Join the most popular community of UK swingers now
Login

The world has gone mad.....

last reply
253 replies
10.8k views
0 watchers
0 likes
Quote by Mrcoupleseekfun
Doctors have apparently said the babies arent addicted, yet they both "shake & twitch" in their sleep which is apparently a "common sleeping disorder"
What a crock of shit, sorry, but this disgusts me

i'd be inclined to think the doctors and nurses and social workers dealing with this are knowledgeable? they wouldn't be doctors and nurses and social workers very long if they weren't? ;)
Well yes, i see your point.....that said, these doctors and nurses etc are hardly going to come out and say "well, yes, we paid for a couple of meth addicts to have IVF treatment and yes, the babies are born and going through cold turkey right now" are they?
Come on Neil, think about it fella!
They're going to pin the blame on these poor babies "shaking & twitching" on anything they can to take the heat off themselves.
Afterall, who is going to prove them wrong, the babies cant speak up for themselves can they?
The doctors and nurses will be saying that, because they have to deal with it in the hospital. But they are not the authorities that sanctioned the IVF treatment. All such things are fully documented and go into the medical/patient records. They have to be recorded, its part of the medical code and the law of the land.
The issues involved will be observed and recorded and debated at successive hearings and meetings. There would be very little that goes undocumented.
Quote by Hisandhers
can methadone do permanent damage to these babies

"Quoting neilinleeds" not that i'm aware of? confused lifestyle? maybe. much of the damage can be easily and rapidly fixed once the baby's born and under supervision.
another of the most stupid statements iv heard on this site, whether permanent damage or not, these babies are born feeling the effects of drugs that they had no choice about taking!!
Tolerance is one thing, there are lots of tolerant people about, and there are also some absolute fools also judging by some of the statements made on here.
How anyone can reasonably think that allowing meth addicts to conceive using IVF treatment payed for by the local authority is ok and then ask people to be less judgmental. Forget the judge you lot are just fooking mental.
Whatever happy planet you live on where the glass is all rose tinted and everything gives off a happy glow is not where the sensible suggestions and comments on this thread have come from!! mad
I'm trying to think of someone, anyone that has been called a 'better person' for taking drugs - or even a 'not changed at all' person.
Although I can think of a fair few people I know personally who think they're much better, more confident, more social, harder working, more friendly people than they were before the discovery of drugs rolleyes too blinded by their own ego to see they've turned into fucking arseholes confused
Getting clean from drugs ain't all it's cracked up to be either. It isn't a quick weeks trip to detox and bobs your uncle, clean and never to touch drugs again - almost the way the media portray it.
It's extremely hard work, physically, but longer term, psychologically. You can't just stop taking drugs and go back to your previous lifestyle with no second thought. You spend the next god knows how many years, if not your life, having to fight them. Constantly being called by them - the willpower to stay off is extreme.
Why these people have been given IVF (either NHS or private), when they've not even really begun to live life drug free is beyond me. How are they expected to fight the call of the drug and bring up a child!! :shock:
Bringing up a child isn't exactly the easiest thing on the planet, I'm sure even the best parent in the world lives on guilt :? Along with utter joy, parenthood can also bring you to points of despair.
How are these people gonna cope with not only these emotions, but the emotions and needs of a child - when they've spent the past god knows how long drugging out any raw emotion..... The drug will call, and I don't think it's fair on a child to be in that situation :?
They had triplets,unfortunately one died....but even bringing up twins is hard work for a couple!
I'm all for tollerence and understanding but I wonder just how any of you promoting that line would feel if a member of your own family needed a treatment that there was suddenly no money left for as a result of the flood gates opening for people in this situation.. I mean come on lets face facts, now one has had the rules have been altered in such a way others will surely follow.. Someone somewhere more deserving, more needy and better suited will without shadow of a doubt go without as a direct result.
Sorry.. you really need a reality check. If they came to you and asked you for some money out of your pocket today can you honestly say you would have coughed up for it for them? No fluckin chance would you but you already have so have I and millions of others who would say stuff em.. Get clean stay clean then come back. As for the argument about who is better suited a meth user or a heroin user, get a grip.. None of them should be funded, not one! If it were to have happened naturally so be it but to fund it is nuts..
Mike
Quote by Mr-Powers
They had triplets,unfortunately one died....but even bringing up twins is hard work for a couple!

