Someone said this site is immoral.
Is it or do we just have different morals to the mundanes?
I have morals!
I don't paly with women at my work or my wife's.
I don't play with friends and family even if I do want to play with my wife's 3 sisters, OH and I do want to.
I alway use a condom when I play away.
I do not preach swinging to the mundanes.
Join the most popular community of UK swingers now
Login
moral or immoral
Sex God
This place is alright but there is too much sex going on and I'm not having it ! 
Someone said this site is immoral.
Is it or do we just have different morals to the mundanes?
I have morals!
I don't paly with women at my work or my wife's.
I don't play with friends and family even if I do want to play with my wife's 3 sisters, OH and I do want to.
I alway use a condom when I play away.
I do not peach swinging to the mundanes.
Yes you defo have morals
Is it or do we just have different morals to the mundanes?
I have morals!
I don't paly with women at my work or my wife's.
I don't play with friends and family even if I do want to play with my wife's 3 sisters, OH and I do want to.
I alway use a condom when I play away.
I do not peach swinging to the mundanes.
Yes you defo have morals
Quote by
Someone said this site is immoral.
Is it or do we just have different morals to the mundanes?
I have morals!
I don't paly with women at my work or my wife's.
I don't play with friends and family even if I do want to play with my wife's 3 sisters, OH and I do want to.
I alway use a condom when I play away.
I do not peach swinging to the mundanes.
I think calling non swingers MUNDANE is a bit of an insult personally!
Just because people don't swing - does not make them mundane, if fact they may have a far more exiting life than you do. Perhaps their sex life with their partner is tremendously exciting and fulfilling, so they feel no desire or need for other diversions.
You may feel their lives are mundane compared to yours sexually- but that is purely your opinion and one for which you can have no basis as you have no real idea of their sex lives.
If you had said vanilla that is more acceptable and less derogotary.
Just my thoughts.
Quote by Alexandra
Someone said this site is immoral.
Is it or do we just have different morals to the mundanes?
I have morals!
I don't paly with women at my work or my wife's.
I don't play with friends and family even if I do want to play with my wife's 3 sisters, OH and I do want to.
I alway use a condom when I play away.
I do not peach swinging to the mundanes.
I think calling non swingers MUNDANE is a bit of an insult personally!
Just because people don't swing - does not make them mundane, if fact they may have a far more exiting life than you do. Perhaps their sex life with their partner is tremendously exciting and fulfilling, so they feel no desire or need for other diversions.
You may feel their lives are mundane compared to yours sexually- but that is purely your opinion and one for which you can have no basis as you have no real idea of their sex lives.
If you had said vanilla that is more acceptable and less derogotary.
Just my thoughts.
Alex I agree with you on that one - nicely put.
NN sort of agree with u lol
Imoral na its great but then i do have morals but even im shocked at how there changing lately....but then im still young and niave (sp) but learning.....
I just think its best to let people think what they like cause they will any way...if they think its immoral then thats there thoughts..let them get on with it...
Imoral na its great but then i do have morals but even im shocked at how there changing lately....but then im still young and niave (sp) but learning.....
I just think its best to let people think what they like cause they will any way...if they think its immoral then thats there thoughts..let them get on with it...
Sex God
Quote by
Someone said this site is immoral.
Is it or do we just have different morals to the mundanes?
Taking the word mundane literally, I think you'll find most people here are very down to Earth.
As for morals, I think the great majority of SH members have a far stricter code governing their behaviour than outsiders would presume. We don't, for example, deliberately deceive and hurt each other, which many of those who judge from a position of ignorance would not be able to say of themselves.
People may express disapproval of some of our lifestyle choices while keeping quiet about their own, but the moral core on which those choices are built is something I'm far more confident of in this community than anywhere else.
Ice
Its a classic problem - there is no agreed definition of what 'moral' is between groups of different interests and beliefs.
By the standards of the Archbishop of Canterbury or Christian Voice I've no doubt we are seen as immoral. By the standards of some of my friend's late teenage children who get blind drunk at weekends and take enormous risks shagging whoever they meet in a pub or club, people on here who are careful and considerate are probably seen as quite moral / stuffy and old fashioned.
Its all Einstein's fault - he invented relativity.
By the standards of the Archbishop of Canterbury or Christian Voice I've no doubt we are seen as immoral. By the standards of some of my friend's late teenage children who get blind drunk at weekends and take enormous risks shagging whoever they meet in a pub or club, people on here who are careful and considerate are probably seen as quite moral / stuffy and old fashioned.
Its all Einstein's fault - he invented relativity.
Sexlightened
there's a moral backbone within the country and from area to area of it, which changes, as time goes by................are we going towards a more roman type of morality rather than what was deemed a strick moral code with the victorians.
The only difference was that in one, it was more a relaxed view of sex and the other the naughtiness of doing something that you was not allowed to do.
where do we fall in all this................well we like the openess of the romans and the naughtiness of the victorians...........so it means we are still f@*ked up sexually
just don't give me the freedom of the europeans
The only difference was that in one, it was more a relaxed view of sex and the other the naughtiness of doing something that you was not allowed to do.
where do we fall in all this................well we like the openess of the romans and the naughtiness of the victorians...........so it means we are still f@*ked up sexually
just don't give me the freedom of the europeans
Quote by Alexandra
Someone said this site is immoral.
Is it or do we just have different morals to the mundanes?
I have morals!
I don't paly with women at my work or my wife's.
I don't play with friends and family even if I do want to play with my wife's 3 sisters, OH and I do want to.
I alway use a condom when I play away.
I do not peach swinging to the mundanes.
I think calling non swingers MUNDANE is a bit of an insult personally!
