Join the most popular community of UK swingers now
Login

Percentage of genuine people on here?

last reply
69 replies
3.0k views
4 watchers
0 likes
I've never had any luck off the ads, had a few replies and a lot of time wasters.
I think the forum is where the real players are. They communicate, that has got to be a start! Here's hoping some horny fem or couple from the Borders or Edinburgh will rescue me from these pic collectors and guys pretending to be girls.
Quote by northwest-cpl

84.6% of all statistics are made up....

Too be honest I heard it was 86.4% but you were near enough I suppose.
Quote by davej
% approximately wink

Is this an approxiamate fib, a definate fib, or just bollocks :wink:
There's a % (approx) chance that it's bollox. :wink: not if your a driver and use a car park. :wink:
Quote by northwest-cpl

84.6% of all statistics are made up....

Too be honest I heard it was 86.4% but you were near enough I suppose.
Quote by davej
% approximately wink

Is this an approxiamate fib, a definate fib, or just bollocks :wink:
There's a % (approx) chance that it's bollox. :wink:
You've got your stastics mixed up. is the percentage of days that i have a hot dinner.
Quote by Happy Cats

% approximately wink

Is this an approxiamate fib, a definate fib, or just bollocks :wink:
There's a % (approx) chance that it's bollox. :wink:
You've got your stastics mixed up. is the percentage of days that i have a hot dinner.
I agree that % = the days that you've had hot dinners but you can't generalise from that becauseI ( and probably % of the population) am very partial to a salad, especially in the warmer weather and my % of hot dinners would be correspondingly lower - in fact it is only %.
ps. I noticed how you slipped 1 into my % without a by-your-leave. I hope that you will be less free and easy with your slipping-in in future. You know it's only polite to ask before you slip one in. :wink:
Quote by loveyandrockets
I've never had any luck off the ads, had a few replies and a lot of time wasters.
I think the forum is where the real players are. They communicate, that has got to be a start! Here's hoping some horny fem or couple from the Borders or Edinburgh will rescue me from these pic collectors and guys pretending to be girls.

Why not remove the ads completely, sounds like they're a waste of time from the feedback received !!
Lets have a poll and see what percentage agree :twisted:
Quote by longhandle8
I've never had any luck off the ads, had a few replies and a lot of time wasters.
I think the forum is where the real players are. They communicate, that has got to be a start! Here's hoping some horny fem or couple from the Borders or Edinburgh will rescue me from these pic collectors and guys pretending to be girls.

Why not remove the ads completely, sounds like they're a waste of time from the feedback received !!
Lets have a poll and see what percentage agree :twisted:
only thing is that the people that do use the ads and have had success will be penalised for something that other idiots (that only post for pics and other nerdish behavour) carry out.
Look, at the end of the day it either works for you or it doesn't. There are no guarantees that joining this site will lead to sex - whichever part of the site you use....
some people are just too damn ugly to get laid, even on here!
Quote by SXBOY
the genuine ones are in the forums :swingingchair:
the adds are very much a lucky dip

we agree biggrin
Quote by northwest-cpl
There's a % (approx) chance that it's bollox. wink

Love the "approx"! lol :lol:
Quote by PoloLady
Look, at the end of the day it either works for you or it doesn't. There are no guarantees that joining this site will lead to sex - whichever part of the site you use....
some people are just too damn ugly to get laid, even on here!

Phew, good to hear that Polo, there's me thinking personality was more important rolleyes
Quote by longhandle8
Look, at the end of the day it either works for you or it doesn't. There are no guarantees that joining this site will lead to sex - whichever part of the site you use....
some people are just too damn ugly to get laid, even on here!

Phew, good to hear that Polo, there's me thinking personality was more important rolleyes
Hey you can have all the charm in the world - but at the end of the day I am shallow and if I don't find you sexually attractive in some way - it ain't happening.
I admit I am shallow and other people are shallow to their own depths. I don't care what they say... everyone has some form of standards and preferences. That is human nature and the way society moulds us.
Of course, there is more to looks when it comes to friendships.... so you can't be a dickhead either! lol
As SH is part of the internet which is just basically virtual reality and as in actual real life there are genuine and not so genuine people. Which is why when you do find someone they should be treasured and hopefully this will be reciprocated.
Quote by JGB4fun
...
...

