Join the most popular community of UK swingers now
Login

Monogamous relationships

last reply
49 replies
3.0k views
0 watchers
0 likes
Monogamous relationships
I’m 45. Been “married” 3 times. By the time I was mid 20s, I’d been (metaphorically) twice around the world.
But I’ve never had a successfullong term monogamous relationship.
One thing I can’t get past in my mind about monogamous relationships is the “dead end” aspect of sex.
Don’t get me wrong, throughout my adult life - I’ve had some wondrous sex with some fantastic women. I’ve had my mind blown almost as much and as deeply as the cock. But I’ve always, sometimes eventually had the question pop into my mind “Is this it”
That’s not in the slightest meant to be derogatory. To anyone.
Then I found “the lifestyle” and within it, quite a few people that actually “get it” (TM Darkfire)
So, while ever it’s working, I’ll be here.
To quote one of the gorgeous ladies of SH – “I never realised that my sex life was called swinging” kiss
You/us bunch of perv’s might not be the best section of people to ask this, but . . . . . . .
How does one see past the dead endedness (????) of sex within a monogamous relationship.
Or could my opinion/view be seen as selfishness on my part
The answers of “Making the effort” “Keeping things fresh” etc don’t really provide any real difference to either my experiences or views.
*Disclaimer
For those that “read between the lines” – When you’ve read between these lines, read also my sig block wink
I don't think I can answer that question as I also don't know how to get past the 'dead endness'........although I can see myself being in a relationship and not actively 'swinging' for certain periods of time, I don't think I could be in a relationship where the possibility was not there......
to me part of this feeling I think comes from being bisexualish and whilst I wouldn't want to have a relationship with a woman I wouldn't want to be in a situation where I knew I would never be intimate with another woman ever again.....
before I discovered SH I didn't really know about swinging but always made it clear to potential boyfriends etc about my wants/needs/fantasies, and whilst many found it a turn on initially it became clear to me that some of them would not be able sustain that type of relationship and so I would move on......
like I said not really an answer to you question.......just my own ramblings......... smile
As a complete aside, poshkate - you sooooooo deserve recognition for this word . . .
bisexualish
(and the paragraph in which you used it)
worship
If I ever find myself using it - I will TM it to you kiss
why thank ya kind sir......... lol
Quote by poshkate
although I can see myself being in a relationship and not actively 'swinging' for certain periods of time, I don't think I could be in a relationship where the possibility was not there......
to me part of this feeling I think comes from being bisexualish and whilst I wouldn't want to have a relationship with a woman I wouldn't want to be in a situation where I knew I would never be intimate with another woman ever again.....

