Should you name and shame time wasters

well what a few weeks I have had regular chats with. The female half of a couple who described herself as a right dirty bitch. Lol.  Chatted Monday and suggest a lunchtime meet at a country pub with outdoors sex for after. Had I died and gone to heaven or was I in Hell at the hands of a time waster.  What do you think.  Lol.  Lots of sexy chat all of the week then on the day of the meet. Radio silence. Doesn't bode well. But the location looked great and if nothing else a decent beer. Bite to eat and bobs your uncle. Or your aunt if this place is anything to go by.   So another timewaster.  So should me name and shame? Would be interested in your opinion.  Xxxx

That's an easy one: no, it's against the rules.  There's a link to the Acceptable Use Policy at the bottom of the page.

If it was allowed, it would be too open to abuse: person A has a grudge against person B, makes up some story about them not showing up, person B gets upset and fights back, friends of both side pile in... it gets very ugly very quickly, and creates an atmosphere that no one wants to be in.

I also vote 'no', but would add that there are sometimes real reasons why people have to cancel at the last minute. Whilst we would always get in contact to explain the situation, even after that people have accused us of time wasting. Here's some real reasons we have had to cancel at the very last minute (grrr):

• Child sent home from school for being naughty;
• Cat being bitten by a fox
• Flood (burst water pipe)
• The curse (we don't have that happen to us any more thankfully)

So you could find legit people being cast as time wasters. Validations are a much better system imho

Cleverjet, it's unfortunate that these things happen, however such is life. We don't allow naming and shaming for the reasons above, therefore this thread is locked.