Exactly....and as Missy says, what are they gonna do when the babies decide they dont want to sleep during the night, or dont want to feed properly, or just decide today is the day that they're gonna wind mam & dad up?
It doesnt take a genius to work it out really does it?
Quote by Srne
can methadone do permanent damage to these babies

"Quoting neilinleeds" not that i'm aware of? confused lifestyle? maybe. much of the damage can be easily and rapidly fixed once the baby's born and under supervision.
another of the most stupid statements iv heard on this site, whether permanent damage or not, these babies are born feeling the effects of drugs that they had no choice about taking!!
the question asked was 'can methadone do permanent ((( forgive the big bold letters won't you? ;) ))) damage to these babies?
my reply to that, as far as i know, was accurate, and therefore NOT stupid! glad we cleared that up! lol ;)
look, the point is, there is no suggestion anyone else lost out so that these two could have a kid. the decision to put them forward would have involved any number of health professionals and support workers, child protection personnel, the full monty. that decision was no doubt agonised over, but it must have been felt that these two, 5 years on the meth or no, had stabilised their lives and managed their addictions to the point where they could go forward, in the knowledge that any and all consequences are manageable.
i tend to think that the people actually dealing with this couple, and their baby, know infinitely more about these things than i, or just about anyone else on this thread, but hey, what do i know? :?
neil x x x ;)
-
Quote by neilinleeds
can methadone do permanent damage to these babies

"Quoting neilinleeds" not that i'm aware of? confused lifestyle? maybe. much of the damage can be easily and rapidly fixed once the baby's born and under supervision.
another of the most stupid statements iv heard on this site, whether permanent damage or not, these babies are born feeling the effects of drugs that they had no choice about taking!!
the question asked was 'can methadone do permanent ((( forgive the big bold letters won't you? ;) ))) damage to these babies?
my reply to that, as far as i know, was accurate, and therefore NOT stupid! glad we cleared that up! lol ;)
look, the point is, there is no suggestion anyone else lost out so that these two could have a kid. the decision to put them forward would have involved any number of health professionals and support workers, child protection personnel, the full monty. that decision was no doubt agonised over, but it must have been felt that these two, 5 years on the meth or no, had stabilised their lives and managed their addictions to the point where they could go forward, in the knowledge that any and all consequences are manageable.
i tend to think that the people actually dealing with this couple, and their baby, know infinitely more about these things than i, or just about anyone else on this thread, but hey, what do i know? :?
neil x x x ;)
-
is it not also possible that someone in the NHS....fucked up?
you keep refering to them and their baby,they had triplets...unfortunately one died!
Quote by Mr-Powers
you keep refering to them and their baby,they had triplets...unfortunately one died!

But surely it's not uncommon for at least one triplet to die in normal circumstances.
Without knowing the case history it is impossible to make a rational judgement on this particular case. It is extremely unlikely that anyone with an addiction of any sort would be allowed to adopt or foster. However, with no other evidence other than newspaper articles, I would have to back the judgement of the professionals in the field. I doubt that it was a decision that was taken lightly and the people that made the decision would have been in possession of far more facts than have been presented in this thread.
Quote by neilinleeds
can methadone do permanent damage to these babies

"Quoting neilinleeds" not that i'm aware of? confused lifestyle? maybe. much of the damage can be easily and rapidly fixed once the baby's born and under supervision.
another of the most stupid statements iv heard on this site, whether permanent damage or not, these babies are born feeling the effects of drugs that they had no choice about taking!!
the question asked was 'can methadone do permanent ((( forgive the big bold letters won't you? ;) ))) damage to these babies?
my reply to that, as far as i know, was accurate, and therefore NOT stupid! glad we cleared that up! lol ;)
look, the point is, there is no suggestion anyone else lost out so that these two could have a kid. the decision to put them forward would have involved any number of health professionals and support workers, child protection personnel, the full monty. that decision was no doubt agonised over, but it must have been felt that these two, 5 years on the meth or no, had stabilised their lives and managed their addictions to the point where they could go forward, in the knowledge that any and all consequences are manageable.
i tend to think that the people actually dealing with this couple, and their baby, know infinitely more about these things than i, or just about anyone else on this thread, but hey, what do i know? :?
neil x x x ;)
-
:thumbup: thank you!! I felt that we are no experts so how can we judge when we don't know the facts but was just called stupid as well
Quote by northwest-cpl

you keep refering to them and their baby,they had triplets...unfortunately one died!

But surely it's not uncommon for at least one triplet to die in normal circumstances.
Without knowing the case history it is impossible to make a rational judgement on this particular case. It is extremely unlikely that anyone with an addiction of any sort would be allowed to adopt or foster. However, with no other evidence other than newspaper articles, I would have to back the judgement of the professionals in the field. I doubt that it was a decision that was taken lightly and the people that made the decision would have been in possession of far more facts than have been presented in this thread.
You would never be allowed to adopt or foster,if you had an addiction of any kind...the same reason i expressed earlier that IVF should carry the same regulations...again i say that isn't it possible someone fucked up by sanctioning the treatment for this couple?
Quote by Mr-Powers
...again i say that isn't it possible someone fucked up by sanctioning the treatment for this couple?

Possibly - or possibly the professionals had facts and knowledge at their disposal that we don't have. Without knowing the full facts who can say? So far the factual information seems to have come from a newspaper which seems to be an oxymoron. confused
is it not also possible that someone in the NHS....fucked up?

no! this decision was not made by one person. not by two people. there will have been a whole panel of people talking about this for months, and months, and months!
they do that so that they can preclude a single person fucking up.
you keep refering to them and their baby,they had triplets...unfortunately one died!

a common occurence in IVF multiple births? methadone might have been a factor? it might also be entirely unconnected and irrelevant. in the absence of a confidential medical report, none of us can really say, can we?
neil x x x ;)
Quote by northwest-cpl
or possibly the professionals had facts and knowledge at their disposal that we don't have.

Facts or no facts, the simple fact of the matter is that it is absolutely bloody ridiculous to give IVF treatment to methadone addicts / heroin addicts.
Someone earlier said that maybe the PCT had seen enough to suggest that this couple had their habits managed and that their lives were getting back on track. Utter garbage IMHO. Their lives wont be back on track until they are clean....and they should no way have been given IVF until this time too.
I cant believe how anybody can agree to this couple recieveing this treatment, it really beggars belief! :shock:
no!
the main purpose of methadone treatment, these days, is not to get the addict clean. there are other drugs available, like Subutex, if the addict decides they can cope with a rapid detox.
the main purpose of methadone is to stabilise. it helps them stop using street heroin. it gets them off the needle. it helps them stop spending all their money on gear, so that they can spend what money they have on the roof over their head, the bills they run up, the food in their cupboards. it might even help them go out to work and live their lives as productive members of society.
course the article linked to mentions none of those things, so we know bugger all about these people, what they have been through, how far they have come, what their ultimate intentions are.
just how many hoops do you want them to jump through FGS, before you will allow them the possibility of the kind of family life you take for granted?
these people will have worked a damned sight harder to get their kid than most will have had to work for theirs, and all i see is condemnation. they will be watched like hawks, and the minute they fuck up, any number of agencies will be all over them like a rash. few bring a child into this world under those circumstances.
neil x x x ;)
i have read every single reply on this thread, and every one of them is thought provoking , but what i find inconcievable is the fact that people are arguing over medical facts and newspaper reports. at the end of the day it doesnt matter if the newspapers have quoted wrong or what medical counsell gave permission for this to go ahead on whatever reason they based their decisions, the point is two babies have been born to heroin addicts, not naturally but artificially, causing these poor little innocent human beings so much distress and uncomprehensible pain as they go through the dettox process, and no matter what has been quoted from doctors in hospital these poor babies will be suffering, because wether its heroine or methadone , they will be suffering side effects at whatever level. i have my nephew placed in my care because his mother, my sister is an alcoholic and is deemed, quite rightly , to be an unfit mother, even though she is on a dettox programme, i have a friend who is a heroine addict getting help from a centre at the corner of my street who has had her children taken off her because of her addiction, even though she is going through a dettox programme, so how the fook these people were deemed fit to become parents and bring two children into this world to suffer the minute they were born is just madness. stuff the protocol surrounding the case, stuff the ignomanious parents and physicians , think about the babies, the pain , and the real life, because thats what counts in reality.
Quote by neilinleeds
just how many hoops do you want them to jump through FGS, before you will allow them the possibility of the kind of family life you take for granted?
neil x x x ;)