Just because people don't swing - does not make them mundane, if fact they may have a far more exiting life than you do. Perhaps their sex life with their partner is tremendously exciting and fulfilling, so they feel no desire or need for other diversions.
You may feel their lives are mundane compared to yours sexually- but that is purely your opinion and one for which you can have no basis as you have no real idea of their sex lives.
If you had said vanilla that is more acceptable and less derogotary.
Just my thoughts.
Don,t be to upset with the term mundane, is just a short hand. Do you have a better term.
Quote by postie
I don't play with friends and family
Always a good idea not to go asking the father in law for a shag
Just a personal opinion I like the use of the words shag and fuck when used to refer to sex, but am turned off by other uses such as (please forgive) 'that f*cking bank has c*cked up my money. (It is not even good English)
I think correct use of Anglo-Saxon show a well adjust person where as the bank sentence just does not appeal.
Anyone feel the same? Am i Just on a rant.
I'm a Christian - I have a very active involvement in my church and I love the sexual freedom of this site. Trust me Christians are not all prudes and I want to add my support for all that this site stands for. Monogamy is unnatural and unnecessary - those of us who have expereinced freedom from monogamy know how good it is, how liberating, how much fun, and also how loving it can be.
I think it is a positive thing that more and more couples and singles are into swinging, swapping, groups etc etc
I think it is a positive thing that more and more couples and singles are into swinging, swapping, groups etc etc
Sex God
Quote by postie
I don't play with friends and family
Always a good idea not to go asking the father in law for a shag
:rotflmao: :rotflmao: :rotflmao: :rotflmao: :rotflmao: :rotflmao: :rotflmao: :rotflmao: :shock: sorry, that just tickled me :laughabove: :laughabove:
Sex God
Quote by naughtynymphos1
well i think its imoral to be expected to shag the same person for the rest of your life :huh:
Dino would agree with that
I think morals are a very personal thing.
My morals would probably be quite different to yours.
I do think though, that people on this site are more open than most and it's the openess which means that people don't knowingly hurt other people. That's the most important thing, really. :inlove:
Postie, I wish you hadn't made that comment about shagging fathers-in-law - that's put a quite horrible picture in my head and it won't go away! :doh:
My morals would probably be quite different to yours.
I do think though, that people on this site are more open than most and it's the openess which means that people don't knowingly hurt other people. That's the most important thing, really. :inlove:
Postie, I wish you hadn't made that comment about shagging fathers-in-law - that's put a quite horrible picture in my head and it won't go away! :doh:
Quote by Fallen Angel
I think morals are a very personal thing.
My morals would probably be quite different to yours.
I do think though, that people on this site are more open than most and it's the openess which means that people don't knowingly hurt other people. That's the most important thing, really. :inlove:
Postie, I wish you hadn't made that comment about shagging fathers-in-law - that's put a quite horrible picture in my head and it won't go away! :doh:
sorry to have started that line. I had no wish to upset you or anyone.
Sex God
Quote by
just a personal opinion I like the use of the words shag and fuck when used to refer to sex, but am turned off by other uses such as (please forgive) 'that f*cking bank has c*cked up my money. (It is not even good English)
I think correct use of Anglo-Saxon show a well adjust person where as the bank sentence just does not appeal.
Anyone feel the same? Am i Just on a rant.
Fucked if I know
Quote by Happy Cats
well i think its imoral to be expected to shag the same person for the rest of your life :huh:
Agree with that 100%, just can't work out how that is possible
Well, if your partner looked like HornyRed, believe me, you'd make it possible!
Seriously, I don't think it's anything to do with looks (or any other delights a partner has) I just can't imagine only ever having one bloke for the rest of my life..it's a variety thing :lol:
Quote by amalthea
well i think its imoral to be expected to shag the same person for the rest of your life :huh:
Agree with that 100%, just can't work out how that is possible
Well, if your partner looked like HornyRed, believe me, you'd make it possible!
Seriously, I don't think it's anything to do with looks (or any other delights a partner has) I just can't imagine only ever having one bloke for the rest of my life..it's a variety thing :lol:
I agree I love my wife and she loves me. That doe's not stop both of us having fun with others, and a shag is just a bit of fun. That what we think, but then when it's just the two of us together it is making love. Strange I don't think of it that way with other women.
Quote by
well i think its imoral to be expected to shag the same person for the rest of your life :huh:
Agree with that 100%, just can't work out how that is possible
Well, if your partner looked like HornyRed, believe me, you'd make it possible!
Seriously, I don't think it's anything to do with looks (or any other delights a partner has) I just can't imagine only ever having one bloke for the rest of my life..it's a variety thing :lol:
I agree I love my wife and she loves me. That doe's not stop both of us having fun with others, and a shag is just a bit of fun. That what we think, but then when it's just the two of us together it is making love. Strange I don't think of it that way with other women.
Agree 100%
Master of Sex
Quote by FreedomSeeker
Monogamy is unnatural and unnecessary
bollox!
I'm really not going to get into this debate coz im gonna end up saying something that won't be appreciated, my one word statement sums it up that sentence perfectly!
Each to their own...
Quote by Ice Pie
Someone said this site is immoral.
Is it or do we just have different morals to the mundanes?
Taking the word mundane literally, I think you'll find most people here are very down to Earth.
As for morals, I think the great majority of SH members have a far stricter code governing their behaviour than outsiders would presume. We don't, for example, deliberately deceive and hurt each other, which many of those who judge from a position of ignorance would not be able to say of themselves.
People may express disapproval of some of our lifestyle choices while keeping quiet about their own, but the moral core on which those choices are built is something I'm far more confident of in this community than anywhere else.
Ice
I have to agre with everyting you said Ice. People who dont swing think that people who do will shag anyone and everyone
Carol
