early on), teach them to provide for themselves, what they grow they cook and eat, get them into good physical fitness. qualifications, a sense of having a place in society.
It should be as such; get up have breakfast, spend 5 hours doing qualifications, GCSE's etc focus on the 3 R's, lunch, 5 hours of physical activity ranging from fitness, working in a garden/farm environment to grow and provide food, learning a trade etc, evening meal, and bed!
Problem with the kids round here is that they are in and out of the system, no one addresses the real problems with them and so they re-offend, they spread the word amongst their mates that it's cushy and so prison is no longer a punishment to be feared, I mean it even gets wiped off their record at 16!!!!
All I am going to say is that I had a horrific upbringing, exactly the same as my siblings did. They unfortunately turned out to be carbon copies of my parents; I on the other hand have carved out a very good life for myself.
If it is all down to upbringing, why am I not the same as the rest of my family?
Likewise, I have a friend who had an absolutely charmed childhood, they could not have asked for better parents and she is a credit to them, yet her brother is scum, for want of a better word.
Quote by winchwench
our kids have all been raised the same. One of them became friends with a kid who had been fostered. This kid was full of half-truths about how she never had to lift a finger to help in the house, how she received vast amounts of spending/clothing money...got special exceptions made for her, etc etc. A downward, hellish spiral began. When kids these days say "you can't do that to me!" they're usually right. If they're clever enough, they can manipulate the system to dance to their tune.
Which is my whole point, the system should be tuned towards protecting the child from itself as well as any outside harmful influence, the system should not allow for manipulation.
I won't go into any more detail in here, but I know that kids are not all born the same.
But then surely that statement infers that some people are born 'evil' for want of a better word? With the exception of those with mental illness surely all children are born as a blank canvas, it being parental behaviour and early socialisation which imprints a standard of behaviour?
As for the crappy parenting always resulting in bad kids:
I have a close friend. (:shocksmile Her mum was a really- really- nasty piece of work. I went to the house she grew up in recently, and saw the hole in the bathroom door her mum made when trying to knock it down. My friend had locked herself & little brother in there when her mum had tried to kill them with a carving knife. One of my friends classmates was killed in a car accident when she was about 11. My friends mum turned to her & said "I wish it had been you."
The mother died when my friend was at the impressionable age of 13. Her dad felt unable to cope, so he sent her to live with friends of the family. These friends were heavily into toting guns & crime. She flirted with the gun toting for a while. Her "foster" dad her when she was 14. She reported it, and was told she'd been "asking for it" by wearing a disney nightie. Whilst waiting for the case to be heard, the perpetrators family firebombed the bedroom she was sleeping in.
When she told her dad what had been done to her, he (a christian) responded by saying "we must forgive people who do bad things to us."
She had an horrific upbringing. However, she chose something different. She's been literally groundbreaking with her choice of career, has travelled widely, and gained a science degree a couple of years ago.
She still bears scars- mental and physical- for example she will only go near guy's you could guarantee would be the complete opposite of her dad. She can't hold down a relationship. However, she's living proof that bad parenting does not always create bad kids.
Yes, I'm sure there will always be exceptions, but i still maintain that they are the exception, not the rule. Whilst not wishing to in any way diminish the suffering your friend has been through, surely the fact remains that her terrible experiences have shaped parts of her future behaviour? You have said it yourself, no she hasn't turned into a gun toting maniac, but her past experience has had a negative effect on her current abilty to form a relationship. The person with 'parental' responsibility (the foster father) has damaged her to that degree by his actions.

Winch,
I seriously do not wish any offence in my last post, I was hesitant to discuss your friend any further but felt the point pertinent enough to take a chance. If i have caused any offence please accept my apologies in advance.
Quote by staffcple
Yep,
It's black and white as far as i am concerned.
Nature vs nurture.......
I do not believe for one second that people are born to become 'evil' for want of a better word. So what makes them like that? Only leaves one thing really doesn't it?

Yes its a very difficult one but i believe people are 'born evil' ok born evil is a bit strong but you know what i mean, i do not believe that a bad upbringing alone makes you bad, many people have a poor child hood and are abused etc and they manage to over come their ordeal and turn out decent people and good parents, and if you blame peoples upbringing for being 'evil' then why arn't all siblings in a family the same? if they have the same parents and are bought up the same surely they should all be 'evil' but usually thats not the case, many 'evil' people have had a perfectly normal child hood, i think its just in some people to disregard a care for others in whatever way they choose and thats not something thats instilled in you thats something that just part of you, some people have the ability to know right from wrong and can act on that to keep them on the straight and narrow and some can't, and i truely believe thats something your born with.
Quote by well_busty_babe
All I am going to say is that I had a horrific upbringing, exactly the same as my siblings did. They unfortunately turned out to be carbon copies of my parents; I on the other hand have carved out a very good life for myself.
If it is all down to upbringing, why am I not the same as the rest of my family?

i fully agree with you there WBB, i had a very bad child hood my dad was an abusive alcoholic and my mum wasn't much better i spent most of my life being shipped around other family members because social services kept taking us off our parents because of the abuse and lack of care, both me and my sister have children and tho we both drink neither of us have a drinking problem and neither of us abuse our children and have had them taken off us, i believe my childhood made me a better parent because i wanted to give my kids everything i never had and the biggest thing i could give was love, so like you said if its your upbringing why arn't i like my parents? yes your childhood does effect you my sister suffered from eating disorders for years which i believe was a cry for help but having bad things done to you does NOT mean you will turn out bad.
Quote by naughtynymphos1
Yes its a very difficult one but i believe people are 'born evil' ok born evil is a bit strong but you know what i mean, i do not believe that a bad upbringing alone makes you bad

I'm sorry, I simply cannot rationalize the fact that people are born bad.
We are all of us born with the same, with no morals, no fear, no inhibitions and no compassion. What gives us those qualities? It's nurture that makes us what we are.
I'll agree as i have all along that there are exceptions to the bad parents = bad children, but that is where free choice comes into things, however Imho that free choice is still based on life experience, not the fact you were 'born that way'.
However, none of it, whether free choice, nurture, nature or peer pressure is or ever should be offered as an excuse for stepping outside of what society deems as basic human decency. As Peanut said earlier in the debate, someone is responsible, someone always is, whether thats child or parent matters not a jot in the great scheme of things.
Fact is in society today there are an awful lot of parents who don't deserve children, they have them, take no notice at all, set no boundaries, take no interest and then refuse to take any responsibility or fall back on the 'I can't control them' defence when said child ends up doing someone serious harm. Why should they be allowed to absolve their responsibilitys in that way?
Fair? I don't think so.
In fact i'd go as far as to say sometimes a license to reproduce might be an idea, because like it or not there are people in society who shouldn't be trusted with a hamster never mind a child.
Quote by kentswingers777
Mar I have seen your replies many many times about bad parents, and you seem to take it as a personel insult to you. dunno
I have seen some of your replies and YOU seem like a great parent. It is not an insult to you everytime someone blames the parents. Now excluding you Mar I have seen and heard many things about kids and their parents, I also have to say that bad parenting always equals bad kids.
All children ARE born the same it is the boundaries held within the home that make the difference. Someone said how do you stop a child who pushes past you to go out when they are grounded. I tell you what my kids would never have done that and I wonder why?
Because they respected me and yes were fearful of me at times but I tell you I never had any trouble from them ever.
I have to not agree as I feel most, not all kids, are a product of their parents skills as a parent, and lets be honest there are some shit parents out there. I dont blame all the parents for their shit kids but... I blame 95% of them.

The parent subject has a massively emotional impact on me but I don't take it 'personally' no... simply because the authors don't know me. What pisses me off is general comments that ALL parents are to blame. Believe me I know of a few parents in this forum alone that are going through the mill with their kids and they are fine wonderful people, they don't deserve it and I think if some people stepped out their bubbles now and then and saw the bigger picture they'd maybe see a different slant on things.
Good for you that you've never been subject to the 'pushing past' on grounding. I didn't have the pushing past as such but I had the breaking out of the house and scaling the walls before pegging it up the street, does that mean I'm bad?? I'm not even going to go into details with my skills as a parent because it's not in question but my argument in here is to people please don't blame all the parents and as you rightly said, a few of them are to blame, I've never denied that.
I agree children are born the same, (n -v- n) it's a blank canvas. I once watched a documentary on Pyschopathic killers which was very interesting in that all the killers were born normal children but they were systematically abused by their fathers over many years which caused them to 'flip' with such hatred. I'm not in any way shape or form making excuses, they shouldn't kill, but what I'm saying is they weren't necessarily born evil, circumstances changed them into evil..this is the instance I say, yes blame the parents.
I hope that's cleared it up for everyone cos I ain't commenting anymore on this thread. lol
Quote by jaymar

Mar I have seen your replies many many times about bad parents, and you seem to take it as a personel insult to you. dunno
I have seen some of your replies and YOU seem like a great parent. It is not an insult to you everytime someone blames the parents. Now excluding you Mar I have seen and heard many things about kids and their parents, I also have to say that bad parenting always equals bad kids.
All children ARE born the same it is the boundaries held within the home that make the difference. Someone said how do you stop a child who pushes past you to go out when they are grounded. I tell you what my kids would never have done that and I wonder why?
Because they respected me and yes were fearful of me at times but I tell you I never had any trouble from them ever.
I have to not agree as I feel most, not all kids, are a product of their parents skills as a parent, and lets be honest there are some shit parents out there. I dont blame all the parents for their shit kids but... I blame 95% of them.

The parent subject has a massively emotional impact on me but I don't take it 'personally' no... simply because the authors don't know me. What pisses me off is general comments that ALL parents are to blame. Believe me I know of a few parents in this forum alone that are going through the mill with their kids and they are fine wonderful people, they don't deserve it and I think if some people stepped out their bubbles now and then and saw the bigger picture they'd maybe see a different slant on things.
Good for you that you've never been subject to the 'pushing past' on grounding. I didn't have the pushing past as such but I had the breaking out of the house and scaling the walls before pegging it up the street, does that mean I'm bad?? I'm not even going to go into details with my skills as a parent because it's not in question but my argument in here is to people please don't blame all the parents and as you rightly said, a few of them are to blame, I've never denied that.
I agree children are born the same, (n -v- n) it's a blank canvas. I once watched a documentary on Pyschopathic killers which was very interesting in that all the killers were born normal children but they were systematically abused by their fathers over many years which caused them to 'flip' with such hatred. I'm not in any way shape or form making excuses, they shouldn't kill, but what I'm saying is they weren't necessarily born evil, circumstances changed them into evil..this is the instance I say, yes blame the parents.
I hope that's cleared it up for everyone cos I ain't commenting anymore on this thread. lol
Mar of course not ALL parents are to blame. You can be a great parent but still end up having a complete horrid kid on your hands. Of course I do not know you but I know enough to know from your posts, that you do the best you can. Thats all you can do.
There is a not a thread of truth to say kids can be born bad, what a load of old cop out bollocks. Kids are a bye product of many things BUT things that happen after they are born, and not before.
Yes I was strict with my kids and would never have tolerated back chat or rudeness, and they knew that from day one. That is why I never got it, but had I have I would have nipped it in the bud straight away, beit when they were two or twenty two. They still show me respect and others too. What a sorry world we live in now when people notice a child when it says please and thankyou for something, as it does not seem the norm anymore.
Yes I was tough sometimes on my kids, and yes I know the bleeding herart liberals would say I did my parenting through putting fear into my kids, but I dont care what they would say. All I know is my kids gave me no problems, they are polite and they are both in their twenties now. But I tell you this they love me and treat me like any of their other mates do treat their Fathers. I could not have been that bad then...can I ?
Oh and don't stop posting Mar either for you have a right to say your thoughts and feelings, as anyone else has. x
Quote by staffcple
Yes its a very difficult one but i believe people are 'born evil' ok born evil is a bit strong but you know what i mean, i do not believe that a bad upbringing alone makes you bad

I'm sorry, I simply cannot rationalize the fact that people are born bad.

Wouldn't that depend not so much on what bad is but how bad is caused.
It's certainly possible and is written up lots of times about how brain 'wiring' is developed from a very early age. For example the amygdala is known to be an important brain area related to sociopathic behaviour.
We are all of us born with the same, with no morals, no fear, no inhibitions and no compassion. What gives us those qualities? It's nurture that makes us what we are.

No, not at all. Nurture is what makes a lot of us what we are. Some people are incapable of learning right from wrong, some people are incapable of caring whether what they do is right or wrong. Some people understand but make a concious decision to ignore what they've been taught for many different reasons.
What makes us what we are is choice and not nurture. Nurture just educates us as to what the choices are.
I'll agree as i have all along that there are exceptions to the bad parents = bad children, but that is where free choice comes into things, however Imho that free choice is still based on life experience, not the fact you were 'born that way'.

We are born with different abilities, different genetics and into different circumstances all of which are relevant. We may not be born bad, but as with everyone, that's where it starts for one reason or another.
If you go to any child nursery and observe, you will eventually see that some kids are just plain bad. They will stand out as such yet they are so young that nurture hasn't had time yet to have had an impact on their behaviour patterns. All the other kids behave in one way, yet there are the above mentioned 'bad' ones.
However, none of it, whether free choice, nurture, nature or peer pressure is or ever should be offered as an excuse for stepping outside of what society deems as basic human decency. As Peanut said earlier in the debate, someone is responsible, someone always is, whether thats child or parent matters not a jot in the great scheme of things.

How could I not agree with that lol
Fact is in society today there are an awful lot of parents who don't deserve children, they have them, take no notice at all, set no boundaries, take no interest and then refuse to take any responsibility or fall back on the 'I can't control them' defence when said child ends up doing someone serious harm. Why should they be allowed to absolve their responsibilitys in that way?
Fair? I don't think so.
In fact i'd go as far as to say sometimes a license to reproduce might be an idea, because like it or not there are people in society who shouldn't be trusted with a hamster never mind a child.

Ah, the ever popular question. Which should take precedence, human rights or societal rights?
I rather doubt there'll ever be a satisfactory answer to that one. rolleyes