im slightly drunk and on my way to bed but i had to post coz you just said exactly what i feel smile apart from the "ish" bit..but good word!
Isn't monogamy that dark hard wood you make sideboards out of? confused
Relationships are not all about sex. I'd be quite happy in a monogamous relationship with the right person, it is more fulfilling of my needs. But right now, I have neither the swinging nor the monogamy so it is all academic.
In my vanilla relationships I found myself to be extremely loyal (not possessive or jealous – just loyal). Sexually I recall feelings of ‘that’s it then – I can’t think of anything else to try’ as I never considered involving other people (well I did make the suggestion to one bf in my early years and whilst he was game he said he would have to dump me afterwards – so I didn’t suggest that to anyone else). Whilst the bonds of friendship grew stronger, I found the sexual side of things becoming predictable and hard work to maintain the buzz that once made me tingle all over. Before anyone starts thinking – “oh she just isn’t very creative” … trust me there are only so many times you can cut the crotch out of your jeans so you can slide your partners fingers inside of you whilst sitting in your local before it gets predictable.
Whilst generally the guys were happy, I would still feel it just wasn’t enough.
I had experimented with small group/swapping in my late teens. I had a friend who was slightly older than me and was married – she suggested that I fuck her hubby one night so she could have his mate. It was exciting yet at the same time felt wrong that I was enjoying sex with my friend’s hubby. Shortly after that I had a 3some with two guys…. Whilst I didn’t actively seek to do either again (not consciously anyway) I guess this was all a sign of things to come.
Anyway – back to relationships. Sexually I would become maybe not bored but certainly unfulfilled and would find myself craving for excitement (which conflicted with the loyalty thing) and ultimately I would move on (yet remain good friends with most of my former partners).
I found myself seeking ‘fuck-buddies’ rather than relationships – best of both if you like. We could become close friends over time but we had freedom to continue to explore. Some of these arrangements where infrequent… some where pretty much like open relationships. One particular fb lasted on and off for around 15 years and I am now his daughter’s Godmother (poor kid).
I know by some of the things I do now I am a bit of a thrill-seeker and I love my freedom. Right now, the idea of a monogamous relationship feels stifling to me - how long that will last I have no idea, I only know what I feel right now.
I just read the title of this thread and thought it said Mongoose relationships; I can’t help feeling a bit cheated now.
That’s all.
I'm going to post my first response after reading this thread - although I may add aditional comments when I've thought about it some more. And yes this is a toally personal opinion.
I don't think that humans are designed to be monogamous. I think it is something we are capable of should we choose to be, but not the natural instinct. It's what a lot of us have had drummed into us all our lives, marriage, monogamy, 2.4 children and the nice family estate car.
I love and adore my gf but I can easily have sex with another person and it will in no way effect my love for her. So why would I be upset if she did the same? I think it's totally unrealistic to expect that you will get all your needs met (sexual or otherwise) from one single person for the rest of your life. Yes there are people who do that, and I say good on them, but it's not for me.
I would consider myself selfish if I thought that I was capable of swinging but tried to stifle any such behaviour in my partner. However I want her to be happy, as long as she comes home to me and loves me then I'm happy. I don't think I could be in a relationship if my gf said "that's it, no more" as it would just be storing up trouble for the future as I don't think I'm capable of monogamy for years on end. Whether it be 5 years or 10 years down the line the inevitable would happen and I would break my promise, hence why I wouldn't/couldn't make it in the first place.
I don't think that one can make sweeping generalisations as to how humans are 'designed' in order to excuse yourself from the fact that monogamy doesn't work for you or fit itself nearly into your psyche..... it is all down to the individuals, their relationships, morals, ethics, what makes them happy and so on...
To the OP, I do understand your question and the whole 'deadendness' of it all - hence the reason that we are part of the fine world of swinging - but life can never be guaranteed to end up a certain way anyway, so why put yourself through the worry of "oh no, I'll never f*ck anyone else again" when you don't know that is going to be the case?
For us, swinging helps us not panic into the whole 'no one else ever again' mindset, but we participate in it due to many other factors too... being a swinging couple means that we don't need to have those thoughts as we never know what/who is around the next corner sexually... we could have a thousand swinging encounters in the next year, or none, but we would be no more or no less sexually aware of the fact that it could be 'just sex with each other and no-one else' as we have the OPTION of other people if the people/situations and so on come along. We haven't painted ourselves into the corner that a lot of vanilla couples do, and as such the asking of such questions about monogamy and its restrictions are, in essence, made redundant.
I suppose what I am trying to say is, why not just keep things simple instead of trying to look ahead and think 'Shit, what if this is it?'. Even if you were 100% monogamous, married and totally happy with that, it still may not be the end of sex with other people, so why assume that it would be in any case?
Every relationship, whatever the status, should ultimately be undertaken because the two people are happy with it and they find it fulfilling. There are too many labels and questions being thrown around for my liking... why not just enjoy what you have instaed of analysing it to the hilt? If it doesn't feel right to you, then in all honesty it probably isn't.. thats not a bad thing, just the way that it goes......
Peace and love to all
Quote by lysistrata
I don't think that one can make sweeping generalisations as to how humans are 'designed' in order to excuse yourself from the fact that monogamy doesn't work for you or fit itself nearly into your psyche..... it is all down to the individuals, their relationships, morals, ethics, what makes them happy and so on...l

That's why I said it's a totally personal opinion.
And as for you implying that I feel the need to make "excuses" isn't that rather a large assumption on your part? rolleyes
I didn't say that was in reference to you - I was answering the thread as a whole.
Sorry that you saw it as a personal attack
Peace and love to all
Quote by lysistrata
I didn't say that was in reference to you - I was answering the thread as a whole.
Sorry that you saw it as a personal attack
Peace and love to all

Lysistrata
I think you were spot on.
For me I think a lot of it is "knowing I can".
Like you said having the option and both being completely happy and comfortable with that is a wonderful thing.
Lysistrata
I think you were spot on.
For me I think a lot of it is "knowing I can".
Like you said having the option and both being completely happy and comfortable with that is a wonderful thing

biggrin
Thanks
It's all about having the option for us, and not knowing what could potentially happen. Restricting yourself is bound to make you want something more.... if someone told me I would never eat another pork pie in my life, I'd probably then start wanting one.... lol....
I am currently single so am technically free to follow any path I wish,but meeting people who wish to share that path with me is another matter lol!
However if I were to meet someone special (in the outside world I mean,not via SH!)and they thought likewise of me I 'd be happy to be in a faithful,commited relationship with just that one person IF it was our mutual desire.
It just depends where I am at and who I am with at the time and how they see it too.
Quote by lysistrata
I don't think that one can make sweeping generalisations as to how humans are 'designed' in order to excuse yourself from the fact that monogamy doesn't work for you ....