Just the one hoop would suffice for me....pretty obvious which hoop that is isnt it?
oh and to add after reading neils ad, who cares what hoops they jumped through or what they are doing with their lives, it makes my blood boil that these people are given the choice of what they want to do. they chose heroin in the first place for whatever reason, they stuck the needles in their veins, they got the high, dettox or no dettox they should not have privellages given to them cos they want to be clean, they fookin should have been clean before they were even considered to be parents. some people dont deserve the human rights that hard working, clean living people have. call me small minded, blinkered, whatever, i dont really care , but wake up and give yer head a shake, they relinquished their rights when they decided to inject crap into their viens to get away from reality!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Quote by Mrcoupleseekfun
just how many hoops do you want them to jump through FGS, before you will allow them the possibility of the kind of family life you take for granted?
neil x x x ;)

Just the one hoop would suffice for me....pretty obvious which hoop that is isnt it?
and it's oh so easy to trot out a line like that when you've never been there. ((( apologies if that's an assumption? you haven't though, have you? )))
would that the world was nearly so shiny and happy and pink as the world i apparently live in. would that it were quite so black and white. would be dead easy then. unfortunately the real world is composed of an infinite number of shades of grey, and luckily there are people who devote themselves to the darker ones.
i'm off somewhere else now to chat shit for a bit. ;)
neil x x x ;)
Quote by neilinleeds
just how many hoops do you want them to jump through FGS, before you will allow them the possibility of the kind of family life you take for granted?
neil x x x ;)

Just the one hoop would suffice for me....pretty obvious which hoop that is isnt it?
and it's oh so easy to trot out a line like that when you've never been there. ((( apologies if that's an assumption? you haven't though, have you? )))

