I've just experienced this too .... concerning a post about whether adults sites should have a paid section to help protect from perverts. I don't wish to discuss that topic here and hijack the thread ... but arbitarily locking threads does seem, well, bloddy rude, especially when not accompanied by some sort of an explanation.
If a thread is uninteresting or "crap" as suggested above then surely it would sink into oblivion anyway without needing to be locked. And if mods feel that a thread should be locked then surely the person who posted should be emailed and informed as to why the thread has been ended. If this doesn't happen then how do we know what we have done wrong and avoid doing it again? It could even be posted at the bottom of the offending thread as a lesson to other posters.
As stated above, it does seem very rude. What happened to free speech?
I agree that there do seem to be a lot of locked threads just lately. Some threads do need to be locked because they have content that breaks the AUP but there does seem to be an arbitrary nature to some of the locking. Some very similar threads are left to run eg. some joke threads are locked immediately, some are left to run. It is this seeming arbitrariness that leads to the complaints of unfairness.
The problem is that the forums have remained static in size as the membership has grown. Posts come so quickly that some 'interesting' threads are swamped by the 'uninteresting'. I can see the argument for not opening another forum as this could lead to a two-tier system but is the solution to lock so many threads without offering guidance as to why they were locked? If the mods are struggling under their workload then the solution could be to recruit more mods.
However, just as the search button is our friend, maybe the 'back' button should be our friend also. Noone is forced to read threads that they find uninteresting. The truly uninteresting will soon sink to the pit of oblivion that is page 2.
Guess what ?????????///
I'm locking this one :shock: :shock: :shock:
Only because there are 4 threads covering this subject on the go now. I will keep this one open simply because it was the first one: http://www.swingingheaven.co.uk/swingers-forum/viewtopic/42525.html