A colleague of mine has stated that she is more than a little bi-curious (she wants to feel another womans mouth on her !)
I am interested in someone who might be able to satisfy her curiosity somewhere in the West Yorks area during the daytime some time in the next couple of weeks.
She is mid-forties but in incredible shape and attractive - you would not be disappointed.
Please mail me if you could help.
Thanks,
Tony
Join the most popular community of UK swingers now
Login
marriedmale
Over 90 days ago
Straight Male, 57
0 miles · West Yorkshire
Forum
I'm in the very centre (Park Lane area) in a hotel tonight and will be free from about 11pm onwards if any genuine people would like to join me. Please either reply here or by private message and I will get back to you as soon as I'm back ......
Hope to hear from and see some genuine people :-)
Tony
Hope to hear from and see some genuine people :-)
Tony
Quote by davidgeorge
xxxx bottom car park, hiya whoever may read this <SNIP>
And therein lies the lesson - 'whoever' might just be ANYone - journalists, Police or just general idiots (oh, and the occasional genuine dogger - to see what area has just been 'busted' now ......)
It says 'keep it vague' on the main topis line for a good reason.
If you want to know good areas to go, you need to know a few good people who will trust you, and eventually tell you. This message won't help gain any trust I'm afraid.
There endeth the lesson !
I wasn't going to weigh-in on this one, but having seen the responses, I can't hold back any more, so:
1. The original message was a warning to others to take care and adequate precautions - this holds true for any type or combination of meeting.
2. Naming and shaming is potentially libellous - that's just the law, plain and simple.
3. If there was an assault, it's a police matter - again - that's the law.
4. There is a facility to report site ause - this should be done and that's the end of it as far as the law is concerned, UNLESS.... any party was found (during subsequent investiagtion) to be complicit in the event.
This is a public forum and there are no guarantees who or what people are .... therefore you should ALWAYS take precautions for your own safety.
As has been said before, there are two sides to each story and the ONLY people who know what happened are those who were present. I'm not suggesting that this is not a true account, but that only they know what happened. If a criminal act had been perpetrated, it is the responsibility of the injured party to bring it to the attnetion of the police - only they can deal with it.
NB: If there was shown to be a criminal act (proven via a court verdict) then it should be considered by the injured party to report it to the site.
Nothing else can be done.
PS. Imagine how easy it would be to have someone you don't like banned ?
PPS. Dannybrut - if this is what happened to you - I'm truly sorry for you chap - take care in future - trust nothing of what you read and only half of what you see.
1. The original message was a warning to others to take care and adequate precautions - this holds true for any type or combination of meeting.
2. Naming and shaming is potentially libellous - that's just the law, plain and simple.
3. If there was an assault, it's a police matter - again - that's the law.
4. There is a facility to report site ause - this should be done and that's the end of it as far as the law is concerned, UNLESS.... any party was found (during subsequent investiagtion) to be complicit in the event.
This is a public forum and there are no guarantees who or what people are .... therefore you should ALWAYS take precautions for your own safety.
As has been said before, there are two sides to each story and the ONLY people who know what happened are those who were present. I'm not suggesting that this is not a true account, but that only they know what happened. If a criminal act had been perpetrated, it is the responsibility of the injured party to bring it to the attnetion of the police - only they can deal with it.
NB: If there was shown to be a criminal act (proven via a court verdict) then it should be considered by the injured party to report it to the site.
Nothing else can be done.
PS. Imagine how easy it would be to have someone you don't like banned ?
PPS. Dannybrut - if this is what happened to you - I'm truly sorry for you chap - take care in future - trust nothing of what you read and only half of what you see.
Quote by Slowhand_1
In all my years dogging i have never ever seen a lone female, I have heard of them and do know they exist but alas my search continues....
Oh, they exist alright (at both ends of the country) - everything from single females to a couple of females and a few spots that only couples and very trusted single guys know.
The key is 'trust'
I would bet good money that NO-ONE that knows of these places will tell anyone anything other than 'in person' for exactly the reasons previously stated - they would be ruined in no time !
Quote by duncanlondon
Its always the same, blame the council, blame the weather.
What about blaming the thicko drivers for continuing to drive on the road and making the potholes worse. Who else is doing it?
They could find a better route. don't tell me every square footage of tarmac is potholed.
And who started the potholes in the first place? Effing 4x4 drivers no doubt.
Anyway we need new landfill sites to get rid of our rubbish. So a few potholes with festering garbage won't be a problem.
Oh dear, oh dear .......
I really hope that these were meant 'tongue in cheek' !
Quote by kentswingers777
They up the prices for fuel as soon as the price of oil increases, but when it comes down they still keep the prices artificially high.
When the oil price went to a record price last year petrol was going up on a weekly basis, but the price of oil has halved, yet the price of petrol has still remained almost what it was at the record levels of oil last year.
You cannot beat the system that they use to justify keeping prices high, and raking in record profits.
Have to disagree with you there - as much as it may seem that way, you're wrong (VERY wrong). NB: The gas prices are a different mechanism to oil/petrol/diesel.
When oil prices rise, fuel rises too.
When oil prices fall, then AS LONG AS USAGE REMAINS THE SAME, petrol prices fall too.
BUT..... the losses incurred on the way up and recovered by what's known as 'parachute pricing' - this means holding on to the higher prices slightly longer than is necessary in order to recoup losses during the increasing period.
The problem right now is that the volumes are MUCH lower than the crazy oil price period in late 2008, so the throughput at the refineries is much lower. Unfortunately, the cost of running the refinery is still the same, so the price has to go up to match the overall fixed costs of processing. This is why we have high prices still.
If you look further, you will see that most European refineries are actually making a LOSS right now due to depressed volumes, even though the price seems high compared to the barrel price of crude. The two are connected, but there are other variables that affect them (e.g. overall market demand, overall capacity, crude price, and crude quality/yield).
Hope that helps a little !
Quote by JTS
And: Storage of large quantities of any highly combustible material is a very long duration project....because of the inevitable planning enquiry and objections.
LNG - Liquified Natural Gas
It's a lot easier to store and a LOT of countries are doing it now.
The alternative is that we either get cold or have high bills ......
NO.
We did it with friends and it led to a real mess, jealousy, suspicion and finally the end of their relationship. A definate no-no. As a result, my partner will not entertain it any more (and doesn't know that I do) and it spoiled what was (at the time) a great time for all of us. It only takes one person to feel like that and it ends in tears.
Anonymity and distance woould have done a great deal to remove that doubt.
We did it with friends and it led to a real mess, jealousy, suspicion and finally the end of their relationship. A definate no-no. As a result, my partner will not entertain it any more (and doesn't know that I do) and it spoiled what was (at the time) a great time for all of us. It only takes one person to feel like that and it ends in tears.
Anonymity and distance woould have done a great deal to remove that doubt.
Kentswingers - you missed an aopportunity to make a better margin and STILL give your customer good value. Now he/she might expect the same deal if they come back again, and you won't be able to do it (unless you have another windfall stock of paper) - this is a chance to make profits from long term investment.
BG try to do this every year, however they (and the other gas companies buy their gas from the wholsesale market at future prices - this means they are buying ahead between 6 and 12 months. If the market collapses and the wholesale gas price falls, they are still tied to their future price parcel of gas bought when it was expected to be a completely different price.
They have to do this to secure supplies for customers as we are not self sufficient in gas (North Sea gas is all but gone now). The real problem occurs when we get a spike in very cold weather, or a prolonged cold spell - the future parcels they bought are going to run out, and they have to buy from the open market to top it up. When demand is high (i.e. cold weather), the price is high and we (UK) get stung in a sellers market (remember, we have no reserves and no storage), so we get higher prices.
The only way we (UK) can combat this is to either find some gas reserves for ourselves (we did that, now it's run out) OR ...... we start to store it like most other European countries, then we can buy loads when it's cheap, and use it when the time comes (so we are isolated from the price peaks).
Incidentally, Brown was warned about this by his own advisers, the Conservatives and ofgem, but STILL they leave us exposed.
Have a coal fire fitted instead .........
BG try to do this every year, however they (and the other gas companies buy their gas from the wholsesale market at future prices - this means they are buying ahead between 6 and 12 months. If the market collapses and the wholesale gas price falls, they are still tied to their future price parcel of gas bought when it was expected to be a completely different price.
They have to do this to secure supplies for customers as we are not self sufficient in gas (North Sea gas is all but gone now). The real problem occurs when we get a spike in very cold weather, or a prolonged cold spell - the future parcels they bought are going to run out, and they have to buy from the open market to top it up. When demand is high (i.e. cold weather), the price is high and we (UK) get stung in a sellers market (remember, we have no reserves and no storage), so we get higher prices.
The only way we (UK) can combat this is to either find some gas reserves for ourselves (we did that, now it's run out) OR ...... we start to store it like most other European countries, then we can buy loads when it's cheap, and use it when the time comes (so we are isolated from the price peaks).
Incidentally, Brown was warned about this by his own advisers, the Conservatives and ofgem, but STILL they leave us exposed.
Have a coal fire fitted instead .........
It's in keeping with our taxation system - you more you work (and therefore earn), the more you are forced to pay. If I getthe chance to go ex-pat with my job, I'm off for sure - my harder and harder work is rewarded by more being taken from me - no incentive at all, yet eh less I do, the more support I get for not doing it.
Hmmm... methinks if not 'ex-pat' then maybe unemployed ?
Either way, I'll have more disposable income !
Hmmm... methinks if not 'ex-pat' then maybe unemployed ?
Either way, I'll have more disposable income !
I like this idea quite a lot ... why ?
When Good Ole' Gordy used MY tax to bail the banks out, I had no say in the matter, and what's worse - I'll be paying it back for the next decade too.
If Cameron says, "OK, I'll give you a chance to get some of your money back" (buy cheaper shares and then either sell them or wait for a dividend), then I'm all for it.
At least he's given me a choice.
And.... if the banks continue to make obscene profits, as a shareholder, you get paid a share of that profit - excellent, I might offset some of the f*cking huge tax bill I know I'll get (to pay off the deficit Gordon 'Frown' generated). Oh, I'll also maybe use them to combat inflated prices (yup, check the RPI/CPI) because let's face it, I know I'm unlikely to get a pay rise for a while.
And..... before anyone else cries "Rich getting richer" - well no actually - it's TAXpayers being given a chance to offset the huge mess we now have as a legacy of a badly planned bank recovery with no thought of how to offset the deficit.
NB: The only other alternative is to stop spending on public services or TAX ME EVEN MORE.
When Good Ole' Gordy used MY tax to bail the banks out, I had no say in the matter, and what's worse - I'll be paying it back for the next decade too.
If Cameron says, "OK, I'll give you a chance to get some of your money back" (buy cheaper shares and then either sell them or wait for a dividend), then I'm all for it.
At least he's given me a choice.
And.... if the banks continue to make obscene profits, as a shareholder, you get paid a share of that profit - excellent, I might offset some of the f*cking huge tax bill I know I'll get (to pay off the deficit Gordon 'Frown' generated). Oh, I'll also maybe use them to combat inflated prices (yup, check the RPI/CPI) because let's face it, I know I'm unlikely to get a pay rise for a while.
And..... before anyone else cries "Rich getting richer" - well no actually - it's TAXpayers being given a chance to offset the huge mess we now have as a legacy of a badly planned bank recovery with no thought of how to offset the deficit.
NB: The only other alternative is to stop spending on public services or TAX ME EVEN MORE.
Quote by dave2912
1. I was born in England not Great Britain
2. I'm fiercely proud of being English
3. So this make me English
I'm actually with you there too, however last time I went to the US, I stated "English" as my nationality and the jobs-worth dipshit immigration nazi made me go to the back of the queue and fill in a new form !
I'd like to state that my nationality is English, but it seems that it's not internationally recognised any more. (except as a language option by MicroSloth)
Simple - answer a few questions !
Were you born in Britain ?
Anywhere else means you have that nationality.
Does it mean 'home' when you're here ?
Are you fiercely proud of being British ?
Yes to them and I guess that makes you British ........
Or (according to an American friend)
To be British means:
1. Drink tea
2. Live in a castle
3. Be gay
I'll make no comments about this - he's American, they're still learning !
Were you born in Britain ?
Anywhere else means you have that nationality.
Does it mean 'home' when you're here ?
Are you fiercely proud of being British ?
Yes to them and I guess that makes you British ........
Or (according to an American friend)
To be British means:
1. Drink tea
2. Live in a castle
3. Be gay
I'll make no comments about this - he's American, they're still learning !
I wasn't going to be drawn by this one ..... honest, I wasn't ....
But.... well, bugger it, why not ?
OK, first and foremost, what he did was to commit murder.
It's not something that's debatable, it just happens to be a fact that when you take actions that you know will cause the death of another, you have murdered them.
Was it ethically or morally correct ?
I really don't know - and neither it seems, does anyone else.
There is no agreement from his partner that it was a request for assistance, and for all we know, he may have just got sick of him and finished it early to ease his own conscience - who knows ?
If this whole messy area is to be settled, then the law needs an addition (not a change) to allow an assisted suicide WHERE THE WISHES ARE CLEAR.
Anything other than that is still murder.
But.... well, bugger it, why not ?
OK, first and foremost, what he did was to commit murder.
It's not something that's debatable, it just happens to be a fact that when you take actions that you know will cause the death of another, you have murdered them.
Was it ethically or morally correct ?
I really don't know - and neither it seems, does anyone else.
There is no agreement from his partner that it was a request for assistance, and for all we know, he may have just got sick of him and finished it early to ease his own conscience - who knows ?
If this whole messy area is to be settled, then the law needs an addition (not a change) to allow an assisted suicide WHERE THE WISHES ARE CLEAR.
Anything other than that is still murder.
The ONLY truth is that no-one really knows what is happening.
Until all of our 'experts' really know and agree, then it's all conjecture.
Incidentally, the same type of scientific arguments were made about the Earth being flat ......
What I DO know is that the current warming trend began 800 years ago.
If that truly is the case, then it certainly has nothing to do with anything we've done does it ?
And, we also know that the Earth has experienced many cyclic changes - some of them extremely rapid (faster than the current trend) and in both directions.
So..... yes there IS a warming phenomenon, and yes we can measure it.
Is it our fault ? probably not.
Are we influencing it ? A little (I stress LITTLE) bit yes.
Can we reverse it ? An emphatic NO.
Until all of our 'experts' really know and agree, then it's all conjecture.
Incidentally, the same type of scientific arguments were made about the Earth being flat ......
What I DO know is that the current warming trend began 800 years ago.
If that truly is the case, then it certainly has nothing to do with anything we've done does it ?
And, we also know that the Earth has experienced many cyclic changes - some of them extremely rapid (faster than the current trend) and in both directions.
So..... yes there IS a warming phenomenon, and yes we can measure it.
Is it our fault ? probably not.
Are we influencing it ? A little (I stress LITTLE) bit yes.
Can we reverse it ? An emphatic NO.
Quote by Kaznkev
thank you married, so why didnt the officer dealing with this know this ffs!
It's usually too much trouble, or they can't be bothered, or they just weren't trained properly, or they're a probationer - too many possibilities.
Generally the first one as the paperwork is a pain in the &rse and they rarely get a prosecution, because whoever has it say they "picked it up on the floor just this second"
etc. etc.
Since Colleymore made the news with his antics, it seems there are a lot more 'new' doggers that think it is their god-given right to shag any female in a dogging spot and seem to know nothing about what the accepted behaviour is.
I watched a couple mercilessly hassled at Barr Beacon (shortly before barriers were fitted - any coincidence ?) to the point that it looked almost ugly - trying to force doors open - honestly !
They left (almost running over said idiots in the process), and were followed by about 3 or 4 cars.
I would say that is the single biggest problem now.
Add to that, plenty of boy-racers and I don't blame couples for staying away !
I watched a couple mercilessly hassled at Barr Beacon (shortly before barriers were fitted - any coincidence ?) to the point that it looked almost ugly - trying to force doors open - honestly !
They left (almost running over said idiots in the process), and were followed by about 3 or 4 cars.
I would say that is the single biggest problem now.
Add to that, plenty of boy-racers and I don't blame couples for staying away !
As long as it is "No" BEFORE the event, then that's a 'NO'.
Clear and emphatic.
However ......
If it turns out to be a "No, I didn't really want to do that" AFTER the event, what then ? This is a very real and dangerous situation that does occur.
Very dodgy ground.
Maybe a pre-sexual agreement is what's required ?
(OK, only kidding !)
Clear and emphatic.
However ......
If it turns out to be a "No, I didn't really want to do that" AFTER the event, what then ? This is a very real and dangerous situation that does occur.
Very dodgy ground.
Maybe a pre-sexual agreement is what's required ?
(OK, only kidding !)
