Needforfun's Forum Posts | Swinging Heaven

Join the most popular community of UK swingers now

Needforfun

Over 90 days ago

Straight Male, 63

•

Straight Female, 66

Profile Friends

Groups Meets Parties Stories

Forum

24 Feb 2012

Quote by lilnfil

If there are no pictures we move on, if people with no pics contact us we explain our preference to them and wish them lots of fun, no pictures or pictures of close up body parts does nothing,
.

Mids
Please have a look at our profile and see what you think :doh:
Can I ask......what would be wrong with folks verifying them selves on cam in chat?
We are quite happy to open a private room and both go on cam, which tbh......would be quicker to do than read your profile rolleyes

rolleyes

We have spoken to MidsCouple24(Sasha) in chat, and would presume its the female of the couple, but never seen either of you on cam.........so how do we know its Sasha?
Your profile could mean as little as ours does.........if you're not genuine wink

wink

And for the record, judging by your posts complaining you can't get meets, we have no problem getting them :thumbup:
Whats ya theory on that one poke

poke

lol

lol

we have savvy kids who may break into our to verify via phone etc. should we leave photo's laying around for the boy's to see?. face pics on request only for us. not cos we don't trust you, but!

24 Feb 2012

Quote by MidsCouple24
When it comes to pictures we understand totally that some people cannot put identifiable pictures in thier public profile, I wonder why some don't put non-identifiable pics in there, faces/tattoos etc blotted out, full body shots from the rear, but each to thier own. for us pics are important, we do need to find people sexually attractive to make us feel we want to have sex with them, we understand that for many this kind of attraction is not important whatsoever, for others it is the penis size, or the age and so on.
If there are no pictures we move on, if people with no pics contact us we explain our preference to them and wish them lots of fun, no pictures or pictures of close up body parts does nothing, the only time we find it annoying is when we do explain but they come back to us saying "we do have pictures" we check again only to find they are group fun pictures and you don't know who is who or which man and woman you would actually be meeting or they are just close up pussies n cocks.
Can I ask ? does any man on here arrange a meet JUST BECAUSE he likes the look of a womans pussy whne she has a close up picture with her legs open ? or do there need to be other factors involved, (yes I know the size of some willies does attract some women which is why I ask the men only).

a lot of guy's do decide on pussy or body pic's. i agree that a lot should depend on personality etc, but when was the last time any guy actually looked across a room and thought " wow, she looks like she's got a nice personality " and i do mean any guy in normal life as we , hopefully, know when it is not going to work or not. a lot of single guy's are just hoping to get lucky. that is why we like a pub meet

23 Feb 2012

does any one want to get sucked and fucked by the wife on sunday evening. sorry to be so blunt, but it seems noone ever actually meets on this site

23 Feb 2012

i think the pic just shows a nice couple having a bit of fun. of course, i do have the benefit of the explination given. no different to a beach shot.

23 Feb 2012

forgive my nievaty, but i honestly don't know what a "social" is. sounds like a drink and a chat. but is there more to it?. genuinely don't know. without being nasty, it sounds like a group of people getting together who would like to have a full on meet but not sure about actually doing it. seriously enlighten me. no joke

22 Feb 2012

Quote by foxylady2209
congratulations to Jane Fonda at 73 she says IM still having sex (daily mail 12 aug )
now dont bite my head off but two things jump in my head here
1) so what if she is at that age --- she has only to lie there
2) and who says there is an age limit to when sex or foreplay stops

Well, obviously I take issue with point 1. (and I'm surprised other women on here haven't) It really is time we argued against this myth. You can't just lie there. Without muscle involvement the male will find it neigh on impossible to stay in (unless he is really well endowed) and certainly won't get much enjoyment. Especially if the lady is older or has had children.
On the other hand - sex doesn't just include male/female penis/vagina. There are dozens of ways of having sex. It's all about being willing to use one'e imagination. biggrin

biggrin

biggrin

biggrin

biggrin

biggrin

so that is where the wife is coming from. she say's it's an age thing, then loves foreplay but not full on. i suppose familiarity plays a part too

22 Feb 2012

Quote by Freckledbird

We have spoken to MidsCouple24(Sasha) in chat, and would presume its the female of the couple, but never seen either of you on cam.........so how do we know its Sasha?
Your profile could mean as little as ours does.........if you're not genuine
And for the record, judging by your posts complaining you can't get meets, we have no problem getting them :thumbup:
Whats ya theory on that one

How can it have been Sasha you spoke to, when Mids clearly states in his signature that Sasha does not use this site?

Quote by MidsCouple24
I may not support your views or opinions but I do support your right to have them and state them, neither do I insist that you ever agree with any views or opinions I have. (Jed because Sasha does not use this site)

was going to say "we" but as j is not here, "i" agree with lilnfil in general ( don't know couple mentioned). we are out to play on thursday, sunday and one day tba. all from this site and our profile isn't the most dynamic. we vet via text.

20 Feb 2012

i know lords, ladies, knights of the realm, brickies, roofers, you name it. a tosser will always be a tosser. sorry to be blunt but never judge any one till you have met them. and i don't mean in our way. we can write anything on here, it doesn't mean thats what we are or who we are. or even our pics are real. meet people, thats when you find out

20 Feb 2012

Quote by meat2pleaseu

ABSOLUTELY as I said we are not the kind of people for them, they are way above our social standing and capacity both in what they enjoy socially and what they would enjoy discussing, I have no illusions about my education standards or abilities and am honest enough to admit it.

You might be missing out. I went to a standard comprehensive school and left with average results. I want to college and did a trade based course. One of the best people i've ever met on swinging sites was a multi millionaire, very high up lawyer who was educated at private school, occasionally socialised with royals and is basically a proper old money posh totty type wink

wink

- and we get on fantastically, chatting about a wide range of subjects with very little attention paid to any financial, social, educational or other differences between us.
I've met with people of a similar background to mine who i could happy beat senseless with a cricket bat lol

lol

yes, you got it spot on. who is to say who is a w****r

20 Feb 2012

Quote by foxylady2209
Snobbery can also come from all levels of education and backgrounds.
Pictures tell me lots about what I think the person is like too, as do their posts in the forums or their banter in the chat rooms. Yes, the way someone posts in here can be deal breaker for us or a king maker where we wouldn't normally have looked.
LG. x

I do find that there is more negativity towards 'education' & ' prefessionals' from people who don't consider themselves in that group than the other way round. I am what you might call a 'highly educated professional'. But one thing that I have learned is that book-learning is bugger all to do with real life and I am nowhere near as clever as some 'uneducated' people I have met. But I have been told that people have felt intimidated - well, get me on a bed and go for my clit and you will see just irrelavent that is. biggrin

biggrin

I certainly don't reject sexual partners on the basis of their CV. And people from any 'level' can be ignorant and unpleasant to be with.
oh. you finaly got my point, never pre-judge any one till you meet them. and no, i will never meet you ( due to distance ect. nothing else. sounded bad )

20 Feb 2012

Quote by neilinleeds
and us

And me.

Quote by Mids
the length of time on site with no SHREP for real meets.
huge list of friends but no SHREP for meeting

There is a school of thought that would probably tell you that people who've been on the site a long time but don't use SHREP to share their conquests to all and sundry are exactly the kind of people youshould be talking to? If you value discretion that is.
I don't use SHREP and I never will. It's nonsense Mids. Long term members who've run the gauntlet as far as being accepted on here know it's bullshit. I have some concerns actually all of a sudden as to whether you're clued up enough to understand that? Reason being I go on what you have to say for yourself, not what someone I don't know from Adam has to say about you.
for once, good point lol. we get ours without it

20 Feb 2012

Quote by Max777

won't have that at all. i was secondary educated but there is no way on earth that stacks up. two of my sons are now restuarant owners, the other is a lawyer. i am a sucsessfull engineer in the hydraulics trade. all secondary. go figure. maybe you just want us kept down but some of us are not as thick as you think

Thought you said you're a farmer?
i don't farm for myself. people better qualified do that. free's up my day to do what i want. if that makes me too successful to be from the down trodden masses, then so be it. i enjoy it

20 Feb 2012

Quote by deancannock
all fox's should be killed. they outlawed hunting, then everyone was up in arms about people getting bitten by them in town and the mennace they cause. as a farmer, it makes my blood boil. if you saw the amount of chickens we have lost just so 1 fox can eat 1 chicken. and, yes we are totally free range, not just by gov guidelines which are cruel. let the country folk take care of foxes as they wish. i only have 5000 chix but boy, they will take 20 to eat 1

above you say you are a farmer ??? in the other thread...you wrote
NEEDFORFUN wrote:
won't have that at all. i was secondary educated but there is no way on earth that stacks up. two of my sons are now restuarant owners, the other is a lawyer. i am a sucsessfull engineer in the hydraulics trade. all secondary. go figure. maybe you just want us kept down but some of us are not as thick as you think
but here you are an engineer in hydraulics trade ??
So which is it....Farmer or Engineer in Hydrailics ????....now what did you say about using the correct facts in another thread !!!!!
lol.i am indeed both, and know many farmers who do not do the job full time for themselves. i choose to work in hydrualics and let other people who know more about it than me run the farm. simple! doesn't mean i don't know the country side and how to treat it.

15 Feb 2012

Quote by Bluefish2009
sorry to be a boring git, but how many people actuaully take the time to revue the facts before posting here. not a row, just wondered

Why let the facts spoil a good debate dunno

dunno

there now. it was just me. lol

15 Feb 2012

Quote by Onthebeach_1
And if you have plenty of money it does not matter how thick you are, you can still get a job in the Govt or banking.
In the (good) old days, places of excellence such as Manchester Grammar didn't need league tables to tell potential employers or Universities (in the days that there were real Universities) that the candidate was properly educated. Places on Medicine and Barrister Law courses were assured.
If you went to an 'ordinary' grammar school, the candidate might have to be more convincing but a potential employer or University would generally know the kind of standard to be expected without the need for meaningless league tables.
If as an employer, you wanted someone good with their hands in a 'crafty' sort of way, you would look for candidates from the Technical High Schools.
And finally, if you wanted a labourer or someone who could use brawn rather than brain, you went to the Secondary Modern School when looking for candidates.
It was all so simple.

won't have that at all. i was secondary educated but there is no way on earth that stacks up. two of my sons are now restuarant owners, the other is a lawyer. i am a sucsessfull engineer in the hydraulics trade. all secondary. go figure. maybe you just want us kept down but some of us are not as thick as you think

15 Feb 2012

sorry to be a boring git, but how many people actuaully take the time to revue the facts before posting here. not a row, just wondered

15 Feb 2012

the "queens" yacht will not be funded by the public purse. it will be bought privately and the queen will only get a time share. all those who fund the boat will use it also.
no point in buying the royal family a plane asthey only use raf flights or chartered flight's which they pay for

15 Feb 2012

all fox's should be killed. they outlawed hunting, then everyone was up in arms about people getting bitten by them in town and the mennace they cause. as a farmer, it makes my blood boil. if you saw the amount of chickens we have lost just so 1 fox can eat 1 chicken. and, yes we are totally free range, not just by gov guidelines which are cruel. let the country folk take care of foxes as they wish. i only have 5000 chix but boy, they will take 20 to eat 1

15 Feb 2012

Quote by HnS

jt is innocent in my opinion. anton is rio ferdinands brother. rio dont like jt. nobody else heard jt call him anything.

loves a good conspiracy theory, seems the Director of Public Prosecutions and Police do as well, can't wait. lol

lol

jt has been innocent of a hell of a lot. roll model ?

15 Feb 2012

Quote by starlightcouple
I actually think John Terry has a lot to answer for.

do you indeed rolleyes

rolleyes

Quote by deancannock
Any decent prinicipled person, would of stepped down from his position, as soon as charged, until he was proved innocent or guilty. This has happened recently to the energy minister, who declares his innocence, but has resigned from his cabinet position, until it is cleared up.

his cabinet position eh? and his MP position? come on then dean why do YOU think he should then be allowed to continue to represent his constituents even though he may well be guilty of a serious charge? are you reely saying that one does not go hand in hand with the other?

Quote by deancannock
I think in this case the FA have taken the right decision. Maybe they could of included Cappello in those discussions. However there could of only been the one result.

one result? why? has jt been found guilty of anything at all dean? what nothing at all dean? not a sausage dean? ah right. i hope that you dean are not put in this situation at any time in your life. imagine working for a company for yeers and another worker acused you of theft as an example. the police then charge you on the say so of this co worker, and then your firm suspend you. or in jt's case you could have been say a manager at that firm and the firm then decided to no longer make you a manager, but give you a little desk job. imagine the humiliation dean. all done on thew say so of a fellow worker. blimey dean you have not even set one foot in court and everyone has you down as a thief. think this has never happened? i bet it has and many times. just sit back and think what you write at times dean, and then after the comments above, fancy being in that position? guilty without trial? and your fellow workers agreeing with your companys decision. i am sure that some would be very happy with that outcome. yeah right.
the fa do what the fa do so well, bottle it when the going gets to tough for them. they always have.
they decided what was the outcome for them and there own necksif jt was indeed found guilty and they allowed him to remain as captain. the media and the public would be screaming that they to are secret racists for allowing jt to still be captain. instead of having the guts to say, hold on a minute jt has been charged but is still not guilty and we will only act as and when a court decide his guilt. oh no they took the cowards way out and threw jt to the lions. for once capelo did the decent thing and knew that the treetment of jt was simply to save the fa's own skin. typical now of brits who try everything to escape the blame game.
how can the fa strip him of being englands captain and yet even though he is still facing very serius racism charges, then be allowed to put the england shirt on and represent his country at the euros? surely he should be stopped from playing for his country period???? why not??
the only reeson jt has not told the fa to stick there comments up their own self inflated arses is that he loves his country. he loves what he does. shame everyone did not have that same love for there country eh?
if i could give jt any advice i would have told him to tell them to stick it. and stick it as far up there areses as it can possibly go :twisted:
sorry but you have to admit, he has been found not guilty of a hell of a lot. as i don't want to offend you i won't call him an arogant tosser who's "power" is on the wain. and if he loved his country, he would respect it.

15 Feb 2012

it's a simple thing to slag all off at the fa and the boss, but a simple look at stat's does clear it up a bit. any one checked them. as south africa proved, the boss can't play. it's the current players who are letting us down. when a younger team is experimented with, england play well, then we revert to the suppossed gods for big games and it all falls over again. oh i am cross. just look at what the dutch did 20-30 years ago. get the kids in. managers hands are tied by our expectations

13 Feb 2012

my point was that what ever a person uses to pre-fix, sur-fix, substitute or endear, some one will always be offended even when the term is used correctly. people should look at the intent. in a formal situation, i agree that a formal greeting should always be used, but i know one knight of the realm who hates being called "sir". so my point stands as i see it

11 Feb 2012

i can walk into my local and get called "love", "darling" or "mate" dependant on who is working. my "misses" says it is over familiar. i feel sure that if they called me by my real name, she would see that as the same. me, i have been called all sorts. (some justified ) but we all call people different things at different times. i am sure some people would take offence to being called mr or mrs. time to stand back and stop taking ourselves seriously, i think
rick

10 Feb 2012

hi we are looking for a guy to meet us in a well lit but private area of a local car park ( tba but perhaps a supermarket or service station ) to just get in back with her as i sit in front watching. thoughts are, play with her for a while as she spreads wide, then get bj's and or full on safe fun. a sort of public thing but descreet

10 Feb 2012

hi
we are looking for a guy to meet us in a local, but out of the way country pub (tba) on monday evening so she can flash( with or without pants ) as we have a pint and chat ( and, of course get touched up as much as you dare )then out to car for full on foreplay then bj's and/or safe full fun. or if you can accom,perfect. 2 mates pref but unimportant

8 Feb 2012

hi
wife and i may be up for it if guy's calm down a bit. or even bukkake club. not highjacking your idea. still in your hands

31 Jan 2012

Quote by danny_aces
well I'm in if thats ok ! :-)

your in. will let you know details asap. bear with us

31 Jan 2012

sorry, have seen your reply's but got you confused with a guy in richmond. my fault then.
we should be free tomorrow evening. contact me via my last add and we will sort it

31 Jan 2012

hi
sorry to be picky, but the wife and i have put adds on this site etc for guy's to join in with us in car fun but no real or genuine takers. we are just back to this scene and used to have great fun. what has changed ?

30 Jan 2012

hi
any guy's fancy just meeting up. you get in back with her. she frigs herself then sucks you off. no chat, just do it, may be a pub car park or super market. some where well lit but private