This question came up on another forum I'm on, though the girlies there are a little too prissy to be honest I think.
We're talking so small that doggy only gives mild satisfaction kinda small here.
So I thought I'd pose the question to an open and honest forum of horny shits, just like me :mrgreen:
So would you give him the great heave-ho or not?
I think I'd have to.
Depends. Does he make up for it with tongue/hands?
Yes.
I have previously chucked a guy for his lack of equipment.
Depends on what you like from sex I suppose. Wouldn't bother me personally. I saw a bloke regularly for several months who could hardly ever get it up. He would have made a fantastic lesbian though :twisted:
:shock: :shock: :shock:
Really Sarge ? Where?
If the guy fulfilled me in other ways (with his charming personality, sense of humour, interest in me and my happiness, and so on) I would not chuck him out. I have had a couple of lovers who were very small but they were terrific lovers.
Maybe it is just me but I'd rather have a guy who makes my whole body shake with his touch and tongue than someone who just bangs me but leaves me indifferent otherwise.
Small like this?
It's not a penis.
It's a super-sized clitoris :lol2:
Just to make a point (theres a pun there somewhere), in terms of length there won't be much difference between an average and bigger. Its the thickness that matters.
There arent many nerve endings higher up the vagina, most are located at the lower 1/3 section (i.e nearer the opening).
All that a super long dong will give in extras will be a sore cervix.
To indepth for me at this time of nite!
In answer to the original question (sorry it's a bit late) yes I would definatey chuck him.
M has never tried anal as I'm too big (well I think so!!!) We considered advertising for a guy with a small penis for her, so there is a need for these guys!