Neither do I – you would be far better supporting such a generalised statement with the actual things which are going on around us in the world….
Not all cultures recognise the monogamous nature of relationships (so it also may be wrong to assume what is or isn’t human nature when looking at it from a Christian based monogamy supporting cultural background).
And even in the societies which drum the monogamy message into us from birth – what is actually happening. The news reports time and time again about affairs, people paying hookers, more affairs, wild sex parties, more affairs (even when those in the public eye know their status and livelihood could go down the pan if they were caught) the actions of those not content with monogamy are plastered everywhere. Look at the membership of this very site – why are many people here? I would hate to hazard a guess at how many guys per year come here to find something ‘extra’ outside of their ‘monogamous’ relationship. Look at the people you work with – does the canteen gossip never include who is knocking off who behind who’s back?
It could make you question if in fact monogamy is just a state of conditioning rather than human nature.
Did you know in years gone by the Hawaiians were almost killed off through Spanish sailors spreading syphilis? It was custom on the island to make guests feel welcome into your home by letting them sleep with your wife and as they had no sexually transmitted diseases, it was a bit of a shock when the sailors brought the clap to their way of life. Somewhere along the lines of most cultural histories it is likely you will find something like that happening and all of a sudden monogamy is the way of life ( or at least that is what is preached).
By the way – has anyone read the Old Testament?
So yes – I agree, it is a pretty poor show to use ones own personal feelings to question human nature when the world is full of much better examples wink
Quote by HornyLittleBlonde
Lysistrata
I think you were spot on.
For me I think a lot of it is "knowing I can".
Like you said having the option and both being completely happy and comfortable with that is a wonderful thing.

Assuming this quote relates to the larger post, I have to disagree.
Quote by lysistrata
To the OP, I do understand your question and the whole 'deadendness' of it all - hence the reason that we are part of the fine world of swinging - but life can never be guaranteed to end up a certain way anyway, so why put yourself through the worry of "oh no, I'll never f*ck anyone else again" when you don't know that is going to be the case?

I'm not sure that you do understand.
As we know, there are only two things about life that are guaranteed wink
But if you enter into a committed monogamous relationship, by it's very nature; surely you are saying you'll never fuck anyone else
For us, swinging helps us not panic into the whole 'no one else ever again' mindset, but we participate in it due to many other factors too... being a swinging couple means that we don't need to have those thoughts as we never know what/who is around the next corner sexually... we could have a thousand swinging encounters in the next year, or none, but we would be no more or no less sexually aware of the fact that it could be 'just sex with each other and no-one else' as we have the OPTION of other people if the people/situations and so on come along. We haven't painted ourselves into the corner that a lot of vanilla couples do, and as such the asking of such questions about monogamy and its restrictions are, in essence, made redundant.

Made redundant by the simple fact that as swingers, you're not in a monogamous relationship ??
I suppose what I am trying to say is, why not just keep things simple instead of trying to look ahead and think 'Shit, what if this is it?'. Even if you were 100% monogamous, married and totally happy with that, it still may not be the end of sex with other people, so why assume that it would be in any case?

Again, if you were in a 100% monogamous marriage, would you not be closing the door on having sex with anyone other than your spouse/partner. It wouldn't so much be an assumption, more a statement/commitment.
My original question wasn't about worrying and 'looking forward' It was more about arrivingat the point where you think "Is this it ?"
... why not just enjoy what you have instaed of analysing it to the hilt? If it doesn't feel right to you, then in all honesty it probably isn't.. thats not a bad thing, just the way that it goes......
Peace and love to all

Purely as an aside . . . . . .
Because by "analysing" you are able to see the good and the bad. Hopefully being able to increase the good and decrease the bad :wink:
Quote by dambuster
*Disclaimer
For those that “read between the lines” – When you’ve read between these lines, read also my sig block :wink:
Quote by PoloLady
Did you know in years gone by the Hawaiians were almost killed off through Spanish sailors spreading syphilis? It was custom on the island to make guests feel welcome into your home by letting them sleep with your wife and as they had no sexually transmitted diseases, it was a bit of a shock when the sailors brought the clap to their way of life. Somewhere along the lines of most cultural histories it is likely you will find something like that happening and all of a sudden monogamy is the way of life ( or at least that is what is preached).

