No, in 19 years I can honestly say I have not (I would post the roll eyes emoticon but it really doesnt do justice to the level of sarcasm I feel towards this post)! how come everyone knows that which I havent done???? perhaps its just the easy and lazy way of not admiting you dont actually have the answer? I dont expect the miracle cure but give me some credit for knowing a bit more about my marrieage than you do
Hi pleasureseeker
I would just like to say you shouldn't assume that everyone on here is a swinger, the only safe assumption you could probably make is everyone here has an interest in sex and sexual relations, in whatever form that may take, hence the reason you are getting such strong and different opinions.
Secondly, I would like to ask if your wife has such a "straight laced" attitude to sex, why has it only just become a big problem now after 19 years, surely she hasn't only just adopted this attitude?
Have you thought about sex therapy?
Point taken Tune, this is going nowhere. be happy in your lives...however you get there its your way, doesnt mean its everyone elses.
Glad the forum has been brought together.
sorted it ut on page 1? course you did, divorce the bitch eh? what a caring individual. your pic indicates your attitude...a general who is also a buffoon and out of touch with what is actaully going on.
Pleasureseeker made one mistake in his opening thread. He invited people to have a dig. And boy did they. From that point onwards he was, understandably, beleaguered and on the defensive. This then gave people the opportunity to then accuse him of 'only listening to views that aligned with his own'.
He is obviously inexperienced in arguing a point when confronted by a range of people who were indignant at his reaction - some of the indignation was righteous indeed.
I'm not saying that his position is particularly defensible but the guy was given no chance to absorb what was some good advice and maybe see that he might modify his view.
Classic pack demolition of a newcomer - not very pretty.
Pleasureseeker - I apologise for referring to you in the third person here - but I do it because I guess you might've 'pissed off'.
I just wonder wether we are gonna have to get all serious and re-hash this arguament every time some joker underestimates the IQ of the board and tries once again to use his 'doubts' and 'my wife doesnt understand me' in order to get an "in" to the board .
Just treat this as the clumsy and transparent attempt at manipulation that it is , and take pride that we are lucky enough to be in the company of people here that see it for what it is , a poor opening gambit .
Peace
Wow celticq, now that would be one hell of a hangover......... well it would when me credit card melted :dry:
Roll-up, roll-up. The moral high-ground band wagon is about to leave and there are still a few seats at the back!
OK, the guy came on here and opened up. OK, his idea may not suit the values that some of you put on what it means to be a ‘swinger’.
I appreciate that a lively debate makes for interesting reading and draws out important points.
I totally support the right to have and share opinions and beliefs.
I know how strongly people feel when they find a subject that hits on their values.
And for what it is worth - here is my opinion:
The levels of hypocrisy in this Café are steadily rising each time a post like this occurs.
I know regular users of this site who are in a ‘vanilla’ marriage/relationship and yet they are accepted by the masses:
Oh yes, but one is a woman!
And another one says he is not here to swing – but has tried his luck on more than one occassion!
Oh yes – another one said he tells his vanilla partner about ALL of his swinging activities (though I have always thought of 1-2-1 meets as being shagging)
I know regular users of this site that have/do meet men who are in ‘vanilla’ relationships – yet they call the men ‘cheats’ and take the moral high ground. I think I know women that do the same - but I am not totally sure on that one.
There are regular users of this site that go to swinging clubs and the subject of “do you have a partner at home?†is NEVER raised. FFS the subject of “by the way, what is your name?†barely gets brought up.
There are swinging couples on this site that attend munches and parties, accepted and befriended by you all – yet they fuck like mad behind their partners backs. And who are they fucking? Other SH members!
You may wish to condemn this guy – yet you condone the actions of others by failing to speak out against them as directly as you have with this guy.
What is the difference between him and them? Oh yes – could it be - you chat to them in the chatroom/they post a lot on the forum/you have had them/you know people who know them/you have met them in person and aside from cheating they are a really nice person/people?
Maybe you only condone through ignorance or maybe you are choosing to ignore. But if you choose to ignore one, then why not the other?
Is it just easier to apply your morals to the ‘new guy’?
Note: This opinion of mine does not apply to everyone who has added their stab to this thread – only those who choose to ignore and be selective of to whom their beliefs apply.
I agree wholeheartedly with Polo that moral high ground is a hard place to reach if your climbing equipment is the confused mix of values involved in what is loosely called swinging . I could give a toss about his morals , I just find it offensive that his opening gambit was so transparently manipulative , not to mention unoriginal.
"Can I just add that I am not particualrly looking for swinging. a relationship with someone in the same predicament would be the ideal, someone who I actually like and respect ..."
OK this is what I posted, however it seems to be taken as me advertising and touting my wares, I can assure you all it was not, I have not placed any adds on this site nor contacted anyone in order to pursue this, it was more of a case of typing out loud. I will repeat, faithfully married for 19 years, had chances to stry but havent done so.
A relationship with another woman in the same predicament, in my confused state seems the logical option...however wrong it is or may appear to be. I cannot believe some of the judgemental attitudes on here and also the propensity to put the boot in when the smell of blood is in the air. I have asked twice without answer (ironically) and will ask again, can any of you honestly deny you have had sex with someone who was cheating?
Asshole I perhaps maybe but I deeply resent the liar accusation
half an answer maybe, because there was still a chance they were cheating...or is it sometimes better not to ask too much info?
Anyway sorry for neglecting your reply.