No its not easy, but in my very humble opinion its the least that should be expected of them before having this treatment!
If they cant get off it for the sake of their kids, even whilst said kids are being affected by it in the mothers womb, then whats to say they'll ever get off it? Or whats to say they wont go back on the smack?
I really do see what you're getting at Neil, but is it really too much to ask for a couple to be clean before getting this chance? Maybe the NHS could have used it as an incentive to get clean?
I just think they've handled this all wrong sad
i feel passionately about this because i live next to a centre for heroine addicts, a street thats full of them. some of my good mates were heroin addicts and are now dead, but their children arent , the children that will never be able to understand that mummy isnt here because she injected crap into her system, or that daddy cant play in the park cos hes now 6ft under because he chose to put shit in his veins. the excuses we make to these children to help them handle their loss so that they dont become addicts when they get older. so yeh, eome of us do have first hand experience of real life, too much bloody first hand experience. i have no illusions about my life, i have seen and experienced things i hope to god my children or anybody else has too. so when i make statements its not based on rainbows, clouds and bunny rabbits, its based on cold facts of a very real life!!!!!!!!!!!
Nicotine is one of the most addictive substances going and really far more common than any methodone or heroine adiction.
Are they refused treatment for not being off the nicotine?
What about alcohol? That can do untold damage to unborn babies too. Do we ask extensive questions about someone who is alcoholic having children?
No.
Why?
Because it's not controversial enough to be able to point 'over there' outside of our own back yards and say 'oooo, look at those dirty users having children, how disgusting'.
I agree it's not fair to make any unborn child suffer any addiction of it's parent, however nobody can make judgements on other people's lives unless they are right there in that person's shoes at that moment in time.
At what point do you pigeon hole a person, decide the person is a waste of space even though they are making an effort, afterall 'a leopard can't change it's spots' confused , write them off as a loss and go down the line of euthanasing anyone who doesn't live up to a set ideal? :?
probably one post too many, if not several. bedtime. night.
neil x x x ;)
I don't agree with IVF full-stop.
Stick that in yer pipe ... lol
Quote by little gem
Nicotine is one of the most addictive substances going and really far more common than any methodone or heroine adiction.
Are they refused treatment for not being off the nicotine?
What about alcohol? That can do untold damage to unborn babies too. Do we ask extensive questions about someone who is alcoholic having children?
No.
Why?
Because it's not controversial enough to be able to point 'over there' outside of our own back yards and say 'oooo, look at those dirty users having children, how disgusting'.
I agree it's not fair to make any unborn child suffer any addiction of it's parent, however nobody can make judgements on other people's lives unless they are right there in that person's shoes at that moment in time.
At what point do you pigeon hole a person, decide the person is a waste of space even though they are making an effort, afterall 'a leopard can't change it's spots' confused , write them off as a loss and go down the line of euthanasing anyone who doesn't live up to a set ideal? :?

It can be even more thought provoking if you amend one of your sentances slightly.
I agree it's not fair to make any unborn child suffer any dependancey (?sp) of it's parent, however nobody can make judgements on other people's lives unless they are right there in that person's shoes at that moment in time.

Then the list of Nicotine, alcohol and illegal drugs can be extended to include pain killers, anti-inflammatories, anti-depressants, valium, anti-psycotics, epilepsy drugs, hermal remedies and many more.
Les x
Quote by little gem
, however nobody can make judgements on other people's lives unless they are right there in that person's shoes at that moment in time.

I think that says it all. :thumbup:
Its all rather convenient to say 'we can't appreciate this without the facts', well maybe we could if we all had several years experience in science, medicine, psychiatry and social work.
Its a redundant statement. The facts would run to a document which makes War and Peace look like a comic.
The people who work in these professions don't pass judgements, they make clinical decisions, and execute directives, which have to comply within a strict discipline.
If you found yourself in the hands of these people, and you really wanted to benefit from their expertise, you would do what they said. Would you not? Of course you would.
Quote by duncanlondon
If you found yourself in the hands of these people, and you really wanted to benefit from their expertise, you would do what they said. Would you not? Of course you would.

well i'd ask for a second opinion!
Quote by neilinleeds
even hard working middle classes can be on methodone.

Though unlikely. Not because of a class thing... just based on the factual effects of shooting up on the brown and then later (when on a programme)the effects of the meths.
sorry Polo. absolutely wrong.
Sorry neil, I accept there are exceptions, hence my use of the term 'unlikely'. I chose my term carefully in this instance and stand by my statement that it is 'unlikely'. I have an extremely close working relationship with a company which quite probably deals with the highest market share of un-counselled/non residential methadone programme addicts in the UK.
You are absolutely wrong to suggest I am absolutely wrong in this particular quote.
I'll have a look through the rest of it in a bit lol
Quote by little gem
Nicotine is one of the most addictive substances going and really far more common than any methodone or heroine adiction.
Are they refused treatment for not being off the nicotine?

Actually yes , some IVF programmes do require the potential parents to quit smoking.