Less than monogomous mores were prevalent throughout Polynesia until the 'civilising' influence of Christianity arrived. confused Maybe it would have been better to have eaten all the missionaries rather than just the choicest specimans. lol Eskimoes had the same problems. Offering the wife to visitors was still happening in the late 19th, early 20th century with the same STD problems.
As well as religious doctrine, cultures seem to need monogamy once possessions are seen as important and the need to be sure of who is inheriting your hard-earned comes into play. Contraception and penicillin has allowed playing away to be safer in recent years than at any time in history and as you said, the evidence is in the tabloids and divorce courts every day.
If monogomy is the true human condition then there are a lot of non-humans out there.. :lol: :lol: :lol:
And I thought I was giving a well thought-out and polite reply to a topic that I found rather interesting..... I understand that people may disagree with what I said, but having my post disected by people who don't agree with me is a harsh pill to swallow I must say (lol)
As I have said, and as I will continue to maintain, it is all a manner of choice that is down to the individual/individuals persuing the relationships that they decide to lead.... I doubt that any amount of 'evidence' from history/the bible/sociological studies will change my mind - people do things for their own reasons - yes, they may be affected by society/upbringing and so on, but we are socialised and intelligent enough creatures to have free will and choice no matter what may have occured (or is occuring) to our other human counterparts throughout the world.... freedom of choice is a wonderful thing!
I was never questioning whether monogamy was or was not the 'true' human condition (if there is such a thing) I was just pointing out that it is a choice that people have, and as such some people are happy with it and can follow it through with no problems, while others will not.
In regards to *our* relationship, we are faithful to each other we just decide to include others within our sexual relationship. Swinging, by its very nature, is entirely different couple to couple, person to person, and we would still call ourselves monogamous, although we do include others within our sex life from time to time, as is our want. We are not unfaithful or even polygamous. Perhaps I am just arguing semantics, but I think that you can be 100% committed and satisfied sexually and yet still want to include others. Of course, the true definition of monogamy is sex with one person within a marriage, and since we are not married (or will we be as we do not feel the need to do so), monogamy would never apply to us as a term in any case... but the principle behind it (to us) is the same.
I suppose what I am trying to say is that you cannot generalise human behaviour or the whys and wherefores of things by looking anywhere other than inside yourself and your realtionships - looking at what *you* want and how *you* and your partner feels. Asking for advice on such a topic is, of course, a fantastic thing to do, especially when people are as open and as honest as they are on here, but in my personal opinion, most people ask questions already knowing what they want to hear and hoping for some evidence to agree and affirmation.
Anyway, I shall say my piece, be glad that we are all able to speak as freely as we wish and hope that you all have a fantastic sunday :-)
Peace and love to all
A very interesting read is an article called "DEFLATING THE MYTH OF MONOGAMY by
David P. Barash"
You will find it here:
There is something here that I'd like to knock on the head as quickly as possible.
Quote by lysistrata
And I thought I was giving a well thought-out and polite reply to a topic that I found rather interesting..... I understand that people may disagree with what I said, but having my post disected by people who don't agree with me is a harsh pill to swallow I must say (lol)

If that's about my response post, then you misunderstand.
I didn't intentionally "dissect your post" - In my head, I separated pieces of it in order to answer individual parts of it.
In regards to *our* relationship, . . . . . .

redface That could be a fault on my part in that I'm unable to correctly use the pronoun "one" as opposed to "you"
To be clear, some, if not all uses by me of "you" were meant in a general "all/us" type of way, rather than "you personally, lysistrata"
Anyway, I shall say my piece, be glad that we are all able to speak as freely as we wish and hope that you all have a fantastic sunday :-)
Peace and love to all