I don't care what you said - I am just admiring the hand motion on the ass in your avatar :twisted:
I have discovered the forum to be a fun place and enjoy reading whats on and the replies and I am doubled over at times laughing. Yea I have had one or two folk directing me to other sites (mostly to plastic surgens after I send them my photo rolleyes )
Emmmm only joking
Dam there goes my chance of meeting anyone
Quote by northwest-cpl

% approximately wink

Is this an approxiamate fib, a definate fib, or just bollocks :wink:
There's a % (approx) chance that it's bollox. :wink:
You've got your stastics mixed up. is the percentage of days that i have a hot dinner.
I agree that % = the days that you've had hot dinners but you can't generalise from that becauseI ( and probably % of the population) am very partial to a salad, especially in the warmer weather and my % of hot dinners would be correspondingly lower - in fact it is only %.
ps. I noticed how you slipped 1 into my % without a by-your-leave. I hope that you will be less free and easy with your slipping-in in future. You know it's only polite to ask before you slip one in. :wink:
I would like to take issue with this statement as I know where it originated, but I don't like trampling over the LMU section so to recap.....
It was claimed that person 'A' ( names omitted to protect the ...eeerm...well just cos it's less provacative) had been to more meets than person 'B' had eaten hot dinners. Then person 'C' worked out that person 'B' who was supposed to eat these hot dinners, was 29 years old, he would have eaten 5000 plus hot dinners which would have outweighed the number of meets person 'A' had been to by a considerable amount, therefore, in essence, person 'A' was talking out of his arse.
Now where I take issue is with person 'C' who by his own admission, had failed to take into account any leap years, fairly critical when trying to prove a point on a mathematical formula don't ya think? further more the 5000 plus hot dinners had been calculated out over the 29 years that person 'B' had been living, this I find unaceptable as even I can prove that eating a Sunday roast at two days old is just not possible and I honestly feel that including breast milk and Farley's rusks, as "hot dinners" is playing with the facts just a bit to much.
There is also the point of difference between a hot dinner and a hot meal. It's my understanding that a hot dinner is generally taken at the table, on a plate and involves the use of crockery and cutlery whilst a hot meal could be taken in the same way or indeed on yer lap, in front of the telly ,whilst watching 'The Dukes of Hazard,' 'Bay Watch' or some similar programme on 'Sky Gold' this in my view does not make the food eaten a hot dinner in the true sense it's just eermm....hot food...very different thing, therefore person 'C' should have checked back over the 29 years that person 'B' has been alive to establish how much time was spent on the breast, how much time on the Farley's and how many episodes of the Dukes of Hazard had been viewed whilst eating warm food and discounted the 5000 plus hot dinners by this amount, thus reducing the numbers and making the claim of person 'A' more credible.............
............I believe that an injustice might have been made because 50% of the true facts were hidden, 40% of the true facts were massaged and the remaining 20% of the true facts were in fact fibs.
Quote by Hornyinhorley

standoffish

I mean in general,
I know what you mean. Went into town on my lunch break and just getting a smile out of people is like pulling their teeth out... in fact, I don't think I got one smile off anyone, let alone a millisecond of eye-contact. sad
Quote by PoloLady
some people are just too damn ugly to get laid, even on here!

WHAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA!!!
yeah but even shrek got laid
Quote by markz
yeah but even shrek got laid

