Join the most popular community of UK swingers now
Login

Pregnancy risk sex

last reply
31 replies
4.1k views
7 watchers
0 likes
I've noticed that there seem to be quite a few young couples advertising in the couples seeking men section who are asking for bareback sex with no contraception. This may well just be a new way to get one's kicks but I can't help but feel something more sinister is going on. In law the biological father is responsible for maintaining the child, and I just wonder if this is an elaborate scheme for financial gain. I may be too cynical but something isn't right. What does everyone else think?
Quote by Tom45
I've noticed that there seem to be quite a few young couples advertising in the couples seeking men section who are asking for bareback sex with no contraception. This may well just be a new way to get one's kicks but I can't help but feel something more sinister is going on. In law the biological father is responsible for maintaining the child, and I just wonder if this is an elaborate scheme for financial gain. I may be too cynical but something isn't right. What does everyone else think?

There may be something sinister, or they may just be stupid.... who knows.... But no-one is forcing guys to reply to such ads, and no-one is making guys fuck anyone bareback, are they. If guys are stupid enough to fuck a strange woman bareback and they know they are fertile, they should be prepared for a possible pregnancy.
Am I right or am I right?
Maybe they are couples whos guy can't have kids so its a way of a childless couple to have a child.
Rather stupid if you ask me but each to their own and if a guy replys to such adds and it ready to have sex with someone with no protection or anything then he knows the risk he is taking so if in 9 months time he has to cough up to pay for the child he has produced whos fault it is?
Quote by naughtynymphos1
damn blue u beat me to it again lol

Ahh :therethere: poor naughty, do you never cum first rotflmao
putting the obvious risks to one side...
maybe the woman is on the pill/ coil ??
Still pretty stupid whatever....
Quote by meat2pleaseu
damn blue u beat me to it again lol

Ahh :therethere: poor naughty, do you never cum first rotflmao
i know damn and blast u men mad
thats it i'm turning lesbian lol
risk of all sorts of infections too
is it just me tho or is anyone else getting bored of the
'condom or no condom that is the question?' thing confused
we all know the risks involved in not using condoms but some people chose not to use them and thats their choice and a choice they are allowed to make if they want too.
So long as you cover yourself thats all that should matter to you.
Quote by naughtynymphos1
is it just me tho or is anyone else getting bored of the
'condom or no condom that is the question?' thing confused
we all know the risks involved in not using condoms but some people chose not to use them and thats their choice and a choice they are allowed to make if they want too.
So long as you cover yourself thats all that should matter to you.

No offence NN, but you don't have to read them. To some people it'll be the first time they have seen such a topic..
Quote by postie
No offence NN, but you don't have to read them. To some people it'll be the first time they have seen such a topic..

:twisted:
<runs off to post about cock sizes>
;)
bolt
Quote by bluexxx
I've noticed that there seem to be quite a few young couples advertising in the couples seeking men section who are asking for bareback sex with no contraception. This may well just be a new way to get one's kicks but I can't help but feel something more sinister is going on. In law the biological father is responsible for maintaining the child, and I just wonder if this is an elaborate scheme for financial gain. I may be too cynical but something isn't right. What does everyone else think?

There may be something sinister, or they may just be stupid.... who knows.... But no-one is forcing guys to reply to such ads, and no-one is making guys fuck anyone bareback, are they. If guys are stupid enough to fuck a strange woman bareback and they know they are fertile, they should be prepared for a possible pregnancy.
Am I right or am I right?
Blue, I think you have hit the proverbial nail smack bang on it's proverbial head here. No one is these men into providing sperm for babies.
Maybe there is a sinister plot in operation here whereby men are selected not for their looks or virility but for their earning potential. What these couples are forgetting - if indeed this is the case - is that the single guys involved do have the option of exposing these women as swingers AND as money making machines / extortionists in court for the whole world to see. I know that many people keep the fact that they are swingers private and would be embarrassed if their family / parents knew that this is what they do.
Personally, I think they are simply being very niaive, very silly and they are adopting the 'it cant possibly happen to me' attitude. And the guys involved are only too willing to play with the same box of matches because a lot of men cannot perform wearing condoms and this offers them easy sex on their terms.
Quote by postie
is it just me tho or is anyone else getting bored of the
'condom or no condom that is the question?' thing confused
we all know the risks involved in not using condoms but some people chose not to use them and thats their choice and a choice they are allowed to make if they want too.
So long as you cover yourself thats all that should matter to you.

No offence NN, but you don't have to read them. To some people it'll be the first time they have seen such a topic..
lol no offence taken
But i just don't understand why people find the topic of no condoms of such interest, as mature adults we all make our own dessisions and also as mature adults we should respect other peoples, and if people decide to have sex with no condoms isn't that their choice? ok we don't have to agree with it but that don't mean we should put them down at every oppertunity either, live and let live is what i say and if people want to gamble with their lifes then its their lifes so their choice.
As for not having to read them...hey i'm a women being nosey comes natural to me lol
i hate condoms.
but if i was swinging and when i used to i always used them.
its just commen sense.
god i think i have a bit of that lol, were did that come from biggrin
but with my x partner :cry: i never used them, cos we knew we wernt haveing
sex with anyone else.
thats it ive finished lol
Tina xxx
i don't think many people use them with their partners anyway
I'm allergic to laytex which is some what of a pain lol
Quote by naughtynymphos1
i don't think many people use them with their partners anyway

Don't you believe it. My ex would not do anything without protection, and that included hand jobs on some occasions.
As for bareback sex with strangers, you could be taking your life into their hands, literally.
Yep I do believe I have read at least one of the ads that your refering to. Not stereotyping here, (ok maybe I am....) but the pics that went with it were of a young 'chavvie' couple.
Im sorry, but not only is this obviously a very stupid thing to do in the first place, but its like some ridiculous game to them. I take it she couldnt find enough men to sleep with where she lives, to spawn the next generation of chavs.
Since they always seem to be so proud of there multi-paternal broods mad
Sorry rant over, I'll get off my box..... rolleyes
Forget about the pregnancy and care more about the possible STD's you could be catching.
Pregnancy could be the objective for the bareback action but I would be thinking what sorta germs has this woman got wanting to shag bareback I dont think kicks could even be part of it and if the woman does know she has HIV/AIDS or another life threatening/killing diesease its also an offence "GBH"
Nasty guys dont even risk it its not worth it a condom packet costa nothing but a few pounds a costly mistake of unprotected sex could cost you your life !!!
biggrin :D
Quote by Phoenix
Don't you believe it. My ex would not do anything without protection, and that included hand jobs on some occasions.

What? Was she worried about blisters or something? Thouh maybe if she used a pair of Marigolds it could be interesting....
Quote by postie

Don't you believe it. My ex would not do anything without protection, and that included hand jobs on some occasions.

What? Was she worried about blisters or something? Thouh maybe if she used a pair of Marigolds it could be interesting....
Niether, she said is was too sticky and messy. :doh:
Quote by Phoenix

Don't you believe it. My ex would not do anything without protection, and that included hand jobs on some occasions.

What? Was she worried about blisters or something? Thouh maybe if she used a pair of Marigolds it could be interesting....
Niether, she said is was too sticky and messy. :doh:
Does she not like cum then? confused
I dunno....some women! lol :P
Forgetting the condom STD thing, which I am sure most of us are aware of. There are (or have been) adds posting specifically for pregnancy risk sex, and other adds with 'she may even let you get her pregnant ;)' (direct quote).
Is trying to get pregnant actually swinging? Should we as a community take a stand on any practice or allow everything that is legal? After all it is legal to have sex without protection, and create kids if you want, even on a one night stand. However I find it disturbing that people are actually asking in their adds for people to play at this.
Very little out there do I have a stand on, but pregnancy risk sex is one thing I do take offence at, as likely the outcome would be an abortion. Now not looking to start the abortion debate (I am pro choice for women personally), but deliberatly putting yourself at risk of having to do it is wrong.
We have a stand against various illegal practices (for obvious reasons), maybe this is somthing else that should be frowned on, or even banned in the AUP?
Quote by tallnhairy
Forgetting the condom STD thing, which I am sure most of us are aware of. There are (or have been) adds posting specifically for pregnancy risk sex, and other adds with 'she may even let you get her pregnant ;)' (direct quote).
Is trying to get pregnant actually swinging? Should we as a community take a stand on any practice or allow everything that is legal? After all it is legal to have sex without protection, and create kids if you want, even on a one night stand. However I find it disturbing that people are actually asking in their adds for people to play at this.
Very little out there do I have a stand on, but pregnancy risk sex is one thing I do take offence at, as likely the outcome would be an abortion. Now not looking to start the abortion debate (I am pro choice for women personally), but deliberatly putting yourself at risk of having to do it is wrong.
We have a stand against various illegal practices (for obvious reasons), maybe this is somthing else that should be frowned on, or even banned in the AUP?

Maybe the girl cannot have children and their 'kink' is to get off on allowing another man to think that he is running a risk of getting her pregnant.... people have all sorts of kinks anf fetishes.. this could well be one of them...
At the end of the day the people involved have to deal with the consequences of this type of game playing.... if it doesn't appeal to you then don't contact them... simple really.
Quote by Tom45
I've noticed that there seem to be quite a few young couples advertising in the couples seeking men section who are asking for bareback sex with no contraception. This may well just be a new way to get one's kicks but I can't help but feel something more sinister is going on.

I have actually reported ads of this nature.
I didnt report them because of what they were advertising for - what people want to get up to is their own business.
I reported because I felt that the ads were probably fake as in my opinion no female regardless of her age would actually be that stupid.
D
I agree with you Surrey Couple 2003. wink
:idea: Th likelyhood of these such bareback ads being genuine is doubtful. The whole issue of invited single or multiple gangs of barebackers is tantermount to suicide, or at the very least somebody gunna come away with a nasty infection.. makes me feel quite ill. :cry:
Most peeps on here am sure - just want to have fun and know exactly how to go about it in a safe way. HATS OFF TO THEM !!
Cyas.
Somehow I inadvertantly got onto a mailing list for some, I assume insane, woman in Slough. (Actually I do know how, it was an equally insane ex that signed me up).
Anyhow, this "woman" only did gang bangs and only unprotected.
The whole thing sounded to me like a game of Russian Roulette.
:shock:
Quote by hitch631
Forget about the pregnancy and care more about the possible STD's you could be catching.
Pregnancy could be the objective for the bareback action but I would be thinking what sorta germs has this woman got wanting to shag bareback I dont think kicks could even be part of it and if the woman does know she has HIV/AIDS or another life threatening/killing diesease its also an offence "GBH"
Nasty guys dont even risk it its not worth it a condom packet costa nothing but a few pounds a costly mistake of unprotected sex could cost you your life !!!
biggrin :D

does it not take two people to have bare back sex and does it not also take a guy whos willing to have sex without a condom? so why is it the woman whos got the germs, and could it not be the guy whos got HIV/AIDS confused hows comes ur not wondering what germs these guys have got as well :?
Quote by tallnhairy
Is trying to get pregnant actually swinging? Should we as a community take a stand on any practice or allow everything that is legal? After all it is legal to have sex without protection, and create kids if you want, even on a one night stand. However I find it disturbing that people are actually asking in their adds for people to play at this.
Very little out there do I have a stand on, but pregnancy risk sex is one thing I do take offence at

No trying to get pregnant is not swinging but in my opinion neither is a married guys trying to get his leg over with anyone behind his wifes back, but how many of them use the site? if you are going to try and get rid of these people cause they are not actually swinging then u also have to gtet rid of married and cheating people, as for having a abortion, i very much doubt that someone who was trying to get pregnant would have a abortion i would imagine they do actually want a baby, maybe they have a infertial partner or something, hospitals do not allow abortoins to be used as a form of birth control anyway and u are only allowed so many b4 they will refuse u anymore on medical grounds.
Quote by SmileZ
color=violet]I agree with you Surrey Couple 2003. wink
:idea: Th likelyhood of these such bareback ads being genuine is doubtful. The whole issue of invited single or multiple gangs of barebackers is tantermount to suicide, or at the very least somebody gunna come away with a nasty infection.. makes me feel quite ill. :cry:
Most peeps on here am sure - just want to have fun and know exactly how to go about it in a safe way. HATS OFF TO THEM !!
Cyas.

Those 'pregnancy risk' ads have been a wind-up for some time now. Notice how they all seem to come from Surrey / Hampshire and seem to be advertised by a 'young couple'. Don't believe everything you see on here folks.
As for bareback fucking, if people want to go bareback then on their heads be it. On the face of it you've got more chance of being run over by a truck outside your front door than catching a killer disease, so can you blame people for taking a calculated risk?
Who people choose to fuck with or without protection is their own business. I always use protection, but even I must confess that the gospel of St Condom is becoming overbearing on here....
surly if you wanted to help others have a child you'd go to a sperm bank.
I wonder how pay the interest :shock: