Gotta be kelly (as in Kellyandmike) 3 points
2 points too,,,,,,,,,,Kelly as well,
Suppose the last point will be going there too :mrgreen:
Gotta be kelly (as in Kellyandmike) 3 points
2 points too,,,,,,,,,,Kelly as well,
Suppose the last point will be going there too :mrgreen:
Any news on the car front for tonight Jo?
With the amount of data flowing through this site every day (yep, I'm a geek, hence the term 'data', not 'people') there has to be more than ONE administrator for the site (try to hold your interest here, there IS a valid point to come,,, eventually).
So are we at the mercy of a myriad of persona or are there some actually rules to follow? Yea I know about T&C's and the like and obviously there's the issue of perv's etc and yes I agree, as sad as it is the site does need policing to weed-out wierdo's. BUT I get the distinct impression we suffer at the wrath of self-made gods at times. I've just had all my ad's cleared for basically telling a short tale about what I was looking for.
To be as brief as possible (but still clear on detail) I placed an ad in the dogging section. I explained I'd been fortunate enough to once stumble across this pastime in my past, prior to my knowing what 'Dogging' was. I did cover the basic story of what happened, which in condensed format was, I discovered a couple in a carpark and was able to view them from the floor above. I didn't know if they'd seen me or not (like I said, THEN I didn't know what dogging was) I observed them whilst jacking off (hey!!! I was excited!!!) and then stated I would like to repeat the incident or something similar with a willing couple and if my lottery ticket had come in, maybe an invite to be included (the odds would be the same as winning the lottery but you’ve got to play it to win it).
There was NOTHING untoward about the language etc and certainly nothing covered in the terms of use. So, some uppity 'Admin' sends me a mail saying "Such things should be in the swingers stories section" and promptly clears every ad I'd created, including ones they (I assume) had no issue with! Why? I could, at a pinch, understand them removing the offending article (rightly or wrongly). I wasn’t aware I’d poked the ‘Admin’s’ daughter/wife/girlfriend/bit on the side (delete accordingly) without there prior written consent, so why the personal attack on me? Perhaps I should write to Tony Blair, perhaps if he new of such a dictatorship taking place in his own country, he could start a war and bomb the self-obsessed ‘Admin’ bastard.
I'm just perplexed as to what the hell I did wrong. How many times as it been stated on this site about 'One-liners' and 'Lack of imagination' etc? Shit, I wish I had a quid for every time I’d seen it. I guess I’m one of the many appealing to the few and I just tried to make an effort, I didn’t cross any moral issues. If you want to be pedantic I suppose you could argue I was encouraging someone to break the law (as ‘Dogging’ is technically illegal) but then surely everyone placing an ad in the Dogging section is doing the same, so delete the bloody lot.
Are these people simply aloud to hide behind the Admin persona and be completely unaccountable? Or is there somewhere I could complain without actually being persecuted and promptly banned for life for having the ordacity to complain?
Rant over
Sooooo,