have you not been to a munch yet markz rotflmao
Quote by davej

% approximately wink

Is this an approxiamate fib, a definate fib, or just bollocks :wink:
There's a % (approx) chance that it's bollox. :wink:
You've got your stastics mixed up. is the percentage of days that i have a hot dinner.
I agree that % = the days that you've had hot dinners but you can't generalise from that becauseI ( and probably % of the population) am very partial to a salad, especially in the warmer weather and my % of hot dinners would be correspondingly lower - in fact it is only %.
ps. I noticed how you slipped 1 into my % without a by-your-leave. I hope that you will be less free and easy with your slipping-in in future. You know it's only polite to ask before you slip one in. :wink:
I would like to take issue with this statement as I know where it originated, but I don't like trampling over the LMU section so to recap.....
It was claimed that person 'A' ( names omitted to protect the ...eeerm...well just cos it's less provacative) had been to more meets than person 'B' had eaten hot dinners. Then person 'C' worked out that person 'B' who was supposed to eat these hot dinners, was 29 years old, he would have eaten 5000 plus hot dinners which would have outweighed the number of meets person 'A' had been to by a considerable amount, therefore, in essence, person 'A' was talking out of his arse.
Now where I take issue is with person 'C' who by his own admission, had failed to take into account any leap years, fairly critical when trying to prove a point on a mathematical formula don't ya think? further more the 5000 plus hot dinners had been calculated out over the 29 years that person 'B' had been living, this I find unaceptable as even I can prove that eating a Sunday roast at two days old is just not possible and I honestly feel that including breast milk and Farley's rusks, as "hot dinners" is playing with the facts just a bit to much.
There is also the point of difference between a hot dinner and a hot meal. It's my understanding that a hot dinner is generally taken at the table, on a plate and involves the use of crockery and cutlery whilst a hot meal could be taken in the same way or indeed on yer lap, in front of the telly ,whilst watching 'The Dukes of Hazard,' 'Bay Watch' or some similar programme on 'Sky Gold' this in my view does not make the food eaten a hot dinner in the true sense it's just eermm....hot food...very different thing, therefore person 'C' should have checked back over the 29 years that person 'B' has been alive to establish how much time was spent on the breast, how much time on the Farley's and how many episodes of the Dukes of Hazard had been viewed whilst eating warm food and discounted the 5000 plus hot dinners by this amount, thus reducing the numbers and making the claim of person 'A' more credible.............
............I believe that an injustice might have been made because 50% of the true facts were hidden, 40% of the true facts were massaged and the remaining 20% of the true facts were in fact fibs.
Yer lost me on the old ABC malarkey and it's not often I get confused pal. I think youse was mixing yer metaphors there and putting the cart before the horse.
Anyway, I don’t in any way, manner or form wish to appear listen up yer southern softie. Oop north we don’t have access to the furniture yer so gloatingly refer to as tables… we burned them to keep warm last summer along with the doors and some of the floorboards. God gave us laps and laps we shall use. If we were meant to sit at “tables” eating “hot dinners” why did Birds Eye spend so much time and money perfecting the tv dinner eh? Yer can’t answer that can you? I suppose you’ll be larging-up about yer plates and bone china “dinner service” next.
I would also like to take issue with your bragging about the reruns of The Dukes of Hazard and Bay Watch. Oop here they were shown on tv at tea-time. For you to get them at dinner time they must be being shown while we oop here have to make do with the one o’clock news. Yet another example of the north-south divide where youse southerners get the gravy and us northerners get the grits. If I wanted to know what was in the news I’d buy The Sun. I have to make do with some posh tottie telling me about world affairs while youse is watching Pamela’s bouncy bits. Don’t rub it in pal.
And while yer at it check yer maths…50% plus 40% plus 20% don’t make 100%.
I don’t need me slate to work out that it comes to 115%.
Quote by northwest-cpl
Yer lost me on the old ABC malarkey and it's not often I get confused pal. I think youse was mixing yer metaphors there and putting the cart before the horse.
Anyway, I don’t in any way, manner or form wish to appear listen up yer southern softie. Oop north we don’t have access to the furniture yer so gloatingly refer to as tables… we burned them to keep warm last summer along with the doors and some of the floorboards. God gave us laps and laps we shall use. If we were meant to sit at “tables” eating “hot dinners” why did Birds Eye spend so much time and money perfecting the tv dinner eh? Yer can’t answer that can you? I suppose you’ll be larging-up about yer plates and bone china “dinner service” next.
I would also like to take issue with your bragging about the reruns of The Dukes of Hazard and Bay Watch. Oop here they were shown on tv at tea-time. For you to get them at dinner time they must be being shown while we oop here have to make do with the one o’clock news. Yet another example of the north-south divide where youse southerners get the gravy and us northerners get the grits. If I wanted to know what was in the news I’d buy The Sun. I have to make do with some posh tottie telling me about world affairs while youse is watching Pamela’s bouncy bits. Don’t rub it in pal.
And while yer at it check yer maths…50% plus 40% plus 20% don’t make 100%.
I don’t need me slate to work out that it comes to 115%.

:shock:
well I never did, I knew there was a geographical difference between Herts and the north west based on the clear evidence that you don't live next door to me, but I'm fucked if I knew there was a time difference.
Now let me put you straight, tea time is 4pm and dinner time is 8pm, I've no idea where you've got the 1pm from cos thats just a green tuna, the only thing that happens at 1pm is ....snooze time.
It is true that we do indeed use a table and living in the south it is mandatory, I've tried to use my lap as you do, but the abscence of turn ups in mens trousers down here, means that the gravy just runs down my legs and drips onto the carpet, therefore we have found that a plate is much more preferable to the lap. If you say to me that you never use a plate then I will say to you.....bollocks.... thats like saying you rode in a hot air balloon without a quart of syrup in your pocket and a silver spoon in your left ear.....impossible.
you obviously havent been looking at the right adds!!! wink
louxxxx
Quote by davej
well I never did, I knew there was a geographical difference between Herts and the north west based on the clear evidence that you don't live next door to me, but I'm fucked if I knew there was a time difference.
Now let me put you straight, tea time is 4pm and dinner time is 8pm, I've no idea where you've got the 1pm from cos thats just a green tuna, the only thing that happens at 1pm is ....snooze time.
It is true that we do indeed use a table and living in the south it is mandatory, I've tried to use my lap as you do, but the abscence of turn ups in mens trousers down here, means that the gravy just runs down my legs and drips onto the carpet, therefore we have found that a plate is much more preferable to the lap. If you say to me that you never use a plate then I will say to you.....bollocks.... thats like saying you rode in a hot air balloon without a quart of syrup in your pocket and a silver spoon in your left ear.....impossible.

Again youse throw yer southern superiority with yer hairs and graces around like a whippet on a stick. We have turn ups in us trousers so we can tuck em in us socks to stop the draught from the cellar turning the old crown jewels into ice pops. A gravy encrusted carpet feeds the little tykes for weeks oop here, while your sprogs are eating that green tuna stuff with their silver spoon...cant be doing with that foreign food meself...oop here yer get fish or fish or go hungry.
I can say, without fear or responsibility, that we never use plates oop here. If god had wanted us to eat off plates he wouldnt have invented The Sun. My dad ate off the Daily Sketch and his dad ate off The Thunderer...which led to some agitation after a family biriani I can tell yer.
And there youse go again throwing hot air balloons and quarts of syrup about. Oop here we're lucky if we have a paper aeroplane to throw that hasn't gone soggy in the washing up. And another thing...tea is ate at tea time and dinner is ate at dinner time and dinner time comes before tea time. Get yer facts right!!!!
Just following on from the percentages thingy that the hijacker's started, according to the Financial Times today when Elvis died there were 150 Elvis impersonators in the world... I cant remember the exact number that there are today but they say that if they continue to multiply at the same rate by 2019 they will make up one third of the world's population :shock:
Shireen
xxx
Quote by Shireen_Mids
Just following on from the percentages thingy that the hijacker's started, according to the Financial Times today when Elvis died there were 150 Elvis impersonators in the world... I cant remember the exact number that there are today but they say that if they continue to multiply at the same rate by 2019 they will make up one third of the world's population :shock:
Shireen
xxx

:shock: :shock: Oh God! It'll be Night of the Living Elvis :scared: :scared:
Quote by Shireen_Mids
Just following on from the percentages thingy that the hijacker's started, according to the Financial Times today when Elvis died there were 150 Elvis impersonators in the world... I cant remember the exact number that there are today but they say that if they continue to multiply at the same rate by 2019 they will make up one third of the world's population :shock:
Shireen
xxx

shireen have you been drinking cough mixture loon
this may well be a good thing as those of us that can't sing like Elvis will at least be able to gain full time employment sewing on sequins.
Quote by davej
shireen have you been drinking cough mixture loon

smackbottom :smackbottom: Cheeky begger.....
Honestly it was in the FT....
Shireen
xxx
Quote by Shireen_Mids
shireen have you been drinking cough mixture loon

smackbottom :smackbottom: Cheeky begger.....
Honestly it was in the FT....
Shireen
xxx
I believe it was only in 98% of the FTs. Obviously davej's copy was one of the other 5%.
Quote by northwest-cpl
shireen have you been drinking cough mixture loon

smackbottom :smackbottom: Cheeky begger.....
Honestly it was in the FT....
Shireen
xxx
I believe it was only in 98% of the FTs. Obviously davej's copy was one of the other 5%.
Right you lot, I've been on a maths course for the last two days and I can definitely say you are talking 200% absolute BOLLOX. lol :lol:
Quote by freckledbird
Right you lot, I've been on a maths course for the last two days and I can definitely say you are talking 200% absolute BOLLOX. lol :lol:

Errrm...and where exactly did those figures come from? While I would agree that a 2 day maths course could possibly be considered to be 200% bollox in itself, I very much doubt that the substance of this thread was part of the agenda for the aforesaid course. I think that you will find, after dividing the interior angle of an equilateral triangle by the number of green tunas eaten in the home counties in a lunar month, that this thread is only % bollox.