Why do so many couples not bother to include any pictures of the husband / male partner on their SH profiles?
Can only assume that
a ) they're so ugly that it would put people off
b) they think that people don't care about what he looks like
c) they're not really interested in meeting couples, just looking for males
Come on folks. If you genuinely want to meet a couple, let's have pics of both of you.
Folk use the galleries for so many reasons.
Its pointless to speculate the whys.
We have the public pics to highlight our interests and a private face pic to help folk identify us or rule us out if looks are their bag.
I would be interested to hear why other posters use the pics that they do.
We maybe a little different because even though we advertise to meet couples it is merely for voyeuristic and exhibiting purposes, we don`t swap partners so for us attraction to the other couple isn`t always necessary although we do like to be able to have a chat and a bit of a giggle.
Plus I would of thought in most cases the guys are more interested in looking at the women than they are in looking at the men.
We have lots of pictures on our profile because we like taking pictures but there are pictures of us both. We don't show our faces in the public pictures but we have an album of face pictures and a private album of rude pictures showing our faces. It is important to me that others have pictures of both the male and female in public too.
Although I do partake in a little girly play, we are primarily here as a full swap couple and if I am going to fuck a guy, then I need to know what he looks like and know that I am attracted to him.
I see a profile as a persons shop window. If you walk past a shop and like what you see in the window, you will go in and take a look, if you don't, you will just walk past. If there are no pictures and no text on a profile telling people who you are and what you want then why would anyone want get in touch with you?
If people send us a message asking for a meet then I will ask for pictures if there are none on the profile but I wouldn't even think about sending a message to anyone without pictures of the guy on their profile because there is nothing there to catch my eye
We think that if there are no pictures of the guy in public then he obviously has something to hide and must be fat or ugly.
There's one of me but several of Jewl on our profile. Why? Jewl is more photogenic, but crap at taking pictures. No ones ever grumbled that the one of me is like a swinging version of 'Where's Wally' and if people really want to see what I look like they can always ask. It's not held us back from meeting anyone and no one has turned us down because there's little in the way of photos of me. What I don't get is why people need 20 photos of themselves that are basically the same pose - Here's me in a hat, here's me without a hat, here's me in a hat at a jaunty angle etc and don't get me started on close up pictures of what seems like the guy has his cock in some kind of ninja choke hold. Surely one is enough if you're that way inclined?
One of the reasons I dont have all my pics in public anymore is I received some pretty sick PMs about them from gay guys - I dont know if couples get the same but I found some of the things they wrote pretty twisted.
We think that if there are no pictures of the guy in public then he obviously has something to hide and must be fat or ugly.
Some people like to keep their face pics private for their own reasons and I`m sure that applies to many body types, not just the "fat or ugly" ones.
I must be really lucky cos I have never had a sick unprompted PM. We rarely get any mildly interesting ones.
I think its largely what we are used to seeing in the world of erotica, soft or hard porn etc.
that is; that women are more photographed than men. and the general public and purveyors of such don't normally demand to see some suitable male counterpart posing alongside them.
although in some societies and during some eras men and women have had an equal role in erotica. but at the moment that is less so.