I may also be guilty of committing a cardinal sin (to me) in that I haven't been and "looked at you" (lysistrata) and entered into dialogue before knowing you kiss
I wanted to get that out and said.
Now I have to go and re-read your last post more thoroughly and possibly over and over regarding the "Asking for advice" paragraph :shock:
Thanks for that Kiss - it seems that part of what I was trying to say was summed up rather beautifully in the conclusion of this article:
"There is no question about monogamy's being natural. It isn't. But at the same time, there is no reason to conclude that adultery is unavoidable, or that it is good. "Smallpox is natural," wrote Ogden Nash. "Vaccine ain't." Animals, most likely, can't help "doing what comes naturally." But humans can. A strong case can even be made that we are never so human as when we behave contrary to our natural inclinations, those most in tune with our biological impulses.
In Civilization and Its Discontents, Freud argued that civilization is founded on the repression of instincts. It now seems clear that one of those instincts leads us away from monogamy. Whether we choose to follow, on the other hand, is up to us."
Perhaps people understand my point a little more now, as I may not have put it very well initially. I was neither arguing for or against monogamy being a 'natural' or 'unnatural' state of events, more that it is a choice that people have - some people take that choice, others dont.
My last words on the subject, I promise wink
Peace and love to all
apart to say thanks to Dam of course.... I've just had a few people 'kick off' with us on here and so can be a little unsure of what people mean when they reply in a way that isn't in agreeance to me (lol)
So thanks mister biggrin
Quote by lysistrata
. . . I've just had a few people 'kick off' with us on here and so can be a little unsure of what people mean when they reply in a way that isn't in agreeance to me (lol)
So thanks mister biggrin

On a semi-serious note . . .
That can be one of the problems with the "written word"
:thumbup:
If I didn't do so at the time - Welcome to the asylum.
Off now to go "have a look" wink
I think I'm fairly well qualified to answer this one.
Until recently I have been in a monogamous marriage of decades duration. The marriage continues but it is no longer monogamous.
At no time have I ever really felt that sex was 'dead-end', because it was always the physical expression of true love making (mushy, I know, but true). But, I guess it is also true, that I looked for something else, as additional not instead of.
Starting to swing has enabled me to identify in my mind the distinction between love making and recreational sex. The recreational sex can be intense and deeply meaningful with friends but it is different to our love making. Angelica and I fully understand this and we both agree that it has made our marriage stronger.
.
Quote by dambuster
As a complete aside, poshkate - you sooooooo deserve recognition for this word . . .
bisexualish
(and the paragraph in which you used it)
worship
If I ever find myself using it - I will TM it to you kiss

Ditto that man....
PK.....hope you don't mind me nicking the word too- I've been trying to sum the feeling up for ages and you just did it for me. :kiss:
Dammie, passionkiss
I have always battled with monogomous relationships and never even got near to the stage of marriage or what I could now have in the form of a commitment ceremony. I always felt that no one person could fulfill all my needs, just as no one group of friends could fulfill the variety that I enjoy in my life.
For a short time swinging seemed to give me the answers, but I found that I just couldn't be "impersonal" enough (and I know that isn't the correct way to describe what I mean - but I can't find the correct words so please don't knock me for useing that one). I also wanted evenings in front of the TV with a bottle of wine, or just cuddling etc. Perhaps if I had been part a couple swinging it may have been different, but as a single person I still felt something lacking. But I knew that swinging provided me with part of what I looked for, and becuase I had read a bit about poly, I had an inkling that what I was was not a swinger but poly. I was lucky enough to meet Mr and Mrs R through this site, who weren't really swingers either. Mrs R was bisexualish (I love it! biggrin ), but they weren't sure that the swinging lifestlye was what they were after. When I broached the subject of Poly with Mrs R she immediately identified with what I was saying, and we have now been together for coming onto 2 years. No - not a long term monogomous relationship yet, but the longest relationship I have actually had in my life to date, and one which I could honestly see me being in for the rest of my life. It isn't easy sometimes, but that isn't through the relationship being lacking - that's just because society can't accept the relationship we have, so it has to remain in the closet.
I know this isn't about swinging - its about being poly - but I think what it comes down to is that we all have different needs in our lives. We all respond to different stimuli. And the one male/one female for the rest of your life "model" just doesn't fit everybody. Unfortunately I doubt there will ever be a day when society accepts that.
I just think the most important thing is to follow one's heart, and be oneself, becuase as long as you aren't hurting anyone, then fluck what society thinks.
Just my opinion on an interesting topic.
Rsxx :color:
Thank you Gorgeous kiss
That's a spin I've never considered, or took a great deal of notice of - apart from looking for titties during that recen TV series redface
I will tho, go find out and read about "poly" - if only for educational reasons
:thumbup: