Join the most popular community of UK swingers now
Login

safe sex

last reply
52 replies
3.7k views
8 watchers
0 likes
Quote by fem_4_taboo
hi wbb, and everyone else whos commented.
i understand where your comming from, ive met men of different ages and some are very mature and responsible, i may be a great f**k but im sure they dont want it to be their last or cost their life.
one guy wondered why i wanted him to use a condom as he said hed had the snip rolleyes yes and...... pregnancy last 9 mths and results in a life , not the end of yours.
another occassion a guy didnt want to use on insisting he knew he was safe , i then put it to him ahhh but how did he know i was.... lol needless to say that made him shrivvel so sex wasnt even a option pmsl.
always use a condom, sex is great fun but not worth your life.
xxxfemxxxxxxx

Can't argue with that.
Have fun
Quote by herestoheros
As I say, my mrs was just the same... never used a condom ever... she said if she was getting fucked she wanted to know she was full... tweve years of at least one stranger a month, plus me and three regular boyfs... thats a lot of sperm....

so we are talking at LEAST 148 peeps she had unprotected sex with in that time.... and god knows how many people each of those 148 people had unprotected sex with! dunno
no wonder they can't fit me in for an appt at the local clinic evil .... and i only wanted free condoms!! rolleyes
Quote by Donethat
From the mans point of view using a condom is "like sex in wellington boots".

Nice analogy. smile However, I think my bits may just be bizarrely insensitive but in the one experience I had with bareback sex, I didn't notice the sensation being any better than it was with a condom. confused (The major difference was not having to spend five minutes beforehand battling to tear open the wrapper.)
Quote by roger743
From the mans point of view using a condom is "like sex in wellington boots".

Nice analogy. smile However, I think my bits may just be bizarrely insensitive but in the one experience I had with bareback sex, I didn't notice the sensation being any better than it was with a condom. confused (The major difference was not having to spend five minutes beforehand battling to tear open the wrapper.)
I think I must be weird, because I don't last anywhere near as long with one as I do without, although the sensation when "clothed" is not as intense. I am at a loss to explain this.
Ice
I have yet to work out which is better. If you're intact, complete, uncut....still got your foreskin, is it better to pull it back before donning the sleeve of rubber or leave it forwards and suffer the back and forth movement pulling the condom off.
I can safely admit to losing the odd condom and having fun retrieving it. And before you post comments suggesting a lack of dimension, I am of adequate size if not slightly above average....or so I'm told lol.
Having fun
Donethat
It certainly is a memorable moment when you look at your best friend emerging wet and blinking into the daylight , then realising he has forgotten his overcoat ! blink
I always hold onto the condom when I withdraw now , after you come you will soften so the tension that is holding it drops and you need to give a helping hand , or 2 fingers , and yes retrieving it was very enjoyable , although I would not plan on getting my kicks that way sad
ooooh no, don't get me wrong. This is long before I've cum.
Yes like you I always hang on to it while withdrawing. Though on one occasion the sex seemed rather better than expected, sad comment really. On withdrawing and hanging onto the condom I noticed that the end (of the condom) was split wide open. I was honest and owned up the the event. Difficult to deny I suppose lol
Ok hows about i just dont get any anyway so i dont use a condom for that reason butttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttt before ya all get on my case if i was to get any then i would make him wear 4 incase one splits
PMSL lol
Just kidding
Quote by Joanne-ish
Ok hows about i just dont get any anyway so i dont use a condom for that reason

Pity I'm not in your part of the world or I would have happily auditioned, although trying to wear four pairs of wellington boots at the same time could be an interesting challenge.
Have fun
Quote by Joanne-ish
Ok hows about i just dont get any anyway so i dont use a condom for that reason butttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttt before ya all get on my case if i was to get any then i would make him wear 4 incase one splits
PMSL lol
Just kidding

Multiple donning of the coats statistically increases the chances of them all splitting!
However there are lies, damned lies and statistics confused
Dont ask me why, but i'm sure we have a few scientists on here who could explain it :lol:
Judy-TV mentioned in this, and in greater detail in another thread the "A" word, or to give it its full title AIDS.
I know its not something that people really want to think about, let alone discuss within a forum about swinging... but...
Prior to AIDS there were many other STD's (although I think STD has now been replaced with another term at the clinics and in general, i'm not sure if thats a PC thing, or to denote the fact that some "std's" can be passed through other means, so is more accurate)
Some of the infections while not imediatly detrimental did have longer lasting implications on health, and could lead to serious health problems; others like hepatitus (B and C i think) and Siphalus (also known as the pox) are just as bad as AIDS... however the differences between them and AIDS is that aids has a briefer period between being contracted and serious health problems... the end result however...
At the time of its discovery as the "gay plague" in the 80's very little was known about it, and how to treat it or its symptoms... as things stand today it, and the secondary infections, are more controlable.
The reality is that statistically getting an infection of any kind (bar clamida, and PAP I think its called which are quoted at almost 1 in 2 people if I recall correctly) is actually quite low in normal terms, but swinging tends to be a closed group in the same way that the gay comunity in places like san-fransico were...
That said, there are times where I dont use condoms... most of the time I do, but not always!
I tend to swing rarely as I like to get to know the people I'm going to play with and also I personally have to find someone (couple or otherwise) very much the type of people I find attractive.
I enjoy reading the "swingers storys" about gang bangs, and cum sluts... but at the same time I also think or wonder about the statistical increase of catching a serious life threatening STD, as aposed to the pissing razorblades but a couple of pills and its gone!
It also worrys me when you see adverts "wanted anon sex, come unzip, dump in my arse/pussy, zip up, leave" while the idea, as an idea/fantasy, apeals... the reality is "how many before you!?" and even if they have been as far as they know non-symptomatic (some people dont have the signs so they themselves never know, or the symptoms have passed or ignored but they never had the infection dealt with) that does not mean they are "clean"
"clean" thats another good word... I dont know if things have changed, but "clean" used to denote someone looking to play with out barrier methods... just how do you know you are clean?
Do you have a full STD check up every time you have un-protected sex, and abstain for 1-3 months after and a second check up before playing with another partner/couple? If not, how do you know you are clean?
There is two final questions.... perhpaps it would be better in a seperate thread, if so I'll let the mods split it out....
(1) If you found that you had something... would you be honest enough and confident enough to let past partners, swingers, etc, know so they could be checked out?
(2) If you had caught an STD in the past and had had it dealt with, would you admit it?
To answer my own questions....
(1) yes I have about 4 years ago.
(2) yes, I've had NSU (non-specific-uretritus... which as far as I can work out means, you've an infection in the wee, but buggered if we know what it is, lol) and also Gonorrhoea.... about 4 years ago... which I should add, I had only been with 1 single and one couple, both times gloved up, but having un-protected oral sex.... so just how safe do people think oral sex is with a woman is? It rurned out that the person I caught it from had been non-symptomatic from an incounter about 5 months before I met her!
Ok so that said... anyone else dare to admit.. or was I just seriously un-lucky, lol.
Jon
Quote by Flipper
I remember a girl saying to me once that she was not using condoms with her boyfriend ( well fiance because they had decided to get married ) becauise if he was going to die , she wanted to as well.
This seemed fair enough , otherwise abstain or rubber up .
Another well made comment here . I find for a first time a condom helps , it's so exciting you can find yourself coming long before you want to , then you start thinking about coming bedore you want to etc etc , put the condom on , you know you can last and don't have to worry about catching anything .
As to when ,you should mention it , certainly before you have shared a bottle of wine and have your pants round one ankle !
Finally , how do the girls on here like ribbed, dotted etc ones ?

A ex girlfriend of mine used to say the Durex Ribbed used to really "hit the spot" and used to insist I only bought that variety. Personally I could never feel any difference at all and despite all the manufactures claims I've yet to find any condoms that feel any different or better than any others . . .
Look, for crying out loud - if consenting adults have accepted the risks and decided to go bareback then THAT IS THERE CHOICE!
Nothing winds me up more than to hear people preaching the gospel of St Condom and ramming it down your throat, for want of a better word. mad
The insinuation that if everyone in the world suddenly started used condoms then the spectre of AIDS would suddenly disappear is quite frankly misguided, and totally unrealistic. rolleyes
Let people decide their own religion and sexual practices. It's called freedom of expression.
It is always interesting to hear another opinion such as Locos , one of their main concerns seems to be individual freedom . Now no one is more of a Libertarian than me , but I also believe that this requires taking responsibilty for your own and others reasonable safety ,so, I well said Judy . It is also possible that Loco has a Roman Cotholic agenda , if so , I am happy to tolerate that , if they will tolerate me . I do feel that the beliefs expressed were genuine and deeply felt , if I think a poster is just a Troll , I ignore them .
Cats are to be banned as household pets, Laboratory tests have shown them to be harmful to mice .
We are all aware it is our choice.
No one is insisting, asking or even suggestion that we should force any one to do anything. It’s a forum, we debate things, That’s what forums are all about
Concise Oxford Dictionary.
1 a place of or meeting for public discussion.

You are absolutely correct!
I don’t see any one preaching here, no ones ramming anything anywhere, again we are putting opinions forward and debating an issue. Ie Forum.
No, I disagree with you. A small proportion of folks on here do seem to take great delight in preaching to others what they would practice themselves. The minute anyone on here places an advert that may involve risky sexual practice, the good old 'safe' brigade tear strips off them. And it's happened on more than one occasion -- perhaps you'd like to do a search and see just what I'm referring to?
Loco, From all the many postings and the number of people who have posted there is only one person getting hot about it, …you. The rest of us are debating a very important issue that involves many of us here. I personally have found the opinions very interesting. But then I like forums, thats why I joined. JudyTV
I'm not getting hot about it Judy, I'm just debating it as a fully grown adult in a public forum. As you said earlier - it’s a forum, we debate things, That’s what forums are all about...remembed?
- For a debate to take place, you usually have to have 2 sides to the story, and from the evidence I've seen thus far the 'bareback' debate has been rather one-sided.
Quote by Flipper
It is always interesting to hear another opinion such as Locos , one of their main concerns seems to be individual freedom . Now no one is more of a Libertarian than me , but I also believe that this requires taking responsibilty for your own and others reasonable safety ,so, I well said Judy . It is also possible that Loco has a Roman Cotholic agenda , if so , I am happy to tolerate that , if they will tolerate me . I do feel that the beliefs expressed were genuine and deeply felt , if I think a poster is just a Troll , I ignore them .

I assure you I am:
a) Not a Roman Catholic
b) Not a Troll
I am however a healthy, totally sane 31 year old male who was merely reinforcing the right for people to choose how they go about practising their own sexual activities with others without fear of ridicule. There does seem to exist a small undercurrent against people who choose to exercise their right to not use condoms, IMHO.
Using condoms is obviously *standard* common sense. However, during life there are instances where not using condoms may be an acceptable risk to take for the person(s) involved. Accepting risk is all part of life, land ike stepping into a Car or Airplane - you accept those risks.
Quote by Loco
The minute anyone on here places an advert that may involve risky sexual practice, the good old 'safe' brigade tear strips off them.

Perhaps you should take another look through the adverts - there are lots of ads wanting bareback sex, and yet this topic has only come up for discussion a few times.
Quote by Loco
- For a debate to take place, you usually have to have 2 sides to the story, and from the evidence I've seen thus far the 'bareback' debate has been rather one-sided.

Okay, so give us the pro-bareback side of the debate. All you've really said is that people should make their own informed choices - I don't think you'll find many who'll argue with that (I myself said something similar on the first page of the thread), but that's not the other side of the debate unless someone's holding guns to people's heads and forcing them to use a condom. I'm sure we'd all be fascinated to hear the reasoned arguments in favour of bareback sex being worth the increased risk.
(Always remember, AIDS is a myth invented by South American rubber companies to boost their profits.)
Perhaps you should take another look through the adverts - there are lots of ads wanting bareback sex, and yet this topic has only come up for discussion a few times.

Yes - but then take a look at the ensuing debate that does occasionally follow on from the mere mention of 'bareback' within an advert and you begin to see my point.
Okay, so give us the pro-bareback side of the debate. All you've really said is that people should make their own informed choices - I don't think you'll find many who'll argue with that (I myself said something similar on the first page of the thread), but that's not the other side of the debate unless someone's holding guns to people's heads and forcing them to use a condom. I'm sure we'd all be fascinated to hear the reasoned arguments in favour of bareback sex being worth the increased risk.

I'm not hear to give you a 'pro bareback' side of the debate. I merely wished to register some frustration at some recent postings that I felt had begun to sound very preachy over individual sexual conduct and practices. cool